Galactical model of subquark particles

[Wise47]

You must mean the Comical Model, as there is no such thing as a "graviton."

However, the concept of gravitons is present in modern physics, although of course as a hypothesis.

 

[toobfreak]

However, the concept of gravitons is present in modern physics, although of course as a hypothesis.

WRONG. The idea of a possible gravitron was only hypothetically postulated and looked for as a force carrier for gravity, to align with other force carriers such as the photon, gluon, and w, z gauge bosons but none has ever been found, driving the conclusion that gravity might then not be a force, but rather, just a mere field/quality of space itself.

 

[Wise47]

but none has ever been found, driving the conclusion that gravity might then not be a force

Everything is made of particles, so gravity probably is too.

 

[Wise47]

Astronomy allows us to derive models for physics.

 

[Wise47]

Subquark particles are very tiny.

 

[Wise47]

These particles in fact have a different sizes, but they are tiny.

 

[hondo 50]

faulty

 

[Wise47]

The smallest particles in the models are related to the structure of black holes (black stars).

 

[Wise47]

The main particle of the model may be related to the formation of other particles of the galactic model.

 

[Wise47]

Main particle from the galactical model will correspond to a supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy. Perhaps quarks are made of such particles. One can also consider the hypothesis that these particles are micro black holes that have ended their lives as particles, by evaporating. These evaporating micro black holes can produce all the particles from the galactical model (compare stars in the galaxy), which would be consistent with the fact of the galaxy's rotation, i.e. the dependence of all particles on the main particle of the model. The only issue is that these particles can also be building blocks of, for example, quarks. However, the probability of a micro black hole (black star) existing as the model's main particle is very high.

 

[Wise47]

Main particle of the model can be a micro black hole, or not.

 

[Wise47]

The probability of a micro black hole (black star) existing as the model's main particle is very high, however, it is not 100 percent..

 

[Wise47]

The galaxy is a good suggestion for a model of matter.

 

[Wise47]

The rotation of the galaxy is part of the model for particles.

 

[Wise47]

Black hole (black star) in the center of galaxy is good suggestion for a model of main particle of galactical model.

 

[Wise47]

Universe as same as galaxy can be a model for particles.

 

[BackAgain]

below text comes from my bigger work New horizons in physics

Electrons, quarks and gluons possess internal structure, consist of quadrillion of particles of size about 10^-35 m [they correspond with photons], these then from quadrillion of particles about 10^-50 m [they correspond with gravitons]. To confirm legitimacy of assuming of hypothesis of internal structure of smallest from hitherto known structural subatomic particles as electrons, quarks and gluons it can be invoked the theory of science created by A.Comte (see after text Comte's Theory of Science).

diagram 1. Galatical model

Every following field uses in a large extent from previous, sociology from biology - theory of evolution, biology from chemistry - an example biochemistry, chemistry from physics - even if structure of atom and periodic table, physics from astronomy. Invoking astronomy it can be in physics reach eg. conception of existence of atoms and their internal structure - stars, planets, planetary system. It can be also reach models applied in conception of subquark particles and QG. It is galactical, and cosmical model. Mystery of dark matter can be explained in this way that preonical particles possess mass (the above part of this paragraph is from year 2014).
A more careful analysis of the galactical model leads to the conclusion that there are more types of particles of the right type. Types of stars, by supergiants, giants, dwarfs, all the way to the supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy would correspond to the types of these particles. Cosmical model analysis leads to similar conclusions, where the types of particles would correspond to the appropriate types of galaxies.
In addition, it can be assumed that there are types of photon-like particles and corresponding waves with significantly higher speeds than the speed of light. So there are non-electromagnetic waves far above the speed of light (the above part of this paragraph is from year 2019).
Particles much faster than photons are related to the cosmical model and sizes in the order of 10^-50 m. One can imagine building devices equipped with antennas for superelectromagnetic communication. The speed of such communication would be enormous, for example, communication with a base on Pluto could take less than a second.
Main particle from the galactical model will correspond to a supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy. Perhaps quarks are made of such particles. One can also consider the hypothesis that these particles are micro black holes that have ended their lives as particles, by evaporating. These evaporating micro black holes can produce all the particles from the galactical model (compare stars in the galaxy). The only issue is that these particles can also be building blocks of, for example, quarks.
The bonds of particles from the galactic model and higher models are probably - like quark-gluon bonds - indecomposable. All particles from the galactical model are somehow related to the main particle of the model, which is related to the rotation of the galaxy where the center is a supermassive black hole (black star). There are three types of galaxies, spiral, elliptical and irregular, just as there are three kinds of particles, electrons, quarks and gluons. The largest particles in the galactic model would correspond to hypergiant stars (the above part of this paragraph is from year 2023).

Gregory Podgorniak, Poland

I looked you up (if you are the author):

If you aren’t the author, you shouldn’t assume his identity. But let’s say you are.

Here is what you wrote including words about yourself. You have only a bachelors degree. No Masters. No doctorate. But the big surprise about your credibility comes at the end (which I put in bold, below):

author of text: Gregory Podgorniak, Poland

about the author, My name is Gregory Podgorniak (brn. 01.1977, Szczecinek, West Pomerania, Poland). I am working on field of natural as well as social sciences. During philosophical studies at Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan (1996-1999) I was actively act in student scientific organisation, got a scientific scholarship, and one from my articles titled Circulus vitiosus and fourfold petitio principii in the system of Descartes was published in Humanistic Drafts of Publishing House of Humaniora Foundation in Poznan, no. 6, 1998. Unfortunately certain fate events made impossible to me continuing studies to master's and later doctor's degree. Thence I was forced to be content only with a title of bachelor.

Thanks to deep and penetrating researchings I was able to establish indisputably some number of my past incarnations reaching of ancient period, these data are certain, these incarnations are: Auguste Comte (1798-1857) French philosopher and sociologist, Edme Mariotte (1620-1684) French physicist and meteorologist, Aenesidemus (1 st century BC) Greek sceptical philosopher, Arcesilaus (315-241 BC) Greek sceptical philosopher, Gorgias (485-380 BC) Greek sophist.

Structure of electrons, quarks and gluons; preon, preons | Page 1 | Naked Science Forum

The following paragraph is from the larger text New horizons in physics (search for the text in google): Galactical model of subquark particles Electrons, ...

www.thenakedscientists.com

So, at the risk of being offensive, I have to say I find your words less than persuasive.

 

[Wise47]

So, at the risk of being offensive, I have to say I find your words less than persuasive.

Believe me, these are facts. If you doubt the possibility of reincarnation, I'll give you examples. For example, Einstein was the earlier Newton, Archimedes. And Faraday was the earlier Galileo.

 

[BackAgain]

Believe me, these are facts. If you doubt the possibility of reincarnation, I'll give you examples. For example, Einstein was the earlier Newton, Archimedes. And Faraday was the earlier Galileo.

Oh. Ok then. Very persuasive. NOW you have conclusively established your claim.

 

[Wise47]

The first level of particles in the galactical model has a size close to the Planck length.