Just a thought.....still the case counts are high and the serious cases and deaths are down no matter how many deaths are added. Those are facts.
Facts can be very misleading for the reasons I stated. Hospitalizations are way up, this is a fact. The number of serious cases are way up, this is a fact.
Also using national averages as an indication of what's happening in any given hospital or city is not particularly useful.
There are many, many hospitals that have much higher rates of hospitalization than the average. These are the points of crisis where people are starting to die in large numbers.
El Paso Texas for example.
Of course certain regions will spike from time to time...its a virus with no vaccine. But infections alone mean nothing just like no single metric by itself means anything about the severity or danger of this virus.
From 'time to time'? Can you show us a time when El Paso's hospitals have EVER been this overwhelmed?
Well they are 7th highest in the country for illegals about 25% of the population so....and I was talking about different parts of the country spiking at different times.
So when was El Paso's hospitals ever overwhelmed as they are now?
If it happens from 'time to time', then surely there would be another time.
Give me the date.
I didn't specifically point out El Paso anywhere, you did. Other regions of the country have spiked with virus cases before....their hospitals got busier then subsided. Again, and slower this time.....its a virus....it spreads to people....what happens after that depends on age, health, strength of immune system, etc. El Paso's problems may have something to do with the makeup of their population.
You said that "Of course certain regions will spike from time to time..." while we were discussing El Paso.
And yet you can't show me any time when their hospitals in the region of El Paso have been as slammed as they are now.
Demonstrating the folly of trying to use national averages to disprove COVID overwhelmed hospitals. As there many, many hospitals that have much higher hospitalization rates than the national average.
That's how averages work.
I am not trying to show you anything about El Paso except what I stated about their population. You were talking about the city I wasn't. We agree that some hospitals occupied rates are higher than national average and those areas change from time to time. So what? The overall averages of the virus are critical to any temporary regional hotspots of infection. And overall the severity is declining sorry if that doesn't fit your desires or narrative.
I'm using El Paso as an example of the futility of using a national average critical care rate or hospitalization rate to prove that there aren't hospitals utterly overwhelmed by COVID.
El Paso is a concrete example of the failure of your premise. Which might explain why you refuse to discuss it.
It means nothing to the overall impact of the virus. Especially given their high number of illegals. Its a hotspot that will come and go and have little impact on the true severity of the virus to the country. Duuuh!
Again, nonsense. And obvious nonsense.
As hospitals are overwhelmed, the resources they have to direct care to individual patients decreases. ICU beds fill up, as they have in El Paso.
Which results in more deaths.
Worse, once the hospitals are overwhelmed, the patients that they'd normally see for say, car accidents, or heart attacks, or difficult child births can't get care that they need either. You see even MORE deaths.
Averages in this case mandate that there will be areas of higher hospitalization rates and critical care and areas of lower rates. But they don't 'balance out'. If El Paso runs out of ICU beds, it doesn't matter if Sand Point Idaho hasn't. As they have no credible way of getting the patients there.
Your premise is just nonsense. As demonstrated elegantly by the surging number of dead. 2000 just yesterday.