Gavin Newsom Vetoes Three Bills that Appeal to Progressives. Raise your Hand if you Know Right Away Why

Seymour Flops

Diamond Member
Nov 25, 2021
13,587
10,884
2,138
Texas
Gov. Gavin Newsom issued a trio of vetoes late Friday evening that are sure to anger his progressive allies — including an unexpected rejection of a bill requiring judges to consider children’s gender identities in custody disputes.

On the losing end of the Democratic governor’s actions are three mainstays of liberal support: LGBTQ rights groups, labor unions and immigration advocates. Newsom has long touted a progressive record while also acting as a moderating counterweight to an overwhelmingly Democratic Legislature.


Newsom dealt a stinging defeat to LGBTQ activists by vetoing a bill that would’ve asked courts to consider a child’s gender identity when it comes to custody decisions. The legislation, Assembly Bill 957, was authored by Lori Wilson, who is herself the parent of a transgender child.
So, for Allah's sake, why, Democrats? Why on Mother Earth would the most liberal governor of the most liberal state veto three bills that are championed by three different factions of his liberal state? Any non-Democrat on here will catch on immediately, but see if you can figure it out as an intellectual exercise. The two others are:

And the governor turned back a bill barring California’s prison system from sharing information about incarcerated immigrants with federal officials, fortifying California’s “sanctuary laws.” In a veto message, Newsom said he believed “current law strikes the right balance on limiting interaction to support community trust and cooperation between law enforcement and local communities.”
So, he breaks with the criminal illegal alien lobby, a key Democratic constituency, and:

Newsom also vetoed a bill requiring human drivers to be onboard in self-driving trucks. The measure was a priority for organized labor groups like the Teamsters, who fear artificial intelligence and automation will lead to widespread economic upheaval, and tumult around self-driving taxis in San Francisco, where city officials fought an expansion of malfunctioning vehicles that have snarled traffic and blocked first responders.

He also breaks with the Teamsters, heavy donors to the DNC.

Why is he doing it? Here's a hint: he is certainly not doing it without permission from the Central Committee. Here's the answer:


They told him they are about to dump Biden like Biden dumps in his pants and to start moving to the middle, so he can easily defeat Harris in the Primary and have a snowballs chance in Hell against Trump. Actually, re-born as a moderate, he would have a good chance against Trump Far better than Biden.
 
Last edited:
Gov. Gavin Newsom issued a trio of vetoes late Friday evening that are sure to anger his progressive allies — including an unexpected rejection of a bill requiring judges to consider children’s gender identities in custody disputes.

On the losing end of the Democratic governor’s actions are three mainstays of liberal support: LGBTQ rights groups, labor unions and immigration advocates. Newsom has long touted a progressive record while also acting as a moderating counterweight to an overwhelmingly Democratic Legislature.


Newsom dealt a stinging defeat to LGBTQ activists by vetoing a bill that would’ve asked courts to consider a child’s gender identity when it comes to custody decisions. The legislation, Assembly Bill 957, was authored by Lori Wilson, who is herself the parent of a transgender child.
So, for Allah's sake, why, Democrats? Why on Mother Earth would the most liberal governor of the most liberal state veto three bills that are championed by three different factions of his liberal state? Any non-Democrat on here will catch on immediately, but see if you can figure it out as an intellectual exercise. The two others are:

And the governor turned back a bill barring California’s prison system from sharing information about incarcerated immigrants with federal officials, fortifying California’s “sanctuary laws.” In a veto message, Newsom said he believed “current law strikes the right balance on limiting interaction to support community trust and cooperation between law enforcement and local communities.”
So, he breaks with the criminal illegal alien lobby, a key Democratic constituency, and:

Newsom also vetoed a bill requiring human drivers to be onboard in self-driving trucks. The measure was a priority for organized labor groups like the Teamsters, who fear artificial intelligence and automation will lead to widespread economic upheaval, and tumult around self-driving taxis in San Francisco, where city officials fought an expansion of malfunctioning vehicles that have snarled traffic and blocked first responders.
He also breaks with the Teamsters, heavy donors to the DNC.

Why is he doing it? Here's a hint: he is certainly not doing it without permission from the Central Committee. Here's the answer:


They told him they are about to dump Biden like Biden dumps in his pants and to start moving to the middle, so he can easily defeat Harris in the Primary and have a snowballs chance in Hell against Trump. Actually, re-born as a moderate, he would have a good chance against Trump Far better than Biden.
After the primaries, all that and more will be back on the table. People like him have to run toward the middle, starting in the primaries to have a chance in hell. Screw Newsom. These vetoes mean nothing, either way.
 
Gov. Gavin Newsom issued a trio of vetoes late Friday evening that are sure to anger his progressive allies — including an unexpected rejection of a bill requiring judges to consider children’s gender identities in custody disputes.

On the losing end of the Democratic governor’s actions are three mainstays of liberal support: LGBTQ rights groups, labor unions and immigration advocates. Newsom has long touted a progressive record while also acting as a moderating counterweight to an overwhelmingly Democratic Legislature.


Newsom dealt a stinging defeat to LGBTQ activists by vetoing a bill that would’ve asked courts to consider a child’s gender identity when it comes to custody decisions. The legislation, Assembly Bill 957, was authored by Lori Wilson, who is herself the parent of a transgender child.
So, for Allah's sake, why, Democrats? Why on Mother Earth would the most liberal governor of the most liberal state veto three bills that are championed by three different factions of his liberal state? Any non-Democrat on here will catch on immediately, but see if you can figure it out as an intellectual exercise. The two others are:

And the governor turned back a bill barring California’s prison system from sharing information about incarcerated immigrants with federal officials, fortifying California’s “sanctuary laws.” In a veto message, Newsom said he believed “current law strikes the right balance on limiting interaction to support community trust and cooperation between law enforcement and local communities.”
So, he breaks with the criminal illegal alien lobby, a key Democratic constituency, and:

Newsom also vetoed a bill requiring human drivers to be onboard in self-driving trucks. The measure was a priority for organized labor groups like the Teamsters, who fear artificial intelligence and automation will lead to widespread economic upheaval, and tumult around self-driving taxis in San Francisco, where city officials fought an expansion of malfunctioning vehicles that have snarled traffic and blocked first responders.

He also breaks with the Teamsters, heavy donors to the DNC.

Why is he doing it? Here's a hint: he is certainly not doing it without permission from the Central Committee. Here's the answer:


They told him they are about to dump Biden like Biden dumps in his pants and to start moving to the middle, so he can easily defeat Harris in the Primary and have a snowballs chance in Hell against Trump. Actually, re-born as a moderate, he would have a good chance against Trump Far better than Biden.

I don't doubt that at all.
 
Gov. Gavin Newsom issued a trio of vetoes late Friday evening that are sure to anger his progressive allies — including an unexpected rejection of a bill requiring judges to consider children’s gender identities in custody disputes.

On the losing end of the Democratic governor’s actions are three mainstays of liberal support: LGBTQ rights groups, labor unions and immigration advocates. Newsom has long touted a progressive record while also acting as a moderating counterweight to an overwhelmingly Democratic Legislature.


Newsom dealt a stinging defeat to LGBTQ activists by vetoing a bill that would’ve asked courts to consider a child’s gender identity when it comes to custody decisions. The legislation, Assembly Bill 957, was authored by Lori Wilson, who is herself the parent of a transgender child.
So, for Allah's sake, why, Democrats? Why on Mother Earth would the most liberal governor of the most liberal state veto three bills that are championed by three different factions of his liberal state? Any non-Democrat on here will catch on immediately, but see if you can figure it out as an intellectual exercise. The two others are:

And the governor turned back a bill barring California’s prison system from sharing information about incarcerated immigrants with federal officials, fortifying California’s “sanctuary laws.” In a veto message, Newsom said he believed “current law strikes the right balance on limiting interaction to support community trust and cooperation between law enforcement and local communities.”
So, he breaks with the criminal illegal alien lobby, a key Democratic constituency, and:

Newsom also vetoed a bill requiring human drivers to be onboard in self-driving trucks. The measure was a priority for organized labor groups like the Teamsters, who fear artificial intelligence and automation will lead to widespread economic upheaval, and tumult around self-driving taxis in San Francisco, where city officials fought an expansion of malfunctioning vehicles that have snarled traffic and blocked first responders.

He also breaks with the Teamsters, heavy donors to the DNC.

Why is he doing it? Here's a hint: he is certainly not doing it without permission from the Central Committee. Here's the answer:


They told him they are about to dump Biden like Biden dumps in his pants and to start moving to the middle, so he can easily defeat Harris in the Primary and have a snowballs chance in Hell against Trump. Actually, re-born as a moderate, he would have a good chance against Trump Far better than Biden.

The transgender bill was dumb in the first place.

The purpose of sanctuary laws is to keep illegals from being preyed upon, not to protect them from law enforcement. If someone is arrested, convicted and imprisoned, then they should be deported when they get out.
 
Oh I know this one!

Answer: Newsom is now totally based and cares about putting America and the nuclear family FIRST and won't let the commies tread on our flag!!!!!!

What did I win?

Oh.....really? Wrong answer?

Fuck.
 
Oh I know this one!

Answer: Newsom is now totally based and cares about putting America and the nuclear family FIRST and won't let the commies tread on our flag!!!!!!

What did I win?

Oh.....really? Wrong answer?

Fuck.


It could happen.
 
The transgender bill was dumb in the first place.

The purpose of sanctuary laws is to keep illegals from being preyed upon, not to protect them from law enforcement. If someone is arrested, convicted and imprisoned, then they should be deported when they get out.



Wow, the foreign commie bitch chimes in with more commie propaganda. Tell the class why CA has a law on the books preventing local LEOs from honoring ICE detainers on criminal aliens, isn't that protecting them from law enforcement?

.
 
Gov. Gavin Newsom issued a trio of vetoes late Friday evening that are sure to anger his progressive allies — including an unexpected rejection of a bill requiring judges to consider children’s gender identities in custody disputes.

On the losing end of the Democratic governor’s actions are three mainstays of liberal support: LGBTQ rights groups, labor unions and immigration advocates. Newsom has long touted a progressive record while also acting as a moderating counterweight to an overwhelmingly Democratic Legislature.


Newsom dealt a stinging defeat to LGBTQ activists by vetoing a bill that would’ve asked courts to consider a child’s gender identity when it comes to custody decisions. The legislation, Assembly Bill 957, was authored by Lori Wilson, who is herself the parent of a transgender child.
So, for Allah's sake, why, Democrats? Why on Mother Earth would the most liberal governor of the most liberal state veto three bills that are championed by three different factions of his liberal state? Any non-Democrat on here will catch on immediately, but see if you can figure it out as an intellectual exercise. The two others are:

And the governor turned back a bill barring California’s prison system from sharing information about incarcerated immigrants with federal officials, fortifying California’s “sanctuary laws.” In a veto message, Newsom said he believed “current law strikes the right balance on limiting interaction to support community trust and cooperation between law enforcement and local communities.”
So, he breaks with the criminal illegal alien lobby, a key Democratic constituency, and:

Newsom also vetoed a bill requiring human drivers to be onboard in self-driving trucks. The measure was a priority for organized labor groups like the Teamsters, who fear artificial intelligence and automation will lead to widespread economic upheaval, and tumult around self-driving taxis in San Francisco, where city officials fought an expansion of malfunctioning vehicles that have snarled traffic and blocked first responders.

He also breaks with the Teamsters, heavy donors to the DNC.

Why is he doing it? Here's a hint: he is certainly not doing it without permission from the Central Committee. Here's the answer:


They told him they are about to dump Biden like Biden dumps in his pants and to start moving to the middle, so he can easily defeat Harris in the Primary and have a snowballs chance in Hell against Trump. Actually, re-born as a moderate, he would have a good chance against Trump Far better than Biden.
Of course.

He began pivoting right awhile ago.
 
Wow, the foreign commie bitch chimes in with more commie propaganda. Tell the class why CA has a law on the books preventing local LEOs from honoring ICE detainers on criminal aliens, isn't that protecting them from law enforcement?

.

Don't you mean the "foreign capitalist bitch"??? Only a total idiot thinks that someone who spent their entire life working in banking and law, is a "commie", but then you've never been right about anything in your life.

There is no such law on the books. There is a law under which:

  • State and local police officers now are prohibited from inquiring about an individual’s immigration status during the routine course of their work.
  • State and local officers are forbidden from holding illegal immigrants until they can be transferred into federal custody.
  • Federal agencies are prohibited from commandeering local authorities to work with immigration agencies and perform the work of immigration agents.

This law isn't about "criminal aliens" at all, but since you're so busy throwing insults at me, you didn't bother actually finding out what "sanctuary state" means at all.
 
The transgender bill was dumb in the first place.
No dumber than the rest of transgenderization of kids movement.
The purpose of sanctuary laws is to keep illegals from being preyed upon, not to protect them from law enforcement. If someone is arrested, convicted and imprisoned, then they should be deported when they get out.
How in the world to sanctuary laws keep illegals from being preyed on? Are they not being preyed now, in sanctuary cities? Do those sanctuary folk scare the cartels?
 
He's FAKING it with a move to the center to FAKE his way into the White House. If he wins expect a sudden swing right back to the left. Remember, Democrats LIE!
 
Don't you mean the "foreign capitalist bitch"??? Only a total idiot thinks that someone who spent their entire life working in banking and law, is a "commie", but then you've never been right about anything in your life.

There is no such law on the books. There is a law under which:



This law isn't about "criminal aliens" at all, but since you're so busy throwing insults at me, you didn't bother actually finding out what "sanctuary state" means at all.


Thanks for proving my point. It's all about protecting illegal, ie criminal aliens, from federal law enforcement.

.
 
Thanks for proving my point. It's all about protecting illegal, ie criminal aliens, from federal law enforcement.

.

Once again, you prove how gullible and stupid you really are. Either you didn't read the law, or you lack the ability to discern what it said. You just parrotted the same lies about "sanctuary cities" you've been bleating from the beginning.

The law says NOTHING about "criminal aliens" at all. It simply says that it won't hold people on ICE warrants, nor should they. So if someone goes into a police station to report a crime, and if they're undocumented, the local authorities are not holding that person for an ice warrant.

Or if someone is jailed for parking tickets, unless ICE shows up before the sentence is served, the person is free to go.

AND HERE'S THE PART WHERE YOU PROVE YOU'RE AN IDIOT! IF THE PERSON IS INDEED IN JAIL FOR A CRIME, MAKING THEM A "CRIMINAL ALIEN", THEY WOULD BE DEPORTED WHEN THEIR SENTENCE ENDS.

PLEASE STOP EMBARASSING YOURSELF, BITCH.
 

Forum List

Back
Top