Lord Long Rod
Diamond Member
- Jan 17, 2023
- 7,706
- 8,122
- 2,138
- Banned
- #1
I have a career where I deal with the public. I work in an office and deal with people's finances. During the course of doing this work over the past 27 years I have come to witness many interesting trends in people's lives. This is true with the gays. Now, when I refer to gays I am including lesbians and male homosexuals. I am lumping them in together to the exclusion of trannies and anything else. What follows is a particularly interesting observation that has been proven time and time again. Remember, this is a general observation. I do not know how prevalent this is. It may be a minority of cases. I do not hang around with these people. But I can tell you beyond a shadow of a doubt that there are a LOT of gay couples who do this.
There are many instances with gay couples where one of them works and the other stays home. The stay at home gay is on a fixed income, like SS/VA disability. In other words, there is a breadwinner, and there is a bitch. There is a dominate and a submissive. I find this extremely interesting since gays generally decry the patriarchy as a form of slavery. However, these gays I am describing are actually mimicking the patriarchal structure. This is, on its face, hypocritical.
Now let's dig a little deeper on this. I know that doing any sort of analysis other than merely scraping the surface and drawing conclusions therefrom is something Democrats, leftists, and progs are unfamiliar with. Therefore, you lefty filth are free to leave so you can go hit your bongs, play with yourselves, and all the other unproductive stupid shit you do with your time. 3-2-1 ... zone out!
Now, for the rest of us, let me make some qualifications here. I have seen this behavior in male and female gay couples, white and black, low income to upper middle class. Does patriarchal mimicry occur in the majority, or ever plurality, of hitched gay? I do not know. However, in my experience, when I deal with married gays, patriarchal mimicry is the norm. However, I cannot say whether my clients are representative of the whole of gay married people. I mean, they probably are. But, I cannot and will not say this as a fact because I have not done any sort of scientific survey.
One possible explanation is that gays who marry may have more traditional values, as opposed to the more run of the mill pedo-perv militant gays. I am talking the about ones who march in pride parades with their cocks swinging around and wearing nipple clamps while normal Americans stand there staring in shock and disbelief (and rightfully so, as these events cause every freak within a 100 miles to crawl out from under their rocks and go show off their preference for deviant sex).
This may sound unduly progressive come from me, Long Rod. But really it is not. It is simple fact. If you live life in America today and interact with people, you are going to come across the gays. As you do so you are going to learn that most gays are not the ridiculous pride marching weirdos who get all the publicity. Many of them are politically conservative and would never, ever, think of prancing down the street nearly naked. They are generally just nice, ordinary folks who were born with a genetic mutation causing them to avoid procreational sexual partners. They want to belong and not be held back by their genetic disability. Personally, I go out of my way to make the gays who come into my office feel as normal as possible. I am not going to treat them differently just because their sexual algorithms are fucked up. I treat them like I would someone with cancer or Down's syndrome. However, if the gay chooses to make their sex life an issue, like the pride marchers, then fuck them. That is so disrespectful to society as to warrant condemnation. In fact, it does a disservice to all gays except the freaks.
So maybe it is not hypocrisy for these gays to be mimicking the patriarchal paradigm because the ones who do this are not the freaks putting down the patriarchy. This proposition rings true with me. Of course, we need to remember that a lot of this is not an either-or proposition. Rather, it is most likely on a spectrum. Moreover, I have not surveyed these clients about their personal opinions and attitudes on the more militant ideas on gay. That would not be appropriate, both due to my need to maintain a professional relationship and because I feel like any such conversation will cross an unseen line that may ultimately lead to drinks and gay sex. I wish to avoid both of these things.
This mimicry may be totally hypocritical on their part, or not. But I can certainly say that based upon the gay sampling I am exposed to with work, there is a pretty high percentage of gay couples who act like the traditional, 1950s, Ozzie and Harriett, hetero married couple. I find this weird.
There are many instances with gay couples where one of them works and the other stays home. The stay at home gay is on a fixed income, like SS/VA disability. In other words, there is a breadwinner, and there is a bitch. There is a dominate and a submissive. I find this extremely interesting since gays generally decry the patriarchy as a form of slavery. However, these gays I am describing are actually mimicking the patriarchal structure. This is, on its face, hypocritical.
Now let's dig a little deeper on this. I know that doing any sort of analysis other than merely scraping the surface and drawing conclusions therefrom is something Democrats, leftists, and progs are unfamiliar with. Therefore, you lefty filth are free to leave so you can go hit your bongs, play with yourselves, and all the other unproductive stupid shit you do with your time. 3-2-1 ... zone out!
Now, for the rest of us, let me make some qualifications here. I have seen this behavior in male and female gay couples, white and black, low income to upper middle class. Does patriarchal mimicry occur in the majority, or ever plurality, of hitched gay? I do not know. However, in my experience, when I deal with married gays, patriarchal mimicry is the norm. However, I cannot say whether my clients are representative of the whole of gay married people. I mean, they probably are. But, I cannot and will not say this as a fact because I have not done any sort of scientific survey.
One possible explanation is that gays who marry may have more traditional values, as opposed to the more run of the mill pedo-perv militant gays. I am talking the about ones who march in pride parades with their cocks swinging around and wearing nipple clamps while normal Americans stand there staring in shock and disbelief (and rightfully so, as these events cause every freak within a 100 miles to crawl out from under their rocks and go show off their preference for deviant sex).
This may sound unduly progressive come from me, Long Rod. But really it is not. It is simple fact. If you live life in America today and interact with people, you are going to come across the gays. As you do so you are going to learn that most gays are not the ridiculous pride marching weirdos who get all the publicity. Many of them are politically conservative and would never, ever, think of prancing down the street nearly naked. They are generally just nice, ordinary folks who were born with a genetic mutation causing them to avoid procreational sexual partners. They want to belong and not be held back by their genetic disability. Personally, I go out of my way to make the gays who come into my office feel as normal as possible. I am not going to treat them differently just because their sexual algorithms are fucked up. I treat them like I would someone with cancer or Down's syndrome. However, if the gay chooses to make their sex life an issue, like the pride marchers, then fuck them. That is so disrespectful to society as to warrant condemnation. In fact, it does a disservice to all gays except the freaks.
So maybe it is not hypocrisy for these gays to be mimicking the patriarchal paradigm because the ones who do this are not the freaks putting down the patriarchy. This proposition rings true with me. Of course, we need to remember that a lot of this is not an either-or proposition. Rather, it is most likely on a spectrum. Moreover, I have not surveyed these clients about their personal opinions and attitudes on the more militant ideas on gay. That would not be appropriate, both due to my need to maintain a professional relationship and because I feel like any such conversation will cross an unseen line that may ultimately lead to drinks and gay sex. I wish to avoid both of these things.
This mimicry may be totally hypocritical on their part, or not. But I can certainly say that based upon the gay sampling I am exposed to with work, there is a pretty high percentage of gay couples who act like the traditional, 1950s, Ozzie and Harriett, hetero married couple. I find this weird.