easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,344
- 2,645
LIVE ON-GOING GARLAND COMMITTEE HEARING...
US AG Garland was asked if the decision to re-instate the pension of Obama failed coup Co-Conspirator Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe took into account that the United States Inspector General Horowitz reported he found that McCabe had committed Felony Perjury under oath.
Garland replied that it played no part in the decision to re-instate McCabe's pension. Garland stated that the decision was based on DOJ Litigation / Legal SMEs who believed McCabe was not given sufficient time to respond to the US IG's findings. These SMEs gave their belief that if McCabe initiated a law suit and the government lost the amount would be more than if they re-instated his pension, that this argument was the basis for re-instating McCabe's pension.
- NOTE: Disgraced Former FBI Deputy Director McCabe had not made any effort to file such a law suit.
- NOTE: Despite having leaked classified information (according to his boss, FBI Director James Comey) and committed Felony Perjury,
McCabe was not charged for his crimes by the DOJ, the same DOJ that just re-instated proven criminal McCabe's pension.
Garland was asked how this failure happened under the DOJ and if the policies that allowed McCabe NOT to be charged while the FBI was indicting others for lying to the FBI are being charged. Garland replied, 'Those policies are under re-view'.
UNDER REVIEW? The DOJ refused to indict, charge, and convict the former Deputy Director of the FBI after it was proven that he leaked classified information and committed Felony Perjury while prosecuting others outside the FBI (US citizens), and Garland could not say this criminal process / oversight IS being fixed, all he could say is 'it's under review'?!
WTF?
www.foxnews.com
US AG Garland was asked if the decision to re-instate the pension of Obama failed coup Co-Conspirator Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe took into account that the United States Inspector General Horowitz reported he found that McCabe had committed Felony Perjury under oath.
Garland replied that it played no part in the decision to re-instate McCabe's pension. Garland stated that the decision was based on DOJ Litigation / Legal SMEs who believed McCabe was not given sufficient time to respond to the US IG's findings. These SMEs gave their belief that if McCabe initiated a law suit and the government lost the amount would be more than if they re-instated his pension, that this argument was the basis for re-instating McCabe's pension.
- NOTE: Disgraced Former FBI Deputy Director McCabe had not made any effort to file such a law suit.
- NOTE: Despite having leaked classified information (according to his boss, FBI Director James Comey) and committed Felony Perjury,
McCabe was not charged for his crimes by the DOJ, the same DOJ that just re-instated proven criminal McCabe's pension.
Garland was asked how this failure happened under the DOJ and if the policies that allowed McCabe NOT to be charged while the FBI was indicting others for lying to the FBI are being charged. Garland replied, 'Those policies are under re-view'.
UNDER REVIEW? The DOJ refused to indict, charge, and convict the former Deputy Director of the FBI after it was proven that he leaked classified information and committed Felony Perjury while prosecuting others outside the FBI (US citizens), and Garland could not say this criminal process / oversight IS being fixed, all he could say is 'it's under review'?!
WTF?
Garland refuses to back away from DOJ memo after school board apology
Attorney General Merrick Garland doubled down on his memo to Department of Justice employees addressing a federal response to violence and intimidation of school board officials — despite the National School Boards Association apologizing for the letter that inspired the memo.
www.foxnews.com
