Your thread title is a lie, shocker there. The fact is Dems rushed vote by mail out the door without the proper safeguards so they could take advantage and cram through God knows how many invalid ballots. If you want vote by mail that's fine but first safeguards must be in place. Then there's the left's blatant RIGGING of the election that's a whole other topic.
My views are similar to
BluesLegend
The people who didn't agree to changes to the election rules involving mass mailin ballots in the millions would agree to
NOTARIZED absentee ballots.
We did not all agree to the election rules,
and lawsuits against mailin ballots are
still pending.
We need to agree on how to pay the costs
of accommodating either notarized ballots or in person voting to meet agreed standards and rules.
Otherwise the volume of mailin ballots
cannot guarantee verification and accuracy
to measure narrow margins in close races
and contested states split roughly 50/50.
Thus, the REAL issue is we didn't agree to the same election rules before rushing to meet and follow the scheduled dates for Election Day, Electoral Votes, and Certification by States and by Congress.
We still need to address election rule changes by Constitutional Convention.
=======
Further Note:
With 70-75 million votes each for both Biden and Trump, that is too many people who do NOT agree to be represented by the other Candidate and Party by majority rule. They only consent to representation
by their own Party by majority rule, due to differences in political beliefs about the role of govt. Such faith based beliefs are the right of individuals and cannot be coerced by govt to comply or change.
Therefore, since we need to address contested election rules anyway, we can also address how to expand the use of Electors to ensure equal and proportional representation by Party. We could then agree to divide Executive Duties and Offices into two independent administrations for "Internal/Domestic/Social programs" that are offered nationally and statewide, but managed locally by democratic free choice, and External/Constitutional govt publicly agreed on by terms specified in the Constitution and Amendments.
Currently both parties believe in funding different roles, limits and purpose of govt.
We need to address that as well, which can be done through a Constitutional conference to agree on objectives to focus on, and a Constitutional Convention to implement the agreed changes.