- Thread starter
- #21
Yea, Ok, you win.
In ten years we can shut down oil drilling, production, and refineries.
We're not going to shut down production or refining. We're just going to stop burning oil.
One brainwashed righty down, millions to go!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yea, Ok, you win.
In ten years we can shut down oil drilling, production, and refineries.
Where did you get the idea I am a righty??We're not going to shut down production or refining. We're just going to stop burning oil.
One brainwashed righty down, millions to go!
Where did you get the idea I am a righty??
You really are quite full of yourself Whosa.
Brain washed about what?My apology, you're not a righty, just brainwashed.
About how difficult it is to stop using fossil fuels.
Apparently it ain't all that hard if we can do it in 10 years as you claim.
Very naive OP
Factorys and industries need massive amounts of fossil fuels to operate.
So does our military

bingo
Okay, so how does that mean they can't be converted?
Yes, but not with out a massive amount of Money being spent, and NOT in 10 years. More like 30 or 40 years if you ask me.
30 or 40 years if we keep electing Republicans.
About how difficult it is to stop using fossil fuels.
This is a classic example of why clean energy has failed.
People either do not support clean energy, or they do support clean energy but they overestimate their own wisdom and consequently micro manage the solution to death.
How to solve the problem: create incentives for clean energy, and remove incentives for dirty energy. Then, let people innovate. Sit back and watch a spectacular show.
Examples of current barriers to clean energy:
Example 1) Fossil fuel energy is not required to pay collateral costs, while clean energy is. Coal plants are free of any responsibility for the pollution they produce the minute it leaves the exhaust stack, but a nuclear power producer is liable for the nuclear fuel indefinitely. Petroleum production/imports pay no tax and suffer virtually zero regulation, but bio ethanol production/imports are required to pay crippling import taxes, are subject to draconian import quota, and are often regulated by multiple federal and state agencies.
Example 2) Infrastructure for fossil fuel use is partly tax payer funded, while infrastructure for more economically friendly alternatives enjoys no subsidies. The gasoline tax (25 cents per gallon or so) pays for only a small fraction of upkeep costs for our roads, with taxpayers footing the rest of the bill. Alternatives such as light rail enjoy no such subsidies.
This is madness. Ecologically friendly solutions will arise on their own accord if government takes its enormous heel off of them.
The oil lobbyists and their Republican allies do not want fuel conservation or alternative energy.
It is up to the American people to move in that direction and screw Big Oil.
Thoughtful post.
Two observations: if outsourcing continues we won't have to worry about an industrial base, and why not use synthetic lubricants, my wife's new car requires it.
It is curious to me the irony and outright silliness of the wingnuts in issues of energy and business (markets), they want to drill all over America to gain a minuscule amount of oil that will only enter the same market that has pushed prices too high. Their argument is the money will stay here. But then they argue for outsourcing and a global economy in which most everything is made over there. They worship walmart, China's biggest ally and buy stuff made everywhere but here because it cost too much to earn a decent living. Boggles my mind on a daily basis.