For Snowflakes Too Lazy To Look It Up & Think For Themselves: Whistle Blower Protection Act of 1989

[colfax_m]

So you’re okay with Presidents deciding to investigate their political opponents? That’s cool with you?

Obviously you are 'cool' with giving military aid / weapons to nations proven to have interfered in our elections without any idea of the details and without assurance that it is not still happening....

The day before Schiff's circus started he declared he was going to protect the Bidens and the Dems who collaborated with the former corrupt Ukrainian officials who helped interfere in the election....and you continue to defend him / them.

Good lil; snowflake.

No one from Ukraine interfered in our election. And what does that have to do with investigating Biden?

 

[basquebromance]

brothers and sisters: Trump is guilty of the 3 C's...Collude, conspire, and Coordinate.

 

[easyt65]

[No one from Ukraine interfered in our election.

DOJ Reconfirms: Ukraine's Role in 2016 Election Interference is Being Investigated

Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire

Ukraine Court Rules Manafort Disclosure Caused ‘Meddling’ in U.S. Election


Once again your 1st statement destroys what credibility you have left.....

 

[easyt65]

brothers and sisters: Trump is guilty of the 3 C's...Collude, conspire, and Coordinate.

Trump is guilty of 'BHA':

BEATIN' HILLARY'S ASS!

 

[colfax_m]

[No one from Ukraine interfered in our election.

DOJ Reconfirms: Ukraine's Role in 2016 Election Interference is Being Investigated

Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire

Ukraine Court Rules Manafort Disclosure Caused ‘Meddling’ in U.S. Election


Once again your 1st statement destroys what credibility you have left.....

You’ve proven again you’re misled by false headlines.

Here’s from the source for link 1: A Department of Justice team led by U.S. Attorney John Durham is separately exploring the extent to which a number of countries, including Ukraine, played a role in the counterintelligence investigation directed at the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.

Notice how it says they’re investigating their participation into the counterintelligence investigation and not election interference. Swing and a miss champ. Next time read the original source.

The last link just needs an update. Sytnik and Leshchenko were found guilty in a notoriously corrupt court. Their convictions were overturned on appeal.

Court cancels earlier ruling that Ukrainian officials interfered in US election | KyivPost - Ukraine's Global Voice


Tell me in your own words what you think Ukraine did to interfere in our election

 

[kwc57]

The fact is that he had second hand and third hand knowledge and was coached by the party whose MO since day one was to "impeach that mother******".

The other fact is that his report has been confirmed as accurate.

Womp whomp

No, there was no evidence. More hearsay and emotion.

Just the transcript of the phone call with Zelensky is enough to warrant an investigation.

President’s asking for criminal investigations into their political opponents used to be considered a no-no.

Well they did and there was nothing on it. No quid pro quo, nada.

So you’re okay with Presidents deciding to investigate their political opponents? That’s cool with you?

It became cool when the Obama admin in concert with Hillary and the DNC decided to use the power of the government to spy on the Trump campaign for the purpose of securing the Presidency for Hillary.

 

[easyt65]

[No one from Ukraine interfered in our election.

DOJ Reconfirms: Ukraine's Role in 2016 Election Interference is Being Investigated

Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire

Ukraine Court Rules Manafort Disclosure Caused ‘Meddling’ in U.S. Election


Once again your 1st statement destroys what credibility you have left.....

You’ve proven again you’re misled by false headlines.

Here’s from the source for link 1: A Department of Justice team led by U.S. Attorney John Durham is separately exploring the extent to which a number of countries, including Ukraine, played a role in the counterintelligence investigation directed at the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.

Notice how it says they’re investigating their participation into the counterintelligence investigation and not election interference. Swing and a miss champ. Next time read the original source.

The last link just needs an update. Sytnik and Leshchenko were found guilty in a notoriously corrupt court. Their convictions were overturned on appeal.

Court cancels earlier ruling that Ukrainian officials interfered in US election | KyivPost - Ukraine's Global Voice


Tell me in your own words what you think Ukraine did to interfere in our election

I find it hilarious that Democrats meeting Ukrainians and collecting dirt on Trump and his team that was used to take down Manafort and used to attempt to take down Trump is in your mind not illegal collusion / interference.

It reminds me how snowflakes like you believe that Hillary paying a foreign spy for Russian-authored Counter Intelligence propaganda, which was used as he basis for the Collusion Delusion 1.0: Russia coup attempt, was NOT illegal collusion with Russia...BUT believe that Trump Jr attending a 10-minutet Obama set-up attempt with a Russian lawyer and walking away with no information having exchanged hands IS illegal collusion.

Bwuhahahahaha

 

[kwc57]

Any truth to the rumor that Bull Schiff pleasures himself under the table during testimony?

 

[easyt65]

...still waiting for DragonLady to come back and post the link to that law Schiff says exists that affords unqualified non-whistle blowers anonymity and immunity.....

 

[easyt65]

The FACT is DL and other snowflakes concede the fact that neither the Whistle Blower Act of 1989 nor the addition Obama signed into law afford a REAL 'whistle blower' any protection other than protection from retaliation in the work place.

The FACT is there is no law that affords anonymity to a 'whistle blower', thereby violating an accused person's Constitutional Right to face their accuser and eliminating the need for them to testify in a follow-on investigation that is called for. There is also no law that affords Immunity to such a 'whistle blower'.

The FACT is D-Adam Schiff, Chairman of the House Intel Committee and head of this on-going NON-Whistle Blower Inquisition has once again been exposed as a LIAR who, at this point, has ZERO credibility.

For 2 years Schiff lied to America, engaging in an act of SEDITION, by willfully, knowingly, and falsely claiming he had direct evidence of crimes committed by the President.

He then was caught attempting to present personally-authored fiction as evidence against the President in order to Impeach the President and remove him from office.

This same proven criminal POS claimed he and his staff communicated with a whistle blower prior to their filing a complaint, threatened to punish anyone who revealed the identity of the Whistle Blower, interrupted testimony to 'protect the identity of the whistle blower, THEN SUDDENLY CLAIMED HE HAD NO IDEA WHO THE WHISTLE BLOWER IS

 

[easyt65]

Hey DragonLady, I just saw that you have resurfaced after running from the challenge of posting a link to the existing law you and Schiff claim affords whistle blowers both anonymity and immunity.....

You got that link for us yet, lil' snowflake, or are you willing to concede Schiff ... and you ... are LIARS?!

 

[RealDave]

Wow. How about you assfucks be concerned that Trump broke the law instead of who brought this to the surface?

 

[kwc57]

Wow. How about you assfucks be concerned that Trump broke the law instead of who brought this to the surface?

Exactly what statute did he break and what is your evidence? Hint, evidence isn't the feelings, beliefs or thoughts of people who were not on the call or have first hand knowledge. Where is a record of an exact quite corroborated my multiple sources? To date, it does not exist. Just unelected bureaucrats claiming interagency consensus overrules the elected President who sets the policy they are supposed to carry out.

 

[easyt65]

Wow. How about you assfucks be concerned that Trump broke the law instead of who brought this to the surface?

How about you lying, easily emotionally-manipulated, TDS-suffering, hate-filled anti-Trump snowflakes prove he broke the law.

After 4 years, STILL:

No crime

No evidence of a crime

No whistle blower

No witnesses

No Indictments of Trump or Associates

Several Democrats / Obama Admin Officials Recommended for Indictment
.
..and more expected after the SISA Court Abuse and Durham Criminal Investigation reports are released.

 

[RealDave]

Wow. How about you assfucks be concerned that Trump broke the law instead of who brought this to the surface?

How about you lying, easily emotionally-manipulated, TDS-suffering, hate-filled anti-Trump snowflakes prove he broke the law.

After 4 years, STILL:

No crime

No evidence of a crime

No whistle blower

No witnesses

No Indictments of Trump or Associates

Several Democrats / Obama Admin Officials Recommended for Indictment
.
..and more expected after the SISA Court Abuse and Durham Criminal Investigation reports are released.

The Ukraine extortion has been investigated less than 5 months.

We have established that Trump did demand Quid Pro Quo.

We have established that Pence, Pompeo. Mulvanny Guiliani all were in on it.

There is a whistle blower whose concern was conform in testimony.

Trump is dead meat.

The House will pass this.

The Senate might concur.

 

[RealDave]

Wow. How about you assfucks be concerned that Trump broke the law instead of who brought this to the surface?

Exactly what statute did he break and what is your evidence? Hint, evidence isn't the feelings, beliefs or thoughts of people who were not on the call or have first hand knowledge. Where is a record of an exact quite corroborated my multiple sources? To date, it does not exist. Just unelected bureaucrats claiming interagency consensus overrules the elected President who sets the policy they are supposed to carry out.

We have testimony that he tried to bribe a foreign leader for political gain. That is against the law.

Some were in on the call. Some were in the system & were told to carry it out. Some were Trump appoiun tees.

Try supporting our country for once instead of your fat assed buddy.

 

[Rambunctious]

Dem whistle blower....

 

[RealDave]

The FACT is DL and other snowflakes concede the fact that neither the Whistle Blower Act of 1989 nor the addition Obama signed into law afford a REAL 'whistle blower' any protection other than protection from retaliation in the work place.

The FACT is there is no law that affords anonymity to a 'whistle blower', thereby violating an accused person's Constitutional Right to face their accuser and eliminating the need for them to testify in a follow-on investigation that is called for. There is also no law that affords Immunity to such a 'whistle blower'.

The FACT is D-Adam Schiff, Chairman of the House Intel Committee and head of this on-going NON-Whistle Blower Inquisition has once again been exposed as a LIAR who, at this point, has ZERO credibility.

For 2 years Schiff lied to America, engaging in an act of SEDITION, by willfully, knowingly, and falsely claiming he had direct evidence of crimes committed by the President.

He then was caught attempting to present personally-authored fiction as evidence against the President in order to Impeach the President and remove him from office.

This same proven criminal POS claimed he and his staff communicated with a whistle blower prior to their filing a complaint, threatened to punish anyone who revealed the identity of the Whistle Blower, interrupted testimony to 'protect the identity of the whistle blower, THEN SUDDENLY CLAIMED HE HAD NO IDEA WHO THE WHISTLE BLOWER IS

Why do you want to know?

Trump already conformed what was in his report.

 

[kwc57]

Wow. How about you assfucks be concerned that Trump broke the law instead of who brought this to the surface?

Exactly what statute did he break and what is your evidence? Hint, evidence isn't the feelings, beliefs or thoughts of people who were not on the call or have first hand knowledge. Where is a record of an exact quite corroborated my multiple sources? To date, it does not exist. Just unelected bureaucrats claiming interagency consensus overrules the elected President who sets the policy they are supposed to carry out.

We have testimony that he tried to bribe a foreign leader for political gain. That is against the law.

Some were in on the call. Some were in the system & were told to carry it out. Some were Trump appoiun tees.

Try supporting our country for once instead of your fat assed buddy.

I note that you didn't provide the evidence. You like the "star" witnesses alluded to what you heard.

 

[RealDave]

Wow. How about you assfucks be concerned that Trump broke the law instead of who brought this to the surface?

Exactly what statute did he break and what is your evidence? Hint, evidence isn't the feelings, beliefs or thoughts of people who were not on the call or have first hand knowledge. Where is a record of an exact quite corroborated my multiple sources? To date, it does not exist. Just unelected bureaucrats claiming interagency consensus overrules the elected President who sets the policy they are supposed to carry out.

We have testimony that he tried to bribe a foreign leader for political gain. That is against the law.

Some were in on the call. Some were in the system & were told to carry it out. Some were Trump appoiun tees.

Try supporting our country for once instead of your fat assed buddy.

I note that you didn't provide the evidence. You like the "star" witnesses alluded to what you heard.

Testimony is evidence, dumbass.