Gabbard-Yang ticket

[dblack]

Gabbard, maybe. Yang, no way. He's one of those technocrats who thinks that any given problem can be solved by giving government more power. His desire to employ China's "social credit" bullshit in the US is poison.

 

[TNHarley]

I think both are nice people but their policies are trash.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Youth, courage, success, intelligence. They could be a winner for the country.

I truly do not understand the obsession conservatives have with Tulsi Gabbard. She is Bernie Sanders Lite.

 

[Terri4Trump]

Youth, courage, success, intelligence. They could be a winner for the country.

Yang is an imbecile and an idiot.

Gabbard seems decent enough, but she still embraces leftist policies that will destroy the jobs and growth created by Trump.

Conclusion: You're a moron

 

[there4eyeM]

Everything negative anyone here has said about this pair can be said in spades about all the other potential candidates, including the present occupant of the White House. At least Gabbard and Yang bring fresh approaches not totally mired in party politics. They are truly independent.

 

[gipper]

Youth, courage, success, intelligence. They could be a winner for the country.

Yang is an imbecile and an idiot.

Gabbard seems decent enough, but she still embraces leftist policies that will destroy the jobs and growth created by Trump.

Conclusion: You're a moron

You calling someone a moron is an insult to hypocrisy.

 

[there4eyeM]

It isn't that Gabbard and Yang are the best candidates that could be found, it is only that they are the best currently on offer.

 

[there4eyeM]

Perhaps Bloomberg and Gabbard?

 

[there4eyeM]

It is surprising this hasn't been picked up in the media.

 

[Dana7360]

Youth, courage, success, intelligence. They could be a winner for the country.

But will never happen.

 

[pknopp]

Gabbard wants to get us out of the wars. Yang wants to continue them. How is that suppose to work?

 

[there4eyeM]

Anyone who's been in a war can out-argue anyone who hasn't.

 

[Zorro!]

Youth, courage, success, intelligence. They could be a winner for the country.

It doesn't really matter who loses to Trump.

LAYERS OF FACT-CHECKERS AND EDITORS: CNBC Mistakes Andrew Yang for GOP Venture Capitalist.

 

[whitehall]

Desperate times call for desperate fantasies when democrats can't get a candidate anybody likes.

 

[G.T.]

#yang2020

 

[there4eyeM]

It isn't a matter of losing to the current President, it's a matter of winning the endorsement of the American people.

 

[Kosh]

Many claim they do not want war, even Obama!

And he was one of the biggest warmongers to sit in office!

So neither will make it in office and any claims that they will not go to war, are just words to appease the smallest percentage of the (D) base.

 

[pknopp]

Youth, courage, success, intelligence. They could be a winner for the country.

I truly do not understand the obsession conservatives have with Tulsi Gabbard. She is Bernie Sanders Lite.

For years "conservatives" didn't support interventionist wars. Now that Trump does that is changing and we see them turning on her.

 

[pknopp]

Many claim they do not want war, even Obama!

And he was one of the biggest warmongers to sit in office!

So neither will make it in office and any claims that they will not go to war, are just words to appease the smallest percentage of the (D) base.

She condemned Obama's war policies while he was in office.

 

[Kosh]

Here is game: