For whom would Republicans vote?

[Mac1958]

You guys have proven Ron Reagan right, and you're embarrassed. That's okay.

But lashing out at me doesn't change the comments or votes on this thread.
.

You're the one who should be embarrassed, putting out a poll on a total impossibility is bad enough, but thinking it actually proves something, now that's just sweet. LMAO


.

I just asked a question. Your end of the spectrum proved Reagan's point. Then some of you went drama queen on me.

It's fine with you that they sided with Putin, but somehow you have a problem with the question. Okay.
.

Wrong again child, my end of the spectrum called BS on your fantasy poll form the get. But you and the fairy dancing boi would make a great couple.


.

Wow, you sure are ignoring a lot of posts that prove you completely wrong.

Selective perception. Okay.
.

I think it's you who's guilty of selective perception by trying to lump me with anyone else.


.

When I see you going after the conservatives who voted for Putin with the same energy you're spending complaining about the question they answered, I'll change my mind on that.
.

 

[Uncensored2008]

A point was made by Ron Reagan
The only point made by Ronnie Reagan is on the top of his empty head.

And yet, several here confirmed it.

Because you engaged in logical fallacy, any supposed "confirmation" is bullshit.

You merely proved WHY a false dichotomy is a logical fallacy.

 

[Mac1958]

A point was made by Ron Reagan
The only point made by Ronnie Reagan is on the top of his empty head.

And yet, several here confirmed it.

Because you engaged in logical fallacy, any supposed "confirmation" is bullshit.

You merely proved WHY a false dichotomy is a logical fallacy.

For the thousandth time, I merely quoted Ron Reagan.

And guess what? Many conservatives proved his point.

That wasn't me.
.

 

[Uncensored2008]

A point was made by Ron Reagan
The only point made by Ronnie Reagan is on the top of his empty head.

And yet, several here confirmed it.

Because you engaged in logical fallacy, any supposed "confirmation" is bullshit.

You merely proved WHY a false dichotomy is a logical fallacy.

For the thousandth time, I merely quoted Ron Reagan.

And guess what? Many conservatives proved his point.

That wasn't me.
.

Who cares?

You presented a false dichotomy. Dishonest posit returns invalid results.

You're better than this.

 

[Mac1958]

A point was made by Ron Reagan
The only point made by Ronnie Reagan is on the top of his empty head.

And yet, several here confirmed it.

Because you engaged in logical fallacy, any supposed "confirmation" is bullshit.

You merely proved WHY a false dichotomy is a logical fallacy.

For the thousandth time, I merely quoted Ron Reagan.

And guess what? Many conservatives proved his point.

That wasn't me.
.

Who cares?

You presented a false dichotomy. Dishonest posit returns invalid results.

You're better than this.

You care, obviously.

They said what they said. The party of personal responsibility has spoken.
.

 

[OKTexas]

"yes" wasn't an option in your poll, so who voted "yes"?


.

For Putin.

So, please answer the question.
.

No one voted yes, of course you already know that.


.

You're right.

They voted for PUTIN.

Of course, you already know that.
.

Really, for what?


.

Have someone explain the premise of the thread to you.
.

There is no premise, just asking who you would vote for is meaningless without specifying the reason for the vote, which you did't do.


.

 

[OKTexas]

You're the one who should be embarrassed, putting out a poll on a total impossibility is bad enough, but thinking it actually proves something, now that's just sweet. LMAO


.

I just asked a question. Your end of the spectrum proved Reagan's point. Then some of you went drama queen on me.

It's fine with you that they sided with Putin, but somehow you have a problem with the question. Okay.
.

Wrong again child, my end of the spectrum called BS on your fantasy poll form the get. But you and the fairy dancing boi would make a great couple.


.

Wow, you sure are ignoring a lot of posts that prove you completely wrong.

Selective perception. Okay.
.

I think it's you who's guilty of selective perception by trying to lump me with anyone else.


.

When I see you going after the conservatives who voted for Putin with the same energy you're spending complaining about the question they answered, I'll change my mind on that.
.

You stupid shit, they didn't vote Putin for anything, exactly what should I go after them about?


.

 

[candycorn]

[

As I've said since day one...Trumpians are not about government or tax relief or America or anything else; just "sticking it" to someone. The poll proves it.

In a way, you're right Comrade.

America is tired of the openly corrupt rule of the deep state, tired of the radical Marxists who have co-opted music, movies, TV, and of course the news. Tired of higher education openly lying, flat out shitting on basic scientific facts (how many genders are there, Comrade?) Then handing a degrees to retards like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who couldn't explain the role of the Federal Reserve to save her life. Boston University gave a degree in economics even though she doesn't know a ******* thing about economics. BUT she attended the right protests and the right riots.

So yes, Trump was the normals getting uppity.

BUT what you Communists better figure out, this is us getting uppity in a calm and civil way. If this fails, we will up the ante - just as you Stalinists have been doing for decades.

The TRUTH is that the reason you Stalinists release your Brown Shirts, your ANTIFA and BLM thugs is because we normals don't shoot them down in the streets like traitorous dogs they are. You foolishly take this as a sign that we fear your terrorist troops (but deep down you know we don't, which is why you are importing MS-13).

Trump was us revolting within the system.

If you don't get the ******* message, then we turn the heat up.

In 2 or 6 years, you’ll vote for some State governor or sitting Senator for President just like you did 6 and 10 years ago.

 

[candycorn]

For Putin.

So, please answer the question.
.

No one voted yes, of course you already know that.


.

You're right.

They voted for PUTIN.

Of course, you already know that.
.

Really, for what?


.

Have someone explain the premise of the thread to you.
.

There is no premise, just asking who you would vote for is meaningless without specifying the reason for the vote, which you did't do.


.

Likewise there was no premise who you’d vote against.
So All things being equal, conservatives prefer a strong violent leader; it’s the battered spouse syndrome.
You won’t be critical of Trump because he and your fellow conservatives won’t “love” you if you are ….so you take the abuse, you enjoy getting lied to, the apologies on the behalf of the US, etc…

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

As I've said since day one...Trumpians are not about government or tax relief or America or anything else; just "sticking it" to someone. The poll proves it.

In a way, you're right Comrade.

America is tired of the openly corrupt rule of the deep state, tired of the radical Marxists who have co-opted music, movies, TV, and of course the news. Tired of higher education openly lying, flat out shitting on basic scientific facts (how many genders are there, Comrade?) Then handing a degrees to retards like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who couldn't explain the role of the Federal Reserve to save her life. Boston University gave a degree in economics even though she doesn't know a ******* thing about economics. BUT she attended the right protests and the right riots.

So yes, Trump was the normals getting uppity.

BUT what you Communists better figure out, this is us getting uppity in a calm and civil way. If this fails, we will up the ante - just as you Stalinists have been doing for decades.

The TRUTH is that the reason you Stalinists release your Brown Shirts, your ANTIFA and BLM thugs is because we normals don't shoot them down in the streets like traitorous dogs they are. You foolishly take this as a sign that we fear your terrorist troops (but deep down you know we don't, which is why you are importing MS-13).

Trump was us revolting within the system.

If you don't get the ******* message, then we turn the heat up.

In 2 or 6 years, you’ll vote for some State governor or sitting Senator for President just like you did 6 and 10 years ago.

In 2 years we will reelect President Trump.

The Swamp is in bad shape. Ryan flees, Flake flees, this is not the party of the swamp, which is why George Will threw a temper tantrum. The peasants are rising up.

 

[bripat9643]

I don't have a tribe **** head. You on the other hand have to struggle to come up with a semi-original thought, you take ignorant shit form other posts, then try to create a weak minded fantasy. You're not being clever.


.

You guys have proven Ron Reagan right, and you're embarrassed. That's okay.

But lashing out at me doesn't change the comments or votes on this thread.
.

You're the one who should be embarrassed, putting out a poll on a total impossibility is bad enough, but thinking it actually proves something, now that's just sweet. LMAO


.

I just asked a question. Your end of the spectrum proved Reagan's point. Then some of you went drama queen on me.

It's fine with you that they sided with Putin, but somehow you have a problem with the question. Okay.
.

It's "fine" with you? When you say we "proved reagan's point" what you mean is that we are really as neanderthal in our views as the people who voted for Hitler. In other words, you're being a condescending asshole.

I'm merely pointing FACTS.

Am I, or am I not?
.

No, you're casting aspersions. It's a loaded question, and it could never happen in reality. So what have you proved?

 

[bripat9643]

No one voted yes, of course you already know that.


.

You're right.

They voted for PUTIN.

Of course, you already know that.
.

Really, for what?


.

Have someone explain the premise of the thread to you.
.

There is no premise, just asking who you would vote for is meaningless without specifying the reason for the vote, which you did't do.


.

Likewise there was no premise who you’d vote against.
So All things being equal, conservatives prefer a strong violent leader; it’s the battered spouse syndrome.
You won’t be critical of Trump because he and your fellow conservatives won’t “love” you if you are ….so you take the abuse, you enjoy getting lied to, the apologies on the behalf of the US, etc…

Obama wasn't a violent leader? He bombed Libya. He supplied arms to ISIS. He killed American citizens and hundreds of others with drone attacks. He also weaponized the FBI and the IRS to attack his political opposition. He was as much of a tyrant as Putin.

Who do you think you're fooling, asshole?

 

[bripat9643]

You're the one who should be embarrassed, putting out a poll on a total impossibility is bad enough, but thinking it actually proves something, now that's just sweet. LMAO


.

I just asked a question. Your end of the spectrum proved Reagan's point. Then some of you went drama queen on me.

It's fine with you that they sided with Putin, but somehow you have a problem with the question. Okay.
.

Wrong again child, my end of the spectrum called BS on your fantasy poll form the get. But you and the fairy dancing boi would make a great couple.


.

Wow, you sure are ignoring a lot of posts that prove you completely wrong.

Selective perception. Okay.
.

I think it's you who's guilty of selective perception by trying to lump me with anyone else.


.

When I see you going after the conservatives who voted for Putin with the same energy you're spending complaining about the question they answered, I'll change my mind on that.
.

No one voted for Putin.

 

[Pogo]

You guys have proven Ron Reagan right, and you're embarrassed. That's okay.

But lashing out at me doesn't change the comments or votes on this thread.
.

You're the one who should be embarrassed, putting out a poll on a total impossibility is bad enough, but thinking it actually proves something, now that's just sweet. LMAO


.

I just asked a question. Your end of the spectrum proved Reagan's point. Then some of you went drama queen on me.

It's fine with you that they sided with Putin, but somehow you have a problem with the question. Okay.
.

It's "fine" with you? When you say we "proved reagan's point" what you mean is that we are really as neanderthal in our views as the people who voted for Hitler. In other words, you're being a condescending asshole.

I'm merely pointing FACTS.

Am I, or am I not?

No, you're casting aspersions. It's a loaded question, and it could never happen in reality. So what have you proved?

If it could never happen in reality -- which is true -- then why did most respondents vote for the Pooter?
Including yourself?

The question is neutral. You're the asshat casting aspersions.

As I said you just keep on proving Mac's point --- you answer her question in a way that proves Reagan's point (proper names get a capital letter in English) --- and then you want to whine and piss and moan that the question you chose to answer, exists.

 

[U2Edge]

[

As I've said since day one...Trumpians are not about government or tax relief or America or anything else; just "sticking it" to someone. The poll proves it.

In a way, you're right Comrade.

America is tired of the openly corrupt rule of the deep state, tired of the radical Marxists who have co-opted music, movies, TV, and of course the news. Tired of higher education openly lying, flat out shitting on basic scientific facts (how many genders are there, Comrade?) Then handing a degrees to retards like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who couldn't explain the role of the Federal Reserve to save her life. Boston University gave a degree in economics even though she doesn't know a ******* thing about economics. BUT she attended the right protests and the right riots.

So yes, Trump was the normals getting uppity.

BUT what you Communists better figure out, this is us getting uppity in a calm and civil way. If this fails, we will up the ante - just as you Stalinists have been doing for decades.

The TRUTH is that the reason you Stalinists release your Brown Shirts, your ANTIFA and BLM thugs is because we normals don't shoot them down in the streets like traitorous dogs they are. You foolishly take this as a sign that we fear your terrorist troops (but deep down you know we don't, which is why you are importing MS-13).

Trump was us revolting within the system.

If you don't get the ******* message, then we turn the heat up.

In 2 or 6 years, you’ll vote for some State governor or sitting Senator for President just like you did 6 and 10 years ago.

In 2 years we will reelect President Trump.

The Swamp is in bad shape. Ryan flees, Flake flees, this is not the party of the swamp, which is why George Will threw a temper tantrum. The peasants are rising up.

Trump won't win re-election for multiple reasons:

1. He will never be more popular than he was on election night. All polls show him below the 46% he won in the election.
2. Winning Wisconsin and Michigan were total flukes that won't happen again in 2020. Romney got more votes in 2012 in Wisconsin than Trump got in 2016 in Wisconsin, but lost. What that tells you is that it was Democratic turn out and not Trump that won Wisconsin for Trump.
3. Democrats are more fired up than they were in 2016.
4. Trump only won Pennsylvania by 40,000 votes. A slim victory that won't happen again.
5. Trump can't take any other states that he did not win in 2016. That means he won't be able to replace the electoral votes he will lose, when he loses Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania in 2020.

Trump is toast no matter how you stack it. There is a good chance he won't even be running for office in 2020.

 

[OKTexas]

No one voted yes, of course you already know that.


.

You're right.

They voted for PUTIN.

Of course, you already know that.
.

Really, for what?


.

Have someone explain the premise of the thread to you.
.

There is no premise, just asking who you would vote for is meaningless without specifying the reason for the vote, which you did't do.


.

Likewise there was no premise who you’d vote against.
So All things being equal, conservatives prefer a strong violent leader; it’s the battered spouse syndrome.
You won’t be critical of Trump because he and your fellow conservatives won’t “love” you if you are ….so you take the abuse, you enjoy getting lied to, the apologies on the behalf of the US, etc…

Damn child, you're delusional, Trump wasn't part of the poll, why do you feel the need to bring him into it? If the OP had asked who you would like to have a beer with, given the same choices, I'd have voted for Putin too. He's definitely the most interesting of the bunch.


.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Trump won't win re-election for multiple reasons:

So, Hillary has it in the bag then?

1. He will never be more popular than he was on election night. All polls show him below the 46% he won in the election.

He has a higher popularity than your god did at this point in his term, and Obama won reelection.

2. Winning Wisconsin and Michigan were total flukes that won't happen again in 2020. Romney got more votes in 2012 in Wisconsin than Trump got in 2016 in Wisconsin, but lost. What that tells you is that it was Democratic turn out and not Trump that won Wisconsin for Trump.
3. Democrats are more fired up than they were in 2016.
4. Trump only won Pennsylvania by 40,000 votes. A slim victory that won't happen again.
5. Trump can't take any other states that he did not win in 2016. That means he won't be able to replace the electoral votes he will lose, when he loses Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania in 2020.

Trump is toast no matter how you stack it. There is a good chance he won't even be running for office in 2020.

Yep, you got him now.

The faithless electors will recount the Russian collusion..

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Hey, Ronnie, your "point" was moronic.

But the conservatives who agreed with him are fine, no problem there.


.

Which of these 5 left-wing big government a-holes do you prefer is no choice at all.

Ronnie is a stupid whiney ****, his "point" was moronic.

 

[Mac1958]

I just asked a question. Your end of the spectrum proved Reagan's point. Then some of you went drama queen on me.

It's fine with you that they sided with Putin, but somehow you have a problem with the question. Okay.
.

Wrong again child, my end of the spectrum called BS on your fantasy poll form the get. But you and the fairy dancing boi would make a great couple.


.

Wow, you sure are ignoring a lot of posts that prove you completely wrong.

Selective perception. Okay.
.

I think it's you who's guilty of selective perception by trying to lump me with anyone else.


.

When I see you going after the conservatives who voted for Putin with the same energy you're spending complaining about the question they answered, I'll change my mind on that.
.

You stupid shit, they didn't vote Putin for anything, exactly what should I go after them about?


.

Nothing at all. You're not allowed to.
.

 

[Mac1958]

You guys have proven Ron Reagan right, and you're embarrassed. That's okay.

But lashing out at me doesn't change the comments or votes on this thread.
.

You're the one who should be embarrassed, putting out a poll on a total impossibility is bad enough, but thinking it actually proves something, now that's just sweet. LMAO


.

I just asked a question. Your end of the spectrum proved Reagan's point. Then some of you went drama queen on me.

It's fine with you that they sided with Putin, but somehow you have a problem with the question. Okay.
.

It's "fine" with you? When you say we "proved reagan's point" what you mean is that we are really as neanderthal in our views as the people who voted for Hitler. In other words, you're being a condescending asshole.

I'm merely pointing FACTS.

Am I, or am I not?
.

No, you're casting aspersions. It's a loaded question, and it could never happen in reality. So what have you proved?

That Reagan's crazy point was right, obviously.
.