Gabbard claims ‘coordinated effort’ by intelligence community to advance narrative to impeach Trump

Well, the reasl question is: Will they have the backbone to do something about it.

The infractions were in the Executive branch. That means its up to Trump to put an end to it and up to Congress to put teeth into a law that will jail those who have misused their authority in this way.
Stand for what exactly? Can you articulate why a whistleblower can't report somethimg he didn't personally overhear but somebody told him. Not that that's actually the case but let's for the sake of argument accept that part of the premise.
 
Stand for what exactly? Can you articulate why a whistleblower can't report somethimg he didn't personally overhear but somebody told him. Not that that's actually the case but let's for the sake of argument accept that part of the premise.
What makes you think the whistleblower cannot articulate what happened?

The issue is a false flag ran by the executive against a running candidate for the Presidency.

We know for a fact that the impeachment was based on lies and a carefully manipulated set of information that has proven to be lies. I know you clowns have your own interpreteationh of events, but IDRGAF.
 
"Gabbard claims ‘coordinated effort’ by intelligence community to advance narrative to impeach Trump

Whistleblower admitted on initial form they did not have direct knowledge of Trump's private communications

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released newly declassified testimony that she alleges shows a "coordinated effort" by the intelligence community to "manufacture a conspiracy" used as the basis of President Donald Trump first impeachment.

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Monday released two declassified transcripts from closed-door House Intelligence Committee hearings that Gabbard’s office says show former Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson advanced as credible a whistleblower complaint based on secondhand information from an individual who had previously worked with then-Vice President Joe Biden in Ukraine. Gabbard’s office argued that, based on this and other testimony, Atkinson’s actions "weaponize[d] the whistleblower process and exceed[ed] his statutory jurisdiction."

Atkinson’s investigation helped trigger the first impeachment of Trump by advancing what he deemed a "credible" whistleblower complaint regarding a July 2019 phone call between the president and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy."




They framed Trump with heresay from a Biden man. Can you believe this?
We heard the phone call....
 
I never completely trusted her. She was a young global leader at the WEF/Davos. While it is admirable that she is military, her role was military police. Then she served on the intelligence committee in the house.

It seems to me, she was positioned by the establishment to appear to be fighting the swamp, much like Trump was, yet both were Manchurian swamp creatures.

She also has been a vigorous supporter of the Zionists her whole career with the notorious waffling on her assessments of Iran.



The biggest contributor to her campaigns has been military.



I could be wrong about her. On the plus side, her agency employee Joe Kent resigned in protest over this war.


Da joos

You all are a joke.
 
What makes you think the whistleblower cannot articulate what happened?

The issue is a false flag ran by the executive against a running candidate for the Presidency.

We know for a fact that the impeachment was based on lies and a carefully manipulated set of information that has proven to be lies. I know you clowns have your own interpreteationh of events, but IDRGAF.
Forget about YOU, not the whistleblower but YOU articulating what the problem is.

A better question is can you read well enough to even understand the premise. This OP refers to his first impeachment.
 
Forget about YOU, not the whistleblower but YOU articulating what the problem is.

A better question is can you read well enough to even understand the premise. This OP refers to his first impeachment.
They have no idea what they’re talking about. They just saw a headline which vaguely confirmed their prior notions and that’s good enough.
 
They have no idea what they’re talking about. They just saw a headline which vaguely confirmed their prior notions and that’s good enough.
Yea, it's pretty amazing to see. It's not even a post fact society. It's a post understanding society.

Their claims don't even have to match the premise anymore.
 
Last edited:
Insanity!!

He literally has made everything in the USA better for residents of the USA, and has reordered and is continuing to reorder the world to our benefit.

You beleiving that to be insane tells us everything that we need to know about you.
 
Wow, Mr. B. Way to go!
Attack the messenger.
No concerns over the TREASONOUS BULLSHIT of the demented LEFT?
Oh wait, you've been exhibiting traits that indicate that YOU have slipped towards the sinister side.
How ******* PATHETIC.
:evil:
The folks that rule over us aren't left or right. The whole thing is orchestrated to get this precise reaction from folks like you.


Listen, mark this post. If anyone actually goes to jail or is fined, I'll admit, you are right.
 
Is that in the Constitution or just wishful thinking?
Impeachment can be used for not only breaking the law, but for incompetence.

Every president since Carter and after knew why you don't attack Iran. An attack would be worse than the OPEC embargo as Iran will close the straight and it will destroy the global economy.

There is no way we come out of this better, and Iran will emerge a world power.



. . . on top of all that? Bondi and Trump have violated the Epstein transparency Act by only giving the country a partial release of the files.

Both of them belong in jail.
 
Back
Top Bottom