Former Top DOJ Official Blows Up Jack Smith’s Case Against President Trump With One Tweet –Notices Key Item on Third Page of the Federal Indictment

[MAGA Macho Man]

Combine this plus the editing out several of Trump's words from the recorded call in the transcript in the Indictment, this should be grounds for dismissal.

Read this.

Former Top Department of Justice Official Blows Up Jack Smith's Case Against President Trump With One Tweet - Notices Key Item on Third Page of the Federal Indictment That Is "Grounds for Granting a Motion" to Dismiss | The Gateway Pundit | by Cullen

A former top Department of Justice official completely blew up Special Counsel Jack Smith’s inquisition against President Trump with one simple tweet on Friday.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[JGalt]

"We got him this time for sure..."

"No, you don't."

"We got him this time for sure..."

"No, you don't."

"We got him this time for sure..."

"No, you don't."

"We got him this time for sure..."

"No, you don't."

"We got him this time for sure..."

"No, you don't."

"We got him this time for sure..."

"No, you don't."

"We got him this time for sure..."

"No, you don't."

"We got him this time for sure..."

"No, you don't."

"We got him this time for sure..."

"No, you don't."

"We got him this time for sure..."

"No, you don't."

 

[JWBooth]

And you think they’ll let that stop them?

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Combine this plus the editing out several of Trump's words from the recorded call in the transcript in the Indictment, this should be grounds for dismissal.

Read this.

Former Top Department of Justice Official Blows Up Jack Smith's Case Against President Trump With One Tweet - Notices Key Item on Third Page of the Federal Indictment That Is "Grounds for Granting a Motion" to Dismiss | The Gateway Pundit | by Cullen

A former top Department of Justice official completely blew up Special Counsel Jack Smith’s inquisition against President Trump with one simple tweet on Friday.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Y-A-W-N. Arraignment..on Tuesday.

 

[okfine]

Three words... We Got Him

 

[Lesh]

Apparently nothing has been “blown up”

 

[okfine]

Apparently nothing has been “blown up”

Three more words... Making Up Excuses

 

[bodecea]

Combine this plus the editing out several of Trump's words from the recorded call in the transcript in the Indictment, this should be grounds for dismissal.

Read this.

Former Top Department of Justice Official Blows Up Jack Smith's Case Against President Trump With One Tweet - Notices Key Item on Third Page of the Federal Indictment That Is "Grounds for Granting a Motion" to Dismiss | The Gateway Pundit | by Cullen

A former top Department of Justice official completely blew up Special Counsel Jack Smith’s inquisition against President Trump with one simple tweet on Friday.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

The Gateway Pundit.....is it payday for you?

 

[bodecea]

Three words... We Got Him

Two cases with indictments.............so far.

One case where jury found him to be a sexual abuser.


Got him.

 

[okfine]

The Gateway Pundit.....is it payday for you?

Notifications set.

 

[jc456]

Apparently nothing has been “blown up”

Your brains were destroyed sometime ago

 

[Doc7505]

And you think they’ll let that stop them?

~~~~~~
Maoist Marxist Democrats have tried many times to stop Trump. If this fails, their next move is assassination.

 

[Lesh]

~~~~~~
Maoist Marxist Democrats have tried many times to stop Trump. If this fails, their next move is assassination.

Fucking nutjob claim

 

[BluesLegend]

~~~~~~
Maoist Marxist Democrats have tried many times to stop Trump. If this fails, their next move is assassination.

This is classic Dem gutter politics. Fabricate shit, have their MSM blast out the narrative 24/7 and if it falls short of causing the candidate to drop out it will at a minimum do some damage.

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

Apparently nothing has been “blown up”

Combine this plus the editing out several of Trump's words from the recorded call in the transcript in the Indictment, this should be grounds for dismissal.

Read this.

Former Top Department of Justice Official Blows Up Jack Smith's Case Against President Trump With One Tweet - Notices Key Item on Third Page of the Federal Indictment That Is "Grounds for Granting a Motion" to Dismiss | The Gateway Pundit | by Cullen

A former top Department of Justice official completely blew up Special Counsel Jack Smith’s inquisition against President Trump with one simple tweet on Friday.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Well what do you know?

The DOJ "candidly acknowledged the unfortunate existence of leaks to the press" in Judge Cannon's footnotes of the original Order!

The footnotes are the most enlightening part of the Order. Some of them are extraordinary in smacking down the FBI/DOJ/ZOMBIEREGIME and laying miles of groundwork for what may be an abrupt Order of Dismissal:

• Page 4, note 2:" Based on the Detailed Property Inventory, of the approximately 11,000 documents seized, roughly 100 contain classification markings[ECF No. 39-1 pp. 2–8]."
  
  
• Page 10, note 1: "When asked about the dissemination to the media of information relative to the contents of the seized records, Government’s counsel stated that he had no knowledge of any leaks stemming from his team but candidly acknowledged the unfortunate existence of leaks to the press."
  

Case dismissed! Impeach Garland.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

It's already been said that there are no smoking guns in the evidence.
If thats the case this bullshit is over before it even gets started.

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

It's already been said that there are no smoking guns in the evidence.
If thats the case this bullshit is over before it even gets started.

Let's hope

 

[Lesh]

I really doubt this is gonna play out the way you MAGAturds are claiming

 

[BackAgain]

Three words... We Got Him

Three letters. L. O. L.

I guess that could be considered just two letters and one repeats.

 

[Marener]

According to Jeffrey Clark, who was the lone loser in the DoJ that was willing to support Trump’s election fraud claims.

He isn’t a top official. He’s an assistant AG for environmental law, working in civil suits.

His expertise in national security cases is zilch.

Jack Smith is a top official, literally was prosecuting war criminals and mob bosses.

These two aren’t comparable.