For Snowflakes Too Lazy To Look It Up & Think For Themselves: Whistle Blower Protection Act of 1989

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,076
2,645
For all the shameless, perfectly-happy-being-ignorant-Democrat-Dupes, easily emotionally-manipulated, hate-driven, Jonathon-Gruber-stupid snowflakes who are too lazy to look anything up and think for themselves, who would rather attack people on this board for posting actual facts and truth:

WHISTLE BLOWER PROTECTION ACT OF 1989:

'The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989, 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(8)-(9), Pub.L. 101-12 as amended, is a United States federal law (PASSED AND AMENDED BY CONGRESS' - THE SAME CONGRESS WHICH D-ADAM SCHIFF IS A MEMBER OF YET HE DOES NOT KNOW THE LAW - 'that protects federal whistleblowers who work for the government and report the possible existence of an activity constituting a violation of law, rules, or regulations, or mismanagement, gross waste of funds, abuse of authority or a substantial and specific danger to public health and safety. A federal agency violates the Whistleblower Protection Act if agency authorities take (or threaten to take) retaliatory personnel action against any employee or applicant because of disclosure of information by that employee or applicant.'

OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL:

'Today, the primary mission of OSC is to safeguard the merit system by protecting federal employees and applicants from prohibited personnel practices, especially reprisal for whistleblowing.'


Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act and Presidential Policy Directive 19:

"President Barack Obama issued Presidential Policy Directive 19 (PPD-19), entitled "Protecting Whistleblowers with Access to Classified Information". It prohibits retaliation against employees for reporting waste, fraud, and abuse.'



That's IT. There is NO MORE!

'Protection from retaliation' is the ONLY protection afforded ACTUAL 'whistleblowers', which Schiff's supposed 'whistleblower-wanna-be' DOES NOT LEGALLY QUALIFY AS!

THERE IS NO AFFORDED ANONYMITY AFFORDED TO THEM BY LAW.

THERE IS NO IMMUNITY AFFORDED TO THEM BY LAW.

D-ADAM SCHIFF IS A PROVEN F*ING LIAR, A PERPETRATOR OF SEDITION, A TRAITOR WHO IS INTENTIONALLY VIOLATING THE PRESIDENT'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS (RIGHT TO FACE HIS ACCUSER, AMONG OTHERS) AND CLAIMING THE EXISTENCE OF A 'WHISTLEBLOWER' THAT DOES NOT EXIST AND CLAIMING THE US LAW AFFORDS THEM ANONYMITY AND IMMUNITY....AND NO SUCH LAW EXISTS!



Whistleblower Protection Act - Wikipedia


.
 
Last edited:
Schiff is a lying coxucker trying to impeach a president using lies and bluster.
The good news is that the Senate can call the WB as a witness and Schiff can't do anything about it.
 
There is NO 'WHISTLE BLOWER'.
Even if Schiff's 'Whistle Blower' existed they do NOT meet the legally qualifying definition of 'Whistle Blower' and therefore is not even afforded the protection from retaliation as provided in this law, which is the ONLY protection afforded a 'whistle blower'. .

Schiff claims there is a 'Whistle Blower'.

- He ALSO claimed for 2 years he had direct evidence of crimes committed by the President, evidence that Special Counsel Mueller and his team did not have. IT WAS A LIE.

- He ALSO attempted to present a personally-authored fictional transcript of the President's and Ukraine PM's phone call as 'EVIDENCE'. After it was quickly exposed as a LIE (Perjury before Congress, Sedition...) the MSM & Schiff scrambled to conduct 'damage control' by claiming it was a 'parody'...in the middle of his initial Impeachment coup hearing at taxpayer expense.

SCHIFF & his staff claimed the whistle blower contacted Schiff prior to filing the 'Whistle Blower' complain. He attempted to justify the communication, despite lying about it until finally forced to admit it.
-- Such contact would make him a CONTACT WITNESS, which would not only disqualify him from leading this 'coup 2.0' but from even participating in it.

SCHIFF threatened to punish anyone who identified the non-whistle blower and has interrupted both Congressmen and non-witnesses during testimony to declare he wanted to keep the identity of the non-whistle blower secret....while claiming he does not even know the identity.

How can he prevent anyone from identifying and bringing up / talking about the non-whistle blower...if he doesn't even know who it is?

Amazingly enough, snowflakes swallowed Schiff's lie about a whistle blower AFTER Schiff had been exposed as a LIAR numerous times, willing to lie - and anything else - to affect the coup / the President's removal from office.

To keep the fact that this non-whistle blower does NOT even exist, that it was another 'parody' intended to be used as a foundation / basis for this entire false accusation of extorting / bribing the Ukraine PM, SCHIFF has claimed legal rights / protections afforded to this non-whistle blower than DO NOT EXIST.

HE has been busted.....and remarkably WILLING ignorant snowflakes continue to defend him despite the FACT has now been proven - ACTUAL WHISTLE BLOWERS ARE NOT AFFORDED ANONYMITY AND / OR IMMUNITY!

.
 
Where are all the board self-appointed snowflake geniuses and legal experts who have defended Schiff and claimed he is right about the non-existent whistle blower being afforded both anonymity and immunity?!
 
DragonLady accused me of being a liar and claiming when asked to produce the law that affords REAL 'whistle blowers' with anonymity and immunity Schiff immediately quoted her the law.

I challenged DL, if Schiff provided the answer and she can prove this then she can also provide the link to the law Schiff was referring to....she ran from that thread / challenge and will not respond in this one because she has been exposed as a shameless liar and defender of proven liars and traitors.
 
Second hand and third hand knowledge doesnt work. Just another reason this is a donkey show.

That is why the prosecutorial division of the DOJ rejected this 'non-whistle blower' complaint, why every court in the land would immediately dismiss it, and who they had to change the rules and go straight to Schiff, the only lying, leaking traitor who would use it as the basis for another coup attempt.
 
For all the shameless, perfectly-happy-being-ignorant-Democrat-Dupes, easily emotionally-manipulated, hate-driven, Jonathon-Gruber-stupid snowflakes who are too lazy to look anything up and think for themselves, who would rather attack people on this board for posting actual facts and truth:

WHISTLE BLOWER PROTECTION ACT OF 1989:

'The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989, 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(8)-(9), Pub.L. 101-12 as amended, is a United States federal law (PASSED AND AMENDED BY CONGRESS' - THE SAME CONGRESS WHICH D-ADAM SCHIFF IS A MEMBER OF YET HE DOES NOT KNOW THE LAW - 'that protects federal whistleblowers who work for the government and report the possible existence of an activity constituting a violation of law, rules, or regulations, or mismanagement, gross waste of funds, abuse of authority or a substantial and specific danger to public health and safety. A federal agency violates the Whistleblower Protection Act if agency authorities take (or threaten to take) retaliatory personnel action against any employee or applicant because of disclosure of information by that employee or applicant.'

OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL:

'Today, the primary mission of OSC is to safeguard the merit system by protecting federal employees and applicants from prohibited personnel practices, especially reprisal for whistleblowing.'


Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act and Presidential Policy Directive 19:

"President Barack Obama issued Presidential Policy Directive 19 (PPD-19), entitled "Protecting Whistleblowers with Access to Classified Information". It prohibits retaliation against employees for reporting waste, fraud, and abuse.'



That's IT. There is NO MORE!

'Protection from retaliation' is the ONLY protection afforded ACTUAL 'whistleblowers', which Schiff's supposed 'whistleblower-wanna-be' DOES NOT LEGALLY QUALIFY AS!

THERE IS NO AFFORDED ANONYMITY AFFORDED TO THEM BY LAW.

THERE IS NO IMMUNITY AFFORDED TO THEM BY LAW.

D-ADAM SCHIFF IS A PROVEN F*ING LIAR, A PERPETRATOR OF SEDITION, A TRAITOR WHO IS INTENTIONALLY VIOLATING THE PRESIDENT'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS (RIGHT TO FACE HIS ACCUSER, AMONG OTHERS) AND CLAIMING THE EXISTENCE OF A 'WHISTLEBLOWER' THAT DOES NOT EXIST AND CLAIMING THE US LAW AFFORDS THEM ANONYMITY AND IMMUNITY....AND NO SUCH LAW EXISTS!



Whistleblower Protection Act - Wikipedia


.
There is no mention at all of anonymity. Schiff is making that up and no one is challenging him in Court on it, and that is what needs to be done.
 
Second hand and third hand knowledge doesnt work. Just another reason this is a donkey show.

That is why the prosecutorial division of the DOJ rejected this 'non-whistle blower' complaint, why every court in the land would immediately dismiss it, and who they had to change the rules and go straight to Schiff, the only lying, leaking traitor who would use it as the basis for another coup attempt.

Yep, thats exactly right. What libs forget is that this will now set a precedent for future R congress' to just name some guy off the street a whistleblower and scream impeachment.
 
The whistleblower is as real as leprechauns.

Here is the whistleblower:

leprechaunsketchjpg-fd696cd31b55ddaa.jpg
 
Second hand and third hand knowledge doesnt work. Just another reason this is a donkey show.

That is why the prosecutorial division of the DOJ rejected this 'non-whistle blower' complaint, why every court in the land would immediately dismiss it, and who they had to change the rules and go straight to Schiff, the only lying, leaking traitor who would use it as the basis for another coup attempt.

Yep, thats exactly right. What libs forget is that this will now set a precedent for future R congress' to just name some guy off the street a whistleblower and scream impeachment.

The ICIG named him a whistleblower, not Congress.
 
Second hand and third hand knowledge doesnt work. Just another reason this is a donkey show.

That is why the prosecutorial division of the DOJ rejected this 'non-whistle blower' complaint, why every court in the land would immediately dismiss it, and who they had to change the rules and go straight to Schiff, the only lying, leaking traitor who would use it as the basis for another coup attempt.

Yep, thats exactly right. What libs forget is that this will now set a precedent for future R congress' to just name some guy off the street a whistleblower and scream impeachment.

The ICIG named him a whistleblower, not Congress.

Doesn't matter. Under the rules specified, he isn't a whistleblower.
 
Second hand and third hand knowledge doesnt work. Just another reason this is a donkey show.

That is why the prosecutorial division of the DOJ rejected this 'non-whistle blower' complaint, why every court in the land would immediately dismiss it, and who they had to change the rules and go straight to Schiff, the only lying, leaking traitor who would use it as the basis for another coup attempt.

Yep, thats exactly right. What libs forget is that this will now set a precedent for future R congress' to just name some guy off the street a whistleblower and scream impeachment.

The ICIG named him a whistleblower, not Congress.
Of course the Deep State Intel Community, already exposed for their part in 'Collusion Delusion 1.0: Russia', wrongly listed the non-existent 'whistle blower' a 'whistle blower', despite not meeting the legal requirement and despite the prosecutorial divisions in the DOJ dismissing the bogus 'Hearsay-based' complaint.
 
WHAT THE ACTUAL LAW SAYS SCHIFF'S UN-QUALIFIED NON-WHISTLE BLOWER IS AFFORDED:



 
Second hand and third hand knowledge doesnt work. Just another reason this is a donkey show.

That is why the prosecutorial division of the DOJ rejected this 'non-whistle blower' complaint, why every court in the land would immediately dismiss it, and who they had to change the rules and go straight to Schiff, the only lying, leaking traitor who would use it as the basis for another coup attempt.

Yep, thats exactly right. What libs forget is that this will now set a precedent for future R congress' to just name some guy off the street a whistleblower and scream impeachment.

The ICIG named him a whistleblower, not Congress.

Doesn't matter. Under the rules specified, he isn't a whistleblower.

The rules are a matter of debate. But you missed the larger point that it wasn’t Congress who labeled him a whistleblower.
 
Second hand and third hand knowledge doesnt work. Just another reason this is a donkey show.

That is why the prosecutorial division of the DOJ rejected this 'non-whistle blower' complaint, why every court in the land would immediately dismiss it, and who they had to change the rules and go straight to Schiff, the only lying, leaking traitor who would use it as the basis for another coup attempt.

Yep, thats exactly right. What libs forget is that this will now set a precedent for future R congress' to just name some guy off the street a whistleblower and scream impeachment.

The ICIG named him a whistleblower, not Congress.
Of course the Deep State Intel Community, already exposed for their part in 'Collusion Delusion 1.0: Russia', wrongly listed the non-existent 'whistle blower' a 'whistle blower', despite not meeting the legal requirement and despite the prosecutorial divisions in the DOJ dismissing the bogus 'Hearsay-based' complaint.

The ICIG was appointed by Trump.
 
WHAT THE ACTUAL LAW SAYS SCHIFF'S UN-QUALIFIED NON-WHISTLE BLOWER IS AFFORDED:





If that’s the case, why is Nunes and Jordan spending their time trying to dox the whistleblower when Trump could release his name in one order?
 
The rules are a matter of debate. But you missed the larger point that it wasn’t Congress who labeled him a whistleblower.

1. WHO, again, labeled the non-eye-witness, heasay-passing non-qualifying 'whistle blower' a 'whistle blower'?

- The ICIG, the same douchebag who changed the rules so the complaint could go right to Schiff and his Committee?

- The non-whistle blower' and complaint dismissed by the prosecutorial divisions within the DOJ BEFORE Schiff turned this into his own public 'Collusion Delusion 2.0: Ukraine'?

2. On WHAT was the IC IG's decision to label this individual a 'Whistle Blower'?

Again, the prosecutorial divisions of the DOJ had dismissed the individual and the complain as bogus hearsay...and the law itself makes it clear the individual does not qualify.
- I guess this is what happens when the Deep State Intel Community once again attempts to assume the role and duties / decisions of the DOJ.

3. All of the above was made clear to Schiff, especially the part about the non-existent non-whistle blower NOT meeting the requirements to be a 'whistle blower'....SO WHY IS LYING TREASONOUS SCHIFF STILL INSISTING / STILL ATTEMPTING TO CONVINCE HIS APPROX 400 FELLOW LAWYER CONGRESSMEN THAT THE NON-WHISTLE BLOWER does MEET THE QUALIFICATION SET BY LAW AND THAT A LAW EXISTS GRANTING HIS NON-WHISTLE BLOWER BOTH ANONYMITY AND IMMUNITY...WHEN NO SUCH LAW AND NO SUCHPROTECTION IS AFFORDED?!
 
If that’s the case, why is Nunes and Jordan spending their time trying to dox the whistleblower when Trump could release his name in one order?
1. IF there is any chance of there being a REAL non-qualifying whistle blower who started all of this then it is President Trump's Constitutional Right to face his accuser.

2, Speaker of the House Pelosi penned a letter to all 435 Congressmen - already presented / reported by the media - declaring the whistle blower MUST testify if such an Impeachment investigation based on their 2nd-hand hearsay is / was to be conducted.

3. If Schiff is just LYING / presenting another 'parody' as real evidence again, which constitutes Sedition and Treason in this attempt to remove a President from power, they want to force Schiff to admit it is all his creation, the continuation of his 2+ year crusade to oust the President.
 

Forum List

Back
Top