rupol2000
Gold Member
- Aug 22, 2021
- 18,215
- 2,628
- 138
- Banned
- #1
Should anything be allowed or prohibited?
From the point of view of the right, freedom implies responsibility. If you carry a gun, but you're a stupid blonde, and shot someone's balls by mistake, you'll be shot. In this case, the stupid blonde doesn't need a weapon, she wants to be allowed to have a weapon and not be responsible for the consequences of using it.
A dog breeder is allowed to have a dog, but if he is made to bear responsibility for the fact that his dog kills someone else's child, for example, by being shot for it, then he does not need a dog.
Left fag seduces an inexperienced young man, but is not responsible if it ends in suicide.
The merchant takes a loan, but does not want to pay with his property in case of a failed buisness, he wants to declare himself bankrupt so that the people of the United States pay for it.
An official wants to have a prestigious position and a good salary, but he does not want to be directly responsible for the consequences of his decisions.
The general wants to command the army, but he does not want to be responsible for the death of soldiers because of his mediocre leadership.
Etc.
It is this "freedom" that the left needs.
The right gives freedom but requires responsibility.
The left forces you to choose between irresponsible freedom and prohibition. He does not consider the option of responsible freedom: this is his nightmare.
From the point of view of the right, freedom implies responsibility. If you carry a gun, but you're a stupid blonde, and shot someone's balls by mistake, you'll be shot. In this case, the stupid blonde doesn't need a weapon, she wants to be allowed to have a weapon and not be responsible for the consequences of using it.
A dog breeder is allowed to have a dog, but if he is made to bear responsibility for the fact that his dog kills someone else's child, for example, by being shot for it, then he does not need a dog.
Left fag seduces an inexperienced young man, but is not responsible if it ends in suicide.
The merchant takes a loan, but does not want to pay with his property in case of a failed buisness, he wants to declare himself bankrupt so that the people of the United States pay for it.
An official wants to have a prestigious position and a good salary, but he does not want to be directly responsible for the consequences of his decisions.
The general wants to command the army, but he does not want to be responsible for the death of soldiers because of his mediocre leadership.
Etc.
It is this "freedom" that the left needs.
The right gives freedom but requires responsibility.
The left forces you to choose between irresponsible freedom and prohibition. He does not consider the option of responsible freedom: this is his nightmare.
If you fucking Democrats and Trumpsters understand this simple idea, you will save the USA. And Freedom in the world too
Last edited: