MacTheKnife
Gold Member
- Jul 20, 2018
- 5,977
- 2,039
- 325
time to end this thread....tyrones supposed defenders just keep repeating themselves and spamming the board.
"Plenty of justification to follow and report."1. Unknown person matching a criminal's description in a gated community? Plenty of justification to follow and report.
2. Zimmerman was reckless. That is not a legally nor morally wrong, and does not justify violence.
3. According to lib theory, your homophobia means YOU are the gay one.
4. You support punishing a man who committed the "crime" of defending himself, and you are a liberal.
As a member of the neighborhood watch, there was no justification to follow as members are instructed to observe and report only; not put themselves into harm's way.
That is true...and that is all George really did until he was attacked.
He observed a SUSPICIOUS person reported it to the police.
Dispatch axed him which way Trayvon had run off to and George got out of his truck to observe and report back the answer to the question.
Following a suspicious person into a dark area is putting oneself into harm's way. What he was trained by police not to do.
"Dispatch axed him which way Trayvon had run off to and George got out of his truck to observe and report back the answer to the question."
And Zimmerman didn't need to exit his car to answer....
Dispatcher: He's running? Which way is he running?
Zimmerman: Down towards the other entrance to the neighborhood.
That is the way Trayvon was headed when Z last saw him...when he lost sight of Trayvon Z got out of his truck so he could see better and walked in that direction a short ways to try and see better.
When the dispatcher axed Z if he was following the suspect George replied in the affirmative meaning he was just walking in the direction where he last saw trayvon running.
One cannot follow anyone unless you can actually see them.
Trayvon only had a hundred yds. to go to get home...since he was running that would have taken him around 30 secs.
Wrong. He said Martin was running "towards the other entrance" as he exited his vehicle.
After getting out of his vehicle, the dispatcher asked Zimmerman, "which entrance is that that he's heading towards?" To which Zimmerman answered, "the back entrance," as he went running after Martin.
So no, you're full of shit when you falsely claim he only got out of his vehicle because he lost sight of him. Zimmerman saw the direction he took off in.
After exiting his vehicle and after informing the dispatcher the direction he observed Martin running, Zimmerman was asked if he was following Martin; and was told he needn't do so by the dispatcher. Then Zimmerman was asked his name, which he gave, and also informed the dispatcher Martin ran. By then he lost sight of him -- but that was after getting out of his truck.
And Martin had good reason not to run straight back to his father's apartment.... Being chased by a crazed guy, why would he lead a nut to where he was staying and to where 14 year old Chad Green was home alone?
The state's star witness...Trayvon's friend...testified Trayvon told her he had returned to his father's place and had completely lost sight of Z....meaning Z had no idea where he was.
It has been shown he had plenty of time to do that...more time than he needed actually as it was a very short distance away...between 80 and a hundred yards....how long does it take a football player to run 100 yards...you do the math.
Unfortunately for Trayvon he did not stay home....various theories regarding why he chose to go back and confront Z.
Again...Z had lost sight of Trayvon very quickly after he took off running it was a dark and rainy night...Z was simply walking in the direction he had seen Trayvon run off to...aka...attempting to follow or perhaps see if Trayvon was anywhere visible...he was not...dispatch heard the wind in Z's phone and axed him if he was following Trayvon Z replied in the affirmative meaning he was attempting to follow trayvon....you cannot follow someone you cannot see.
It is documented that Z reported to dispatch that he had lost sight of trayvon...he had no idea where he was....how can you follow someone you cannot see and you have no idea where he is? Impossible.
Simple stuff. Trayvon's defenders are simply grasping at straws in a failed attempt to obfusicate and hide the truth of the matter. aka.............It has been proven time and again Trayvvon had more than enough time to travel the very short distance to where his father was staying....that the states star witness testified that he went there....and thus anything that happened after that is due to trayvon returning to confront George for whtever reason.
Last edited: