It is forgone conclusion that any legal action directed at a president is going called polticaly motiveated.
The problem with great lie conspiracy theory is it falls apart when you look at the claims.
Looking at the claims of election fraud, 60 judges, many appointed by Trump dismissed the evidence of election fraud presented or lack of it. The top election officials in every state have said that there was insufficient irregularities in the election to change the winner of the presidential election in their state.
In regard to to criminal charges Trump faces, Protect Democracy released what it terms a guide to determining whether the federal charges against Mr. Trump represent politicized justice or accountability. Boiled down, the guide asks three questions.
- First, is there evidence suggesting political interference with the Justice Department investigation?
- Second, is there evidence to support the indictment, and is Mr. Trump being treated as others in a similar situation would be?
- Third, are courts and judges upholding Justice Department actions?
So far what we have seen indicates that Trump is being held accountable for his action.
Donald Trump is facing another indictment from a federal grand jury in the Southern District of Florida, but is the indictment warranted?
protectdemocracy.org