Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Donald Trump, and any of his supporters.No. They just say that banning all Muslims is reasonable, because any one might be am extremist. Tell me how that is, substantively different?Then radical Muslims do not represent Islam?
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
I do not believe that ANYONE says that radical Islam represents all Muslims. If anyone has, I do not agree with them.
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
Who is "they", bigot boy?
I've never been a Trump supporter, but I've never heard him call for "banning all Muslims". All I have EVER heard was that immigration be halted from some areas of the world, such as Syria, until we can vet them properly. I remember hearing FBI director James Comey saying during a House Committee on Homeland Security hearing that the federal government does not have the ability to conduct thorough background checks on all of the 10,000 Syrian refugees that the Obama administration says will be allowed to come to the U.S.
I believe our FBI director over a reactionary like you.
More gun laws? Ban? Heroin is banned but pours in from Mexico by the TON from down south. So would guns, to the bad guys.
So in your world laws don't do anything so we shouldn't have any laws. All you have are Red Herrings and Strawmen fallacies. The go-to toolbox for the conservative trying desperately to make a fake argument.
Here is what you do. Since open borders invite terrorists, close them.
Because black market suppliers will continue to arm terrorists, then 1. do NOT disarm their targets, and 2. do not give them access to their targets.
An Afgan wishing to kill homosexuals in Florida would have to be a pretty good shot to hit one from Afghanistan.
Ironically, there are no terrorists coming in to the US from south of the border that you want to close (which would end $519 billion in trade with Mexico per year.) Even more ironically, the cartels in Mexico, who certainly are terrorists, get their arms from the USA black marketers. .
Who are you addressing here? I am the one who has been saying all along that an entire religion-be it Muslims or Christians-should NOT be vilified for the actions of a few! The point of this post is to show that there are in fact radical, hateful Christians to contribute to the anti gay sentiment that leads to violence, a fact that the Muslim bashers refuse to acknowledge.Stupid? What is stupid is your saying that he was no Christian. No one is saying that he was a Christian. Your just resorting to a straw man with that one. And, if you had read the article, you would know that it's more than "two loons " that praised him. You would also have seen the hypocrisy of focusing on Islam and ignoring Christians contribution to the hate. Here is more for your convenienceDid someone say something about Islamic terrorism?
Christian Extremists Praise Anti-LGBT Violence After Orlando Because Every Religion Has Radicals
It’s been 10 days since a gunman shot his way into a queer nightclub in Orlando, Florida, where he massacred 49 people and injured dozens of others. And while much of the nation has been trying to heal or push for action to prevent future mass shootings, very few people have been willing to focus on another disturbing trend rearing its head in the U.S. In fact, nobody seems willing to call this menace by its true name. But we will.
What you see below is radical Christianity. ( Read More...)
Christian Extremists Praise Anti-LGBT Violence After Orlando Because Every Religion Has Radicals
That's stupid. The shooter was no sort of Christian and the TWO loons that "praised" the shootings don't represent anything but their own ignorance. Go pound salt.
Presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump and other Republicans have hammered President Barack Obama for choosing not to use the term “radical Islam,” suggesting that his rhetoric reflects an unwillingness to get serious about a national security threat. They’ve also used the shooting to further blur the line between the tiny fraction of radical Muslims and the rest of the world’s 1.6 billion followers of Islam. They say the Quran teaches that homosexuality is punishable by death, which means Muslims must be anti-gay. Yet again, the actions of a single person are being used to cast a pall over an entire community.
Christians are rarely asked to answer these questions, because nobody is rushing to confront or condemn radical Christianity. But what does the Bible say about the LGBT community, and do we assume most Christians take it literally? Does Christianity promote violent homophobia? Should we interpret one preacher’s despicable anti-queer comments as the gospel of an entire religion? These have not traditionally been topics of political debate. Though to their credit, some Christian leaders have asked such questions of themselves over the past week.
I have just as much contempt for your point of view as I have for radical Islam and radical Christians. People who seek to condemn entire groups based on the most radical viewpoints are bigots.
Which religion is throwing fags off of roofs?Who are you addressing here? I am the one who has been saying all along that an entire religion-be it Muslims or Christians-should NOT be vilified for the actions of a few! The point of this post is to show that there are in fact radical, hateful Christians to contribute to the anti gay sentiment that leads to violence, a fact that the Muslim bashers refuse to acknowledge.Stupid? What is stupid is your saying that he was no Christian. No one is saying that he was a Christian. Your just resorting to a straw man with that one. And, if you had read the article, you would know that it's more than "two loons " that praised him. You would also have seen the hypocrisy of focusing on Islam and ignoring Christians contribution to the hate. Here is more for your convenienceDid someone say something about Islamic terrorism?
Christian Extremists Praise Anti-LGBT Violence After Orlando Because Every Religion Has Radicals
It’s been 10 days since a gunman shot his way into a queer nightclub in Orlando, Florida, where he massacred 49 people and injured dozens of others. And while much of the nation has been trying to heal or push for action to prevent future mass shootings, very few people have been willing to focus on another disturbing trend rearing its head in the U.S. In fact, nobody seems willing to call this menace by its true name. But we will.
What you see below is radical Christianity. ( Read More...)
Christian Extremists Praise Anti-LGBT Violence After Orlando Because Every Religion Has Radicals
That's stupid. The shooter was no sort of Christian and the TWO loons that "praised" the shootings don't represent anything but their own ignorance. Go pound salt.
Presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump and other Republicans have hammered President Barack Obama for choosing not to use the term “radical Islam,” suggesting that his rhetoric reflects an unwillingness to get serious about a national security threat. They’ve also used the shooting to further blur the line between the tiny fraction of radical Muslims and the rest of the world’s 1.6 billion followers of Islam. They say the Quran teaches that homosexuality is punishable by death, which means Muslims must be anti-gay. Yet again, the actions of a single person are being used to cast a pall over an entire community.
Christians are rarely asked to answer these questions, because nobody is rushing to confront or condemn radical Christianity. But what does the Bible say about the LGBT community, and do we assume most Christians take it literally? Does Christianity promote violent homophobia? Should we interpret one preacher’s despicable anti-queer comments as the gospel of an entire religion? These have not traditionally been topics of political debate. Though to their credit, some Christian leaders have asked such questions of themselves over the past week.
I have just as much contempt for your point of view as I have for radical Islam and radical Christians. People who seek to condemn entire groups based on the most radical viewpoints are bigots.
Which religion is cheering them on would like to do the same- IN THIS COUNTRY- if they could get away with it? Ted Cruz, Who Attended Event Calling For Gays To Be Put To Death, Delivers Characteristically Smug Response To Orlando AttackWhich religion is throwing fags off of roofs?Who are you addressing here? I am the one who has been saying all along that an entire religion-be it Muslims or Christians-should NOT be vilified for the actions of a few! The point of this post is to show that there are in fact radical, hateful Christians to contribute to the anti gay sentiment that leads to violence, a fact that the Muslim bashers refuse to acknowledge.Stupid? What is stupid is your saying that he was no Christian. No one is saying that he was a Christian. Your just resorting to a straw man with that one. And, if you had read the article, you would know that it's more than "two loons " that praised him. You would also have seen the hypocrisy of focusing on Islam and ignoring Christians contribution to the hate. Here is more for your convenienceDid someone say something about Islamic terrorism?
Christian Extremists Praise Anti-LGBT Violence After Orlando Because Every Religion Has Radicals
It’s been 10 days since a gunman shot his way into a queer nightclub in Orlando, Florida, where he massacred 49 people and injured dozens of others. And while much of the nation has been trying to heal or push for action to prevent future mass shootings, very few people have been willing to focus on another disturbing trend rearing its head in the U.S. In fact, nobody seems willing to call this menace by its true name. But we will.
What you see below is radical Christianity. ( Read More...)
Christian Extremists Praise Anti-LGBT Violence After Orlando Because Every Religion Has Radicals
That's stupid. The shooter was no sort of Christian and the TWO loons that "praised" the shootings don't represent anything but their own ignorance. Go pound salt.
Presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump and other Republicans have hammered President Barack Obama for choosing not to use the term “radical Islam,” suggesting that his rhetoric reflects an unwillingness to get serious about a national security threat. They’ve also used the shooting to further blur the line between the tiny fraction of radical Muslims and the rest of the world’s 1.6 billion followers of Islam. They say the Quran teaches that homosexuality is punishable by death, which means Muslims must be anti-gay. Yet again, the actions of a single person are being used to cast a pall over an entire community.
Christians are rarely asked to answer these questions, because nobody is rushing to confront or condemn radical Christianity. But what does the Bible say about the LGBT community, and do we assume most Christians take it literally? Does Christianity promote violent homophobia? Should we interpret one preacher’s despicable anti-queer comments as the gospel of an entire religion? These have not traditionally been topics of political debate. Though to their credit, some Christian leaders have asked such questions of themselves over the past week.
I have just as much contempt for your point of view as I have for radical Islam and radical Christians. People who seek to condemn entire groups based on the most radical viewpoints are bigots.
Vs which religion is actually throwing them off of roofs and not simply giving lip service.Which religion is cheering them on would like to do the same- IN THIS COUNTRY- if they could get away with it? Ted Cruz, Who Attended Event Calling For Gays To Be Put To Death, Delivers Characteristically Smug Response To Orlando AttackWhich religion is throwing fags off of roofs?Who are you addressing here? I am the one who has been saying all along that an entire religion-be it Muslims or Christians-should NOT be vilified for the actions of a few! The point of this post is to show that there are in fact radical, hateful Christians to contribute to the anti gay sentiment that leads to violence, a fact that the Muslim bashers refuse to acknowledge.Stupid? What is stupid is your saying that he was no Christian. No one is saying that he was a Christian. Your just resorting to a straw man with that one. And, if you had read the article, you would know that it's more than "two loons " that praised him. You would also have seen the hypocrisy of focusing on Islam and ignoring Christians contribution to the hate. Here is more for your convenienceThat's stupid. The shooter was no sort of Christian and the TWO loons that "praised" the shootings don't represent anything but their own ignorance. Go pound salt.
Presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump and other Republicans have hammered President Barack Obama for choosing not to use the term “radical Islam,” suggesting that his rhetoric reflects an unwillingness to get serious about a national security threat. They’ve also used the shooting to further blur the line between the tiny fraction of radical Muslims and the rest of the world’s 1.6 billion followers of Islam. They say the Quran teaches that homosexuality is punishable by death, which means Muslims must be anti-gay. Yet again, the actions of a single person are being used to cast a pall over an entire community.
Christians are rarely asked to answer these questions, because nobody is rushing to confront or condemn radical Christianity. But what does the Bible say about the LGBT community, and do we assume most Christians take it literally? Does Christianity promote violent homophobia? Should we interpret one preacher’s despicable anti-queer comments as the gospel of an entire religion? These have not traditionally been topics of political debate. Though to their credit, some Christian leaders have asked such questions of themselves over the past week.
I have just as much contempt for your point of view as I have for radical Islam and radical Christians. People who seek to condemn entire groups based on the most radical viewpoints are bigots.
Who are you addressing here? I am the one who has been saying all along that an entire religion-be it Muslims or Christians-should NOT be vilified for the actions of a few! The point of this post is to show that there are in fact radical, hateful Christians to contribute to the anti gay sentiment that leads to violence, a fact that the Muslim bashers refuse to acknowledge.Stupid? What is stupid is your saying that he was no Christian. No one is saying that he was a Christian. Your just resorting to a straw man with that one. And, if you had read the article, you would know that it's more than "two loons " that praised him. You would also have seen the hypocrisy of focusing on Islam and ignoring Christians contribution to the hate. Here is more for your convenienceDid someone say something about Islamic terrorism?
Christian Extremists Praise Anti-LGBT Violence After Orlando Because Every Religion Has Radicals
It’s been 10 days since a gunman shot his way into a queer nightclub in Orlando, Florida, where he massacred 49 people and injured dozens of others. And while much of the nation has been trying to heal or push for action to prevent future mass shootings, very few people have been willing to focus on another disturbing trend rearing its head in the U.S. In fact, nobody seems willing to call this menace by its true name. But we will.
What you see below is radical Christianity. ( Read More...)
Christian Extremists Praise Anti-LGBT Violence After Orlando Because Every Religion Has Radicals
That's stupid. The shooter was no sort of Christian and the TWO loons that "praised" the shootings don't represent anything but their own ignorance. Go pound salt.
Presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump and other Republicans have hammered President Barack Obama for choosing not to use the term “radical Islam,” suggesting that his rhetoric reflects an unwillingness to get serious about a national security threat. They’ve also used the shooting to further blur the line between the tiny fraction of radical Muslims and the rest of the world’s 1.6 billion followers of Islam. They say the Quran teaches that homosexuality is punishable by death, which means Muslims must be anti-gay. Yet again, the actions of a single person are being used to cast a pall over an entire community.
Christians are rarely asked to answer these questions, because nobody is rushing to confront or condemn radical Christianity. But what does the Bible say about the LGBT community, and do we assume most Christians take it literally? Does Christianity promote violent homophobia? Should we interpret one preacher’s despicable anti-queer comments as the gospel of an entire religion? These have not traditionally been topics of political debate. Though to their credit, some Christian leaders have asked such questions of themselves over the past week.
I have just as much contempt for your point of view as I have for radical Islam and radical Christians. People who seek to condemn entire groups based on the most radical viewpoints are bigots.
No, I'm not buying that "awh, they're just saying bad things about them crap" First of all, it's not just "lip service" They are doing plenty to make life miserable for LGBT people, but that is beside the point.Vs which religion is actually throwing them off of roofs and not simply giving lip service.Which religion is cheering them on would like to do the same- IN THIS COUNTRY- if they could get away with it? Ted Cruz, Who Attended Event Calling For Gays To Be Put To Death, Delivers Characteristically Smug Response To Orlando AttackWhich religion is throwing fags off of roofs?Who are you addressing here? I am the one who has been saying all along that an entire religion-be it Muslims or Christians-should NOT be vilified for the actions of a few! The point of this post is to show that there are in fact radical, hateful Christians to contribute to the anti gay sentiment that leads to violence, a fact that the Muslim bashers refuse to acknowledge.Stupid? What is stupid is your saying that he was no Christian. No one is saying that he was a Christian. Your just resorting to a straw man with that one. And, if you had read the article, you would know that it's more than "two loons " that praised him. You would also have seen the hypocrisy of focusing on Islam and ignoring Christians contribution to the hate. Here is more for your convenience
I have just as much contempt for your point of view as I have for radical Islam and radical Christians. People who seek to condemn entire groups based on the most radical viewpoints are bigots.
Feel free to continue to misrepresent me if that is what you feel that you have to do to believe your right.Who are you addressing here? I am the one who has been saying all along that an entire religion-be it Muslims or Christians-should NOT be vilified for the actions of a few! The point of this post is to show that there are in fact radical, hateful Christians to contribute to the anti gay sentiment that leads to violence, a fact that the Muslim bashers refuse to acknowledge.Stupid? What is stupid is your saying that he was no Christian. No one is saying that he was a Christian. Your just resorting to a straw man with that one. And, if you had read the article, you would know that it's more than "two loons " that praised him. You would also have seen the hypocrisy of focusing on Islam and ignoring Christians contribution to the hate. Here is more for your convenienceDid someone say something about Islamic terrorism?
Christian Extremists Praise Anti-LGBT Violence After Orlando Because Every Religion Has Radicals
It’s been 10 days since a gunman shot his way into a queer nightclub in Orlando, Florida, where he massacred 49 people and injured dozens of others. And while much of the nation has been trying to heal or push for action to prevent future mass shootings, very few people have been willing to focus on another disturbing trend rearing its head in the U.S. In fact, nobody seems willing to call this menace by its true name. But we will.
What you see below is radical Christianity. ( Read More...)
Christian Extremists Praise Anti-LGBT Violence After Orlando Because Every Religion Has Radicals
That's stupid. The shooter was no sort of Christian and the TWO loons that "praised" the shootings don't represent anything but their own ignorance. Go pound salt.
Presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump and other Republicans have hammered President Barack Obama for choosing not to use the term “radical Islam,” suggesting that his rhetoric reflects an unwillingness to get serious about a national security threat. They’ve also used the shooting to further blur the line between the tiny fraction of radical Muslims and the rest of the world’s 1.6 billion followers of Islam. They say the Quran teaches that homosexuality is punishable by death, which means Muslims must be anti-gay. Yet again, the actions of a single person are being used to cast a pall over an entire community.
Christians are rarely asked to answer these questions, because nobody is rushing to confront or condemn radical Christianity. But what does the Bible say about the LGBT community, and do we assume most Christians take it literally? Does Christianity promote violent homophobia? Should we interpret one preacher’s despicable anti-queer comments as the gospel of an entire religion? These have not traditionally been topics of political debate. Though to their credit, some Christian leaders have asked such questions of themselves over the past week.
I have just as much contempt for your point of view as I have for radical Islam and radical Christians. People who seek to condemn entire groups based on the most radical viewpoints are bigots.
No, your anti-Christian bias was obvious. In fact, your post was an attack on Christians to counterbalance the idea that a Muslim was to blame for the Orlando shooting. You seemed to feel that since some fringe Christians made anti-Gay comments, it equates to the actual murder. You're only modifying because you've failed to make your case.
But which ones are actually throwing them off roofs?No, I'm not buying that "awh, they're just saying bad things about them crap" First of all, it's not just "lip service" They are doing plenty to make life miserable for LGBT people, but that is beside the point.Vs which religion is actually throwing them off of roofs and not simply giving lip service.Which religion is cheering them on would like to do the same- IN THIS COUNTRY- if they could get away with it? Ted Cruz, Who Attended Event Calling For Gays To Be Put To Death, Delivers Characteristically Smug Response To Orlando AttackWhich religion is throwing fags off of roofs?Who are you addressing here? I am the one who has been saying all along that an entire religion-be it Muslims or Christians-should NOT be vilified for the actions of a few! The point of this post is to show that there are in fact radical, hateful Christians to contribute to the anti gay sentiment that leads to violence, a fact that the Muslim bashers refuse to acknowledge.I have just as much contempt for your point of view as I have for radical Islam and radical Christians. People who seek to condemn entire groups based on the most radical viewpoints are bigots.
The point is that there are people who are advocating what amounts to genocide and all genocide starts with hateful rhetoric. Rhetoric leads to marginalization and dehumanization which sets the stage for the acceptance of discrimination, internment, expulsion and even death. It is all the same mentality. It's what I call the continuum of violence. Speech can be violent and incite violence.
I don't do homework for retards.Merriam-Webster: Definition of ASSAULT WEAPONCalling someone ignorant and posting a wikipedia link to prove his case is off the charts ironic.Here is the definition for you of assault weapons. If you'd like I can also post the definition of ignorance, since you are ignorant of its meaning.Your willingness to allow Muslim terrorists easy access to assault weapons in the US is duly noted.
You do realize that there is no such thing as an "assault weapon"? It is an invented word. Just by the use of the term you prove your ignorance.
Assault weapon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Happy?
PS there's this thing called Google, try it sometime!
Your link was sloppy and defeats your argument. It says:
Definition of assault weapon
That's a rather wide range.
- : any of various automatic or semiautomatic
The M4 shoots three round bursts, not full auto. That's considered an assault weapon, for war. The AR does not have that function unless some illegally turns it into am assault rifle. How many more times are you going to demonstrate your ignorance here?And while we're looking at what an AR-15 is, perhaps a little history is in order. You see, we're all told that this is "just a hunting rifle". Except that's not entirely true. Until the late 1950's the military weapon of choice was the M-14. Unfortunately, the M-14 was less than useful against soldiers using helmets. So, the Army asked gun manufacturers to design a weapon that would make two holes with one bullet - entrance, and exit. Now, let's let that soak in for a second: "The army asked..." Not "hunters wanted...", or "sportsmen were requesting...", or even "shooting contest participants needed...", but the ARMY asked. Anyone who wants to tell you that an AR-15 is "just a hunting rifle" need only be reminded of that right there. This was never a "hunting" design; it was a military design. And it was specifically designed to rip through helmets, and bone of the enemy. The military design was the M-4 A1, and was a fully automatic. Colt, then, redesigned a semi-automatic version, dubbed it the AR-15, and sold it for civilian use.
Now, there are going to be peopled who insist that the M-4 A1, and the AR-15 are two completely different weapons, and don't even look similar. Really?
That's all the AR-15 is. It is the M-4 A1, without the full auto function. Tell us again, how it's not a military assault style weapon, and was only made, and meant for hunting?
Guns are not the problem. Liberals letting these people in our country are the problem. Japan does not have a Muslim problem. Can you guess why?GW said it, you're either in our side or the side of terrorists. You're helping to arm terrorists, therefore you are against your own people. Now go shoot yourself in the foot.Your willingness to strip our rights away are duly noted. Fortunately liberals require others to do their dirty work so we don't need to worry about you.Your willingness to allow Muslim terrorists easy access to assault weapons in the US is duly noted.ROFLMAO As if Islamic terrorists need access to weapons from the people they end up murdering.. You leftists are insane freaks. LOL A laugh a minute.
Guns is not available to the public or online. There are no gun store in Japan. Murder rate, robbery, massacre and suicide by GUNS is extremely very low or none existent in Japan.
Lefties are so BTFO that they can't even keep it off the MSNBC.
Omar Mateen's Wife Tried to Talk Him Out of Orlando Attack
She knew and didn't call authorities. It seems she even drove him to the club... "to scope it out".
The M4 shoots three round bursts, not full auto. That's considered an assault weapon, for war. The AR does not have that function unless some illegally turns it into am assault rifle. How many more times are you going to demonstrate your ignorance here?And while we're looking at what an AR-15 is, perhaps a little history is in order. You see, we're all told that this is "just a hunting rifle". Except that's not entirely true. Until the late 1950's the military weapon of choice was the M-14. Unfortunately, the M-14 was less than useful against soldiers using helmets. So, the Army asked gun manufacturers to design a weapon that would make two holes with one bullet - entrance, and exit. Now, let's let that soak in for a second: "The army asked..." Not "hunters wanted...", or "sportsmen were requesting...", or even "shooting contest participants needed...", but the ARMY asked. Anyone who wants to tell you that an AR-15 is "just a hunting rifle" need only be reminded of that right there. This was never a "hunting" design; it was a military design. And it was specifically designed to rip through helmets, and bone of the enemy. The military design was the M-4 A1, and was a fully automatic. Colt, then, redesigned a semi-automatic version, dubbed it the AR-15, and sold it for civilian use.
Now, there are going to be peopled who insist that the M-4 A1, and the AR-15 are two completely different weapons, and don't even look similar. Really?
That's all the AR-15 is. It is the M-4 A1, without the full auto function. Tell us again, how it's not a military assault style weapon, and was only made, and meant for hunting?
The M4, if it shoots three round bursts, also fires full automatic or semi-automatic.
Hey, that works for me. I'm not the one who supports the guy who wants to ban an entire religion because, you know, any one of them might be - you never know - one of the extremists.No more than radical Christians represent Christianity. Either the religious extremists represent the religion or they don't. You can't pick and choose which religions that applies to.Then radical Muslims do not represent Islam?Did someone say something about Islamic terrorism?
Christian Extremists Praise Anti-LGBT Violence After Orlando Because Every Religion Has Radicals
It’s been 10 days since a gunman shot his way into a queer nightclub in Orlando, Florida, where he massacred 49 people and injured dozens of others. And while much of the nation has been trying to heal or push for action to prevent future mass shootings, very few people have been willing to focus on another disturbing trend rearing its head in the U.S. In fact, nobody seems willing to call this menace by its true name. But we will.
What you see below is radical Christianity. ( Read More...)
Christian Extremists Praise Anti-LGBT Violence After Orlando Because Every Religion Has Radicals
That's stupid. The shooter was no sort of Christian and the TWO loons that "praised" the shootings don't represent anything but their own ignorance. Go pound salt.
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
The M4 shoots three round bursts, not full auto. That's considered an assault weapon, for war. The AR does not have that function unless some illegally turns it into am assault rifle. How many more times are you going to demonstrate your ignorance here?And while we're looking at what an AR-15 is, perhaps a little history is in order. You see, we're all told that this is "just a hunting rifle". Except that's not entirely true. Until the late 1950's the military weapon of choice was the M-14. Unfortunately, the M-14 was less than useful against soldiers using helmets. So, the Army asked gun manufacturers to design a weapon that would make two holes with one bullet - entrance, and exit. Now, let's let that soak in for a second: "The army asked..." Not "hunters wanted...", or "sportsmen were requesting...", or even "shooting contest participants needed...", but the ARMY asked. Anyone who wants to tell you that an AR-15 is "just a hunting rifle" need only be reminded of that right there. This was never a "hunting" design; it was a military design. And it was specifically designed to rip through helmets, and bone of the enemy. The military design was the M-4 A1, and was a fully automatic. Colt, then, redesigned a semi-automatic version, dubbed it the AR-15, and sold it for civilian use.
Now, there are going to be peopled who insist that the M-4 A1, and the AR-15 are two completely different weapons, and don't even look similar. Really?
That's all the AR-15 is. It is the M-4 A1, without the full auto function. Tell us again, how it's not a military assault style weapon, and was only made, and meant for hunting?
The M4, if it shoots three round bursts, also fires full automatic or semi-automatic.
The M4, if it shoots three round bursts, also fires full automatic or semi-automatic.
Would your panties still be in a wad if the law restricted it to 2 rounds per trigger pull instead of three, or would you still be able to feed your family with deers killed with only 2 rounds?
Holy crap! Seriously?? You already asked that simplistic question once. I responded with a lengthy and detailed explanation as to why the answer to that question does not address the real issue, and all that you can do is to respond with the same question again? Do you have even two functioning brain cells to rub together??But which ones are actually throwing them off roofs?No, I'm not buying that "awh, they're just saying bad things about them crap" First of all, it's not just "lip service" They are doing plenty to make life miserable for LGBT people, but that is beside the point.Vs which religion is actually throwing them off of roofs and not simply giving lip service.Which religion is cheering them on would like to do the same- IN THIS COUNTRY- if they could get away with it? Ted Cruz, Who Attended Event Calling For Gays To Be Put To Death, Delivers Characteristically Smug Response To Orlando AttackWhich religion is throwing fags off of roofs?Who are you addressing here? I am the one who has been saying all along that an entire religion-be it Muslims or Christians-should NOT be vilified for the actions of a few! The point of this post is to show that there are in fact radical, hateful Christians to contribute to the anti gay sentiment that leads to violence, a fact that the Muslim bashers refuse to acknowledge.
The point is that there are people who are advocating what amounts to genocide and all genocide starts with hateful rhetoric. Rhetoric leads to marginalization and dehumanization which sets the stage for the acceptance of discrimination, internment, expulsion and even death. It is all the same mentality. It's what I call the continuum of violence. Speech can be violent and incite violence.
