Because I'm a legal professional and I know the judge won't allow the defence to go off on a snipe hunt about the 2020 election, because the Trial isn't about the 2020 election. It's about the crimes Donald Trump committed.
Remember when Dominion Voting machines sued FOX News, and you got all excited because now you were going to get your hands on all of the software and testing data in Discovery. I posted then that this would not happen. That Discovery would involve FOX New proving where THEIR story came from and whether it was valid. You mocked me then saying Dominion were idiots were launching this suit.
Discovery proved that FOX News had no evidence of the things they said on air, and in fact knew they were lying and said these things anyway. As for Discovery, Dominion didn't have to prove a thing about their machines. They only had to prove FOX knew they were lying, and Discovery proved it.
Jack Smith only has to prove that Donald Trump refused to accept the results of the election and committed he multiple crimes in an effort to overturn the results of that election. What Trump did was illegal. Period. End of story. Whether he won or lost, the fake electors scheme was illegal. January 6th was illegal. Everything Trump did after November 3rd, was in furtherance of his illegal conspiracy to cling to power.
