Skull Pilot
Diamond Member
- Nov 17, 2007
- 45,446
- 6,164
- 1,830
If you didn't think Pelosi, AKA Bella I want to suck your wallet Pelosi, was a fucking moron...
[youtube]z_PTqvyzwRg&eurl[/youtube]
STEPHANOPOULOS: Hundreds of millions of dollars to expand family-planning services. How is that stimulus?
PELOSI: Well, the family-planning services reduce cost. They reduce cost. The states are in terrible fiscal budget crises now, and part of what we do for childrens health, education and some of those elements are to help the states meet their financial needs. One of thoseone of the initiatives you mentioned, the contraception, will reduce costs to the states and to the federal government.
STEPHANOPOULOS: So no apologies for that?
PELOSI: No apologies. No. we have to deal with the consequences of the downturn in our economy. Food stamps, unemployment insurance, some of the initiatives you just mentioned. What the economists have told us from right to left: There is more bang for the buck, a term they use, by investing in food stamps and in unemployment insurance than in any tax cut.
So money for rubbers and abortions saves states money and putting more people on food stamps and government assistance is a better investment than tax cuts?
OK can some moonbat explain this to me?
[youtube]z_PTqvyzwRg&eurl[/youtube]
STEPHANOPOULOS: Hundreds of millions of dollars to expand family-planning services. How is that stimulus?
PELOSI: Well, the family-planning services reduce cost. They reduce cost. The states are in terrible fiscal budget crises now, and part of what we do for childrens health, education and some of those elements are to help the states meet their financial needs. One of thoseone of the initiatives you mentioned, the contraception, will reduce costs to the states and to the federal government.
STEPHANOPOULOS: So no apologies for that?
PELOSI: No apologies. No. we have to deal with the consequences of the downturn in our economy. Food stamps, unemployment insurance, some of the initiatives you just mentioned. What the economists have told us from right to left: There is more bang for the buck, a term they use, by investing in food stamps and in unemployment insurance than in any tax cut.
So money for rubbers and abortions saves states money and putting more people on food stamps and government assistance is a better investment than tax cuts?
OK can some moonbat explain this to me?