For those who are opposed to a wall on our southern border:

[jc456]

If it was privately funded, I'd have zero problems with it.

But, that is never gonna happen.

The wall as envisioned by Trump isn't that effective. A better way of guarding the border would be electronic detection devices, planted around every 1/2 mile, combined with a patrol of surveillance drones continually over the border (they can "see" up to 250 miles).

Not only would an electronic fence be more effective, but it would also be cheaper.

dude, that was so encrypted no one knows what you said.

 

[jc456]

GOD could pay for a wall and Texas land owners will keep him tied up in court for the next 20-30 years.

AINT GONNA BE NO DAMN WALL - DEAL WITH IT.

there's already a wall, perhaps you need to deal with that.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

That would be impossible . You realize all that border property isn’t just fed owned empty land.

You would need gov imminent domain to build the thing . Cons do love taking people’s property by force .

Educate yourself.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure...Cartography-by-Eric-Leinberger_fig1_241709039

 

[Timmy]

That would be impossible . You realize all that border property isn’t just fed owned empty land.

You would need gov imminent domain to build the thing . Cons do love taking people’s property by force .

Educate yourself.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure...Cartography-by-Eric-Leinberger_fig1_241709039

Hey thanks !

A buch if that land is wildlife refuge, national parks and. Indian reservations .

You’ve strengthened the anti wall argument .

 

[ABikerSailor]

That would be impossible . You realize all that border property isn’t just fed owned empty land.

You would need gov imminent domain to build the thing . Cons do love taking people’s property by force .

Educate yourself.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure...Cartography-by-Eric-Leinberger_fig1_241709039

Doesn't change the fact that there are property owners who have land on the border. Some of them have even had their property cut in half by the border wall.

Trump’s border wall threatens to end Texas families’ 250 years of ranching on Rio Grande

Border homes, and the wall that would tear them apart

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

That would be impossible . You realize all that border property isn’t just fed owned empty land.

You would need gov imminent domain to build the thing . Cons do love taking people’s property by force .

Educate yourself.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure...Cartography-by-Eric-Leinberger_fig1_241709039

Hey thanks !

A buch if that land is wildlife refuge, national parks and. Indian reservations .

You’ve strengthened the anti wall argument .

It means that a large portion of the land is already under gov control and they can do what the fuck they want to do with it.
On top of that there is a large percentage of land owners who want the wall because of the damage to property and threat to their lives.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

That would be impossible . You realize all that border property isn’t just fed owned empty land.

You would need gov imminent domain to build the thing . Cons do love taking people’s property by force .

Educate yourself.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure...Cartography-by-Eric-Leinberger_fig1_241709039

Doesn't change the fact that there are property owners who have land on the border. Some of them have even had their property cut in half by the border wall.

Trump’s border wall threatens to end Texas families’ 250 years of ranching on Rio Grande

Border homes, and the wall that would tear them apart

How the fuck does it cut their property in half when you only need 20 feet for the wall and a road to maintain it?

 

[Brain357]

Would you still be opposed to completing a Wall if it was privately funded? If so, why?

I’m fine when Mexico pays for it.

 

[ABikerSailor]

That would be impossible . You realize all that border property isn’t just fed owned empty land.

You would need gov imminent domain to build the thing . Cons do love taking people’s property by force .

Educate yourself.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure...Cartography-by-Eric-Leinberger_fig1_241709039

Doesn't change the fact that there are property owners who have land on the border. Some of them have even had their property cut in half by the border wall.

Trump’s border wall threatens to end Texas families’ 250 years of ranching on Rio Grande

Border homes, and the wall that would tear them apart

How the fuck does it cut their property in half when you only need 20 feet for the wall and a road to maintain it?

Because of the way the land is on the border. In some cases, they have to build it across their land to be able to make it work. There have already been several landowners on the news who have had a wall divide their property.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Would you still be opposed to completing a Wall if it was privately funded? If so, why?

I’m fine when Mexico pays for it.

Great!!!
So all we need to do is cut off aid to mehico.
At 320 million a year it wont take long.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

That would be impossible . You realize all that border property isn’t just fed owned empty land.

You would need gov imminent domain to build the thing . Cons do love taking people’s property by force .

Educate yourself.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure...Cartography-by-Eric-Leinberger_fig1_241709039

Doesn't change the fact that there are property owners who have land on the border. Some of them have even had their property cut in half by the border wall.

Trump’s border wall threatens to end Texas families’ 250 years of ranching on Rio Grande

Border homes, and the wall that would tear them apart

How the fuck does it cut their property in half when you only need 20 feet for the wall and a road to maintain it?

Because of the way the land is on the border. In some cases, they have to build it across their land to be able to make it work. There have already been several landowners on the news who have had a wall divide their property.

How the land is on the border?
Are you saying we cant build on rough terrain?

 

[Brain357]

Would you still be opposed to completing a Wall if it was privately funded? If so, why?

I’m fine when Mexico pays for it.

Great!!!
So all we need to do is cut off aid to mehico.
At 320 million a year it wont take long.

You seen the $$$ estimates for this wall?

 

[Siete]

GOD could pay for a wall and Texas land owners will keep him tied up in court for the next 20-30 years.

AINT GONNA BE NO DAMN WALL - DEAL WITH IT.

there's already a wall, perhaps you need to deal with that.

get a 1st grader to tell you the difference between a wall and a fence - and be sure to take notes.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Would you still be opposed to completing a Wall if it was privately funded? If so, why?

I’m fine when Mexico pays for it.

Great!!!
So all we need to do is cut off aid to mehico.
At 320 million a year it wont take long.

You seen the $$$ estimates for this wall?

Did you pay cash for your house?
I mean I did for my current house but most don't.

 

[Siete]

Would you still be opposed to completing a Wall if it was privately funded? If so, why?

I’m fine when Mexico pays for it.

Great!!!
So all we need to do is cut off aid to mehico.
At 320 million a year it wont take long.

You seen the $$$ estimates for this wall?

legal fees will cost more than a wall before Texas land owners get finished ...

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Would you still be opposed to completing a Wall if it was privately funded? If so, why?

I’m fine when Mexico pays for it.

Great!!!
So all we need to do is cut off aid to mehico.
At 320 million a year it wont take long.

You seen the $$$ estimates for this wall?

legal fees will cost more than a wall before Texas land owners get finished ...

Imminent domain always wins.

 

[Timmy]

That would be impossible . You realize all that border property isn’t just fed owned empty land.

You would need gov imminent domain to build the thing . Cons do love taking people’s property by force .

Educate yourself.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure...Cartography-by-Eric-Leinberger_fig1_241709039

Hey thanks !

A buch if that land is wildlife refuge, national parks and. Indian reservations .

You’ve strengthened the anti wall argument .

It means that a large portion of the land is already under gov control and they can do what the fuck they want to do with it.
On top of that there is a large percentage of land owners who want the wall because of the damage to property and threat to their lives.

Not all “gov control “ land is equal . You’re not putting a fence around a post office . National Parks ?! Indian reservations?! You think you can just unilaterally throw up a huge wall across those lands on a whim and not face considerable legal fights .

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

That would be impossible . You realize all that border property isn’t just fed owned empty land.

You would need gov imminent domain to build the thing . Cons do love taking people’s property by force .

Educate yourself.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure...Cartography-by-Eric-Leinberger_fig1_241709039

Hey thanks !

A buch if that land is wildlife refuge, national parks and. Indian reservations .

You’ve strengthened the anti wall argument .

It means that a large portion of the land is already under gov control and they can do what the fuck they want to do with it.
On top of that there is a large percentage of land owners who want the wall because of the damage to property and threat to their lives.

Not all “gov control “ land is equal . Your not putting a fence around a post office . National Parks ?! Indian reservations?! You think you can just unilaterally throw up a huge wall across those lands on a whim and not face considerable legal fights .

Imminent domain timothy....

 

[Timmy]

That would be impossible . You realize all that border property isn’t just fed owned empty land.

You would need gov imminent domain to build the thing . Cons do love taking people’s property by force .

Educate yourself.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure...Cartography-by-Eric-Leinberger_fig1_241709039

Hey thanks !

A buch if that land is wildlife refuge, national parks and. Indian reservations .

You’ve strengthened the anti wall argument .

It means that a large portion of the land is already under gov control and they can do what the fuck they want to do with it.
On top of that there is a large percentage of land owners who want the wall because of the damage to property and threat to their lives.

Not all “gov control “ land is equal . Your not putting a fence around a post office . National Parks ?! Indian reservations?! You think you can just unilaterally throw up a huge wall across those lands on a whim and not face considerable legal fights .

Imminent domain timothy....

Sovereign Indian land . Protected environmental land . Good luck beating that.

Since when are you cons for taking Americans property by force ?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Educate yourself.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure...Cartography-by-Eric-Leinberger_fig1_241709039

Hey thanks !

A buch if that land is wildlife refuge, national parks and. Indian reservations .

You’ve strengthened the anti wall argument .

It means that a large portion of the land is already under gov control and they can do what the fuck they want to do with it.
On top of that there is a large percentage of land owners who want the wall because of the damage to property and threat to their lives.

Not all “gov control “ land is equal . Your not putting a fence around a post office . National Parks ?! Indian reservations?! You think you can just unilaterally throw up a huge wall across those lands on a whim and not face considerable legal fights .

Imminent domain timothy....

Sovereign Indian land . Protected environmental land . Good luck beating that.

Since when are you cons for taking Americans property by force ?

Again Timothy...imminent domain.
No one is immune.