D
Dim Bulb
Guest
- Thread starter
- #121
You raised an essentially hermeneutic issue, one dealt with at length by A.J. Ayer in his seminal work, "Language, Truth, and Logic." It is also a linguistic issue insofar as the meanings of words and acts can be said to change with common use. Constitutional scholars discuss this question at length when confronted with the question of whether the Constitution is a static document or subject to current and common understandings. I would assume you would take the latter view of the Constitution, that the current and common understanding controls in questions of interpretation./----/ Of course libtard moonbats think conservatives are wrong on the issues. Brilliant deduction. Ask mommy for some ice cream
Not a one of them grasped what I was saying..jyst kneejerk reactionary BS typical of a left tard
I said some use it to symbolize a nation in distress. Do they or do they not?
Save the blather and answer. Yes or no
Just ask the twins what my post means. They will tell you I am actually agreeing with you.
They'd laugh at you...they would recognize back pedaling and face saving attempts
Look, I mean no disrespect, but you're really punching out of your weight class here. You are saying A and I am saying B. Both A and B are true. You are taking the position that B cannot be true, and that anyone who believes B is incorrect, stupid, etc. And I am saying A and B are true. You are interpreting that, for your own psychological reasons, to mean that since A is true, B cannot be true.
A = some people fly the flag upside down to mean the nation is in peril.
B = some people fly the flag upside down only to mean that the fort (their military position) is in peril.
You have a need to interpret this to mean that you've won some sort of a prize, so be it. It just shows your intellectual paucity. Again, no offense intended. It is what it is.