Since you homo marriage proponents like to misuse the word equality so much, I have one question for you to answer; why should the general public be forced by law to subsidize male-on-male buttfucking? Simple question. What's your answer?
The answer is that is regulating marriage. You don't like it, don't marry someone who looks like you.
You didn't answer my question. You just made a detached comment. Why should the public be forced to subsidize male-on-male buttfucking?
Marriage isn't about sex. As demonstrated by all the infertile and childless folks that are allowed to marry or remain married.
So the entire premise of your argument is invalid. A classic 'when did you stop beating your wife' question.
Then how can homosexual marriage be defined as homosexual marriage if it isn't about homosexuality? Root word, sex.
Because there is no such thing as 'homosexual marriage' – or 'gay marriage,' for that matter.
There is only one marriage contract law written by the states and administered by state courts, where two equal, consenting adult partners agree to enter into a committed relationship recognized by the state – same- or opposite-sex, it makes no difference.
This is why it's un-Constitutional for states to deny same-sex couples access to marriage contract law they're currently eligible to participate in.