For whom would Republicans vote?

[Correll]

The huge swing to the other side is going to happen, due to demographic shift, barring radical and rapid change.

That was set in stone by Third World Immigration, even though the Libs promised that it would not change the basic nature of our society.

It is not OUR actions that is risking the huge swing.


And it is kind of rubbing salt in the wound for you to blame us for it, when we are the primary victims of this vile policy.

I agree that the demographic shift will change the country, but I disagree that there is nothing the GOP can do about it.

And we've been over the "how to do it" thing a hundred times, so I don't want to beat that dead horse. But conservatives are sealing their own fate, so you're probably right about what's coming.

This thread is rubbing salt in the wound only if it's an indication of the mindset of so much of the party. And yeah, it's not in a good place for the future.
.

Sorry, your comments have led us right back to that same dead horse.


EVERYTHING, you've suggested has been tried and failed at some point by some republican.


We are on the outside looking in, and there is nothing we can do about that shit.

Hell, despite all your talk, when the time came to be counted, you stood with the regressives and voted for Hillary Freaking Clinton.


If something as radical as Trade and Immigration is so scary that you felt you had to vote against it and for the Regressive,

even YOU,

then it is a joke to say "what could the gop do?"

Yep, I voted for Hillary despite what I think of her and the Regressive Left.

That should tell you what I think of the alternative. That should be the point.
.

That was my point.

Despite your opposition to the regressive left, you still bought everything they said about Trump without question.


Thus you saw a world where you had to vote against the EVUL TRUMP.


You made your judgement based on what the liberal media told you.


There is NOTHING that we republicans can do to get the liberal media to stop lying about us.


So, they will keep lying and people like you who for reasons unknown, believe them will always be given a reason to vote against the GOP.


There is nothing we can do about that.


That is bad enough.


It is worse to blame US for that ******* shit.

You're making this assumption that the reason I feel the way I do is because I'm blinded by the media.

I could say the same about you and talk radio. Talk radio has trained its flock to think everything they don't like is "fake news", and that anyone who doesn't agree with them is slave to the media. How convenient.

My opinions of him are based on what I have SEEN and HEARD him actually SAY. So, unless you're claiming that what I have seen and heard is some kind of CGI computer magic, that argument doesn't fly.

At some point you guys need to get past that crutch. It doesn't work.
.

I don't listen to talk radio.

There is nothing radical about Trump, or his policies.


He is brash and course, vulgar even. I can see what that would be a minus to most.


But, Hillary is the ******* QUEEN OF REGRESSIVES, your personal pet peeve, and you stood by her.

There is nothing that we cons can do against a machine like that.

 

[Mac1958]

I agree that the demographic shift will change the country, but I disagree that there is nothing the GOP can do about it.

And we've been over the "how to do it" thing a hundred times, so I don't want to beat that dead horse. But conservatives are sealing their own fate, so you're probably right about what's coming.

This thread is rubbing salt in the wound only if it's an indication of the mindset of so much of the party. And yeah, it's not in a good place for the future.
.

Sorry, your comments have led us right back to that same dead horse.


EVERYTHING, you've suggested has been tried and failed at some point by some republican.


We are on the outside looking in, and there is nothing we can do about that shit.

Hell, despite all your talk, when the time came to be counted, you stood with the regressives and voted for Hillary Freaking Clinton.


If something as radical as Trade and Immigration is so scary that you felt you had to vote against it and for the Regressive,

even YOU,

then it is a joke to say "what could the gop do?"

Yep, I voted for Hillary despite what I think of her and the Regressive Left.

That should tell you what I think of the alternative. That should be the point.
.

That was my point.

Despite your opposition to the regressive left, you still bought everything they said about Trump without question.


Thus you saw a world where you had to vote against the EVUL TRUMP.


You made your judgement based on what the liberal media told you.


There is NOTHING that we republicans can do to get the liberal media to stop lying about us.


So, they will keep lying and people like you who for reasons unknown, believe them will always be given a reason to vote against the GOP.


There is nothing we can do about that.


That is bad enough.


It is worse to blame US for that ******* shit.

You're making this assumption that the reason I feel the way I do is because I'm blinded by the media.

I could say the same about you and talk radio. Talk radio has trained its flock to think everything they don't like is "fake news", and that anyone who doesn't agree with them is slave to the media. How convenient.

My opinions of him are based on what I have SEEN and HEARD him actually SAY. So, unless you're claiming that what I have seen and heard is some kind of CGI computer magic, that argument doesn't fly.

At some point you guys need to get past that crutch. It doesn't work.
.

I don't listen to talk radio.

There is nothing radical about Trump, or his policies.


He is brash and course, vulgar even. I can see what that would be a minus to most.


But, Hillary is the ******* QUEEN OF REGRESSIVES, your personal pet peeve, and you stood by her.

There is nothing that we cons can do against a machine like that.

Okay, then give up.
.

 

[Correll]

Sorry, your comments have led us right back to that same dead horse.


EVERYTHING, you've suggested has been tried and failed at some point by some republican.


We are on the outside looking in, and there is nothing we can do about that shit.

Hell, despite all your talk, when the time came to be counted, you stood with the regressives and voted for Hillary Freaking Clinton.


If something as radical as Trade and Immigration is so scary that you felt you had to vote against it and for the Regressive,

even YOU,

then it is a joke to say "what could the gop do?"

Yep, I voted for Hillary despite what I think of her and the Regressive Left.

That should tell you what I think of the alternative. That should be the point.
.

That was my point.

Despite your opposition to the regressive left, you still bought everything they said about Trump without question.


Thus you saw a world where you had to vote against the EVUL TRUMP.


You made your judgement based on what the liberal media told you.


There is NOTHING that we republicans can do to get the liberal media to stop lying about us.


So, they will keep lying and people like you who for reasons unknown, believe them will always be given a reason to vote against the GOP.


There is nothing we can do about that.


That is bad enough.


It is worse to blame US for that ******* shit.

You're making this assumption that the reason I feel the way I do is because I'm blinded by the media.

I could say the same about you and talk radio. Talk radio has trained its flock to think everything they don't like is "fake news", and that anyone who doesn't agree with them is slave to the media. How convenient.

My opinions of him are based on what I have SEEN and HEARD him actually SAY. So, unless you're claiming that what I have seen and heard is some kind of CGI computer magic, that argument doesn't fly.

At some point you guys need to get past that crutch. It doesn't work.
.

I don't listen to talk radio.

There is nothing radical about Trump, or his policies.


He is brash and course, vulgar even. I can see what that would be a minus to most.


But, Hillary is the ******* QUEEN OF REGRESSIVES, your personal pet peeve, and you stood by her.

There is nothing that we cons can do against a machine like that.

Okay, then give up.
.

Can't. Lefties won't stop coming at us.

Giving up is suicide.

 

[candycorn]

[

As I've said since day one...Trumpians are not about government or tax relief or America or anything else; just "sticking it" to someone. The poll proves it.

In a way, you're right Comrade.

America is tired of the openly corrupt rule of the deep state, tired of the radical Marxists who have co-opted music, movies, TV, and of course the news. Tired of higher education openly lying, flat out shitting on basic scientific facts (how many genders are there, Comrade?) Then handing a degrees to retards like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who couldn't explain the role of the Federal Reserve to save her life. Boston University gave a degree in economics even though she doesn't know a ******* thing about economics. BUT she attended the right protests and the right riots.

So yes, Trump was the normals getting uppity.

BUT what you Communists better figure out, this is us getting uppity in a calm and civil way. If this fails, we will up the ante - just as you Stalinists have been doing for decades.

The TRUTH is that the reason you Stalinists release your Brown Shirts, your ANTIFA and BLM thugs is because we normals don't shoot them down in the streets like traitorous dogs they are. You foolishly take this as a sign that we fear your terrorist troops (but deep down you know we don't, which is why you are importing MS-13).

Trump was us revolting within the system.

If you don't get the ******* message, then we turn the heat up.

In 2 or 6 years, you’ll vote for some State governor or sitting Senator for President just like you did 6 and 10 years ago.

In 2 years we will reelect President Trump.

The Swamp is in bad shape. Ryan flees, Flake flees, this is not the party of the swamp, which is why George Will threw a temper tantrum. The peasants are rising up.

Yep, I mis-spoke. You’ll vote for trump in 2 years. In 6? You’ll vote for some governor or congress person. Your “standards” are a joke; otherwise we’d either have a “President Cruz” or at least ex Nominee Cruz.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Ronnie is a stupid whiney ****, his "point" was moronic.

And conservatives here illustrated his point.

That's not my fault.
.

What would you vote for:

1) Exploding ass cancer
2) Brain extraction thru your elbow
3) Lung removal without anesthesia

Ronnie Reagan wants to know, because it will prove his twatty point.

 

[peach174]

I wouldn't vote for any of them.
They are all anti American who hates the Constitution and freedom.

 

[candycorn]

You're right.

They voted for PUTIN.

Of course, you already know that.
.

Really, for what?


.

Have someone explain the premise of the thread to you.
.

There is no premise, just asking who you would vote for is meaningless without specifying the reason for the vote, which you did't do.


.

Likewise there was no premise who you’d vote against.
So All things being equal, conservatives prefer a strong violent leader; it’s the battered spouse syndrome.
You won’t be critical of Trump because he and your fellow conservatives won’t “love” you if you are ….so you take the abuse, you enjoy getting lied to, the apologies on the behalf of the US, etc…

Obama wasn't a violent leader? He bombed Libya. He supplied arms to ISIS. He killed American citizens and hundreds of others with drone attacks. He also weaponized the FBI and the IRS to attack his political opposition. He was as much of a tyrant as Putin.

Who do you think you're fooling, asshole?

Obama was Violent to our enemies fuckface. Not violent to defenseless kids, minorities, etc…

 

[MarcATL]

[

As I've said since day one...Trumpians are not about government or tax relief or America or anything else; just "sticking it" to someone. The poll proves it.

In a way, you're right Comrade.

America is tired of the openly corrupt rule of the deep state, tired of the radical Marxists who have co-opted music, movies, TV, and of course the news. Tired of higher education openly lying, flat out shitting on basic scientific facts (how many genders are there, Comrade?) Then handing a degrees to retards like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who couldn't explain the role of the Federal Reserve to save her life. Boston University gave a degree in economics even though she doesn't know a ******* thing about economics. BUT she attended the right protests and the right riots.

So yes, Trump was the normals getting uppity.

BUT what you Communists better figure out, this is us getting uppity in a calm and civil way. If this fails, we will up the ante - just as you Stalinists have been doing for decades.

The TRUTH is that the reason you Stalinists release your Brown Shirts, your ANTIFA and BLM thugs is because we normals don't shoot them down in the streets like traitorous dogs they are. You foolishly take this as a sign that we fear your terrorist troops (but deep down you know we don't, which is why you are importing MS-13).

Trump was us revolting within the system.

If you don't get the ******* message, then we turn the heat up.

In 2 or 6 years, you’ll vote for some State governor or sitting Senator for President just like you did 6 and 10 years ago.

In 2 years we will reelect President Trump.

The Swamp is in bad shape. Ryan flees, Flake flees, this is not the party of the swamp, which is why George Will threw a temper tantrum. The peasants are rising up.

Trump won't win re-election for multiple reasons:

1. He will never be more popular than he was on election night. All polls show him below the 46% he won in the election.
2. Winning Wisconsin and Michigan were total flukes that won't happen again in 2020. Romney got more votes in 2012 in Wisconsin than Trump got in 2016 in Wisconsin, but lost. What that tells you is that it was Democratic turn out and not Trump that won Wisconsin for Trump.
3. Democrats are more fired up than they were in 2016.
4. Trump only won Pennsylvania by 40,000 votes. A slim victory that won't happen again.
5. Trump can't take any other states that he did not win in 2016. That means he won't be able to replace the electoral votes he will lose, when he loses Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania in 2020.

Trump is toast no matter how you stack it. There is a good chance he won't even be running for office in 2020.

This sounds cogent.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

 

[Mac1958]

Ronnie is a stupid whiney ****, his "point" was moronic.

And conservatives here illustrated his point.

That's not my fault.
.

What would you vote for:

1) Exploding ass cancer
2) Brain extraction thru your elbow
3) Lung removal without anesthesia

Ronnie Reagan wants to know, because it will prove his twatty point.

I'd guess the conservatives here who went with Putin are pretty insulted by that.
.

 

[candycorn]

Ronnie is a stupid whiney ****, his "point" was moronic.

And conservatives here illustrated his point.

That's not my fault.
.

What would you vote for:

1) Exploding ass cancer
2) Brain extraction thru your elbow
3) Lung removal without anesthesia

Ronnie Reagan wants to know, because it will prove his twatty point.

The difference between conservatives and the liberals.

You’re embarrassed by the answer you’d have to give to the question.
When we were asked, we had no problem.

 

[candycorn]

Ronnie is a stupid whiney ****, his "point" was moronic.

And conservatives here illustrated his point.

That's not my fault.
.

What would you vote for:

1) Exploding ass cancer
2) Brain extraction thru your elbow
3) Lung removal without anesthesia

Ronnie Reagan wants to know, because it will prove his twatty point.

I'd guess the conservatives here who went with Putin are pretty insulted by that.
.

So are you going to come up with a cute little moniker for them? I doubt it.

 

[candycorn]

[

As I've said since day one...Trumpians are not about government or tax relief or America or anything else; just "sticking it" to someone. The poll proves it.

In a way, you're right Comrade.

America is tired of the openly corrupt rule of the deep state, tired of the radical Marxists who have co-opted music, movies, TV, and of course the news. Tired of higher education openly lying, flat out shitting on basic scientific facts (how many genders are there, Comrade?) Then handing a degrees to retards like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who couldn't explain the role of the Federal Reserve to save her life. Boston University gave a degree in economics even though she doesn't know a ******* thing about economics. BUT she attended the right protests and the right riots.

So yes, Trump was the normals getting uppity.

BUT what you Communists better figure out, this is us getting uppity in a calm and civil way. If this fails, we will up the ante - just as you Stalinists have been doing for decades.

The TRUTH is that the reason you Stalinists release your Brown Shirts, your ANTIFA and BLM thugs is because we normals don't shoot them down in the streets like traitorous dogs they are. You foolishly take this as a sign that we fear your terrorist troops (but deep down you know we don't, which is why you are importing MS-13).

Trump was us revolting within the system.

If you don't get the ******* message, then we turn the heat up.

In 2 or 6 years, you’ll vote for some State governor or sitting Senator for President just like you did 6 and 10 years ago.

In 2 years we will reelect President Trump.

The Swamp is in bad shape. Ryan flees, Flake flees, this is not the party of the swamp, which is why George Will threw a temper tantrum. The peasants are rising up.

Trump won't win re-election for multiple reasons:

1. He will never be more popular than he was on election night. All polls show him below the 46% he won in the election.
2. Winning Wisconsin and Michigan were total flukes that won't happen again in 2020. Romney got more votes in 2012 in Wisconsin than Trump got in 2016 in Wisconsin, but lost. What that tells you is that it was Democratic turn out and not Trump that won Wisconsin for Trump.
3. Democrats are more fired up than they were in 2016.
4. Trump only won Pennsylvania by 40,000 votes. A slim victory that won't happen again.
5. Trump can't take any other states that he did not win in 2016. That means he won't be able to replace the electoral votes he will lose, when he loses Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania in 2020.

Trump is toast no matter how you stack it. There is a good chance he won't even be running for office in 2020.

Easy there….nobody thought Trump would survive the Spring 2016…much less the fall of 2016. If voters were rational; they would not elect this sleaze bag. Voters are not rational.

 

[Mac1958]

Ronnie is a stupid whiney ****, his "point" was moronic.

And conservatives here illustrated his point.

That's not my fault.
.

What would you vote for:

1) Exploding ass cancer
2) Brain extraction thru your elbow
3) Lung removal without anesthesia

Ronnie Reagan wants to know, because it will prove his twatty point.

I'd guess the conservatives here who went with Putin are pretty insulted by that.
.

So are you going to come up with a cute little moniker for them? I doubt it.

The Talk Radio Right, of course.

Did you think you had me there?

Not as cool a moniker as the Regressive Left, admittedly.
.

 

[Correll]

Ronnie is a stupid whiney ****, his "point" was moronic.

And conservatives here illustrated his point.

That's not my fault.
.

What would you vote for:

1) Exploding ass cancer
2) Brain extraction thru your elbow
3) Lung removal without anesthesia

Ronnie Reagan wants to know, because it will prove his twatty point.

I'd guess the conservatives here who went with Putin are pretty insulted by that.
.

I think his opinion on Putin is a little harsh, but I am certainly not invested in Putin.

He could easily be the better choice than Hillary and still be an "exploding ass cancer" or similar.

 

[candycorn]

You're right.

They voted for PUTIN.

Of course, you already know that.
.

Really, for what?


.

Have someone explain the premise of the thread to you.
.

There is no premise, just asking who you would vote for is meaningless without specifying the reason for the vote, which you did't do.


.

Likewise there was no premise who you’d vote against.
So All things being equal, conservatives prefer a strong violent leader; it’s the battered spouse syndrome.
You won’t be critical of Trump because he and your fellow conservatives won’t “love” you if you are ….so you take the abuse, you enjoy getting lied to, the apologies on the behalf of the US, etc…

Damn child, you're delusional, Trump wasn't part of the poll, why do you feel the need to bring him into it? If the OP had asked who you would like to have a beer with, given the same choices, I'd have voted for Putin too. He's definitely the most interesting of the bunch.


.

Delusional? perhaps.
On this topic? No.

See it everyday in our ER reports. I get the suspected family violence notes. …battered spouse comes in; leaves with the batterer once they are bailed out of jail. Seen the same victims here something like 3 times.

Its not as personal in politics but the same traits are there.

 

[candycorn]

Ronnie is a stupid whiney ****, his "point" was moronic.

And conservatives here illustrated his point.

That's not my fault.
.

What would you vote for:

1) Exploding ass cancer
2) Brain extraction thru your elbow
3) Lung removal without anesthesia

Ronnie Reagan wants to know, because it will prove his twatty point.

I'd guess the conservatives here who went with Putin are pretty insulted by that.
.

So are you going to come up with a cute little moniker for them? I doubt it.

The Talk Radio Right, of course.

Did you think you had me there?

Not as cool a moniker as the Regressive Left, admittedly.
.

More truthful….which is why you probably don’t put it out there very often.

 

[Mac1958]

And conservatives here illustrated his point.

That's not my fault.
.

What would you vote for:

1) Exploding ass cancer
2) Brain extraction thru your elbow
3) Lung removal without anesthesia

Ronnie Reagan wants to know, because it will prove his twatty point.

I'd guess the conservatives here who went with Putin are pretty insulted by that.
.

So are you going to come up with a cute little moniker for them? I doubt it.

The Talk Radio Right, of course.

Did you think you had me there?

Not as cool a moniker as the Regressive Left, admittedly.
.

More truthful….which is why you probably don’t put it out there very often.

Meh, they're both accurate.

But I'm a little biased. I just don't care for Regressive Lefties. On a personal level.

Some people don't care for single malt scotch, I don't care for Regressives. Personal taste, I guess.
.

 

[DustyInfinity]

Hey Mac, you know you can walk away. I think part of you wants to. I formally invite you to join the republicans. We don't bite, and we still have people left who are free. It is still largely a uniparty, but not all republicans are like McCain and Flake. There are still a few who stand up for the little guy, and hopefully that number will grow. Walk away and join us.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Ronnie is a stupid whiney ****, his "point" was moronic.

And conservatives here illustrated his point.

That's not my fault.
.

What would you vote for:

1) Exploding ass cancer
2) Brain extraction thru your elbow
3) Lung removal without anesthesia

Ronnie Reagan wants to know, because it will prove his twatty point.

The difference between conservatives and the liberals.

You’re embarrassed by the answer you’d have to give to the question.
When we were asked, we had no problem.

Yeah, Hillary, pretty embarrassing.

 

[OODA_Loop]

The Talk Radio Right, of course.
.

62,979,636 Trump voters
14,000,000 Highest Single Conservative Radio audience

48,000,000 unaccounted for voters

List of most-listened-to radio programs - Wikipedia