Telling of what? The video shows Brown leaving with his dope in his hand when he first went in there early in the morning. So when he went back later in the day, the store did not have his dope, therefore he stole the cigars. When the owner approached him to get the cigars back, Brown threatened him.
I have to ask: If there was some kind of agreement between Brown and the clerk to exchange dope for cigars then why did they not complete the transaction? Why did Brown leave the store with his dope in hand and without the cigars or even the two sodas he had grabbed out of the cooler?
Maybe he thought he could come back later for them, AFTER he gave his friends the dope. Gee, I mean, it would have been nice if the DA had actually BOTHERED To call these guys and ask serious questions about what actually went down, and what their relationship with Brown was. But look, he lightly shoved Apu and if we play that in slow motion, it looks really sinister.
The Jews weren't attacking police officers. Not until later, anyway. Nice try.
The police followed their training. The Gestapo followed their training. Same thing.
You're saying employers don't pay employees and you've said it twice now. How stupid is that?
I can't be responsible for your lack of reading comprehension skills. Employees don't pay into Unemployment, employers do. Any REASONABLE person would understand that was my meaning, but you are about the most obtuse **** I've ever met. Do you do special exercises to be this stupid?
I still don't see what employers and bosses behaving like shit during the pandemic has to do with Trump.
Everything. You see, here's the thing. Democrats are for workers and consumers. Republicans are for businesses and investors. Clearly, when you have a pro-business president, you KNOW you can get away with the shitty behavior.
Look at the whining that is going on. Businesses are whining that people aren't willing to risk their lives for crappy salaries, as long as people can collect enhanced unemployment for another couple of weeks. Republicans solution, don't give them better salaries, slash their benefits.
So, blame the company because one of their douchebag employees chose to break the law?
Naw, I blame the company for creating an atmosphere where people thought that was okay. They made this guy a shift supervisor. He promptly thanked them by driving in his car on saturday and loading up on product.
Unarmed black children, no. Potentially armed black adults who attack police officers for being asked to get on the sidewalk and then move towards the officer in a threatening manner, yes.
We know you are invested in the murder of this black child.
There's no way you can spin this to get beyond the fact that Brown made horrible choices that day. He was not a child, he was an adult. His losing his sandals is irrelevant because he attacked the officer while wearing them and losing them didn't render him suddenly not violent or dangerous.
We know you are invested in the murder of this black child.
So who's responsible for Joe Smith's finances? Who's responsible for telling Joe that he really can't afford the house? How ******* stupid do you have to be to buy a three hundred thousand dollar home when your income and finances will only support a hundred thousand dollar home?
Again, the banks are the ones who should have shut that down, and they didn't. They were happy to milk Joe Smith for every penny they could get out of him, then foreclose and sell that same house to the next sucker. Then take those mortgages, misrepresent their value and sell them as investments. And it all went fine until the bubble burst.
Then we have to rush out and do a big old bailout the taxpayers will be paying for until they are dead, while these same cocksuckers who caused this paid themselves eight figure bonuses
Seriously, man, we need to break out the ******* guillotine.
Jesus Christ, do you EVER hold individuals responsible for their own actions or do you always find a way to blame cops and rich people for others making mistakes?
I expect the banks and the cops to be more responsible, because - get this- WE GAVE THEM THE RESPONSIBILITY.
I mean, if you want to hold people equally responsible, let's remove qualified immunity from cops so they can be personally sued for wrongful deaths, and let's get rid of FDIC and FSLIC so that banks will be responsible for their own bad investments. If we give someone authority and give them protection for the decisions they make, then YES< I want them held to a higher standard than some kid who jaywalked or some dipstick who watched a house flipping show on HGTV and thought he could get rich quick.
I don't blame him for wanting a better house, I blame him for buying a house he can't afford.
**** man, it's not rocket science, it's simple mathematics.
If the math were simple, then the banks should have known, "Your salary won't support this house."
So do I. Problem is, in your obsessive hatred of rich people you willfully overlook the consumer's personal responsibilities.
Not at all. Again, we socialize risk and we capitalize profits. I WISH we were holding the rich responsible.
Where was the bailout for the people who lost their jobs and homes in 2008 recession? I live out here in McMansion land, and I was a census enumerator in 2010... a lot of those people lost their homes, but the banksters all got bailouts and got to keep their bonuses and not a one of those fuckers went to jail.
Let's look at another angle of this. 62% of bankruptcies are not because people bought too much house or spent too much on goodies. 62% of them are because of a medical crisis because we are the only industrialized country that doesn't have universal health care.
Now, me, I've done everything right. I don't over spend, I don't own more house than I need, I am not carrying any unsecured debt. And I know one serious illness will wipe me out.
So no, you don't believe anyone can be happy with their job and employer? Am I reading that right?
I can't be responsible for your lack of reading comprehension skills.
The witnesses who lied in their testimony about things like Wilson shooting Brown in the back decided from the outset to hang the officer. So what difference does it make?
We know you are invested in the murder of this child.
So then why do you refer to them as "fuckers"?
Because a lot of them are... I see the police as a necessary evil at best. Yes, we need them, but you give someone authority, and they will tend to abuse it if there aren't checks in place.
What reasons have they given? Not your opinion. I want to know what the unions have to say on the matter.
Then do your own google search.
I really stopped caring about what the FOP and PBA's "reasons" are. As pro-Union as I am, those are the two unions I'd like to get rid of.