FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights

[danielpalos]

Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!

Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that

However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos

Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!

Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that

However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos

Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.

you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.

 

[danielpalos]

Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!

Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that

However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos

Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.

you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.

You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

 

[freyasman]

Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!

Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that

However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos

Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.

you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.

You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

And what do you think that means, if anything, in regards to personal ownership of arms?

 

[danielpalos]

Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!

Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that

However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos

Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.

you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.

You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

And what do you think that means, if anything, in regards to personal ownership of arms?

We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well!

 

[freyasman]

Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!

Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that

However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos

Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.

you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.

You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

And what do you think that means, if anything, in regards to personal ownership of arms?

We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well!

So you're just rambling then?



Okay.

 

[danielpalos]

Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!

Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that

However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos

Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.

you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.

You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

And what do you think that means, if anything, in regards to personal ownership of arms?

We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well!

So you're just rambling then?



Okay.

I was being literal.

 

[freyasman]

Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!

Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that

However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos

Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.

you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.

You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

And what do you think that means, if anything, in regards to personal ownership of arms?

We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well!

So you're just rambling then?



Okay.

I was being literal.

No, you were being a dick.

 

[danielpalos]

Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!

Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that

However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos

Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.

you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.

You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

And what do you think that means, if anything, in regards to personal ownership of arms?

We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well!

So you're just rambling then?



Okay.

I was being literal.

No, you were being a dick.

You are simply ignorant of the whole concept but still want to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth" simply because you are on the right wing.

 

[freyasman]

Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!

Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that

However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos

Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.

you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.

You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

And what do you think that means, if anything, in regards to personal ownership of arms?

We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well!

So you're just rambling then?



Okay.

I was being literal.

No, you were being a dick.

You are simply ignorant of the whole concept but still want to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth" simply because you are on the right wing.

Not really.

You are just being a dick, is all.

 

[miketx]

There is not a single policy issue bed wetting liberals are correct about, especially when it comes to guns.

All they really gotta do is stop letting violent criminals go free.

 

[miketx]

Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!

Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that

However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos

Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.

you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.

You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

And what do you think that means, if anything, in regards to personal ownership of arms?

We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well!

So you're just rambling then?



Okay.

I was being literal.

No, you were being a dick.

No way, that's part of man!

 

[danielpalos]

Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!

Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that

However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos

Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.

you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.

You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

And what do you think that means, if anything, in regards to personal ownership of arms?

We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well!

So you're just rambling then?



Okay.

I was being literal.

No, you were being a dick.

You are simply ignorant of the whole concept but still want to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth" simply because you are on the right wing.

Not really.

You are just being a dick, is all.

Yes, really. You are being more of a Dick by being so Ignorant yet wanting to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth"; only right wingers do that.

 

[freyasman]

Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!

Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that

However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos

Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.

you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.

You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

And what do you think that means, if anything, in regards to personal ownership of arms?

We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well!

So you're just rambling then?



Okay.

I was being literal.

No, you were being a dick.

You are simply ignorant of the whole concept but still want to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth" simply because you are on the right wing.

Not really.

You are just being a dick, is all.

Yes, really. You are being more of a Dick by being so Ignorant yet wanting to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth"; only right wingers do that.

Excuse me; you're being a rambling dick, I should have said.

 

[danielpalos]

Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!

Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that

However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos

Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.

you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.

You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

And what do you think that means, if anything, in regards to personal ownership of arms?

We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well!

So you're just rambling then?



Okay.

I was being literal.

No, you were being a dick.

You are simply ignorant of the whole concept but still want to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth" simply because you are on the right wing.

Not really.

You are just being a dick, is all.

Yes, really. You are being more of a Dick by being so Ignorant yet wanting to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth"; only right wingers do that.

Excuse me; you're being a rambling dick, I should have said.

Says the guy who understands nothing, and doesn't feel any need whatsoever, to care. How right-wing of you.

 

[freyasman]

Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!

Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that

However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos

Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.

you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.

You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

And what do you think that means, if anything, in regards to personal ownership of arms?

We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well!

So you're just rambling then?



Okay.

I was being literal.

No, you were being a dick.

You are simply ignorant of the whole concept but still want to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth" simply because you are on the right wing.

Not really.

You are just being a dick, is all.

Yes, really. You are being more of a Dick by being so Ignorant yet wanting to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth"; only right wingers do that.

Excuse me; you're being a rambling dick, I should have said.

Says the guy who understands nothing, and doesn't feel any need whatsoever, to care. How right-wing of you.

I understand you, all right.








You're a dick, the end.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

freyasman — Getting drawn into an argument with the troll danielpalos is like competing in the Special Olympics. Even when you win, you're still a retard; if nothing else, just for helping and encouraging him to dilute and derail whatever thread he spreads his nonsense into.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!

Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that

However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos

Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.

you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.

You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

And what do you think that means, if anything, in regards to personal ownership of arms?

We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well!

So you're just rambling then?



Okay.

I was being literal.

No, you were being a dick.

You are simply ignorant of the whole concept but still want to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth" simply because you are on the right wing.

Not really.

You are just being a dick, is all.

Yes, really. You are being more of a Dick by being so Ignorant yet wanting to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth"; only right wingers do that.

Excuse me; you're being a rambling dick, I should have said.

Says the guy who understands nothing, and doesn't feel any need whatsoever, to care. How right-wing of you.

you're a parrot that keeps repeating the same old shit. And really doesn't comprehend what he's repeating

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!

Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that

However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos

Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.

you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.

You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

And what do you think that means, if anything, in regards to personal ownership of arms?

We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well!

So you're just rambling then?



Okay.

yes exactly that

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Gruesome Newsom is pissed!!

Everyone on the Left who does not respect the role of 2A will hate this as well. Newsome will spare no expense to appeal. SCOTUS has already added another 2A case to this term's docket. That question is an appeal against NY state's imposition of frivolous requirements to impede citizens who want to conceal carry.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Translation: the government should only have firearms
Nazi Brownshirts also believed that

However, did you reach that conclusion besides right-wing fantasy?

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

George Mason was right you on the other hand are so far left of the issue you need to stay away maybe go back to making tacos

Says the guy with nothing but fallacy.

you've yet to be right
Why would the founders make sure the right of the people was protected when you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
Your position on this issue shows that you are ignorant on this issue.

You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. The law is clear.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

So you think the government should have only access to firearms?