FUNNY but TRUE!

[Hutch Starskey]

"Notably, none of the [CURRENT]* policies ranked both effective and popular appear likely to have stopped yesterday's grisly shooting."

None of These Popular Gun Control Proposals Would Have Prevented the Parkland Shooting


Universal background checks? Nikolas Cruz—the man charged with the shootings—purchased his AR-15 legally at Sunrise Tactical Supply, according to a law enforcement official who spoke with the Associated Press. A special agent at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives told The New York Times that Cruz passed a federally mandated instant background check, saying, "No laws were violated in the procurement of this weapon."




uhh hello?? that's the whole ******* point. i added the word [CURRENT] above*

if the federal requirement didn't demand INSTANT results, this shooting would have been easily prevented because this kid cruz was a well known psycho who openly made threats...

the federal "system" failed and the NRA symps just shrug and mumble on about mental health. (oh isn't it awful)


this isn't rocket science, people...... CHANGE the federal system and make people WAIT for permits.

GMAFB with the "gun-grabbing" fear mongering already, you ******* dumbo parrots.

Exactly. There needs to be a way to put flags in the background system.

 

[Doc1]

We do already ban weapons of war such as full auto, tanks, etc. The question is, why is an AR-15 more deadly than a shotgun (for instance) and why should they be banned? It is not a weapon of war.

An AR 15 is deadlier than a shotgun because it has a longer effective range, as well as it can fire more ammo downrange than a shotgun before it has to be reloaded.

Originally, the AR 15 came with only a 5 round magazine. Now? You can get them in 30 to 100 round magazines and drums.

Do you TRULY think that someone who desires a larger magazine really couldn't get one because we pass a law?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Just 3% of Americans own more than half the country's guns

These folk need help, or locking up...

Give it your best shot, we'll be waiting.

Give it your best shot, we'll be waiting.

................

I'm glad you're entertained. Just don't make the mistake of thinking I don't mean it.

Just 3% of Americans own more than half the country's guns

These folk need help, or locking up...

Give it your best shot, we'll be waiting.

Give it your best shot, we'll be waiting.

................

I'm glad you're entertained. Just don't make the mistake of thinking I don't mean it.

Oh you mean it all right. You can't help your homo-erotic, hyper macho posturing.
It's been a useful tool to hide your latent tendencies.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I LMAO at this, because it's freakin' TRUE.

That is hands down the worst gun control argument I have seen

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I LMAO at this, because it's freakin' TRUE.

/----/ This is what printing presses were like when the First amendment was written. So TV, Radio or Internet is not included in Freedom of the Press.

View attachment 177763

/ thread

 

[Leo123]

We do already ban weapons of war such as full auto, tanks, etc. The question is, why is an AR-15 more deadly than a shotgun (for instance) and why should they be banned? It is not a weapon of war.

An AR 15 is deadlier than a shotgun because it has a longer effective range, as well as it can fire more ammo downrange than a shotgun before it has to be reloaded.

Originally, the AR 15 came with only a 5 round magazine. Now? You can get them in 30 to 100 round magazines and drums.

Actually most of these shootings were done at close range and, unless I am mistaken, a shotgun fires lots of 'rounds' in one blast. I do think that you have a point about magazine size however I always return to the fact that banning these things will only take them out of the hands of the law abiding which puts them at a disadvantage when facing criminals. I do think that the schools owe it to US to protect our children....Banning guns in schools is not the answer, the answer is arming teachers as well as putting up check points as school entrances. I heard that this school was on several acres and had only 1 security guard. That, IMO, is completely unacceptable.

These shootings (IMO) do not represent a gun problem, they represent a problem with a society breaking free of it's traditional morals and values moorings.

 

[ABikerSailor]

We do already ban weapons of war such as full auto, tanks, etc. The question is, why is an AR-15 more deadly than a shotgun (for instance) and why should they be banned? It is not a weapon of war.

An AR 15 is deadlier than a shotgun because it has a longer effective range, as well as it can fire more ammo downrange than a shotgun before it has to be reloaded.

Originally, the AR 15 came with only a 5 round magazine. Now? You can get them in 30 to 100 round magazines and drums.

Actually most of these shootings were done at close range and, unless I am mistaken, a shotgun fires lots of 'rounds' in one blast. I do think that you have a point about magazine size however I always return to the fact that banning these things will only take them out of the hands of the law abiding which puts them at a disadvantage when facing criminals. I do think that the schools owe it to US to protect our children....Banning guns in schools is not the answer, the answer is arming teachers as well as putting up check points as school entrances. I heard that this school was on several acres and had only 1 security guard. That, IMO, is completely unacceptable.

No, one shell is one round, not the amount of shot (or as some call them, bb's) that the particular round has. And yes, while some shotgun shells fire lots of shot downrange from just one round (birdshot), there are other types of shells that have only 1 slug, usually used for hunting deer.

And, why is it that the gun manufacturers think its a good idea to make 30 to 100 round magazines? The only time you need firepower like that is in time of war.

 

[Doc1]

Just 3% of Americans own more than half the country's guns

These folk need help, or locking up...

Give it your best shot, we'll be waiting.

Give it your best shot, we'll be waiting.

................

I'm glad you're entertained. Just don't make the mistake of thinking I don't mean it.

Just 3% of Americans own more than half the country's guns

These folk need help, or locking up...

Give it your best shot, we'll be waiting.

Give it your best shot, we'll be waiting.

................

I'm glad you're entertained. Just don't make the mistake of thinking I don't mean it.

Oh you mean it all right. You can't help your homo-erotic, hyper macho posturing.
It's been a useful tool to hide your latent tendencies.

Sure thing Goober I've had the displeasure of having to pull the trigger in both a defensive and offensive posture. It's never a good thing. Just thank those who have and move on.

 

[Leo123]

No, one shell is one round, not the amount of shot (or as some call them, bb's) that the particular round has. And yes, while some shotgun shells fire lots of shot downrange from just one round (birdshot), there are other types of shells that have only 1 slug, usually used for hunting deer.

And, why is it that the gun manufacturers think its a good idea to make 30 to 100 round magazines? The only time you need firepower like that is in time of war.

That's why I put 'rounds' in quotes but you know as well as I that a shogun can take down multiple people with just on shell. Look, I am not arguing banning shotguns I was using it as and example. I think your question about large round magazines is a valid one though. I also know that any semi-auto can be 'bumped' even without a bump stock. They never address that either. But, even after all that, criminals and those bent on destruction will always be able to make a plan and IMO what we really need to concentrate on is security in our schools.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Just 3% of Americans own more than half the country's guns

These folk need help, or locking up...

Give it your best shot, we'll be waiting.

Give it your best shot, we'll be waiting.

................

I'm glad you're entertained. Just don't make the mistake of thinking I don't mean it.

Just 3% of Americans own more than half the country's guns

These folk need help, or locking up...

Give it your best shot, we'll be waiting.

Give it your best shot, we'll be waiting.

................

I'm glad you're entertained. Just don't make the mistake of thinking I don't mean it.

Oh you mean it all right. You can't help your homo-erotic, hyper macho posturing.
It's been a useful tool to hide your latent tendencies.

Sure thing Goober I've had the displeasure of having to pull the trigger in both a defensive and offensive posture. It's never a good thing. Just thank those who have and move on.

You cowboy avi types crack me up.

 

[Cellblock2429]

The Second doesn't say guns, it says arms.

Dumb ass

it also says well-regulated militia, dumbass.

which means we get to have both,

dumbass

One is kind of worthless without the other.

you seem to be having trouble reading the clause....

the right was always supposed to be for a well-regulated militia. justices laughed their butts off at the assertion that it was a private right.... until Scalia. who made up this who new means of constitutional construction that didn't exist before him.

/——/ Hey gun grabber, notice the commas? They mean “and” so it reads A well regulated militia AND the right of the people to keep and bear arms. The first does not exclude the second. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

 

[Cellblock2429]

The Second doesn't say guns, it says arms.

Dumb ass

View attachment 177778

/——/ It says bear arms not people arms —— dumbass.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I LMAO at this, because it's freakin' TRUE.

/----/ This is what printing presses were like when the First amendment was written. So TV, Radio or Internet is not included in Freedom of the Press.

View attachment 177763

Back in the day they could own a cannon LOL

Still can....God Bless America.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Just 3% of Americans own more than half the country's guns

These folk need help, or locking up...

Interesting....
Thats about the same % that fought in The War of Independence.

Not that I believe your numbers.

 

[Cellblock2429]

I LMAO at this, because it's freakin' TRUE.

/-----/ Time to teach the gun grabbers some history:
Enter the Girandoni air rifle. The Girandoni air rifle is a repeating rifle capable of firing 22 shots in under a minute without a reload — and Meriwether Lewis’s air gun was one such firearm. Lewis’s rifle was a .46 caliber, magazine-fed repeating gun capable of shooting 22 shots in under a minute. IN 1803
These Guns Dispel The Notion The Founding Fathers Could Never Have Imagined Modern Assault Rifles

Lewis and Clark may have had them with them, but did you know that they were discontinued after only a few years because of all the problems associated with them? And Lewis and Clark only used them for demonstrations.

Girandoni air rifle - Wikipedia

The Girandoni air rifle was in service with the Austrian army from 1780 to around 1815. The advantages of a high rate of fire, no smoke from propellants, and low muzzle report granted it acceptance. It did have problems and was eventually removed from service for several reasons decades after introduction. While the detachable air reservoir was capable of around 30 shots it took nearly 1,500 strokes of a hand pump to fill those reservoirs. Later, a wagon-mounted pump was provided. The reservoirs, made from hammered sheet iron held together with rivets and sealed by brazing, proved very difficult to manufacture using the techniques of the period and were always in short supply.


In addition, the weapon was very delicate and a small break in the reservoir could make it inoperable. Finally, it was very different from any other weapon of the time and any soldier using it needed to be highly trained.


The Lewis and Clark Expedition used the rifle in the demonstrations that they performed for nearly every Native American tribe they encountered on the expedition.[1][2]

/——/ Why are you being so obtuse? The fact they had automatic weapons in their infancy in revolutionary times means they knew we’d have them one day. Libs claim the Founding Fathers had no ideas better rapid fire weapons would ever be created.

 

[Dale Smith]

I LMAO at this, because it's freakin' TRUE.

That was also the only type of gun the colonists had to contend with during the Revolutionary War. The official story of the Las Vegas shooting has fallen apart and the more I learn about the Florida school shooting via eye witness accounts? It's starting to stink as well. When your beloved "gubermint" is so intent on disarming you using fear, you might want to weigh and consider as to what they are planning for their sheeple.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Well, considering that the AR 15 wasn't invented until 1964, and it seems to be the preferred weapon of mass shooters, yeah, I'd say that there is a reason to update the gun regulations.

And..................did you know that the AR 15 originally only had a 5 round magazine? That is a hell of a lot less than the 30 rounds that people nowadays think they have to be able to fire before reloading.

Colt AR-15 - Wikipedia

Colt started selling the semi-automatic version of the M16 rifle as the Colt AR-15 in 1964.[2][3][4] The first mass production version was the Colt AR-15 Sporter, in .223 Remington, with a 20-inch barrel and issued with 5-round magazines.[5] Over the decades, Colt has made many different types of AR-15 rifle and carbine models, including the AR-15, AR-15A2, AR-15A3, AR-15A4, and many other models.


The National Rifle Association, a national gun rights advocacy organization, calls it "America's rifle".[1] AR-15 variants are frequently used in mass shootings in the United States,[1] including in the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, 2012 Aurora shooting, 2015 San Bernardino attack[1] and 2018 Stoneman Douglas High School shooting.[6]

TheHuffingPaintPost laughs at you....
Thousands Of Americans Are Gunned Down Each Year, But Few Die By Assault-Style Rifle | HuffPost

 

[Muhammed]

The Lewis and Clark Expedition used the rifle in the demonstrations that they performed for nearly every Native American tribe they encountered on the expedition.[1][2]

In other words, it saved their lives.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

The Second doesn't say guns, it says arms.

Dumb ass

it also says well-regulated militia, dumbass.

People way smarter than you address the 2nd Amendment.

 

[jillian]

The Second doesn't say guns, it says arms.

Dumb ass

it also says well-regulated militia, dumbass.

People way smarter than you address the 2nd Amendment.

smarter than every justice for 200 years?

I don't think so hon