Fulton County Election Board member Mark Wingate just testified that the Fulton County 2020 election shouldn’t have been certified because ...

[WEATHER53]

Everyone who followed the rules in Pennsylvania had their vote counted. You tried changing the rules after they voted.

Procedure was changed While they were voting because they needed more time for more votes

 

[Billiejeens]

Until they lose in November when their fake votes can't cover the gap for Biden, and they have to resort to burning down cities and looting and murder.

As long as it's blue cities it's a win/win.

 

[Billiejeens]

Nope. The election board changed the rules. The Pennsylvania state constitution states the legislative body is the only entity that can changes election laws. They are elected by the people therefore it’s the people’s will. The election board is appointed not elected.

That has been explained since even before the election.

They don't care/can't comprehend

 

[leftwinger]

I glanced into a Fulton Court hearing about 6 months back? On closed caption? This was all brought out in Court. Fulton County answer was "the machine was down". The Judge said "I understand". Moving on to the next point of order. WTH! That should have ended it right there. 148K in an 11K race. All dumped in late (see the vote spike). I posted it, Stain denied it. Stain suck massive amounts of crank.//

 

[leftwinger]

Tip of the Iceberg: plenty more is out there.

New York
In upstate New York, Marly Hornik, a homeschool mom, teamed up with election and cybersecurity expert Harry Haury, and formed New York Citizens Audit to investigate their state voter roll database.

They released peer-reviewed statistical reports that exposed alarming errors in the data for 2020 and 2022. Among their findings for 2022.
1,467,399 illegal duplicate registrations with 449,856 votes cast.
16,623 votes cast by voters with a blank address.
35,312 more votes counted than voters who voted – an impossibility in a properly conducted election.

 

[leftwinger]

Illinois
USA groups from other states have been completing their analyses – the results are just as alarming as those found in New York. In Illinois, the team found…

Over 300,000 votes from the 2020 election missing or improperly deleted from the Illinois voter data.
Over a four-year period, Illinois population decreased by 150,000, while the voter roll increased by 650,000.
Over 2.5 million people had votes cast prior to their registration dates.

They also conducted an informal study of Illinois voting history with over 1,300 Illinois residents across the state and uncovered over 57% irregularities, including votes cast when the voter did not vote, votes missing when they did vote, voters registered and voting at addresses where they did not live.

 

[leftwinger]

Maryland
On February 27, 2024, United Sovereign Americans joined with Maryland Election Integrity, LLC, in filing a lawsuit in Maryland Federal Court against the Maryland State Board of Elections.

The suit cites multiple federal laws regarding election conduct, including Article 1, Section 2, of the U.S. Constitution, Sections 1 & 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment, the National Voter Registration Act, and the Help America Vote Act.

They allege…

79,392 current apparent registration violations.

1,699 duplicate registrations.

3,366 instances of active registrations without a certified U.S. Post Office mailing address.

5,680 instances of active registrants who moved at least 4 years ago.

605 instances of registrations with no residential address.

296 instances of active registrants with a nonstandard address.

1,218 instances of active registrants who are deceased.

883 instances of “age discrepant registration” (younger than 18 or older than 115).


They seek an injunction forcing the Maryland State Board of Elections to keep accurate voter rolls and enjoining them from certifying any future elections unless voter rolls are updated, registration records are corrected, and the entire voting process is reformed to follow all applicable federal and state laws. They also seek the decertification of the electronic voting system currently in use.

Finally, they ask the court to establish a Special Master to guide the Maryland State Board of Elections, among other things, to ensure changes are implemented prior to the November 2024 election to verify voters are U.S. citizens and the ballot custody process is corrected and auditable.

 

[Marener]

Procedure was changed While they were voting because they needed more time for more votes

Link?

 

[Marener]

Nope. The election board changed the rules. The Pennsylvania state constitution states the legislative body is the only entity that can changes election laws. They are elected by the people therefore it’s the people’s will. The election board is appointed not elected.

Show us where the election board changed the rules

 

[Rawley]

To make them fair.

The Dems sued before the election and won. Republicans tried to change the rules by suing after the election and lost.

Even you should know you can’t change the rules after the election.

The law required signature verification. They didn't know Fulton County was going to violate the law until after the election.

 

[Marener]

The law required signature verification. They didn't know Fulton County was going to violate the law until after the election.

Fulton county performed signature verification on all ballots.

 

[Rawley]

Fulton county performed signature verification on all ballots.

Not according to this Fulton County Election Board member

Do you think he was lying under oath?

 

[Burgermeister]

 

[Marener]

Not according to this Fulton County Election Board member

Do you think he was lying under oath?

Hearsay. Not admissible in court.

 

[Rawley]

Hearsay. Not admissible in court.

Not the question. He testified that Fulton County did not performed the signature verification required by Georgia law.

Do you think he was lying under oath?

 

[Marener]

Not the question. He testified that Fulton County did not performed the signature verification required by Georgia law.

Do you think he was lying under oath?

His testimony is hearsay. Therefore it’s not admissible.

 

[Rawley]

His testimony is hearsay. Therefore it’s not admissible.

OK. You don't want to answer the question. Understood.

 

[Marener]

OK. You don't want to answer the question. Understood.

That is the answer. You just don’t want to accept it.

He doesnt testify to knowing anything. He was “told” they didn’t do verification.

Maybe he was told that. I have no idea

But they did do signature verification.

Did he lie under oath? I don’t know. is he wrong? Absolutely.

It’s all about the details, important if you want to ask a question with a premise thar mirrors reality.

 

[Rawley]

That is the answer. You just don’t want to accept it.

He doesnt testify to knowing anything. He was “told” they didn’t do verification.

Maybe he was told that. I have no idea

But they did do signature verification.

Cite? Third time, this affiant, a Fulton County Election Board member, when asked to certify the election, asked about signature verification of 147K votes and he was told none was done.

Did he lie under oath? I don’t know. is he wrong? Absolutely.

It’s all about the details, important if you want to ask a question with a premise thar mirrors reality.

Nah. You make it quite clear you don't give a flying **** about the integrity of elections as long as your guy wins.

 

[Marener]

he was told none was done.

This is hearsay.

Look it up.

Maybe he was told that. I don’t care.

Its hearsay, not admissible, and ultimately incorrect.

You guys did more to harm election integrity than anyone else. There’s no integrity in the president telling state officials to change the votes for him so he can win.