Fossil Fuel's War to Delay Action on Global Warming

[Dagosa]

Translation = DAG just PARROTED a FUDGE CHART and CANNOT DEFEND how it was constructed, which is


1. lying about URBAN HEAT ISLAND EFFECT
2. FUDGING all other temp data


Your "theory" is that increasing atmospheric Co2 causes atmospheric warming. Let's go over the two methods here, science and "climate science."


Science = highly correlated satellite and balloon data shows NO WARMING in the atmosphere during three decades of rising Co2

THEORY REJECTED

"climate science" = fudge both satellite and balloon data to show "warming" that DOES NOT EXIST and blame Co2 for it

Prove it…..show a temp chart from ANY climate source for the last one to two thousand years. Go for it math illiterates.

 

[EMH]

Prove it…..show a temp chart from ANY climate source for the last one to two thousand years. Go for it math illiterates.

Once again, the BEAKED BIRDBRAIN relies on fudged "charts" that he has no idea how they were constructed. In reality, before we start a CHART, we must first have DATA, and THIS is THE ONLY DATA WE NEED to REJECT the CO2 FRAUD...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling


Translation - for more than three straight decades during a period of rising Co2, the TWO and ONLY TWO MEASURES we have of ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE, satellites and balloons, both showed NO WARMING


There is NO REASON to PAY ANY FURTHER ATTENTION TO the Co2 FRAUD, since the above 100% REFUTES IT

 

[Dagosa]

Once again, the BEAKED BIRDBRAIN relies on fudged "charts" that he has no idea how they were constructed. In reality, before we start a CHART, we must first have DATA, and THIS is THE ONLY DATA WE NEED to REJECT the CO2 FRAUD...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling


Translation - for more than three straight decades during a period of rising Co2, the TWO and ONLY TWO MEASURES we have of ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE, satellites and balloons, both showed NO WARMING


There is NO REASON to PAY ANY FURTHER ATTENTION TO the Co2 FRAUD, since the above 100% REFUTES IT

That’s a hilarious reference you didn’t even read did you…
You idiots keep using it for some stupid reason…and it supports AGW.

 

[EMH]

That’s a hilarious reference you didn’t even read did you…
You idiots keep using it for some stupid reason…and it supports AGW.

What that article documents is the FUDGING PROCESS that is "climate science."

The DATA showed NO WARMING.

That did not follow the politicized narrative, so the data was FUDGED and the FUDGE JOB here is completely laughable.

Orbit wobble - wouldn't change the satellite readings at all

Shade "issues" that were constant with the balloons - might justify a one time "correction" to ALL DATA which would keep a FLAT LINE a FLAT LINE, but somehow the FUDGE JOB for a CONSTANT changed a FLAT LINE into an upward slope. Only those with IQ under 5 would fall for such bullshit...


DATA MATTERS

FUDGE is FRAUD

 

[Dagosa]

What that article documents is the FUDGING PROCESS that is "climate science."

The DATA showed NO WARMING.

That did not follow the politicized narrative, so the data was FUDGED and the FUDGE JOB here is completely laughable.

Orbit wobble - wouldn't change the satellite readings at all

Shade "issues" that were constant with the balloons - might justify a one time "correction" to ALL DATA which would keep a FLAT LINE a FLAT LINE, but somehow the FUDGE JOB for a CONSTANT changed a FLAT LINE into an upward slope. Only those with IQ under 5 would fall for such bullshit...


DATA MATTERS

FUDGE is FRAUD

Dufus….
READ THE ARTICLE…. THE DENIERS FUDGED THE DATA STUPID.

 

[EMH]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Can anyone possibly be THIS STUPID!!!!!

 

[Dagosa]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Can anyone possibly be THIS STUPID!!!!!

You are idiot….the deniers used the data and fudged it for your dishonesty. Science explained why they were different.
and why satellite readings are more accurate than those taken on earth and in the shade, dufus.
Science has explained the difference in the 70 readings then and now..but you bozos still fudged it…

 

[Dagosa]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Can anyone possibly be THIS STUPID!!!!!

You are..you can’t even read the title or the explanation…dufus.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

THE DENIERS FUDGED THE DATA STUPID.

You are plagiarizing the "deniers" argument genius...

 

[Dagosa]

You are plagiarizing the "deniers" argument genius...

Yup. The differences in the data was explained. One set in shade, the other satellite data. Its fudging bubba to claim they are compatible. It’s the deniers who are wrong …..your inability to actually read the entire article is amazingly ignorant.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Yup. The differences in the data was explained. One set in shade, the other satellite data. Its fudging bubba to claim they are compatible. It’s the deniers who are wrong

who cares

…..your inability to actually read the entire article is amazingly ignorant.

it is difficult to understand how some forms of ignorance are "amazing" to the socially educated.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

You are plagiarizing the "deniers" argument genius...

Yup.

I guess kudos for honesty are in order here.

 

[Dagosa]

who cares

it is difficult to understand how some forms of ignorance are "amazing" to the socially educated.

So you’re not a reader or science person ?

 

[Dagosa]

who cares

Obviously you don’t.

 

[Dagosa]

who cares

it is difficult to understand how some forms of ignorance are "amazing" to the socially educated.

Socially educated ? There’s a lap full of woo woo.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Socially educated ? There’s a lap full of woo woo.

Are you pretending you do not have a social education?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Why no same person listens to the AGWCult hysterics

Is the Sun causing global warming?.

This is NASA's answer, taken over by the insane AGWCult. Turned NASA into an AGWCult HQ. It needs to be sold to Elon Musk, it's a waste of time, effort and money and lies about everything

"Is the Sun causing global warming?

No. The Sun can influence Earth's climate, but it isn't responsible for the warming trend we've seen over recent decades."

Seriously?

Never
A
Straight
Answer

 

[CrusaderFrank]

AGWCult: The Sun has no effect, Earth's shifting magnetic field has no effect, it's all CO2, and only American CO2

 

[Dagosa]

Are you pretending you do not have a social education?

It sounds like a cop out phrase. Your ” social education “ is standardized. Don’t pretend it is.

 

[EMH]

Why no same person listens to the AGWCult hysterics

Is the Sun causing global warming?.

This is NASA's answer, taken over by the insane AGWCult. Turned NASA into an AGWCult HQ. It needs to be sold to Elon Musk, it's a waste of time, effort and money and lies about everything

"Is the Sun causing global warming?

No. The Sun can influence Earth's climate, but it isn't responsible for the warming trend we've seen over recent decades."

Seriously?

Never
A
Straight
Answer

The only "warming trend" is from Urban Heat Island Effect.

Otherwise, the data still reads precisely

NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE
NO WARMING in the OCEANS
NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT
NO BREAKOUT in CANES
NO OCEAN RISE