Fox news analyst tells us he would impeach Trump

[wamose]

Napolitano is a known imbecile. They just put him on air to appease the nincompoop demographic. Fox would be much better without him. He belongs on the View.

An imbecile you couldn't debate. You produce no counter arguments to his, therefore you are the ultimate failure. Congratulations. You said nothing.

Napolitano is a libertarian who believes in open borders, free trade and legalizing all drugs. You must think that's a good thing.

And Trump thinks he's Rocky Balboa because a voice whispered in his head. You cultists better pray that that voice doesn't tell him he's really Meryl Streep

What's wrong with Meryl Streep you liberal bigot? Live and let live.

 

[OKTexas]

There are legal ways to move money around separating families at the border was done under previous administrations nary a word about impeachment enjoy the factual rebuttal.

Nope! Money was not authorized by Congress for military action. And the judge was talking about separating families, not money. You're twisting the argument to be incoherent and confusing.

So what law requires children to be kept with people who are being prosecuted criminally?

.

Most of those people were not being prosecuted for crimes. They were refugees who weren't turning themselves in as criminals, but as refugees. That's not illegal. You are addressing a different issue.

Actually they were, they pressed criminal charges against everyone who crossed illegally. Why are you dodging my first question?

.

No, they weren't criminals. They came to the border as refugees. There is a big difference. And I did answer your question. The discussion is not about children being accompanied by criminals. That is a totally different discussion. No law mandates a separation of children from their parents, even if they are illegal. That is Trump's unconstitutional maneuver.

No difference at all, they crossed illegally, that is a crime. And children can't be housed with suspected criminals. Plus rapid DNA tests proved many were not related to the children.

Still waiting to hear what funds Trump spent that congress didn't appropriate. Come on get with it already.

.

 

[Clipper]

Napolitano is a known imbecile. They just put him on air to appease the nincompoop demographic. Fox would be much better without him. He belongs on the View.

An imbecile you couldn't debate. You produce no counter arguments to his, therefore you are the ultimate failure. Congratulations. You said nothing.

Napolitano is a libertarian who believes in open borders, free trade and legalizing all drugs. You must think that's a good thing.

And Trump thinks he's Rocky Balboa because a voice whispered in his head. You cultists better pray that that voice doesn't tell him he's really Meryl Streep

What's wrong with Meryl Streep you liberal bigot? Live and let live.

What kind of foolish bastard tweets a post of himself as Rocky other then that halfwit president of yours? Truth is we have a crazy person in the W.H. Pay attention.

 

[Clipper]

Nope! Money was not authorized by Congress for military action. And the judge was talking about separating families, not money. You're twisting the argument to be incoherent and confusing.

So what law requires children to be kept with people who are being prosecuted criminally?

.

Most of those people were not being prosecuted for crimes. They were refugees who weren't turning themselves in as criminals, but as refugees. That's not illegal. You are addressing a different issue.

Actually they were, they pressed criminal charges against everyone who crossed illegally. Why are you dodging my first question?

.

No, they weren't criminals. They came to the border as refugees. There is a big difference. And I did answer your question. The discussion is not about children being accompanied by criminals. That is a totally different discussion. No law mandates a separation of children from their parents, even if they are illegal. That is Trump's unconstitutional maneuver.

No difference at all, they crossed illegally, that is a crime. And children can't be housed with suspected criminals. Plus rapid DNA tests proved many were not related to the children.

Still waiting to hear what funds Trump spent that congress didn't appropriate. Come on get with it already.

.

Trump is still waiting for that check from Mexico. He's waiting for that one phone call. It's sad.

 

[OKTexas]

So what law requires children to be kept with people who are being prosecuted criminally?

.

Most of those people were not being prosecuted for crimes. They were refugees who weren't turning themselves in as criminals, but as refugees. That's not illegal. You are addressing a different issue.

Actually they were, they pressed criminal charges against everyone who crossed illegally. Why are you dodging my first question?

.

No, they weren't criminals. They came to the border as refugees. There is a big difference. And I did answer your question. The discussion is not about children being accompanied by criminals. That is a totally different discussion. No law mandates a separation of children from their parents, even if they are illegal. That is Trump's unconstitutional maneuver.

No difference at all, they crossed illegally, that is a crime. And children can't be housed with suspected criminals. Plus rapid DNA tests proved many were not related to the children.

Still waiting to hear what funds Trump spent that congress didn't appropriate. Come on get with it already.

.

Trump is still waiting for that check from Mexico. He's waiting for that one phone call. It's sad.

Not mentioned in the video in the OP, deflection noted.

.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Lets review a couple of his points firing an AG or FBI Director something any President has the legal and constitutional authority to do deploying troops or ordering military action without congressional approval again something that has been done by previous Presidents both Republican and Democrat and yet in all these instances no one ever suggested impeaching a sitting President over them. The following sums up those who suddenly support impeachment over things they never did before.
View attachment 292533

Let's start with money not authorized by Congress and separating families. Both are unconstitutional. Any rebuttals to those facts?

What money?
And barry started the separation of families at the border and I didnt hear any crying from the left.
Why the change of heart?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Lets review a couple of his points firing an AG or FBI Director something any President has the legal and constitutional authority to do deploying troops or ordering military action without congressional approval again something that has been done by previous Presidents both Republican and Democrat and yet in all these instances no one ever suggested impeaching a sitting President over them. The following sums up those who suddenly support impeachment over things they never did before.
View attachment 292533

Let's start with money not authorized by Congress and separating families. Both are unconstitutional. Any rebuttals to those facts?

When you break the law your family doesnt go to jail with you.

 

[Crixus]

If that doesn't tell Republicans how wrong they are about Trump, and how they are fighting the indefensible, then knock yourself out Trump cultists. Because you will pay a heavy price in the end for siding with stupid.

Judge napi? Are you serious?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Napolitano is a known imbecile. They just put him on air to appease the nincompoop demographic. Fox would be much better without him. He belongs on the View.

He begged Trump to put him on the Supreme Court. This is his snit.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Lets review a couple of his points firing an AG or FBI Director something any President has the legal and constitutional authority to do deploying troops or ordering military action without congressional approval again something that has been done by previous Presidents both Republican and Democrat and yet in all these instances no one ever suggested impeaching a sitting President over them. The following sums up those who suddenly support impeachment over things they never did before.
View attachment 292533

Let's start with money not authorized by Congress and separating families. Both are unconstitutional. Any rebuttals to those facts?

What money?
And barry started the separation of families at the border and I didnt hear any crying from the left.
Why the change of heart?

Obama was known as the "deporter n chief" for a reason. Deportations went down substantially under Trump. In fact some call him "soft" on deportations.

 

[Mac-7]

Napolitano is a known imbecile. They just put him on air to appease the nincompoop demographic. Fox would be much better without him. He belongs on the View.

He’s also a blowhard who says outrageous things to get attention

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Lets review a couple of his points firing an AG or FBI Director something any President has the legal and constitutional authority to do deploying troops or ordering military action without congressional approval again something that has been done by previous Presidents both Republican and Democrat and yet in all these instances no one ever suggested impeaching a sitting President over them. The following sums up those who suddenly support impeachment over things they never did before.
View attachment 292533

Let's start with money not authorized by Congress and separating families. Both are unconstitutional. Any rebuttals to those facts?

What money?
And barry started the separation of families at the border and I didnt hear any crying from the left.
Why the change of heart?

Obama was known as the "deporter n chief" for a reason. Deportations went down substantially under Trump. In fact some call him "soft" on deportations.

I dont think we really know whats going on on our southern border.
You cant trust the media to tell the truth thats for sure.
Barry's numbers were inflated because they started counting those turned away at the border as deported.

 

[bripat9643]

If that doesn't tell Republicans how wrong they are about Trump, and how they are fighting the indefensible, then knock yourself out Trump cultists. Because you will pay a heavy price in the end for siding with stupid.

Napolitano is a neverTrump douchebag.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

If that doesn't tell Republicans how wrong they are about Trump, and how they are fighting the indefensible, then knock yourself out Trump cultists. Because you will pay a heavy price in the end for siding with stupid.

Explain this even further by going into great detail on how Republicans that support Trump will pay?

If the Economy is strong and no wars are brewing how will Trump and the GOP pay?

Do you think the average voter in November of 2020 will give a damn about the Ukraine when voting or their pocketbooks?

 

[BWK]

If that doesn't tell Republicans how wrong they are about Trump, and how they are fighting the indefensible, then knock yourself out Trump cultists. Because you will pay a heavy price in the end for siding with stupid.

Explain this even further by going into great detail on how Republicans that support Trump will pay?

If the Economy is strong and no wars are brewing how will Trump and the GOP pay?

Do you think the average voter in November of 2020 will give a damn about the Ukraine when voting or their pocketbooks?

The average voter doesn't support criminals in the WH. Which is why Trump is on the way out.

 

[BWK]

If that doesn't tell Republicans how wrong they are about Trump, and how they are fighting the indefensible, then knock yourself out Trump cultists. Because you will pay a heavy price in the end for siding with stupid.

Napolitano is a neverTrump douchebag.

Oh the retarded arguments that say nothing. Lol!

 

[BWK]

If that doesn't tell Republicans how wrong they are about Trump, and how they are fighting the indefensible, then knock yourself out Trump cultists. Because you will pay a heavy price in the end for siding with stupid.

Judge napi? Are you serious?

Color us with counter arguments proving him wrong.

 

[BWK]

Napolitano is a known imbecile. They just put him on air to appease the nincompoop demographic. Fox would be much better without him. He belongs on the View.

He’s also a blowhard who says outrageous things to get attention

Your inabilities are always welcomed on this board.

 

[BWK]

Napolitano is a known imbecile. They just put him on air to appease the nincompoop demographic. Fox would be much better without him. He belongs on the View.

An imbecile you couldn't debate. You produce no counter arguments to his, therefore you are the ultimate failure. Congratulations. You said nothing.

Napolitano is a libertarian who believes in open borders, free trade and legalizing all drugs. You must think that's a good thing.

And Trump thinks he's Rocky Balboa because a voice whispered in his head. You cultists better pray that that voice doesn't tell him he's really Meryl Streep

What's wrong with Meryl Streep you liberal bigot? Live and let live.

What kind of foolish bastard tweets a post of himself as Rocky other then that halfwit president of yours? Truth is we have a crazy person in the W.H. Pay attention.

He really is insane.

 

[BWK]

Nope! Money was not authorized by Congress for military action. And the judge was talking about separating families, not money. You're twisting the argument to be incoherent and confusing.

So what law requires children to be kept with people who are being prosecuted criminally?

.

Most of those people were not being prosecuted for crimes. They were refugees who weren't turning themselves in as criminals, but as refugees. That's not illegal. You are addressing a different issue.

Actually they were, they pressed criminal charges against everyone who crossed illegally. Why are you dodging my first question?

.

No, they weren't criminals. They came to the border as refugees. There is a big difference. And I did answer your question. The discussion is not about children being accompanied by criminals. That is a totally different discussion. No law mandates a separation of children from their parents, even if they are illegal. That is Trump's unconstitutional maneuver.

No difference at all, they crossed illegally, that is a crime. And children can't be housed with suspected criminals. Plus rapid DNA tests proved many were not related to the children.

Still waiting to hear what funds Trump spent that congress didn't appropriate. Come on get with it already.

.

Trump Pulls $3.6 Billion From Pentagon Budget to Build Border Wall