SassyIrishLass
Diamond Member
- Mar 31, 2009
- 114,136
- 102,199
- 3,605
- Thread starter
- #2,361
Even better yet, how bout we keep what happens in the bedroom out of everyone's freaking face?So heterosexuality should not be a criteria for discrimination protection.Oh good. You realize that at least on a national level, lifestyle choice was never a criteria of discrimination protection. Many Leftists don't get that fine point. The "add the words" campaign failed here in Idaho, and that's a good thing. Whether it be drugs, homosexuality, or pedophilia, nobody deserves to live however they want and not face discrimination for it. That's bullshit. So here in Idaho since sexual orientation can be discriminated, my kids are safe because I don't have to hire a pedophile babysitter.Bullshit. People are discriminated against all the time and for good reasons. Lifestyle choice is a worthy means for discrimination, something I keep well in mind before hiring a pedophile to watch my kids.Rights aren't special privileges. If any of us have the right to not be discriminated against, all of us do.
Why would you be hiring a pedophile to watch your kids? Or for that matter a murderer or a convicted conman?
You are right that we do discriminate against people all of the time. In 1964 Congress passed a law making it illegal for certain kinds of business's to discriminate in providing service because of a customers race, creed, gender or national origin.
Was that law wrong?
They'll come back with Mardi Gras....it's on page 23 of the GLAAD homo handbook