Where_r_my_Keys
Gold Member
- Jan 19, 2014
- 15,272
- 1,848
- 280
- Banned
- #261
Liberals continue to use their new, ridiculous definition of "discrimination" and just won't budge from it. I'll point out for about the 40th time that by the new ultra-liberal definition of "discrimination," an Orthodox Jewish photographer would be guilty of "discrimination" if he declined to photograph a "commitment" ceremony between a 60-year-old man and a 13-year-old girl whose parents had consented to her moving in with the old man. By the definition that liberals are using here, that would be "discrimination."
Quite sensibly, "discrimination" used to refer to denying someone a regular service or employment based on their race, nationality, religion, gender, or skin color. No one ever dreamed that some people would pervert the term to mean that a religious vendor could be punished for declining to host or service a gay ceremony or that a Christian college would be threatened with disaccreditation and the loss of federal financial aid for its students because its long-standing code of conduct stipulated that no one--gay or straight--could be a student if they were engaging in sex outside traditional marriage.