Fully Vetted Immigrant from Turkey, Huh

[OKTexas]

You bet your ass, foreigners outside the US have no constitutional rights.

But the Congress is has no power to pass a law respecting the establishment of religion.

Banning a particular religion from future immigration, establishes a religion how?

What part of "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" is too complicated for you to understand?

What part of foreigners outside the US have no constitutional protections do you not understand? We decide who we allow to immigrate or visit, no foreigner has a constitutional right to come here.

 

[OKTexas]

Sadly, it's very clear Hussein has completely dismantled the US Immigration System. It's a chaotic nightmare. And Clinton has vowed to continue Hussein's awful policies. So, Trump is the only realistic hope for change.

No she's promising to double down on his policies, she thinks people have a right to come here.

 

[paulitician]

Sadly, it's very clear Hussein has completely dismantled the US Immigration System. It's a chaotic nightmare. And Clinton has vowed to continue Hussein's awful policies. So, Trump is the only realistic hope for change.

No she's promising to double down on his policies, she thinks people have a right to come here.

Oh yeah, it's a very sad mess. Clinton will surely make it worse. Trump's the only shot we have at making a stand against the NWO Globalist Elites. They're intentionally destroying America. They want their New World Order. And they'll do anything to get it.

 

[SwimExpert]

You bet your ass, foreigners outside the US have no constitutional rights.

But the Congress is has no power to pass a law respecting the establishment of religion.

Banning a particular religion from future immigration, establishes a religion how?

What part of "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" is too complicated for you to understand?

What part of foreigners outside the US have no constitutional protections do you not understand? We decide who we allow to immigrate or visit, no foreigner has a constitutional right to come here.

See, this is a perfect example of how lunatic partisan hacks shit on the very principles they allege to hold most dear. The federal government is a government of limited powers. The Congress is bound by the constitution. Congress cannot imply pass laws because any potentially aggrieved party allegedly lacks an avenue for recourse. If the constitution prohibits Congress from passing a certain type of law, then the Congress has no power to pass the ******* law! Period! Jackass!

You are advocating for Congress to make laws as if the only thing that matters is whether someone can stop them. It is logically equivalent to punching someone in the face, then justifying it by saying "What are you going to do about it?" That the aggrieved party lacks recourse does not mean you had a right to punch them in the face. Your entire position imparts upon Congress expansive power, up until the point of being curtailed. Whereas a true conservative understands Congress having no inherent power whatsoever, unless granted by the constitution.

 

[OKTexas]

Sadly, it's very clear Hussein has completely dismantled the US Immigration System. It's a chaotic nightmare. And Clinton has vowed to continue Hussein's awful policies. So, Trump is the only realistic hope for change.

No she's promising to double down on his policies, she thinks people have a right to come here.

Oh yeah, it's a very sad mess. Clinton will surely make it worse. Trump's the only shot we have at making a stand against the NWO Globalist Elites. They're intentionally destroying America. They want their New World Order. And they'll do anything to get it.

No their intent on compromising the societies of all of western civilization. They want chaos so they can be our saviors. Typical regressive mindset.

 

[paulitician]

Turkey, another one of our besties. We should all be ashamed of our Government's close relationships with evil nations like Turkey and Saudi Arabia. It's time to reconsider such 'friendships.'

 

[ClosedCaption]

Yeah, let's let in a hundred thousand Syrians who we can't even contact their government to ask about into America.

What does fully vetted mean?

Figures you wouldn't know.

I figured you wouldnt know

 

[paulitician]

Sadly, it's very clear Hussein has completely dismantled the US Immigration System. It's a chaotic nightmare. And Clinton has vowed to continue Hussein's awful policies. So, Trump is the only realistic hope for change.

No she's promising to double down on his policies, she thinks people have a right to come here.

Oh yeah, it's a very sad mess. Clinton will surely make it worse. Trump's the only shot we have at making a stand against the NWO Globalist Elites. They're intentionally destroying America. They want their New World Order. And they'll do anything to get it.

No their intent on compromising the societies of all of western civilization. They want chaos so they can be our saviors. Typical regressive mindset.

Out of chaotic disorder, comes their New World Order. They have a plan.

 

[OKTexas]

You bet your ass, foreigners outside the US have no constitutional rights.

But the Congress is has no power to pass a law respecting the establishment of religion.

Banning a particular religion from future immigration, establishes a religion how?

What part of "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" is too complicated for you to understand?

What part of foreigners outside the US have no constitutional protections do you not understand? We decide who we allow to immigrate or visit, no foreigner has a constitutional right to come here.

See, this is a perfect example of how lunatic partisan hacks shit on the very principles they allege to hold most dear. The federal government is a government of limited powers. The Congress is bound by the constitution. Congress cannot imply pass laws because any potentially aggrieved party allegedly lacks an avenue for recourse. If the constitution prohibits Congress from passing a certain type of law, then the Congress has no power to pass the ******* law! Period! Jackass!

You are advocating for Congress to make laws as if the only thing that matters is whether someone can stop them. It is logically equivalent to punching someone in the face, then justifying it by saying "What are you going to do about it?" That the aggrieved party lacks recourse does not mean you had a right to punch them in the face. Your entire position imparts upon Congress expansive power, up until the point of being curtailed. Whereas a true conservative understands Congress having no inherent power whatsoever, unless granted by the constitution.

You might try reading Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1, after 1808 congress has the power to set the standards for anyone coming to the country. Those standards can be whatever congress see fit. You don't like it, see Article 5.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Yeah, let's let in a hundred thousand Syrians who we can't even contact their government to ask about into America.

What does fully vetted mean?

Figures you wouldn't know.

I figured you wouldnt know

You're the dufus asking. Moron leftist doesn't even know the basics of immigration.

 

[Weatherman2020]

You bet your ass, foreigners outside the US have no constitutional rights.

But the Congress is has no power to pass a law respecting the establishment of religion.

Banning a particular religion from future immigration, establishes a religion how?

What part of "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" is too complicated for you to understand?

What part of foreigners outside the US have no constitutional protections do you not understand? We decide who we allow to immigrate or visit, no foreigner has a constitutional right to come here.

See, this is a perfect example of how lunatic partisan hacks shit on the very principles they allege to hold most dear. The federal government is a government of limited powers. The Congress is bound by the constitution. Congress cannot imply pass laws because any potentially aggrieved party allegedly lacks an avenue for recourse. If the constitution prohibits Congress from passing a certain type of law, then the Congress has no power to pass the ******* law! Period! Jackass!

You are advocating for Congress to make laws as if the only thing that matters is whether someone can stop them. It is logically equivalent to punching someone in the face, then justifying it by saying "What are you going to do about it?" That the aggrieved party lacks recourse does not mean you had a right to punch them in the face. Your entire position imparts upon Congress expansive power, up until the point of being curtailed. Whereas a true conservative understands Congress having no inherent power whatsoever, unless granted by the constitution.

So there has never been slavery in America, people jailed because of their ethnic heritage or jobs handed out based upon religion? Dumbass.

 

[SwimExpert]

But the Congress is has no power to pass a law respecting the establishment of religion.

Banning a particular religion from future immigration, establishes a religion how?

What part of "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" is too complicated for you to understand?

What part of foreigners outside the US have no constitutional protections do you not understand? We decide who we allow to immigrate or visit, no foreigner has a constitutional right to come here.

See, this is a perfect example of how lunatic partisan hacks shit on the very principles they allege to hold most dear. The federal government is a government of limited powers. The Congress is bound by the constitution. Congress cannot imply pass laws because any potentially aggrieved party allegedly lacks an avenue for recourse. If the constitution prohibits Congress from passing a certain type of law, then the Congress has no power to pass the ******* law! Period! Jackass!

You are advocating for Congress to make laws as if the only thing that matters is whether someone can stop them. It is logically equivalent to punching someone in the face, then justifying it by saying "What are you going to do about it?" That the aggrieved party lacks recourse does not mean you had a right to punch them in the face. Your entire position imparts upon Congress expansive power, up until the point of being curtailed. Whereas a true conservative understands Congress having no inherent power whatsoever, unless granted by the constitution.

So there has never been slavery in America, people jailed because of their ethnic heritage or jobs handed out based upon religion? Dumbass.

 

[SwimExpert]

Those standards can be whatever congress see fit.

But Congress cannot pay any law interfering with the free exercise of religion.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Banning a particular religion from future immigration, establishes a religion how?

What part of "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" is too complicated for you to understand?

What part of foreigners outside the US have no constitutional protections do you not understand? We decide who we allow to immigrate or visit, no foreigner has a constitutional right to come here.

See, this is a perfect example of how lunatic partisan hacks shit on the very principles they allege to hold most dear. The federal government is a government of limited powers. The Congress is bound by the constitution. Congress cannot imply pass laws because any potentially aggrieved party allegedly lacks an avenue for recourse. If the constitution prohibits Congress from passing a certain type of law, then the Congress has no power to pass the ******* law! Period! Jackass!

You are advocating for Congress to make laws as if the only thing that matters is whether someone can stop them. It is logically equivalent to punching someone in the face, then justifying it by saying "What are you going to do about it?" That the aggrieved party lacks recourse does not mean you had a right to punch them in the face. Your entire position imparts upon Congress expansive power, up until the point of being curtailed. Whereas a true conservative understands Congress having no inherent power whatsoever, unless granted by the constitution.

So there has never been slavery in America, people jailed because of their ethnic heritage or jobs handed out based upon religion? Dumbass.

Dufus hates getting called on his bullshit.
America can keep out anyone we chose to.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Yeah, let's let in a hundred thousand Syrians who we can't even contact their government to ask about into America.

What does fully vetted mean?

Figures you wouldn't know.

I figured you wouldnt know

You're the dufus asking. Moron leftist doesn't even know the basics of immigration.

Yes, I'm asking the person who said it. Should I ask someone else who knows what you mean?

 

[SwimExpert]

What part of "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" is too complicated for you to understand?

What part of foreigners outside the US have no constitutional protections do you not understand? We decide who we allow to immigrate or visit, no foreigner has a constitutional right to come here.

See, this is a perfect example of how lunatic partisan hacks shit on the very principles they allege to hold most dear. The federal government is a government of limited powers. The Congress is bound by the constitution. Congress cannot imply pass laws because any potentially aggrieved party allegedly lacks an avenue for recourse. If the constitution prohibits Congress from passing a certain type of law, then the Congress has no power to pass the ******* law! Period! Jackass!

You are advocating for Congress to make laws as if the only thing that matters is whether someone can stop them. It is logically equivalent to punching someone in the face, then justifying it by saying "What are you going to do about it?" That the aggrieved party lacks recourse does not mean you had a right to punch them in the face. Your entire position imparts upon Congress expansive power, up until the point of being curtailed. Whereas a true conservative understands Congress having no inherent power whatsoever, unless granted by the constitution.

So there has never been slavery in America, people jailed because of their ethnic heritage or jobs handed out based upon religion? Dumbass.

Dufus hates getting called on his bullshit.
America can keep out anyone we chose to.

Sure. But Congress can pass no law interfering with the free exercise of religion.

 

[OKTexas]

Those standards can be whatever congress see fit.

But Congress cannot pay any law interfering with the free exercise of religion.

Immigration has nothing to do with how citizens exercise their religion, does it? Why don't you just admit your argument is bullshit and move on?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Those standards can be whatever congress see fit.

But Congress cannot pay any law interfering with the free exercise of religion.

Dufus thinks Muslims can't be Muslims if they can't live in America.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Yeah, let's let in a hundred thousand Syrians who we can't even contact their government to ask about into America.

What does fully vetted mean?

Figures you wouldn't know.

I figured you wouldnt know

You're the dufus asking. Moron leftist doesn't even know the basics of immigration.

Yes, I'm asking the person who said it. Should I ask someone else who knows what you mean?

Go to the video game message board, this is for adults who have at least an 8th grade understanding of civics and politics.

 

[ClosedCaption]

What does fully vetted mean?

Figures you wouldn't know.

I figured you wouldnt know

You're the dufus asking. Moron leftist doesn't even know the basics of immigration.

Yes, I'm asking the person who said it. Should I ask someone else who knows what you mean?

Go to the video game message board, this is for adults who have at least an 8th grade understanding of civics and politics.

Is there someone else you can point me to to explain what a fully vetted person is?