So he was forced to plea guilty?
Got it...
National Security advisors are often oppressed by law enforcement and coerced into making false confessions....
As has been stated before, a guilty plea is irrelevant if the crime of tampering with evidence exists in the case. The evidence the plea is based on cannot have been tampered with. That makes the entire case illegal.
If.....still some meat on that bone. Judge could rule an entirely different way..right now..all we have are the allegations of the Defense. The plea probably will stand..absent egregious behavior. Which is what they are alleging..in their 151 page brief.
Not with evidence of or intent to entrap. This case is going boom!
What the left doesn't realize that is that INTENT is what is at play here.
The INTENT of the FBI should NEVER be to entrap someone or get them to purjure themselves. The evidence showed that there was zero evidence that Flynn was colluding with the Russians so it should have died there. It didn't because Peter Suck told them not to.
You can't go into an investigation with the intent to entrap. That's entrapment and is a defense to a crime. If someone lies to the FBI during a normal investigation that's one thing. But to do it during a dead investigation with the sole intent to try to perjure the witness, that's against the law.