FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights

[bigrebnc1775]

It means what it says and says what it means. That is how Good of a job our Founding Fathers did at the convention with our federal Constitution.

you keep repeating that but have yet to tell me in your own words what it means
Here's what you have said

"the people are the militia"

"The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia."

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788"

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia."

Here's what George Washington said about armed citizens
"A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well-digested plan is requisite; and their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories as tend to render them independent of others for essential, particularly military, supplies."

It is all unambiguous and clear and supports my reasoning and not yours.

I do not believe you actually know what these quotes you keep repeating actually means Especially when you write something like this
"We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well!"

Your quotes you have no clue about just words you cut and paste
"the people are the militia"

"The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia."

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788"

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia."

 

[Colin norris]

FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights​

BREAKING: FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights

Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the...

www.firearmspolicy.org

4 Jun 2021
SAN DIEGO, CA (June 4, 2021) — Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. The opinion, along with other filings in this case, can be viewed at AssaultWeaponLawsuit.com.

In 2019, FPC developed and filed Miller v. Becerra, a federal Second Amendment challenge to California’s Assault Weapons Control Act (AWCA) ban on common semiautomatic arms with certain characteristics, including those with ammunition magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds. Throughout the lawsuit, FPC argued that the State’s ban prohibits arms that are constitutionally protected, no more lethal than other certain arms that are not banned, and commonly possessed and used for lawful purposes in the vast majority of the United States.
In the opinion, the Court ruled that many categories of firearms California bans as so-called “assault weapons” are protected by the Second Amendment, and that “[t]he Second Amendment stands as a shield from government imposition of that policy.”
~Snip~
“In his order today, Judge Benitez held what millions of Americans already know to be true: Bans on so-called ‘assault weapons’ are unconstitutional and cannot stand,” said FPC President Brandon Combs. “This historic victory for individual liberty is just the beginning, and FPC will continue to aggressively challenge these laws throughout the United States. We look forward to continuing this challenge at the Ninth Circuit and, should it be necessary, the Supreme Court.”

Comment:
These arguments of the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie left ignore the fact that the very rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution for armed citizens, are the very same sections that allow armed cops and soldiers.

How is communism associated with the decision? There's no mention of a communist takeover to justify the weapons.

For what would your average citizen use that weapon for "lawful purposes".?

The guns are to PREVENT a communist takeover.

Duh.

Well, I've used my guns for pest control, killing birds, coyotes, beaver, Antelope, deer, hog, Elk using everything in my collection from 12 gauge, .22 cal, 5.56mm, 6mm, 7.62x39 mm, 30-30 cal and 30.06 including self protection, but I've never shoot a Communist unless it was in Nam and in the bush.
Even then I was using an "Assault Shotgun" in 12 gauge double 00 Buck shot.... gifted to me by a Marine at the Siagon Embassy. But I never used a M-16.
Therefore should all 12 gauge shotguns be banned from civilian use since they were used in battle during WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan and now in Syria.

BFD. The Founders wrote the 2nd to deal with an illegitimate government. The Bill of Rights is 9 limitations on what government can do to the individual, and one final option.

The founders did note do that. At those times for everyone to have th e right to have a gun was basically the country had something to protect itself with.
There was never an intention for illegitimate governments. That favourite catch cry was invented by those who wanted to stock the armoury for ego reasons.

As a Republican, you would have been bellowing about Biden being illegitimate etc. Why haven't you done something about him? No courage of your convictions? You said you have a right under the 2nd to do it so do it. See how good your are against the American military, tough guy.

They also said Obama wasn't even American also. That would have made him illegitimate also but no one fire a shot. The lot of you are all piss and wind.

Well, here's what the Founders had to say about it:

"To disarm the people…s the most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” – Noah Webster

“Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country.” – James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434

“…the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone…” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.” – William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.” – Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…. The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.” – Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention

So now, who should I believe about what the Founding Fathers did and didn't intend? The Founding Fathers themselves, or the anti-gun crying pantywaist on the Internet?

Quoting all those must really stir all your inner patriotism. Hand on heart stuff.
Prancing around like a dog with two dicks. It's a shame it didnt include it's those same guns are responsible for daily mass slaughter. But who cares about that? It's those tyrannical Democrat presidents we must suppress at any cost. Small kids are just collateral damage to maintain our freedom.
Stirring stuff indeed.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights​

BREAKING: FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights

Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the...

www.firearmspolicy.org

4 Jun 2021
SAN DIEGO, CA (June 4, 2021) — Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. The opinion, along with other filings in this case, can be viewed at AssaultWeaponLawsuit.com.

In 2019, FPC developed and filed Miller v. Becerra, a federal Second Amendment challenge to California’s Assault Weapons Control Act (AWCA) ban on common semiautomatic arms with certain characteristics, including those with ammunition magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds. Throughout the lawsuit, FPC argued that the State’s ban prohibits arms that are constitutionally protected, no more lethal than other certain arms that are not banned, and commonly possessed and used for lawful purposes in the vast majority of the United States.
In the opinion, the Court ruled that many categories of firearms California bans as so-called “assault weapons” are protected by the Second Amendment, and that “[t]he Second Amendment stands as a shield from government imposition of that policy.”
~Snip~
“In his order today, Judge Benitez held what millions of Americans already know to be true: Bans on so-called ‘assault weapons’ are unconstitutional and cannot stand,” said FPC President Brandon Combs. “This historic victory for individual liberty is just the beginning, and FPC will continue to aggressively challenge these laws throughout the United States. We look forward to continuing this challenge at the Ninth Circuit and, should it be necessary, the Supreme Court.”

Comment:
These arguments of the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie left ignore the fact that the very rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution for armed citizens, are the very same sections that allow armed cops and soldiers.

How is communism associated with the decision? There's no mention of a communist takeover to justify the weapons.

For what would your average citizen use that weapon for "lawful purposes".?

The guns are to PREVENT a communist takeover.

Duh.

Well, I've used my guns for pest control, killing birds, coyotes, beaver, Antelope, deer, hog, Elk using everything in my collection from 12 gauge, .22 cal, 5.56mm, 6mm, 7.62x39 mm, 30-30 cal and 30.06 including self protection, but I've never shoot a Communist unless it was in Nam and in the bush.
Even then I was using an "Assault Shotgun" in 12 gauge double 00 Buck shot.... gifted to me by a Marine at the Siagon Embassy. But I never used a M-16.
Therefore should all 12 gauge shotguns be banned from civilian use since they were used in battle during WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan and now in Syria.

BFD. The Founders wrote the 2nd to deal with an illegitimate government. The Bill of Rights is 9 limitations on what government can do to the individual, and one final option.

The founders did note do that. At those times for everyone to have th e right to have a gun was basically the country had something to protect itself with.
There was never an intention for illegitimate governments. That favourite catch cry was invented by those who wanted to stock the armoury for ego reasons.

As a Republican, you would have been bellowing about Biden being illegitimate etc. Why haven't you done something about him? No courage of your convictions? You said you have a right under the 2nd to do it so do it. See how good your are against the American military, tough guy.

They also said Obama wasn't even American also. That would have made him illegitimate also but no one fire a shot. The lot of you are all piss and wind.

Well, here's what the Founders had to say about it:

"To disarm the people…s the most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” – Noah Webster

“Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country.” – James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434

“…the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone…” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.” – William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.” – Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…. The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.” – Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention

So now, who should I believe about what the Founding Fathers did and didn't intend? The Founding Fathers themselves, or the anti-gun crying pantywaist on the Internet?

Quoting all those must really stir all your inner patriotism. Hand on heart stuff.
Prancing around like a dog with two dicks. It's a shame it didnt include it's those same guns are responsible for daily mass slaughter. But who cares about that? It's those tyrannical Democrat presidents we must suppress at any cost. Small kids are just collateral damage to maintain our freedom.
Stirring stuff indeed.

dumbass the Virginia Tech shooter used a Glock 19 and a shotgun
the ar 15 is not the weapon of choice for mass shooters pistols are

 

[Colin norris]

FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights​

BREAKING: FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights

Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the...

www.firearmspolicy.org

4 Jun 2021
SAN DIEGO, CA (June 4, 2021) — Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. The opinion, along with other filings in this case, can be viewed at AssaultWeaponLawsuit.com.

In 2019, FPC developed and filed Miller v. Becerra, a federal Second Amendment challenge to California’s Assault Weapons Control Act (AWCA) ban on common semiautomatic arms with certain characteristics, including those with ammunition magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds. Throughout the lawsuit, FPC argued that the State’s ban prohibits arms that are constitutionally protected, no more lethal than other certain arms that are not banned, and commonly possessed and used for lawful purposes in the vast majority of the United States.
In the opinion, the Court ruled that many categories of firearms California bans as so-called “assault weapons” are protected by the Second Amendment, and that “[t]he Second Amendment stands as a shield from government imposition of that policy.”
~Snip~
“In his order today, Judge Benitez held what millions of Americans already know to be true: Bans on so-called ‘assault weapons’ are unconstitutional and cannot stand,” said FPC President Brandon Combs. “This historic victory for individual liberty is just the beginning, and FPC will continue to aggressively challenge these laws throughout the United States. We look forward to continuing this challenge at the Ninth Circuit and, should it be necessary, the Supreme Court.”

Comment:
These arguments of the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie left ignore the fact that the very rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution for armed citizens, are the very same sections that allow armed cops and soldiers.

How is communism associated with the decision? There's no mention of a communist takeover to justify the weapons.

For what would your average citizen use that weapon for "lawful purposes".?

The guns are to PREVENT a communist takeover.

Duh.

Well, I've used my guns for pest control, killing birds, coyotes, beaver, Antelope, deer, hog, Elk using everything in my collection from 12 gauge, .22 cal, 5.56mm, 6mm, 7.62x39 mm, 30-30 cal and 30.06 including self protection, but I've never shoot a Communist unless it was in Nam and in the bush.
Even then I was using an "Assault Shotgun" in 12 gauge double 00 Buck shot.... gifted to me by a Marine at the Siagon Embassy. But I never used a M-16.
Therefore should all 12 gauge shotguns be banned from civilian use since they were used in battle during WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan and now in Syria.

BFD. The Founders wrote the 2nd to deal with an illegitimate government. The Bill of Rights is 9 limitations on what government can do to the individual, and one final option.

The founders did note do that. At those times for everyone to have th e right to have a gun was basically the country had something to protect itself with.
There was never an intention for illegitimate governments. That favourite catch cry was invented by those who wanted to stock the armoury for ego reasons.

As a Republican, you would have been bellowing about Biden being illegitimate etc. Why haven't you done something about him? No courage of your convictions? You said you have a right under the 2nd to do it so do it. See how good your are against the American military, tough guy.

They also said Obama wasn't even American also. That would have made him illegitimate also but no one fire a shot. The lot of you are all piss and wind.

Well, here's what the Founders had to say about it:

"To disarm the people…s the most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” – Noah Webster

“Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country.” – James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434

“…the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone…” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.” – William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.” – Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…. The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.” – Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention

So now, who should I believe about what the Founding Fathers did and didn't intend? The Founding Fathers themselves, or the anti-gun crying pantywaist on the Internet?

Quoting all those must really stir all your inner patriotism. Hand on heart stuff.
Prancing around like a dog with two dicks. It's a shame it didnt include it's those same guns are responsible for daily mass slaughter. But who cares about that? It's those tyrannical Democrat presidents we must suppress at any cost. Small kids are just collateral damage to maintain our freedom.
Stirring stuff indeed.

dumbass the Virginia Tech shooter used a Glock 19 and a shotgun
the ar 15 is not the weapon of choice for mass shooters pistols are

Oh really. Please excuse my ignorance. I thought it was an air rifle.
How dumb are you?
Your obsession with guns has taken you to categorise the type of weapons for a particular task.

Who gives a shit. THEY ARE DEAD and it is a result of a nut like you having a gun.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights​

BREAKING: FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights

Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the...

www.firearmspolicy.org

4 Jun 2021
SAN DIEGO, CA (June 4, 2021) — Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. The opinion, along with other filings in this case, can be viewed at AssaultWeaponLawsuit.com.

In 2019, FPC developed and filed Miller v. Becerra, a federal Second Amendment challenge to California’s Assault Weapons Control Act (AWCA) ban on common semiautomatic arms with certain characteristics, including those with ammunition magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds. Throughout the lawsuit, FPC argued that the State’s ban prohibits arms that are constitutionally protected, no more lethal than other certain arms that are not banned, and commonly possessed and used for lawful purposes in the vast majority of the United States.
In the opinion, the Court ruled that many categories of firearms California bans as so-called “assault weapons” are protected by the Second Amendment, and that “[t]he Second Amendment stands as a shield from government imposition of that policy.”
~Snip~
“In his order today, Judge Benitez held what millions of Americans already know to be true: Bans on so-called ‘assault weapons’ are unconstitutional and cannot stand,” said FPC President Brandon Combs. “This historic victory for individual liberty is just the beginning, and FPC will continue to aggressively challenge these laws throughout the United States. We look forward to continuing this challenge at the Ninth Circuit and, should it be necessary, the Supreme Court.”

Comment:
These arguments of the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie left ignore the fact that the very rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution for armed citizens, are the very same sections that allow armed cops and soldiers.

How is communism associated with the decision? There's no mention of a communist takeover to justify the weapons.

For what would your average citizen use that weapon for "lawful purposes".?

The guns are to PREVENT a communist takeover.

Duh.

Well, I've used my guns for pest control, killing birds, coyotes, beaver, Antelope, deer, hog, Elk using everything in my collection from 12 gauge, .22 cal, 5.56mm, 6mm, 7.62x39 mm, 30-30 cal and 30.06 including self protection, but I've never shoot a Communist unless it was in Nam and in the bush.
Even then I was using an "Assault Shotgun" in 12 gauge double 00 Buck shot.... gifted to me by a Marine at the Siagon Embassy. But I never used a M-16.
Therefore should all 12 gauge shotguns be banned from civilian use since they were used in battle during WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan and now in Syria.

BFD. The Founders wrote the 2nd to deal with an illegitimate government. The Bill of Rights is 9 limitations on what government can do to the individual, and one final option.

The founders did note do that. At those times for everyone to have th e right to have a gun was basically the country had something to protect itself with.
There was never an intention for illegitimate governments. That favourite catch cry was invented by those who wanted to stock the armoury for ego reasons.

As a Republican, you would have been bellowing about Biden being illegitimate etc. Why haven't you done something about him? No courage of your convictions? You said you have a right under the 2nd to do it so do it. See how good your are against the American military, tough guy.

They also said Obama wasn't even American also. That would have made him illegitimate also but no one fire a shot. The lot of you are all piss and wind.

Well, here's what the Founders had to say about it:

"To disarm the people…s the most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” – Noah Webster

“Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country.” – James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434

“…the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone…” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.” – William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.” – Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…. The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.” – Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention

So now, who should I believe about what the Founding Fathers did and didn't intend? The Founding Fathers themselves, or the anti-gun crying pantywaist on the Internet?

Quoting all those must really stir all your inner patriotism. Hand on heart stuff.
Prancing around like a dog with two dicks. It's a shame it didnt include it's those same guns are responsible for daily mass slaughter. But who cares about that? It's those tyrannical Democrat presidents we must suppress at any cost. Small kids are just collateral damage to maintain our freedom.
Stirring stuff indeed.

dumbass the Virginia Tech shooter used a Glock 19 and a shotgun
the ar 15 is not the weapon of choice for mass shooters pistols are

Oh really. Please excuse my ignorance. I thought it was an air rifle.
How dumb are you?
Your obsession with guns has taken you to categorise the type of weapons for a particular task.

Who gives a shit. THEY ARE DEAD and it is a result of a nut like you having a gun.

ok idiot where did I mention an air rifle unless you believe a glock 19 is an air pistol lol
yes you are an idiot

 

[Jarlaxle]

If I don't use a rifle, that doesn't mean that millions of others don't use the rifle...are you really this dumb?

Yes, he is.

Someone I know uses an AR-15 to kill hogs......the ability to follow up is important because they are mean and dangerous.

And tough. I wouldn't use an AR simply because I wouldn't want to try anything less than a full-power .308 to stop a hog.

The store owners who used the AR-15 rifles to keep the democrat party terrrorists in blm and antifa from burning their stores are really glad they had them...

Colin believes they should have let the rioters destroy their stores and murder them.

 

[Jarlaxle]

I remember some specific coverage, back during the 1992 Rodney “Piñata” King riots, from some part of Los Angeles that had been particularly devastated; of a group of neighboring shops in that area owned by Korean immigrants, who were successful in protecting their shops using “assault weapons”, while everything else around them was burned to the ground.

Always remember the Roof Koreans.

 

[Jarlaxle]

What’s interesting is this illustrates the dishonesty and hypocrisy of the inconsistent right with regard to “states’ rights” dogma.

Clearly Benitez is a tyrant in black robes, legislating from the bench, ignoring the will of the people of the State of California.

Just how STUPID do you have to be to squat and squeeze out that jewel?

 

[Colin norris]

FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights​

BREAKING: FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights

Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the...

www.firearmspolicy.org

4 Jun 2021
SAN DIEGO, CA (June 4, 2021) — Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. The opinion, along with other filings in this case, can be viewed at AssaultWeaponLawsuit.com.

In 2019, FPC developed and filed Miller v. Becerra, a federal Second Amendment challenge to California’s Assault Weapons Control Act (AWCA) ban on common semiautomatic arms with certain characteristics, including those with ammunition magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds. Throughout the lawsuit, FPC argued that the State’s ban prohibits arms that are constitutionally protected, no more lethal than other certain arms that are not banned, and commonly possessed and used for lawful purposes in the vast majority of the United States.
In the opinion, the Court ruled that many categories of firearms California bans as so-called “assault weapons” are protected by the Second Amendment, and that “[t]he Second Amendment stands as a shield from government imposition of that policy.”
~Snip~
“In his order today, Judge Benitez held what millions of Americans already know to be true: Bans on so-called ‘assault weapons’ are unconstitutional and cannot stand,” said FPC President Brandon Combs. “This historic victory for individual liberty is just the beginning, and FPC will continue to aggressively challenge these laws throughout the United States. We look forward to continuing this challenge at the Ninth Circuit and, should it be necessary, the Supreme Court.”

Comment:
These arguments of the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie left ignore the fact that the very rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution for armed citizens, are the very same sections that allow armed cops and soldiers.

How is communism associated with the decision? There's no mention of a communist takeover to justify the weapons.

For what would your average citizen use that weapon for "lawful purposes".?

The guns are to PREVENT a communist takeover.

Duh.

Well, I've used my guns for pest control, killing birds, coyotes, beaver, Antelope, deer, hog, Elk using everything in my collection from 12 gauge, .22 cal, 5.56mm, 6mm, 7.62x39 mm, 30-30 cal and 30.06 including self protection, but I've never shoot a Communist unless it was in Nam and in the bush.
Even then I was using an "Assault Shotgun" in 12 gauge double 00 Buck shot.... gifted to me by a Marine at the Siagon Embassy. But I never used a M-16.
Therefore should all 12 gauge shotguns be banned from civilian use since they were used in battle during WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan and now in Syria.

BFD. The Founders wrote the 2nd to deal with an illegitimate government. The Bill of Rights is 9 limitations on what government can do to the individual, and one final option.

The founders did note do that. At those times for everyone to have th e right to have a gun was basically the country had something to protect itself with.
There was never an intention for illegitimate governments. That favourite catch cry was invented by those who wanted to stock the armoury for ego reasons.

As a Republican, you would have been bellowing about Biden being illegitimate etc. Why haven't you done something about him? No courage of your convictions? You said you have a right under the 2nd to do it so do it. See how good your are against the American military, tough guy.

They also said Obama wasn't even American also. That would have made him illegitimate also but no one fire a shot. The lot of you are all piss and wind.

Well, here's what the Founders had to say about it:

"To disarm the people…s the most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” – Noah Webster

“Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country.” – James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434

“…the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone…” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.” – William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.” – Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…. The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.” – Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention

So now, who should I believe about what the Founding Fathers did and didn't intend? The Founding Fathers themselves, or the anti-gun crying pantywaist on the Internet?

Quoting all those must really stir all your inner patriotism. Hand on heart stuff.
Prancing around like a dog with two dicks. It's a shame it didnt include it's those same guns are responsible for daily mass slaughter. But who cares about that? It's those tyrannical Democrat presidents we must suppress at any cost. Small kids are just collateral damage to maintain our freedom.
Stirring stuff indeed.

dumbass the Virginia Tech shooter used a Glock 19 and a shotgun
the ar 15 is not the weapon of choice for mass shooters pistols are

Oh really. Please excuse my ignorance. I thought it was an air rifle.
How dumb are you?
Your obsession with guns has taken you to categorise the type of weapons for a particular task.

Who gives a shit. THEY ARE DEAD and it is a result of a nut like you having a gun.

ok idiot where did I mention an air rifle unless you believe a glock 19 is an air pistol lol
yes you are an idiot

Read it again dumbarse. I never said said. You did.
I was taking the piss out of you and your not smart enough to pick you it. But you smart enough to own a gun. Says it all doesn't it. Spend your money on an education.

 

[Colin norris]

FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights​

BREAKING: FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights

Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the...

www.firearmspolicy.org

4 Jun 2021
SAN DIEGO, CA (June 4, 2021) — Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. The opinion, along with other filings in this case, can be viewed at AssaultWeaponLawsuit.com.

In 2019, FPC developed and filed Miller v. Becerra, a federal Second Amendment challenge to California’s Assault Weapons Control Act (AWCA) ban on common semiautomatic arms with certain characteristics, including those with ammunition magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds. Throughout the lawsuit, FPC argued that the State’s ban prohibits arms that are constitutionally protected, no more lethal than other certain arms that are not banned, and commonly possessed and used for lawful purposes in the vast majority of the United States.
In the opinion, the Court ruled that many categories of firearms California bans as so-called “assault weapons” are protected by the Second Amendment, and that “[t]he Second Amendment stands as a shield from government imposition of that policy.”
~Snip~
“In his order today, Judge Benitez held what millions of Americans already know to be true: Bans on so-called ‘assault weapons’ are unconstitutional and cannot stand,” said FPC President Brandon Combs. “This historic victory for individual liberty is just the beginning, and FPC will continue to aggressively challenge these laws throughout the United States. We look forward to continuing this challenge at the Ninth Circuit and, should it be necessary, the Supreme Court.”

Comment:
These arguments of the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie left ignore the fact that the very rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution for armed citizens, are the very same sections that allow armed cops and soldiers.

How is communism associated with the decision? There's no mention of a communist takeover to justify the weapons.

For what would your average citizen use that weapon for "lawful purposes".?

An AR-15, or just rifles in general?

The AR-15 is a great gun for home defense versus the shotgun.....and it is also used for hunting...it is good for hunting wild hogs....I am told......and it is used in competition by shooters of all ages and both sexes......

It also helps keep the democrat party terrorist groups, blm and antifa, from burning down your store when they are burning and looting black neighborhoods for the democrat party just before elections.......

You have never used it for defense of your home and never will. That's propaganda. How often do you go hinting hogs? Honestly. Very rarely.
Used in a gun club? Possibly.

As for shooting rioters, that stupid kid found himself in jail when he opened fire on people.

So don't give me your pathetic justifications for ownership. The truth is you have guns because you can. You will never use them for defense because you haven't the guts to go out. Where were you when BLM did their thing? Cowering in the shed?

If I don't use a rifle, that doesn't mean that millions of others don't use the rifle...are you really this dumb?

Yes, he is.

Someone I know uses an AR-15 to kill hogs......the ability to follow up is important because they are mean and dangerous.

And tough. I wouldn't use an AR simply because I wouldn't want to try anything less than a full-power .308 to stop a hog.

The store owners who used the AR-15 rifles to keep the democrat party terrrorists in blm and antifa from burning their stores are really glad they had them...

Colin believes they should have let the rioters destroy their stores and murder them.

No he doesn't. He believes republicans should be racist and Christians simultaneously he beli erves idiots should never have guns and the more I witness stupid statements by people like you I feel vindicated. You are exactly the reason they should be banned.

 

[Jarlaxle]

No he doesn't. He believes republicans should be racist and Christians simultaneously he beli erves idiots should never have guns and the more I witness stupid statements by people like you I feel vindicated. You are exactly the reason they should be banned.

That is not even coherent. Try again.

 

[Jarlaxle]

you're a parrot that keeps repeating the same old shit. And really doesn't comprehend what he's repeating

I'm pretty sure he's a bot.

 

[2aguy]

FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights​

BREAKING: FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights

Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the...

www.firearmspolicy.org

4 Jun 2021
SAN DIEGO, CA (June 4, 2021) — Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. The opinion, along with other filings in this case, can be viewed at AssaultWeaponLawsuit.com.

In 2019, FPC developed and filed Miller v. Becerra, a federal Second Amendment challenge to California’s Assault Weapons Control Act (AWCA) ban on common semiautomatic arms with certain characteristics, including those with ammunition magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds. Throughout the lawsuit, FPC argued that the State’s ban prohibits arms that are constitutionally protected, no more lethal than other certain arms that are not banned, and commonly possessed and used for lawful purposes in the vast majority of the United States.
In the opinion, the Court ruled that many categories of firearms California bans as so-called “assault weapons” are protected by the Second Amendment, and that “[t]he Second Amendment stands as a shield from government imposition of that policy.”
~Snip~
“In his order today, Judge Benitez held what millions of Americans already know to be true: Bans on so-called ‘assault weapons’ are unconstitutional and cannot stand,” said FPC President Brandon Combs. “This historic victory for individual liberty is just the beginning, and FPC will continue to aggressively challenge these laws throughout the United States. We look forward to continuing this challenge at the Ninth Circuit and, should it be necessary, the Supreme Court.”

Comment:
These arguments of the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie left ignore the fact that the very rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution for armed citizens, are the very same sections that allow armed cops and soldiers.

How is communism associated with the decision? There's no mention of a communist takeover to justify the weapons.

For what would your average citizen use that weapon for "lawful purposes".?

The guns are to PREVENT a communist takeover.

Duh.

Well, I've used my guns for pest control, killing birds, coyotes, beaver, Antelope, deer, hog, Elk using everything in my collection from 12 gauge, .22 cal, 5.56mm, 6mm, 7.62x39 mm, 30-30 cal and 30.06 including self protection, but I've never shoot a Communist unless it was in Nam and in the bush.
Even then I was using an "Assault Shotgun" in 12 gauge double 00 Buck shot.... gifted to me by a Marine at the Siagon Embassy. But I never used a M-16.
Therefore should all 12 gauge shotguns be banned from civilian use since they were used in battle during WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan and now in Syria.

BFD. The Founders wrote the 2nd to deal with an illegitimate government. The Bill of Rights is 9 limitations on what government can do to the individual, and one final option.

The founders did note do that. At those times for everyone to have th e right to have a gun was basically the country had something to protect itself with.
There was never an intention for illegitimate governments. That favourite catch cry was invented by those who wanted to stock the armoury for ego reasons.

As a Republican, you would have been bellowing about Biden being illegitimate etc. Why haven't you done something about him? No courage of your convictions? You said you have a right under the 2nd to do it so do it. See how good your are against the American military, tough guy.

They also said Obama wasn't even American also. That would have made him illegitimate also but no one fire a shot. The lot of you are all piss and wind.

Well, here's what the Founders had to say about it:

"To disarm the people…s the most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” – Noah Webster

“Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country.” – James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434

“…the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone…” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.” – William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.” – Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…. The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.” – Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention

So now, who should I believe about what the Founding Fathers did and didn't intend? The Founding Fathers themselves, or the anti-gun crying pantywaist on the Internet?

Quoting all those must really stir all your inner patriotism. Hand on heart stuff.
Prancing around like a dog with two dicks. It's a shame it didnt include it's those same guns are responsible for daily mass slaughter. But who cares about that? It's those tyrannical Democrat presidents we must suppress at any cost. Small kids are just collateral damage to maintain our freedom.
Stirring stuff indeed.

Prancing around like a dog with two dicks.


Okay, it is now official...you have become just like the other anti-gun extremists who.....when we discuss guns and self defense, you start to think about the male penis.

What I don't understand is how you shitheads get there. A gun is a tool that good people use for self defense........and then you guys start to breathe heavy, you break into a sweat, and you tremble......and you rub intimate parts of your body....

As I keep telling the other anti-gun extremists who start talking about penises ..... get help. Guns are not sex toys. Guns are nothing to play around with, and before you hurt yourself or someone else....get professional help. Your psycho-sexual wires are crossed and you seem to get sexually stimulated at the mere thought of "guns."

Get help.

 

[2aguy]

FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights​

BREAKING: FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights

Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the...

www.firearmspolicy.org

4 Jun 2021
SAN DIEGO, CA (June 4, 2021) — Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. The opinion, along with other filings in this case, can be viewed at AssaultWeaponLawsuit.com.

In 2019, FPC developed and filed Miller v. Becerra, a federal Second Amendment challenge to California’s Assault Weapons Control Act (AWCA) ban on common semiautomatic arms with certain characteristics, including those with ammunition magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds. Throughout the lawsuit, FPC argued that the State’s ban prohibits arms that are constitutionally protected, no more lethal than other certain arms that are not banned, and commonly possessed and used for lawful purposes in the vast majority of the United States.
In the opinion, the Court ruled that many categories of firearms California bans as so-called “assault weapons” are protected by the Second Amendment, and that “[t]he Second Amendment stands as a shield from government imposition of that policy.”
~Snip~
“In his order today, Judge Benitez held what millions of Americans already know to be true: Bans on so-called ‘assault weapons’ are unconstitutional and cannot stand,” said FPC President Brandon Combs. “This historic victory for individual liberty is just the beginning, and FPC will continue to aggressively challenge these laws throughout the United States. We look forward to continuing this challenge at the Ninth Circuit and, should it be necessary, the Supreme Court.”

Comment:
These arguments of the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie left ignore the fact that the very rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution for armed citizens, are the very same sections that allow armed cops and soldiers.

How is communism associated with the decision? There's no mention of a communist takeover to justify the weapons.

For what would your average citizen use that weapon for "lawful purposes".?

The guns are to PREVENT a communist takeover.

Duh.

Well, I've used my guns for pest control, killing birds, coyotes, beaver, Antelope, deer, hog, Elk using everything in my collection from 12 gauge, .22 cal, 5.56mm, 6mm, 7.62x39 mm, 30-30 cal and 30.06 including self protection, but I've never shoot a Communist unless it was in Nam and in the bush.
Even then I was using an "Assault Shotgun" in 12 gauge double 00 Buck shot.... gifted to me by a Marine at the Siagon Embassy. But I never used a M-16.
Therefore should all 12 gauge shotguns be banned from civilian use since they were used in battle during WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan and now in Syria.

BFD. The Founders wrote the 2nd to deal with an illegitimate government. The Bill of Rights is 9 limitations on what government can do to the individual, and one final option.

The founders did note do that. At those times for everyone to have th e right to have a gun was basically the country had something to protect itself with.
There was never an intention for illegitimate governments. That favourite catch cry was invented by those who wanted to stock the armoury for ego reasons.

As a Republican, you would have been bellowing about Biden being illegitimate etc. Why haven't you done something about him? No courage of your convictions? You said you have a right under the 2nd to do it so do it. See how good your are against the American military, tough guy.

They also said Obama wasn't even American also. That would have made him illegitimate also but no one fire a shot. The lot of you are all piss and wind.

Well, here's what the Founders had to say about it:

"To disarm the people…s the most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” – Noah Webster

“Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country.” – James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434

“…the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone…” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.” – William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.” – Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…. The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.” – Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention

So now, who should I believe about what the Founding Fathers did and didn't intend? The Founding Fathers themselves, or the anti-gun crying pantywaist on the Internet?

Quoting all those must really stir all your inner patriotism. Hand on heart stuff.
Prancing around like a dog with two dicks. It's a shame it didnt include it's those same guns are responsible for daily mass slaughter. But who cares about that? It's those tyrannical Democrat presidents we must suppress at any cost. Small kids are just collateral damage to maintain our freedom.
Stirring stuff indeed.

dumbass the Virginia Tech shooter used a Glock 19 and a shotgun
the ar 15 is not the weapon of choice for mass shooters pistols are

Actually, he used two pistols...he didn't even use a long gun.

Virginia Tech shooting - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Weapons	Glock 19 pistol Walther P22 pistol[4]

 

[westwall]

FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights​

BREAKING: FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights

Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the...

www.firearmspolicy.org

4 Jun 2021
SAN DIEGO, CA (June 4, 2021) — Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. The opinion, along with other filings in this case, can be viewed at AssaultWeaponLawsuit.com.

In 2019, FPC developed and filed Miller v. Becerra, a federal Second Amendment challenge to California’s Assault Weapons Control Act (AWCA) ban on common semiautomatic arms with certain characteristics, including those with ammunition magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds. Throughout the lawsuit, FPC argued that the State’s ban prohibits arms that are constitutionally protected, no more lethal than other certain arms that are not banned, and commonly possessed and used for lawful purposes in the vast majority of the United States.
In the opinion, the Court ruled that many categories of firearms California bans as so-called “assault weapons” are protected by the Second Amendment, and that “[t]he Second Amendment stands as a shield from government imposition of that policy.”
~Snip~
“In his order today, Judge Benitez held what millions of Americans already know to be true: Bans on so-called ‘assault weapons’ are unconstitutional and cannot stand,” said FPC President Brandon Combs. “This historic victory for individual liberty is just the beginning, and FPC will continue to aggressively challenge these laws throughout the United States. We look forward to continuing this challenge at the Ninth Circuit and, should it be necessary, the Supreme Court.”

Comment:
These arguments of the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie left ignore the fact that the very rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution for armed citizens, are the very same sections that allow armed cops and soldiers.

How is communism associated with the decision? There's no mention of a communist takeover to justify the weapons.

For what would your average citizen use that weapon for "lawful purposes".?

The guns are to PREVENT a communist takeover.

Duh.

Well, I've used my guns for pest control, killing birds, coyotes, beaver, Antelope, deer, hog, Elk using everything in my collection from 12 gauge, .22 cal, 5.56mm, 6mm, 7.62x39 mm, 30-30 cal and 30.06 including self protection, but I've never shoot a Communist unless it was in Nam and in the bush.
Even then I was using an "Assault Shotgun" in 12 gauge double 00 Buck shot.... gifted to me by a Marine at the Siagon Embassy. But I never used a M-16.
Therefore should all 12 gauge shotguns be banned from civilian use since they were used in battle during WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan and now in Syria.

BFD. The Founders wrote the 2nd to deal with an illegitimate government. The Bill of Rights is 9 limitations on what government can do to the individual, and one final option.

The founders did note do that. At those times for everyone to have th e right to have a gun was basically the country had something to protect itself with.
There was never an intention for illegitimate governments. That favourite catch cry was invented by those who wanted to stock the armoury for ego reasons.

As a Republican, you would have been bellowing about Biden being illegitimate etc. Why haven't you done something about him? No courage of your convictions? You said you have a right under the 2nd to do it so do it. See how good your are against the American military, tough guy.

They also said Obama wasn't even American also. That would have made him illegitimate also but no one fire a shot. The lot of you are all piss and wind.

Well, here's what the Founders had to say about it:

"To disarm the people…s the most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” – Noah Webster

“Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country.” – James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434

“…the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone…” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.” – William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.” – Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…. The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.” – Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention

So now, who should I believe about what the Founding Fathers did and didn't intend? The Founding Fathers themselves, or the anti-gun crying pantywaist on the Internet?

Quoting all those must really stir all your inner patriotism. Hand on heart stuff.
Prancing around like a dog with two dicks. It's a shame it didnt include it's those same guns are responsible for daily mass slaughter. But who cares about that? It's those tyrannical Democrat presidents we must suppress at any cost. Small kids are just collateral damage to maintain our freedom.
Stirring stuff indeed.

Funny you mention kids but are all in favor of abortions.

Feckless clod.

 

[westwall]

FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights​

BREAKING: FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights

Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the...

www.firearmspolicy.org

4 Jun 2021
SAN DIEGO, CA (June 4, 2021) — Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. The opinion, along with other filings in this case, can be viewed at AssaultWeaponLawsuit.com.

In 2019, FPC developed and filed Miller v. Becerra, a federal Second Amendment challenge to California’s Assault Weapons Control Act (AWCA) ban on common semiautomatic arms with certain characteristics, including those with ammunition magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds. Throughout the lawsuit, FPC argued that the State’s ban prohibits arms that are constitutionally protected, no more lethal than other certain arms that are not banned, and commonly possessed and used for lawful purposes in the vast majority of the United States.
In the opinion, the Court ruled that many categories of firearms California bans as so-called “assault weapons” are protected by the Second Amendment, and that “[t]he Second Amendment stands as a shield from government imposition of that policy.”
~Snip~
“In his order today, Judge Benitez held what millions of Americans already know to be true: Bans on so-called ‘assault weapons’ are unconstitutional and cannot stand,” said FPC President Brandon Combs. “This historic victory for individual liberty is just the beginning, and FPC will continue to aggressively challenge these laws throughout the United States. We look forward to continuing this challenge at the Ninth Circuit and, should it be necessary, the Supreme Court.”

Comment:
These arguments of the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie left ignore the fact that the very rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution for armed citizens, are the very same sections that allow armed cops and soldiers.

How is communism associated with the decision? There's no mention of a communist takeover to justify the weapons.

For what would your average citizen use that weapon for "lawful purposes".?

The guns are to PREVENT a communist takeover.

Duh.

Well, I've used my guns for pest control, killing birds, coyotes, beaver, Antelope, deer, hog, Elk using everything in my collection from 12 gauge, .22 cal, 5.56mm, 6mm, 7.62x39 mm, 30-30 cal and 30.06 including self protection, but I've never shoot a Communist unless it was in Nam and in the bush.
Even then I was using an "Assault Shotgun" in 12 gauge double 00 Buck shot.... gifted to me by a Marine at the Siagon Embassy. But I never used a M-16.
Therefore should all 12 gauge shotguns be banned from civilian use since they were used in battle during WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan and now in Syria.

BFD. The Founders wrote the 2nd to deal with an illegitimate government. The Bill of Rights is 9 limitations on what government can do to the individual, and one final option.

The founders did note do that. At those times for everyone to have th e right to have a gun was basically the country had something to protect itself with.
There was never an intention for illegitimate governments. That favourite catch cry was invented by those who wanted to stock the armoury for ego reasons.

As a Republican, you would have been bellowing about Biden being illegitimate etc. Why haven't you done something about him? No courage of your convictions? You said you have a right under the 2nd to do it so do it. See how good your are against the American military, tough guy.

They also said Obama wasn't even American also. That would have made him illegitimate also but no one fire a shot. The lot of you are all piss and wind.

Well, here's what the Founders had to say about it:

"To disarm the people…s the most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” – Noah Webster

“Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country.” – James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434

“…the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone…” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.” – William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.” – Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…. The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.” – Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention

So now, who should I believe about what the Founding Fathers did and didn't intend? The Founding Fathers themselves, or the anti-gun crying pantywaist on the Internet?

Quoting all those must really stir all your inner patriotism. Hand on heart stuff.
Prancing around like a dog with two dicks. It's a shame it didnt include it's those same guns are responsible for daily mass slaughter. But who cares about that? It's those tyrannical Democrat presidents we must suppress at any cost. Small kids are just collateral damage to maintain our freedom.
Stirring stuff indeed.

dumbass the Virginia Tech shooter used a Glock 19 and a shotgun
the ar 15 is not the weapon of choice for mass shooters pistols are

Oh really. Please excuse my ignorance. I thought it was an air rifle.
How dumb are you?
Your obsession with guns has taken you to categorise the type of weapons for a particular task.

Who gives a shit. THEY ARE DEAD and it is a result of a nut like you having a gun.

No, it is a result of assholes like you, constantly letting violent criminals out of prison, and creating gun free, free fire zones.

You are not just an ignorant clod, but a mental midget as well.

 

[Colin norris]

FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights​

BREAKING: FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights

Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the...

www.firearmspolicy.org

4 Jun 2021
SAN DIEGO, CA (June 4, 2021) — Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. The opinion, along with other filings in this case, can be viewed at AssaultWeaponLawsuit.com.

In 2019, FPC developed and filed Miller v. Becerra, a federal Second Amendment challenge to California’s Assault Weapons Control Act (AWCA) ban on common semiautomatic arms with certain characteristics, including those with ammunition magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds. Throughout the lawsuit, FPC argued that the State’s ban prohibits arms that are constitutionally protected, no more lethal than other certain arms that are not banned, and commonly possessed and used for lawful purposes in the vast majority of the United States.
In the opinion, the Court ruled that many categories of firearms California bans as so-called “assault weapons” are protected by the Second Amendment, and that “[t]he Second Amendment stands as a shield from government imposition of that policy.”
~Snip~
“In his order today, Judge Benitez held what millions of Americans already know to be true: Bans on so-called ‘assault weapons’ are unconstitutional and cannot stand,” said FPC President Brandon Combs. “This historic victory for individual liberty is just the beginning, and FPC will continue to aggressively challenge these laws throughout the United States. We look forward to continuing this challenge at the Ninth Circuit and, should it be necessary, the Supreme Court.”

Comment:
These arguments of the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie left ignore the fact that the very rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution for armed citizens, are the very same sections that allow armed cops and soldiers.

How is communism associated with the decision? There's no mention of a communist takeover to justify the weapons.

For what would your average citizen use that weapon for "lawful purposes".?

The guns are to PREVENT a communist takeover.

Duh.

Well, I've used my guns for pest control, killing birds, coyotes, beaver, Antelope, deer, hog, Elk using everything in my collection from 12 gauge, .22 cal, 5.56mm, 6mm, 7.62x39 mm, 30-30 cal and 30.06 including self protection, but I've never shoot a Communist unless it was in Nam and in the bush.
Even then I was using an "Assault Shotgun" in 12 gauge double 00 Buck shot.... gifted to me by a Marine at the Siagon Embassy. But I never used a M-16.
Therefore should all 12 gauge shotguns be banned from civilian use since they were used in battle during WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan and now in Syria.

BFD. The Founders wrote the 2nd to deal with an illegitimate government. The Bill of Rights is 9 limitations on what government can do to the individual, and one final option.

The founders did note do that. At those times for everyone to have th e right to have a gun was basically the country had something to protect itself with.
There was never an intention for illegitimate governments. That favourite catch cry was invented by those who wanted to stock the armoury for ego reasons.

As a Republican, you would have been bellowing about Biden being illegitimate etc. Why haven't you done something about him? No courage of your convictions? You said you have a right under the 2nd to do it so do it. See how good your are against the American military, tough guy.

They also said Obama wasn't even American also. That would have made him illegitimate also but no one fire a shot. The lot of you are all piss and wind.

Well, here's what the Founders had to say about it:

"To disarm the people…s the most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” – Noah Webster

“Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country.” – James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434

“…the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone…” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.” – William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.” – Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…. The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.” – Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention

So now, who should I believe about what the Founding Fathers did and didn't intend? The Founding Fathers themselves, or the anti-gun crying pantywaist on the Internet?

Quoting all those must really stir all your inner patriotism. Hand on heart stuff.
Prancing around like a dog with two dicks. It's a shame it didnt include it's those same guns are responsible for daily mass slaughter. But who cares about that? It's those tyrannical Democrat presidents we must suppress at any cost. Small kids are just collateral damage to maintain our freedom.
Stirring stuff indeed.

dumbass the Virginia Tech shooter used a Glock 19 and a shotgun
the ar 15 is not the weapon of choice for mass shooters pistols are

Oh really. Please excuse my ignorance. I thought it was an air rifle.
How dumb are you?
Your obsession with guns has taken you to categorise the type of weapons for a particular task.

Who gives a shit. THEY ARE DEAD and it is a result of a nut like you having a gun.

No, it is a result of assholes like you, constantly letting violent criminals out of prison, and creating gun free, free fire zones.

You are not just an ignorant clod, but a mental midget as well.

Firstly, I am not in favour of abortions but I do agree with the democrats allowing women to have control of over their bodies. Until then your filthy religion took their gospel from the bible into the womb without permission from anyone including your hideous god. But lets not dwell on the hypocrisy of Jesus junkies.

How many of the mass murders were committed by released violent criminals?
You don't know?
So its just a cheap shot at democrats and deflect the from the real issue of a gun culture accompanied by the country saturated in the hands of testosterone filled Rambos. All because of your filthy 2nd amendment.

 

[Colin norris]

FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights​

BREAKING: FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights

Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the...

www.firearmspolicy.org

4 Jun 2021
SAN DIEGO, CA (June 4, 2021) — Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. The opinion, along with other filings in this case, can be viewed at AssaultWeaponLawsuit.com.

In 2019, FPC developed and filed Miller v. Becerra, a federal Second Amendment challenge to California’s Assault Weapons Control Act (AWCA) ban on common semiautomatic arms with certain characteristics, including those with ammunition magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds. Throughout the lawsuit, FPC argued that the State’s ban prohibits arms that are constitutionally protected, no more lethal than other certain arms that are not banned, and commonly possessed and used for lawful purposes in the vast majority of the United States.
In the opinion, the Court ruled that many categories of firearms California bans as so-called “assault weapons” are protected by the Second Amendment, and that “[t]he Second Amendment stands as a shield from government imposition of that policy.”
~Snip~
“In his order today, Judge Benitez held what millions of Americans already know to be true: Bans on so-called ‘assault weapons’ are unconstitutional and cannot stand,” said FPC President Brandon Combs. “This historic victory for individual liberty is just the beginning, and FPC will continue to aggressively challenge these laws throughout the United States. We look forward to continuing this challenge at the Ninth Circuit and, should it be necessary, the Supreme Court.”

Comment:
These arguments of the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie left ignore the fact that the very rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution for armed citizens, are the very same sections that allow armed cops and soldiers.

How is communism associated with the decision? There's no mention of a communist takeover to justify the weapons.

For what would your average citizen use that weapon for "lawful purposes".?

The guns are to PREVENT a communist takeover.

Duh.

Well, I've used my guns for pest control, killing birds, coyotes, beaver, Antelope, deer, hog, Elk using everything in my collection from 12 gauge, .22 cal, 5.56mm, 6mm, 7.62x39 mm, 30-30 cal and 30.06 including self protection, but I've never shoot a Communist unless it was in Nam and in the bush.
Even then I was using an "Assault Shotgun" in 12 gauge double 00 Buck shot.... gifted to me by a Marine at the Siagon Embassy. But I never used a M-16.
Therefore should all 12 gauge shotguns be banned from civilian use since they were used in battle during WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan and now in Syria.

BFD. The Founders wrote the 2nd to deal with an illegitimate government. The Bill of Rights is 9 limitations on what government can do to the individual, and one final option.

The founders did note do that. At those times for everyone to have th e right to have a gun was basically the country had something to protect itself with.
There was never an intention for illegitimate governments. That favourite catch cry was invented by those who wanted to stock the armoury for ego reasons.

As a Republican, you would have been bellowing about Biden being illegitimate etc. Why haven't you done something about him? No courage of your convictions? You said you have a right under the 2nd to do it so do it. See how good your are against the American military, tough guy.

They also said Obama wasn't even American also. That would have made him illegitimate also but no one fire a shot. The lot of you are all piss and wind.

Well, here's what the Founders had to say about it:

"To disarm the people…s the most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” – Noah Webster

“Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country.” – James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434

“…the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone…” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.” – William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.” – Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…. The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.” – Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention

So now, who should I believe about what the Founding Fathers did and didn't intend? The Founding Fathers themselves, or the anti-gun crying pantywaist on the Internet?

Quoting all those must really stir all your inner patriotism. Hand on heart stuff.
Prancing around like a dog with two dicks. It's a shame it didnt include it's those same guns are responsible for daily mass slaughter. But who cares about that? It's those tyrannical Democrat presidents we must suppress at any cost. Small kids are just collateral damage to maintain our freedom.
Stirring stuff indeed.

Prancing around like a dog with two dicks.


Okay, it is now official...you have become just like the other anti-gun extremists who.....when we discuss guns and self defense, you start to think about the male penis.

What I don't understand is how you shitheads get there. A gun is a tool that good people use for self defense........and then you guys start to breathe heavy, you break into a sweat, and you tremble......and you rub intimate parts of your body....

As I keep telling the other anti-gun extremists who start talking about penises ..... get help. Guns are not sex toys. Guns are nothing to play around with, and before you hurt yourself or someone else....get professional help. Your psycho-sexual wires are crossed and you seem to get sexually stimulated at the mere thought of "guns."

Get help.

Take your guns away and you guys would shit yourselves when a rooster crows. Most of you compare the power of your guns like who has the biggest dick.

 

[2aguy]

FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights​

BREAKING: FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights

Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the...

www.firearmspolicy.org

4 Jun 2021
SAN DIEGO, CA (June 4, 2021) — Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. The opinion, along with other filings in this case, can be viewed at AssaultWeaponLawsuit.com.

In 2019, FPC developed and filed Miller v. Becerra, a federal Second Amendment challenge to California’s Assault Weapons Control Act (AWCA) ban on common semiautomatic arms with certain characteristics, including those with ammunition magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds. Throughout the lawsuit, FPC argued that the State’s ban prohibits arms that are constitutionally protected, no more lethal than other certain arms that are not banned, and commonly possessed and used for lawful purposes in the vast majority of the United States.
In the opinion, the Court ruled that many categories of firearms California bans as so-called “assault weapons” are protected by the Second Amendment, and that “[t]he Second Amendment stands as a shield from government imposition of that policy.”
~Snip~
“In his order today, Judge Benitez held what millions of Americans already know to be true: Bans on so-called ‘assault weapons’ are unconstitutional and cannot stand,” said FPC President Brandon Combs. “This historic victory for individual liberty is just the beginning, and FPC will continue to aggressively challenge these laws throughout the United States. We look forward to continuing this challenge at the Ninth Circuit and, should it be necessary, the Supreme Court.”

Comment:
These arguments of the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie left ignore the fact that the very rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution for armed citizens, are the very same sections that allow armed cops and soldiers.

How is communism associated with the decision? There's no mention of a communist takeover to justify the weapons.

For what would your average citizen use that weapon for "lawful purposes".?

The guns are to PREVENT a communist takeover.

Duh.

Well, I've used my guns for pest control, killing birds, coyotes, beaver, Antelope, deer, hog, Elk using everything in my collection from 12 gauge, .22 cal, 5.56mm, 6mm, 7.62x39 mm, 30-30 cal and 30.06 including self protection, but I've never shoot a Communist unless it was in Nam and in the bush.
Even then I was using an "Assault Shotgun" in 12 gauge double 00 Buck shot.... gifted to me by a Marine at the Siagon Embassy. But I never used a M-16.
Therefore should all 12 gauge shotguns be banned from civilian use since they were used in battle during WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan and now in Syria.

BFD. The Founders wrote the 2nd to deal with an illegitimate government. The Bill of Rights is 9 limitations on what government can do to the individual, and one final option.

The founders did note do that. At those times for everyone to have th e right to have a gun was basically the country had something to protect itself with.
There was never an intention for illegitimate governments. That favourite catch cry was invented by those who wanted to stock the armoury for ego reasons.

As a Republican, you would have been bellowing about Biden being illegitimate etc. Why haven't you done something about him? No courage of your convictions? You said you have a right under the 2nd to do it so do it. See how good your are against the American military, tough guy.

They also said Obama wasn't even American also. That would have made him illegitimate also but no one fire a shot. The lot of you are all piss and wind.

Well, here's what the Founders had to say about it:

"To disarm the people…s the most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” – Noah Webster

“Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country.” – James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434

“…the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone…” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.” – William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.” – Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…. The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.” – Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention

So now, who should I believe about what the Founding Fathers did and didn't intend? The Founding Fathers themselves, or the anti-gun crying pantywaist on the Internet?

Quoting all those must really stir all your inner patriotism. Hand on heart stuff.
Prancing around like a dog with two dicks. It's a shame it didnt include it's those same guns are responsible for daily mass slaughter. But who cares about that? It's those tyrannical Democrat presidents we must suppress at any cost. Small kids are just collateral damage to maintain our freedom.
Stirring stuff indeed.

Prancing around like a dog with two dicks.


Okay, it is now official...you have become just like the other anti-gun extremists who.....when we discuss guns and self defense, you start to think about the male penis.

What I don't understand is how you shitheads get there. A gun is a tool that good people use for self defense........and then you guys start to breathe heavy, you break into a sweat, and you tremble......and you rub intimate parts of your body....

As I keep telling the other anti-gun extremists who start talking about penises ..... get help. Guns are not sex toys. Guns are nothing to play around with, and before you hurt yourself or someone else....get professional help. Your psycho-sexual wires are crossed and you seem to get sexually stimulated at the mere thought of "guns."

Get help.

Take your guns away and you guys would shit yourselves when a rooster crows. Most of you compare the power of your guns like who has the biggest dick.

Again....the fixation on the penis......

Get help.....soon.

 

[Colin norris]

FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights​

BREAKING: FPC Wins “Assault Weapon” Lawsuit in Historic Victory for Second Amendment Rights

Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the...

www.firearmspolicy.org

4 Jun 2021
SAN DIEGO, CA (June 4, 2021) — Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Judge Roger T. Benitez of the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Miller v. Bonta (previously Miller v. Becerra), holding that California’s tyrannical ban on so-called “assault weapons” is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. The opinion, along with other filings in this case, can be viewed at AssaultWeaponLawsuit.com.

In 2019, FPC developed and filed Miller v. Becerra, a federal Second Amendment challenge to California’s Assault Weapons Control Act (AWCA) ban on common semiautomatic arms with certain characteristics, including those with ammunition magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds. Throughout the lawsuit, FPC argued that the State’s ban prohibits arms that are constitutionally protected, no more lethal than other certain arms that are not banned, and commonly possessed and used for lawful purposes in the vast majority of the United States.
In the opinion, the Court ruled that many categories of firearms California bans as so-called “assault weapons” are protected by the Second Amendment, and that “[t]he Second Amendment stands as a shield from government imposition of that policy.”
~Snip~
“In his order today, Judge Benitez held what millions of Americans already know to be true: Bans on so-called ‘assault weapons’ are unconstitutional and cannot stand,” said FPC President Brandon Combs. “This historic victory for individual liberty is just the beginning, and FPC will continue to aggressively challenge these laws throughout the United States. We look forward to continuing this challenge at the Ninth Circuit and, should it be necessary, the Supreme Court.”

Comment:
These arguments of the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commie left ignore the fact that the very rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution for armed citizens, are the very same sections that allow armed cops and soldiers.

How is communism associated with the decision? There's no mention of a communist takeover to justify the weapons.

For what would your average citizen use that weapon for "lawful purposes".?

The guns are to PREVENT a communist takeover.

Duh.

Well, I've used my guns for pest control, killing birds, coyotes, beaver, Antelope, deer, hog, Elk using everything in my collection from 12 gauge, .22 cal, 5.56mm, 6mm, 7.62x39 mm, 30-30 cal and 30.06 including self protection, but I've never shoot a Communist unless it was in Nam and in the bush.
Even then I was using an "Assault Shotgun" in 12 gauge double 00 Buck shot.... gifted to me by a Marine at the Siagon Embassy. But I never used a M-16.
Therefore should all 12 gauge shotguns be banned from civilian use since they were used in battle during WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan and now in Syria.

BFD. The Founders wrote the 2nd to deal with an illegitimate government. The Bill of Rights is 9 limitations on what government can do to the individual, and one final option.

The founders did note do that. At those times for everyone to have th e right to have a gun was basically the country had something to protect itself with.
There was never an intention for illegitimate governments. That favourite catch cry was invented by those who wanted to stock the armoury for ego reasons.

As a Republican, you would have been bellowing about Biden being illegitimate etc. Why haven't you done something about him? No courage of your convictions? You said you have a right under the 2nd to do it so do it. See how good your are against the American military, tough guy.

They also said Obama wasn't even American also. That would have made him illegitimate also but no one fire a shot. The lot of you are all piss and wind.

Well, here's what the Founders had to say about it:

"To disarm the people…s the most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” – Noah Webster

“Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country.” – James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434

“…the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone…” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46

“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.” – William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.” – Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…. The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.” – Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention

So now, who should I believe about what the Founding Fathers did and didn't intend? The Founding Fathers themselves, or the anti-gun crying pantywaist on the Internet?

Quoting all those must really stir all your inner patriotism. Hand on heart stuff.
Prancing around like a dog with two dicks. It's a shame it didnt include it's those same guns are responsible for daily mass slaughter. But who cares about that? It's those tyrannical Democrat presidents we must suppress at any cost. Small kids are just collateral damage to maintain our freedom.
Stirring stuff indeed.

Prancing around like a dog with two dicks.


Okay, it is now official...you have become just like the other anti-gun extremists who.....when we discuss guns and self defense, you start to think about the male penis.

What I don't understand is how you shitheads get there. A gun is a tool that good people use for self defense........and then you guys start to breathe heavy, you break into a sweat, and you tremble......and you rub intimate parts of your body....

As I keep telling the other anti-gun extremists who start talking about penises ..... get help. Guns are not sex toys. Guns are nothing to play around with, and before you hurt yourself or someone else....get professional help. Your psycho-sexual wires are crossed and you seem to get sexually stimulated at the mere thought of "guns."

Get help.

Take your guns away and you guys would shit yourselves when a rooster crows. Most of you compare the power of your guns like who has the biggest dick.

Again....the fixation on the penis......

Get help.....soon.

You are reacting as I thought.
It comes down to the tough guy image.
Egos and testosterone are a corrosive moisture and mass slaughters proves it.