zaangalewa
Gold Member
- Jan 24, 2015
- 26,892
- 2,892
- 140
My ancestors left Germany in the 1830s because they were smart ...
Dann ist es ja gut, Smartie.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My ancestors left Germany in the 1830s because they were smart ...
You make out Poland are innocent victims ...
Are you signing up?How goes the military buildup to save demockwacy from putin ? ...
Poland was seperated into three parts - a Russian part, a Prussian part and an Austrian part. Maria Theresia (head of the K&K monarchy) said about when she had to aggree: "Agreeing to this division will cost me 10 years of my life." In the Austrian part of Poland the inhabitants had the same rights as everyone else in her monarchy; for example to use own language in front of a court or in administrative matters. No restrictions. In Prussia the Poles had been expected to follow the blind obedience of the Prussians and the Poles had been second class citizens. Not an easy situation. But in the Russian part of Poland the Russians tried to wipe out the complete Polish culture and tried to make Russians out of the Poles. Murder, displacement, violence had been normal.

Then after the war the Soviets rebuilt Warsaw and fed the population![]()
Dann ist es ja gut, Smartie.
Hard to beleive, right? A developed country should plunder, but here these Eastern savages are helping to rebuild what was destroyed in Poland, even after leaving 600,000 of their soldiers dead in the fields after fighting the nazis. Savages. They have no place among the civilized peoples of Europe!I guess you have a totally wrong imagination from Stalin's Russia.
guarantee you tougher and smarter than me or you
Well you're just a gay vegetarian, my niece could kick your a**.
During that time period.I could only imagine crossing an ocean like that. And starting a f****** farm in Pennsylvania. Out of pretty much nothing
Smart
A f****** einstein
He left early
View attachment 1211226
Hard to beleive, right? A developed country should plunder, but here these Eastern savages are helping to rebuild what was destroyed in Poland, even after leaving 600,000 of their soldiers dead in the fields after fighting the nazis. Savages. They have no place among the civilized peoples of Europe!
Stop lying Nazi, Soviet union didn't persecute Jews.Your Red Army was able to save the people in the Ghetto of Warschaw (= no real Ghetto but a concentration camp) - but you (=Stalin) did not do it. Indeed Stalin's Soviet Union persecuted Jews until Stalin died in 1953. Not comparable with the Holocaust - but deadly enough. You are a proud Russian on the totally wrong reasons.
Stop lying Nazi,
Soviet union didn't persecute Jews.
Alice Weidel ... won't win the election.
Democracy won't let it happen.
I very doubt that Britain and the USA could join the same alliance (especially anti-commintern pact) as soon as 1936-37. The war was seen mostly as the war for taking British and French colonies, and larger the gang - lesser is the prize of every member (and the USA were interested in taking British colonies, not in protecting them).No it wouldn't, if we had fought on the side of the Nazis then Europe would have been part of the third Reich and there were some from the start of the war in this Country most of them the elite would have been ok with that.
Well i believe Hitler made it clear if Britain were to stay out of it or even collaborate he was ok with Britain keeping it's Colonies.I very doubt that Britain and the USA could join the same alliance (especially anti-commintern pact) as soon as 1936-37. The war was seen mostly as the war for taking British and French colonies, and larger the gang - lesser is the prize of every member (and the USA were interested in taking British colonies, not in protecting them).
But, if we play alternative history where the USA join anti-commintern pact in 1937 (and Britain - no), then there are at least three obvious consequences:
1) American terror against Jews and commies force them to go in Britain, and Britain got additional boost in the nuclear race;
2) If America is allied with Japan on Pacific and fight against Britain and France in Atlantic... I'm not sure, may be it's just a stereotype, but it seems to me, that Britain and France could create much more problems to America than Japan did in our reality. Especially, if the USA have to fight against Canada, too.
3) If America joined anti-commintern pact in 1937, then Britain and France can't ignore German menace and play cahoots with them against each other. It means no Munich, and World War II starts in May, 1938 without division of Czechoslovakia, Poland and without catastrophic German attack on Soviet Union in 1941. It seems to me, that in this case Germany, Italy and Spain would be defeated in two, top three years (even if we count that British and French fleets distracted to fight in America).
Summarised, it's quite likely, that in this scenario anti-commintern pact could be defeated in Europe as early as at 1941, and, with some luck in naval battles and fighting in Canada, Britain made the bomb as early as 1944.
Hitler himself, as a person, might be able to sign such an agreement. But the logic of circumstances was pretty clear. He would have pretty little profit and pretty big problems in Russia to have peaceful coexistence with the UK.Well i believe Hitler made it clear if Britain were to stay out of it or even collaborate he was ok with Britain keeping it's Colonies.