Florist Sued for Refusing Service to Gay Couple Pens Defiant Letter Rejecting Gov’t Settlement Offer

[PaintMyHouse]

Rights don't have limitations, scum.

Your level of ignorance is amazing:

Start here: The Limits Of First Amendment Protection Casebriefs

And here: United States free speech exceptions - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Nicely said:
"Exceptions to free speech in the United States are limitations on the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech and expression as recognized by the United States Supreme Court. These exceptions have been created over time, based on certain types of speech and expression, and under different contexts. While freedom of speech in the United States is a constitutional right, these exceptions make that right a limited one."

 

[g5000]

Funny - fact shows it was your democrats who forced blacks to the back of the bus.

Funny - facts show those Democrats were right wing conservatives.

Funny - you rubes always leave that part out.

Which "facts"? When did these democrats become right wing conservatives?

The racist Southern Democrats of the civil rights era were always far right wing conservatives. Anti communist, pro states rights, big on Defense, low taxation...sound familiar?

And bigots.

They were your political ancestors.

I feel sorry for you for not knowing that. Your manipulators are telling you lies of omission.

 

[bodecea]

[

Well that's tough shit. How bout that?

That sounds like the attitude the Nazis had with the Jews. "We are talking away your freedom and if you don't like it then tough shit".

Typical Libtard mindset.

Check you out! Comparing keeping a business from discriminating against fellow citizens because of their sexual orientation (which is totally legal) is JUST LIKE what the Nazis did to the Jews.

RWrs sure do suck at analogies.

It was legal for the government to abuse the Jews in Germany just like it is legal for the government to abuse the florist in this example. Both are government tyranny, just different degrees. The mindset is the same. Government control.

The government has abused the florist just like the government abused the Jews in Germany...................
Yep, you sure suck at analogies.

 

[Carla_Danger]

It must suck to be a conservative. Black people get to ride at the front of the bus, and businesses can't discriminate based on sexual orientation.

Oh the sacrifices you've had to make!

Funny - fact shows it was your democrats who forced blacks to the back of the bus.

Tell me, can a business discriminate based on bathing? Why or why not? (I'll wait while you log on to KOS to have the answer programmed into you..)

Well those racist Southern States are now red. Times, they have changed.

My suggestion for anyone getting a business license, is to familiarize themselves with the State laws on discrimination, which apparently, the florist did not do.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

[

Well that's tough shit. How bout that?

That sounds like the attitude the Nazis had with the Jews. "We are talking away your freedom and if you don't like it then tough shit".

Typical Libtard mindset.

Check you out! Comparing keeping a business from discriminating against fellow citizens because of their sexual orientation (which is totally legal) is JUST LIKE what the Nazis did to the Jews.

RWrs sure do suck at analogies.

It was legal for the government to abuse the Jews in Germany just like it is legal for the government to abuse the florist in this example. Both are government tyranny, just different degrees. The mindset is the same. Government control.

Capitalism is regulated here, and everywhere else. Time to grow up now.

 

[Katzndogz]

The florist didn't discriminate against anyone.

 

[Carla_Danger]

Funny - fact shows it was your democrats who forced blacks to the back of the bus.

Funny - facts show those Democrats were right wing conservatives.

Funny - you rubes always leave that part out.

Which "facts"? When did these democrats become right wing conservatives?

Gradually, after the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

 

[Carla_Danger]

The florist didn't discriminate against anyone.

That's not what the judge said.

 

[g5000]

Funny - fact shows it was your democrats who forced blacks to the back of the bus.

Funny - facts show those Democrats were right wing conservatives.

Funny - you rubes always leave that part out.

Which "facts"? When did these democrats become right wing conservatives?

Gradually, after the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

After the Voting Rights Act, the Republican Party began luring the negrophobes into their fold. The famous "Southern Strategy".

Nixon's Southern Strategy: "It's All In The Charts":

"From now on, the Republicans are never going to get more than 10 to 20 percent of the Negro vote and they don't need any more than that...but Republicans would be shortsighted if they weakened enforcement of the Voting Rights Act. The more Negroes who register as Democrats in the South, the sooner the Negrophobe whites will quit the Democrats and become Republicans. That's where the votes are. Without that prodding from the blacks, the whites will backslide into their old comfortable arrangement with the local Democrats."

That's a Republican strategist laying out the GOP plan going forward.

Because of that successful southern strategy, we are plagued with bigots in the GOP to this day. They have permanently altered the host organism. They are a disease that must be rooted out.

 

[Carla_Danger]

[

Well that's tough shit. How bout that?

That sounds like the attitude the Nazis had with the Jews. "We are talking away your freedom and if you don't like it then tough shit".

Typical Libtard mindset.

Check you out! Comparing keeping a business from discriminating against fellow citizens because of their sexual orientation (which is totally legal) is JUST LIKE what the Nazis did to the Jews.

RWrs sure do suck at analogies.

It was legal for the government to abuse the Jews in Germany just like it is legal for the government to abuse the florist in this example. Both are government tyranny, just different degrees. The mindset is the same. Government control.

I refuse to debate this kind of stupidity.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The florist didn't discriminate against anyone.

That dog won't hunt, and it didn't so don't bother.

 

[bodecea]

Here's a scenerio for you all to chew on.

Washington Business A sells flowers. Customer B comes in and orders flowers for a wedding that will take place at a Catholic church. Business owner A tells Customer B that they don't sell flowers nor flower arrangements to Catholics because of their personal belief system.

SO.....
1) Has Business A broken the law?

2) Does Customer A have the right to report them to the state if they have broken the law?

3) If the state finds that Business A has indeed broken the law, has the state the right to fine Business A based on the law?

4) Does Business A have the right to ignore the law and ignore the fine because they don't like it?

Why does no one want to take this on?

 

[Dana7360]

My, my, my, you sure have gotten yourself confused. Nazi Germany was all about Whites Only. No homosexuals allowed either, meine kleine Führer.
.

Jake, you grasp that Jews are white, right?

Herman Goering was openly homosexual.

Hey, you might be a bigot - but you're extremely ignorant, so that makes up for it.

If herman goering was openly homosexual why was he married not once but twice to two different women?

He was married to carin von kantzow from 1935 until she died in 1931. He then married emmy shonnemann from 1935 to 1946 when he died.

An openly gay person doesn't get married to a person of the opposite sex. They openly are gay to everyone and only have physical relationships with people who are the same sex as they are.

You might want to either learn about history or stop lying because it's way too easy to prove your lies for what they are.

Hermann Göring - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[PaintMyHouse]

[

Well that's tough shit. How bout that?

That sounds like the attitude the Nazis had with the Jews. "We are talking away your freedom and if you don't like it then tough shit".

Typical Libtard mindset.

Check you out! Comparing keeping a business from discriminating against fellow citizens because of their sexual orientation (which is totally legal) is JUST LIKE what the Nazis did to the Jews.

RWrs sure do suck at analogies.

It was legal for the government to abuse the Jews in Germany just like it is legal for the government to abuse the florist in this example. Both are government tyranny, just different degrees. The mindset is the same. Government control.

I refuse to debate this kind of stupidity.

Drama queens like Flash don't want to debate, they want to have temper tantrum, with words.

 

[g5000]

It was legal for the government to abuse the Jews in Germany just like it is legal for the government to abuse the florist in this example. Both are government tyranny, just different degrees. The mindset is the same. Government control.

I refuse to debate this kind of stupidity.

Yeah, no shit. That kind of retardation cannot be cured with reason.

Nazis hated non-whites and homosexuals. Hmmmm, sounds like some people here we know. They can't stand the thought they have so much in common with Nazis and so they have to do a lot of mental twists to console themselves. I've seen it countless times.

 

[koshergrl]

Nope. Neither did the doctor, not the baker discriminated against anyone.

Small business owners have a right and a duty to reject customers they feel they cannot or do not want to serve. It isn't just to save them the unpleasant interaction..it's in their clients' best interests to be served by somebody who wants their business.

When you force people to unwillingly serve people they don't want to associate with, you have created slave market.

Of course, we all know progressives lives for slavery. They have historically been the ones constantly thinking of new and special ways to kill off and subjugate people they don't like..and putting those ingenious ideas to the test.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

When you force people to unwillingly serve people they don't want to associate with, you have created slave market.

That argument failed to win the day, sixty years ago. Time to catch up little one.

 

[g5000]

How We Know Hitler Was A Liberal

 

[bodecea]

Nope. Neither did the doctor, not the baker discriminated against anyone.

Small business owners have a right and a duty to reject customers they feel they cannot or do not want to serve. It isn't just to save them the unpleasant interaction..it's in their clients' best interests to be served by somebody who wants their business.

When you force people to unwillingly serve people they don't want to associate with, you have created slave market.

Of course, we all know progressives lives for slavery. They have historically been the ones constantly thinking of new and special ways to kill off and subjugate people they don't like..and putting those ingenious ideas to the test.

PA laws disagree with you.

 

[Carla_Danger]

Nope. Neither did the doctor, not the baker discriminated against anyone.

Small business owners have a right and a duty to reject customers they feel they cannot or do not want to serve. It isn't just to save them the unpleasant interaction..it's in their clients' best interests to be served by somebody who wants their business.

When you force people to unwillingly serve people they don't want to associate with, you have created slave market.

Of course, we all know progressives lives for slavery. They have historically been the ones constantly thinking of new and special ways to kill off and subjugate people they don't like..and putting those ingenious ideas to the test.

No, they don't have that right. It's against the law, and rightly so.