- Thread starter
- #61
What the fuck are you babbling about now? What does the existence, or non existence, of consequences have to do with anything? Do consequences magically prevent people from doing things? If not, what the fuck do you think you are saying?
Next time you think something is too simple for comment take the advice of Abraham Lincoln to keep your fucking mouth shut.
Freedom is not defined by what you can do, it is defined by how you think.
So a slave would only need to think? You should have been around to advise President Lincoln.
Is that what I said?
Didn't think so.
QW, please stop you seem lost in this thread. And vulgarity doesn't help explanation. Try again. Tell me something I am free to do in reality not in that magical sphere you debate in. Name the freedoms you consider important.
And that is what you said, if freedom is defined by thought alone, then all any subjugated person needs is a mind and a thought and they are free. Prisoners by your logic are the freest people in the world as they have lots of time for thought. http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/50799-is-freedom-real.html
.
Last edited: