Georgia prosecutors considering racketeering and conspiracy charges in probe of effort to overturn T

[Harpy Eagle]

Exactly.

You have (finally) articulated exactly how they manipulated the election.

They knew once ballots were mixed together there was no legal process to separate them.

That is why no court was able to intervene.

It has always been this way. This is not new. We have never put any way to ID a specific voter on the ballot.

Are you suggesting we should start putting the name of the voter on the ballot?

 

[Orangecat]

The rancid democrats are getting hysterical.

More hysterical.
They've been hysterical for decades.
See: MMGW.

 

[Billiejeens]

How do you do that when the ballot does not have the voters name on it?

You don't
That was the eloquence of the steal
But, it was still a steal.

 

[Nostra]

How do you do that when the ballot does not have the voters name on it?

If you do that for all voters the ballot is legit, Moron.

 

[Billiejeens]

It has always been this way. This is not new. We have never put any way to ID a specific voter on the ballot.

Are you suggesting we should start putting the name of the voter on the ballot?

No

And no it was never done that way before.

 

[Lastamender]

Good point. Cleary you are too stupid and blindly loyal to have read them.

I apologize for making assumptions about you.

I heard them when it happened. What Trump said has not changed.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Looks like Donald Trump might be in some hot water! Prosecutors in Atlanta are considering bringing racketeering charges against him for trying to overturn the 2020 election in Georgia.

Racketeering is just a fancy word for organized crime, and it looks like Trump might be in some serious trouble. The move comes after a recent report from the New York Times revealed that Trump pressured Georgia officials to overturn the election results. The report also revealed that Trump’s efforts to overturn the election were more extensive than previously known, and that he had pressured officials in other states as well.

It looks like the former president might have finally met his match!"

MSN

www.msn.com

This proves don't have fuckall. Nothing about this meets the definition of "racketeering"...lol

 

[Lastamender]

I do know, because that’s how the hand recount was done.

They both looked at every single ballot before putting it in the respective pile.

Again, bullshit. Plus the fact illegal ballots can be counted as many times as you want.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Asking for a specific number of votes to be magically found and then telling the SOS what to tell the people of the state once they are found is going to far.

If anyone but your god did it you would be up in arms about it

Trump didn't say "magically find" votes.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

If you do that for all voters the ballot is legit, Moron.

We do not do it for any voters. We have always had a secret ballot.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

No

And no it was never done that way before.

We have never had a way to ID a voter on the ballot. The secret ballot is one of the hallmarks of our system.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

If you do that for all voters the ballot is legit, Moron.

We have never done it for any ballot in any election.

 

[Lastamender]

And that has been proven in court?

You cannot prove anything without an evidentiary hearing. That fact has been established and will never change.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You cannot prove anything without an evidentiary hearing. That fact has been established and will never change.

So, if you have proof why has this not happened?

 

[Lastamender]

True, they might have bamboo fibers in them, then you know they are fake

And you might have the same people driving by drops boxes repeatably in the early AM hours. Of course no one asks them why. Why is that?

 

[Lastamender]

So, if you have proof why has this not happened?

Because the corrupt judges dismiss the case and that voids the case from ever getting an evidentiary hearing. That is another fact that will not change.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Because the corrupt judges dismiss the case and that voids the case from ever getting an evidentiary hearing. That is another fact that will not change.

Damn, so there is not a single non-corrupt judge in the entire fucking country.

 

[Lastamender]

Damn, so there is not a single non-corrupt judge in the entire fucking country.

It seems that way, doesn't it? The fact that Trump supporters never got that hearing is just one more fact that will never change.

 

[Marener]

Again, bullshit. Plus the fact illegal ballots can be counted as many times as you want.

You have to prove a ballot is illegal. If you take away their vote without proving it, then you’ve disenfranchised someone.

And that’s illegal. People have a right to due process.

 

[Marener]

I dependably show your inability to understand what is being g discussed.

I wasn’t discussing anything with you, troll.

Why would I? There’s no point.