- Jun 22, 2020
- 20,850
- 23,333
- 2,288
Only mindless to those who lack the capacity to understand.
Gabbard is DNI
- Thread starter berg80
- Start date
- Jun 22, 2020
- 20,850
- 23,333
- 2,288
IOW, she's intelligent and the dims turned on her for exercising that attribute.
pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 82,369
- 33,405
- 2,250
I understand he was being an asshole.
- Jun 22, 2020
- 20,850
- 23,333
- 2,288
I understand that he triggers you.
Daily.
The Duke
Diamond Member
- Jul 30, 2022
- 37,129
- 47,476
- 2,788
Okay, you know. IMO, that's enough of the RINOs and Democrats exposing what absolute dickwads they are.
Call recess, fuck them, make the appointments now. This dog and pony show is costing money and time.
Then the Democrats will holler "Oh! Authoritarian!", yeah no, fuck you. They're just dicking the dog, seriously.
Call recess, fuck them, make the appointments now. This dog and pony show is costing money and time.
Then the Democrats will holler "Oh! Authoritarian!", yeah no, fuck you. They're just dicking the dog, seriously.
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 45,382
- 31,949
- 3,545
buttercup
Diamond Member
- Apr 9, 2010
- 12,233
- 9,341
- 2,220
I liked Tulsi because of some of the things she claimed to stand for...(and her takedown of Kamala during a debate and how she exposed corrupt Dems.) but I haven't seen anyone mention that she recently did a 180° flip on few things, including FISA. (warrantless spying on Americans) That, along with her being a former WEF Young Global Leader and former CFR has caused me to distrust her. I mean, I already had some doubts about her before....so what she did recently just confirmed those doubts.
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 45,382
- 31,949
- 3,545
Who csres?
buttercup
Diamond Member
- Apr 9, 2010
- 12,233
- 9,341
- 2,220
Who cares that she is OK with warrantless surveillance? Or who cares about her connection to globalist groups? A lot of people care. People who aren't total partisan hacks and value liberty, privacy and the constitution.
pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 82,369
- 33,405
- 2,250
I do.
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 45,382
- 31,949
- 3,545
- Sep 16, 2012
- 66,761
- 62,434
- 3,605
this
What globalist groups do the dems cater to?
Trump project 2025......................remember AOC crowing about 2030? Look into the WEF globalist agenda and get back to me.
buttercup
Diamond Member
- Apr 9, 2010
- 12,233
- 9,341
- 2,220
Why are you telling me this? It's common knowledge that Dems cater to those groups. What does that have to do with what I said about Tulsi?
ETA: Ah, I see where the confusion is. It looks like your read my post #389 without reading my post before that, #387, and the string of conversation. I was responding to Billiejeans' "who cares" comment.
Last edited:
Everything if you think about it.
buttercup
Diamond Member
- Apr 9, 2010
- 12,233
- 9,341
- 2,220
I have no idea what you're talking about. But I added on to my previous post, so look at what I added.
I'm as anti-globalist as it gets. In case you didn't realize that.
OldFlame
Diamond Member
- Aug 5, 2020
- 9,669
- 7,887
- 1,938
buttercup
Diamond Member
- Apr 9, 2010
- 12,233
- 9,341
- 2,220
As I already said in the post you quoted, one of the flips was on FISA. (warrantless spying on Americans) Another thing she did a 180 on was Trump's Iran policy, which she previously denounced as "neocon" warmongering. And also Trump's drone-assassinating of Soleimani, which she previously called an "illegal and unconstitutional act of war" that had "no justification whatsoever." Now she says she agrees with it.
As for the video you posted about the WEF YGL, I think she's lying. I say that for a few reasons. She tweeted about it in 2015, and nowhere in the tweet did she say "I don't know much about the WEF but I want no part of it.".... Here's what she said:
Also, she was a member of the CFR. Don't get me wrong. I know that many politicians rebrand themselves or change their positions. But that's not the same thing as outright denying one's previous stance. I don't believe that someone who was ALWAYS anti-globalist would have been a member of the CFR for a number of years. I think she "has to" deny certain things about her past, because she wants to gain people's trust and she knows full well that conservatives and patriots wouldn't feel good about someone with connections to globalist groups.
Last edited:
berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 25,282
- 21,270
- 2,320
- Thread starter
- #399
You can count the number of times McTreason is right on one half of one hand but this time he nailed it.
Mr. McConnell said he voted against her because the director of national intelligence should not be someone “with a history of alarming lapses in judgment.”
“Entrusting the coordination of the intelligence community to someone who struggles to acknowledge these facts is an unnecessary risk,” he said in a statement.
Mr. McConnell has taken stances against several of Mr. Trump’s nominees, but so far has not persuaded many in his caucus to join him.
www.nytimes.com
Mr. McConnell said he voted against her because the director of national intelligence should not be someone “with a history of alarming lapses in judgment.”
“Entrusting the coordination of the intelligence community to someone who struggles to acknowledge these facts is an unnecessary risk,” he said in a statement.
Mr. McConnell has taken stances against several of Mr. Trump’s nominees, but so far has not persuaded many in his caucus to join him.
Tulsi Gabbard Confirmed by Senate as Trump’s Director of National Intelligence
The success of one of President Trump’s more divisive cabinet candidates shows his domination over the Republican Senate.
berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 25,282
- 21,270
- 2,320
- Thread starter
- #400
Like most of the nominees before her Gabbard lied under oath. Making her perfect for the trump admin.
When asked by Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-New Mexico) whether she was aware of the threat made by Ahmad Badreddin Hassoun, who was then grand mufti of Syria, Gabbard — President Donald Trump’s nominee for director of national intelligence — answered: “I was not and had not heard that until today.”
But documents reviewed by The Washington Post indicate that Gabbard was aware of Hassoun’s threats soon after she returned from her controversial visit to the country in January 2017.
But hey, she's only in charge of all the intel agencies so what difference does it?
Records undercut Tulsi Gabbard’s claim of ignorance on cleric’s views
In her confirmation hearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday, senators repeatedly pressed Tulsi Gabbard on her highly scrutinized trip to Syria in 2017, where she met President Bashar al-Assad and others, including a Syrian cleric who had previously threatened to unleash suicide bombers in the United States if the American military intervened in his country.When asked by Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-New Mexico) whether she was aware of the threat made by Ahmad Badreddin Hassoun, who was then grand mufti of Syria, Gabbard — President Donald Trump’s nominee for director of national intelligence — answered: “I was not and had not heard that until today.”
But documents reviewed by The Washington Post indicate that Gabbard was aware of Hassoun’s threats soon after she returned from her controversial visit to the country in January 2017.
But hey, she's only in charge of all the intel agencies so what difference does it?
New Topics
-
80 Student protesters take over Columbia University Library.
- Started by MarathonMike
- Replies: 6
-
Unreliable Al jazeera [jihad zeera] promotes fakenews / Pallywood imagery [PallyWeid]- Started by Sayaras
- Replies: 2
-
Frontier agents who mocked passenger were terminated- Started by Quasar44
- Replies: 3
-
FAA announces new air traffic control system in hope of taming busy skies- Started by Crepitus
- Replies: 4
