For the last Time, "skeptics," the SUN is NOT the cause of climate change, and "solar cycle" was put out by the fraud

Here is one major reason why we have spastic weather in the last 50+ years.

Project Haaarp! Weather Manipulation! Responsible for Extreme Weather, Climate Change

No there is no increase in storminess not in Tropical or Hurricane storms neither are Tornadoes.

Let's go with the data instead:

To start with, deaths from climate-related phenomena are at an all-time low. If you think deaths from climate-related catastrophes are an emergency, please point in the graph below to the start of the “emergency”.

global-climate-deaths-per-mil-mine-square.png

===

Storminess has not gone up, and there’s been no increase in hurricane strength or frequency … no “emergency” there. First, the strength.

maue-ace-2019-1.png


And here is the global hurricane frequency, both for all hurricanes and for the strongest hurricanes.

global-hurricane-frequency-maue-202205.png


The 12 months from April 2021 to May 2022 have seen close to the fewest major hurricanes in more than 40 years.

And there is much longer evidence to back that up. Here are the records of all hurricanes (left) and major hurricanes (right) that came ashore in the US in the last 150 years … NO increase. SOURCE: Nature magazine.

hurricane-strikes.png


And here are the numbers of Pacific typhoons (hurricanes) from the Japanese Meteorological Agency.

pacific-cyclones.jpg


Here are all the records of landfalling hurricanes worldwide. This shows Global, North Atlantic (NATL), Western Pacific (WPAC), Eastern Pacific (EPAC), Northern Indian Ocean (NIO), and Southern Hemisphere (SH) landfalls for both major and all hurricanes.

landfalling-hurricanes-maue-pielke-1.png


And here are a century and a half of records of the number of landfalling hurricanes in Florida.

florida-landfalling-hurricanes.png


Finally, here are the declining numbers of both strong and average cyclones in Australian waters, from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM).

australian-severe-non-cyclones.png


===

Strong tornadoes in the US are decreasing.

strong-to-violent-tornadoes.png
 
No there is no increase in storminess not in Tropical or Hurricane storms neither are Tornadoes.

Let's go with the data instead:

To start with, deaths from climate-related phenomena are at an all-time low. If you think deaths from climate-related catastrophes are an emergency, please point in the graph below to the start of the “emergency”.

global-climate-deaths-per-mil-mine-square.png

===

Storminess has not gone up, and there’s been no increase in hurricane strength or frequency … no “emergency” there. First, the strength.

maue-ace-2019-1.png


And here is the global hurricane frequency, both for all hurricanes and for the strongest hurricanes.

global-hurricane-frequency-maue-202205.png


The 12 months from April 2021 to May 2022 have seen close to the fewest major hurricanes in more than 40 years.

And there is much longer evidence to back that up. Here are the records of all hurricanes (left) and major hurricanes (right) that came ashore in the US in the last 150 years … NO increase. SOURCE: Nature magazine.

hurricane-strikes.png


And here are the numbers of Pacific typhoons (hurricanes) from the Japanese Meteorological Agency.

pacific-cyclones.jpg


Here are all the records of landfalling hurricanes worldwide. This shows Global, North Atlantic (NATL), Western Pacific (WPAC), Eastern Pacific (EPAC), Northern Indian Ocean (NIO), and Southern Hemisphere (SH) landfalls for both major and all hurricanes.

landfalling-hurricanes-maue-pielke-1.png


And here are a century and a half of records of the number of landfalling hurricanes in Florida.

florida-landfalling-hurricanes.png


Finally, here are the declining numbers of both strong and average cyclones in Australian waters, from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM).

australian-severe-non-cyclones.png


===

Strong tornadoes in the US are decreasing.

strong-to-violent-tornadoes.png
Did you even watch the doco? No, thought as much.

Where and how do you think your colourful graphs and charts came into existence? Because of weather manipulation.
 

the SUN is NOT the cause of climate change​

Well, it may not be the sole cause of climate change. But it is a factor, as is likely other things like human activity.

This is what North America looked like 1 million years ago, but the map is WRONG because it has Greenland frozen, and Greenland was not frozen...
So then, it is NOT what NA looked like a million years ago but might be pretty close to maybe 12,000 years ago?
 
Did you even watch the doco? No, thought as much.

Where and how do you think your colourful graphs and charts came into existence? Because of weather manipulation.

It is clear you have been REFUTED as you offer no counterpoint, and I posted official data.

===

Meanwhile here is what Haarp really is about and nothing to with weather manipulation:

University of Alaska

About HAARP​


The High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program, or HAARP, is a scientific endeavor aimed at studying the properties and behavior of the ionosphere. "The ionosphere stretches roughly 50 to 400 miles above Earth's surface, right at the edge of space. Along with the neutral upper atmosphere, the ionosphere forms the boundary between Earth's lower atmosphere — where we live and breathe — and the vacuum of space." (NASA)

Operation of the research facility was transferred from the United States Air Force to the University of Alaska Fairbanks on Aug. 11, 2015, allowing HAARP to continue with exploration of ionospheric phenomenology via a land-use cooperative research and development agreement.

HAARP is the world's most capable high-power, high-frequency transmitter for study of the ionosphere. The HAARP program is committed to developing a world-class ionospheric research facility consisting of:

  • The Ionospheric Research Instrument, a high power transmitter facility operating in the High Frequency range. The IRI can be used to temporarily excite a limited area of the ionosphere for scientific study.
  • A sophisticated suite of scientific or diagnostic instruments that can be used to observe the physical processes that occur in the excited region.
Observation of the processes resulting from the use of the IRI in a controlled manner will allow scientists to better understand processes that occur continuously under the natural stimulation of the sun.

Scientific instruments installed at the HAARP Observatory can also be used for a variety of continuing research efforts which do not involve the use of the IRI but are strictly passive. These include ionospheric characterization using satellite beacons, telescopic observation of the fine structure in the aurora and documentation of long-term variations in the ozone layer.

LINK

bolding mine

Weather occurs far below the Ionosphere section from surface upward to about 7.5 miles.
 
Meanwhile here is what Haarp really is about and nothing to with weather manipulation:

University of Alaska
Yeah, just because the University of Alaska states that. :auiqs.jpg:
Now you have to ask yourself, who funds the University, so who controls the narrative?

HAARP is the acronym many people recognize, it is an "ionosphere heater" facility in Alaska. Mainstream media and the military industrial complex tried to convince the public that HAARP was going to be completely dismantled by the summer of 2014, but did this happen? No, and now it seems HAARP has been funded through 2015, the lies never end when the government is involved. What many people don't know is that the Alaskan HAARP facility is only one of many major ground based ionosphere heaters around the world. This global network of incredibly powerful ionosphere heaters is wreaking havoc on the climate system and the biosphere as a whole. The more educated activists are in regard to what the ionosphere heaters are and what these installations can do, the more effective they will be in the battle to raise awareness on the critical climate engineering issue.
The bold text is what the University of Alaska didn't disclose.

HAARP will zap the upper atmosphere with a focused and steerable electromagnetic beam. It is an advanced model of an "ionospheric heater." (The ionosphere is the electrically-charged sphere surrounding Earth's upper atmosphere. It ranges between 40 to 60 miles above the surface of the Earth.)
HAARP, A Weapon Of Mass Destruction

So if you think outside the box, you'll able to shrug off the academia bullshit and dig further. As the doco described, the military used to manipulate the weather of the enemy, to favour the US or hinder the enemy. Now it's gone absolutely mad.

Meanwhile here is what Haarp really is about and nothing to with weather manipulation

Are you sure about that? But of course, the Uni of Alaska said it so.
 
BTW, your link is bunk!

Next time try to be rational since this is from the University of Alaska and the project is real which you could have easily found in a quick online search.

LINK

From the link is this your own website doesn't address:

"Operation of the research facility was transferred from the United States Air Force to the University of Alaska Fairbanks on Aug. 11, 2015, allowing HAARP to continue with exploration of ionospheric phenomenology via a land-use cooperative research and development agreement."

===

From Wikipedia:

History​


The High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program began in 1990. Ted Stevens, Republican U.S. senator from Alaska, helped win approval for the facility,[9] and construction began in 1993.

In early May 2013, HAARP was temporarily shut down, awaiting a change between contractors to operate the facility. In July 2013, HAARP program manager James Keeney said, "Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is expected on site as a client to finish up some research in fall 2013 and winter 2014."[10][11] The temporary shutdown was described as being due to "a contractor regime change." Ahtna, Incorporated, the Alaska Native corporation serving the region of Alaska where the HAARP site is located, was reportedly in talks to take over the facility administration contract from Marsh Creek, LLC.[12]

In May 2014, the Air Force announced that the HAARP program would be shut down later in 2014.[4][13] While experiments ended in the summer of 2014, the complete shutdown and dismantling of the facility was postponed until at least May 2015.[14] In mid-August 2015 control of the facility and its equipment was turned over to the University of Alaska Fairbanks, which is making the facilities available for researchers on a pay-per-use basis.[15]

===

Conspiracy theories​


Stanford University professor Umran Inan told Popular Science that weather-control conspiracy theories were "completely uninformed," explaining that "there's absolutely nothing we can do to disturb the Earth's [weather] systems. Even though the power HAARP radiates is very large, it's minuscule compared with the power of a lightning flash—and there are 50 to 100 lightning flashes every second. HAARP's intensity is very small."[7] Computer scientist David Naiditch characterizes HAARP as "a magnet for conspiracy theorists," saying that HAARP attracts their attention because, "its purpose seems deeply mysterious to the scientifically uninformed."[8] Journalist Sharon Weinberger called HAARP "the Moby Dick of conspiracy theories," and said the popularity of conspiracy theories often overshadows the benefits HAARP may provide to the scientific community.[47][48] Austin Baird writing in the Alaska Dispatch said, "What makes HAARP susceptible to conspiracy criticism is simple. The facility doesn't open its doors in the same way as other federally funded research facilities around the country, and it doesn't go to great efforts to explain the importance of its research to the public."[38] In 2016, in response to these claims, the University of Alaska Fairbanks Geophysical Institute, which manages the facility, announced that HAARP will host an annual open house in August, allowing visitors to tour the complex.[49

LINK

:laugh:

===

Your link is filled with speculative garbage similar to the crap said about Chemtrails, Big Foot, Loch Ness, Moon landing hoax claims and so on.

Maybe you are just lazy........
 
Last edited:
Did you even watch the doco? No, thought as much.

Where and how do you think your colourful graphs and charts came into existence? Because of weather manipulation.

What I posted shows ZERO evidence of climate crisis developing.

You didn't post any evidence to disprove what I posted thus you have nothing.
 
Yeah, just because the University of Alaska states that, who funds the University, so who controls the narrative?
But of course, the Uni of Alaska said it so.

Really? So you have invented now a magical way to dismiss any info you don't like by merely calling into question funding? I mean, can you name a single university on this PLANET then I can't also likewise just call into question their funding and so, "narrative?" Thus simply dismissing all whose views I don't like.

How convenient and easy.

I guess that is what derpy people do now in lieu of providing any actual evidence showing the U of A or anyone else is actually in error or some findings of theirs really needs to be called into question for its conclusions.

Here's an idea: Don't defame what you can't prove wrong. :smoke:
 
I agree with The Toob here ... the Sun may have a small effect on Earth's climate, say with 10,000-year averages ... but are we measuring such a small amount? ...

We can certainly measure the Sun output to a very high degree of accuracy ... but that's absolutely not true for surface temperature ... when meteorologists say 14ºC, that comes with Marge N. O'Hara of ±0.5ºC ... we just don't have more accurate thermometers in wide distribution ...
 
Plenty of debunkings on the stupid HAARP allegations:

Disabling

** The Claim: HAARP is designed to take out satellites and missiles.

** The late physicist Bernard Eastlund believed that HAARP was built using patents of his that included satellite- and missile-disabling technology. The Rebuttal: The Air Force, Navy and Darpa deny that they used Eastlund’s patents. Killing missiles and satellites would require injecting particles into the radiation belt, which is impossible.

===

Shuttles

** The Claim: HAARP took down the space shuttle Columbia . . .
** In 2003, HAARP was trying to shoot down a North Korean missile at the same that Columbia was reentering the atmosphere, and something went terribly wrong. The Rebuttal: HAARP isn’t powerful enough to shoot down missiles.

More here,

LINK
 
Plenty of debunkings on the stupid HAARP allegations:

Disabling

** The Claim: HAARP is designed to take out satellites and missiles.

** The late physicist Bernard Eastlund believed that HAARP was built using patents of his that included satellite- and missile-disabling technology. The Rebuttal: The Air Force, Navy and Darpa deny that they used Eastlund’s patents. Killing missiles and satellites would require injecting particles into the radiation belt, which is impossible.

===

Shuttles

** The Claim: HAARP took down the space shuttle Columbia . . .
** In 2003, HAARP was trying to shoot down a North Korean missile at the same that Columbia was reentering the atmosphere, and something went terribly wrong. The Rebuttal: HAARP isn’t powerful enough to shoot down missiles.

More here,

LINK
Did you fact-check it? :auiqs.jpg:

But of course, as if the military/DARPA would disclose they use it for anything but...
Just like the CIA claims that stopped Operation Mockingbird in the 70s.
 
Last edited:
Really? So you have invented now a magical way to dismiss any info you don't like by merely calling into question funding? I mean, can you name a single university on this PLANET then I can't also likewise just call into question their funding and so, "narrative?" Thus simply dismissing all whose views I don't like.

How convenient and easy.

I guess that is what derpy people do now in lieu of providing any actual evidence showing the U of A or anyone else is actually in error or some findings of theirs really needs to be called into question for its conclusions.

Here's an idea: Don't defame what you can't prove wrong. :smoke:
No, I didn't. The authors of the article I cited make that claim.
Your link is filled with speculative garbage similar to the crap
A lot like your rubbish. Just because you post a lot of fact-checked nonsense, doesn't make you any more correct. It seems as though the Matrix has given you an endless supply of blue pills.
 
Did you fact-check it? :auiqs.jpg:

But of course, as if the military/DARPA would disclose they use it for anything but...
Just like the CIA claims that stopped Operation Mockingbird in the 70s.

Yet you can't support that claim at all.

Article remains unchallenged.

Chuckle......
 
Then you have no counterpoints to offer my post remains unchallenged.

Enjoy your ignorance.

:cool:
Bugger, you got me... NOT!!

HAARP History​


The patents described below were the package of ideas which were originally controlled by ARCO Power Technologies Incorporated (APTI), a subsidiary of Atlantic Richfield Company, one of the biggest oil companies in the world. APTI was the contractor that built the HAARP facility. ARCO sold this subsidiary, the patents and the second phase construction contract to E-Systems in June 1994.

E-Systems is one of the biggest intelligence contractors in the world — doing work for the CIA, defense intelligence organizations and others. $1.8 billion of their annual sales are to these organizations, with $800 million for black projects — projects so secret that even the United States Congress isn't told how the money is being spent.
E-Systems was bought out by Raytheon, which is one of the largest defense contractors in the world. In 1994 Raytheon was listed as number forty-two on the Fortune 500 list of companies. Raytheon has thousands of patents, some of which will be valuable in the HAARP project. The twelve patents below are the backbone of the HAARP project, and are now buried among the thousands of others held in the name of Raytheon. Bernard J. Eastlund's U.S. Patent # 4,686,605, "Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth's Atmosphere, Ionosphere; and/or Magnetosphere," was sealed for a year under a government Secrecy Order.


The Eastlund ionospheric heater was different; the radio frequency (RF) radiation was concentrated and focused to a point in the ionosphere. This difference throws an unprecedented amount of energy into the ionosphere. The Eastlund device would allow a concentration of one watt per cubic centimeter, compared to others only able to deliver about one millionth of one watt.


This huge difference could lift and change the ionosphere in the ways necessary to create futuristic effects described in the patent. According to the patent, the work of Nikola Tesla in the early 1900's formed the basis of the research.


What would this technology be worth to ARCO, the owner of the patents? They could make enormous profits by beaming electrical power from a powerhouse in the gas fields to the consumer without wires.


For a time, HAARP researchers could not prove that this was one of the intended uses for HAARP. In April, 1995, however, Begich found other patents, connected with a "key personnel" list for APTI. Some of these new APTI patents were indeed a wireless system for sending electrical power. Eastlund's patent said the technology can confuse or completely disrupt airplanes' and missiles' sophisticated guidance systems. Further, this ability to spray large areas of Earth with electromagnetic waves of varying frequencies, and to control changes in those waves, makes it possible to knock out communications on land or sea as well as in the air.

The patent said:


"Thus, this invention provides the ability to put unprecedented amounts of power in the Earth's atmosphere at strategic locations and to maintain the power injection level particularly if random pulsing is employed, in a manner far more precise and better controlled than heretofore accomplished by the prior art, particularly by detonation of nuclear devices of various yields at various altitudes… "

"…it is possible not only to interfere with third party communications but to take advantage of one or more such beams to carry out a communications network even though the rest of the world's communications are disrupted. Put another way, what is used to disrupt another's communications can be employed by one knowledgeable of this invention as a communication network at the same time."

"… large regions of the atmosphere could be lifted to an unexpectedly high altitude so that missiles encounter unexpected and unplanned drag forces with resultant destruction."

"Weather modification is possible by, for example, altering upper atmosphere wind patterns by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles which will act as a lens or focusing device.
… molecular modifications of the atmosphere can take place so that positive environmental effects can be achieved. Besides actually changing the molecular composition of an atmospheric region, a particular molecule or molecules can be chosen for increased presence. For example, ozone, nitrogen, etc., concentrations in the atmosphere could be artificially increased."
Ignorance is the pit of shit you wallow in.
 
No, I didn't. The authors of the article I cited make that claim.
Can you disprove it?

A lot like your rubbish.
No thanks, you keep it.

Just because you post a lot of fact-checked nonsense
How can it be nonsense if it is all fact-checked? Guess you didn't think that one through.

doesn't make you any more correct.
Doesn't make me wrong, neither. Unless you can PROVE me wrong.

It seems as though the Matrix has given you an endless supply of blue pills.
Leave it to a Tard to confuse a sci-fi movie with reality.
 

Forum List

Back
Top