Florida Passes “Anti-Science” Law

[RealDave]

water boils at 100c. Period.

Depends on your altitude.

Water boiling point is a couple of degrees lower in Denver, Colorado. ...

It is a given that the boiling point of water is at sea level.

 

[RealDave]

.
Conservatives in Florida got their wish last Monday when their governor, Rick Scott signed a bill into law guaranteeing scientific facts taught in public schools can be challenged if they offend an individual’s personal beliefs.

Climate change tops the list of such facts denied by conservatives. But will they be as happy about this law when they find their homes waste-deep in seawater? Or, when they are finally forced to tread water 24/7 if they wish to remain in Florida?

The oceans ARE rising, and Florida’s conservatives will eventually discover how burying their head’s in the sand will have them drowning much sooner. This is going to make being a devoted Republican much, much more difficult.

Two Sad Ironies In Florida Passing Its 'Anti-Science' Law

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

View attachment 136518

Debating a conservative is like playing chess with a pigeon, they wander around the board aimlessly, sh!t on everything, and still believe they won. And they prove this over and over and over.





.

It's the liberal solution they are fighting. Liberals want to redistribute billions of tax payer money when it will have no effect on anything. Pumping money into socialist and communist countries who have run out of money has nothing to do with climate change.

And it has not been proven. Many scientists have come forth to say that the science is flawed, skewed and some it just plain made up bullshit.

The purpose is to have an excuse to take control over all energy sources and be able to attack capitalism and take more money from people.

Either come up with a real solution, after proving we can change anything, or shut the **** up.

Industries hurt by reducing emissions pay for their own "science" & then dupe the feeble minded to believe their "science" is right.

How many is "many" ? 2? 5? 10? The vast majority say global warming is real & man made emissions are a factor.

Solar & wind & geothermal are capitalistic. Companies make panels & companies install panels. Companies manufsacture geothermal HVAC units & drilling companies drill hoes & companies install these systems.

That asswipe is capitalism.

The fact is that the higher the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere the high the greenhouse effect & that makes it warmer.

If we can lower the CO2 concentration, the greenhouse effect will be less.

Why can't you morons get that?

The solution is lower emissions.

 

[Wyatt earp]

.
Conservatives in Florida got their wish last Monday when their governor, Rick Scott signed a bill into law guaranteeing scientific facts taught in public schools can be challenged if they offend an individual’s personal beliefs.

Climate change tops the list of such facts denied by conservatives. But will they be as happy about this law when they find their homes waste-deep in seawater? Or, when they are finally forced to tread water 24/7 if they wish to remain in Florida?

The oceans ARE rising, and Florida’s conservatives will eventually discover how burying their head’s in the sand will have them drowning much sooner. This is going to make being a devoted Republican much, much more difficult.

Two Sad Ironies In Florida Passing Its 'Anti-Science' Law

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

View attachment 136518

Debating a conservative is like playing chess with a pigeon, they wander around the board aimlessly, sh!t on everything, and still believe they won. And they prove this over and over and over.





.

It's the liberal solution they are fighting. Liberals want to redistribute billions of tax payer money when it will have no effect on anything. Pumping money into socialist and communist countries who have run out of money has nothing to do with climate change.

And it has not been proven. Many scientists have come forth to say that the science is flawed, skewed and some it just plain made up bullshit.

The purpose is to have an excuse to take control over all energy sources and be able to attack capitalism and take more money from people.

Either come up with a real solution, after proving we can change anything, or shut the **** up.

Industries hurt by reducing emissions pay for their own "science" & then dupe the feeble minded to believe their "science" is right.

How many is "many" ? 2? 5? 10? The vast majority say global warming is real & man made emissions are a factor.

Solar & wind & geothermal are capitalistic. Companies make panels & companies install panels. Companies manufsacture geothermal HVAC units & drilling companies drill hoes & companies install these systems.

That asswipe is capitalism.

The fact is that the higher the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere the high the greenhouse effect & that makes it warmer.

If we can lower the CO2 concentration, the greenhouse effect will be less.

Why can't you morons get that?

The solution is lower emissions.

Then stop posting on the internet **** head.. practice what you preach.


.

 

[Toro]

We hate science here in Florida.

We're more into football.

 

[Correll]

.
Conservatives in Florida got their wish last Monday when their governor, Rick Scott signed a bill into law guaranteeing scientific facts taught in public schools can be challenged if they offend an individual’s personal beliefs.

Climate change tops the list of such facts denied by conservatives. ...



.

Man driven climate change is not a scientific fact, but a scientific theory.


That you are either unaware or dishonest about the difference invalidates your entire post and point.

 

[hadit]

Students should question things they are skeptical about,

Only up until the point of being deemed special needs.

If a teacher cannot demonstrate scientifically that a science fact is a fact, why is it being taught as a fact?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Facts cannot be challenged.

The sky is blue and water boils at 100c. Period.

Not to be a smart ass but water boils at 100c only at sea level. I can make water boil at temps as low as 26c. This is provable because we can repeat it and get consistent results.

Mans effect on the enviroment is a completely different can of worms. In order to accept their conclussions one must do it based on faith. It should not be taught as facts.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

It's obvious what standard I used when I said 100c , dope.

I just challenged your fact, asshole

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

And you look foolish for doing so.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Students should question things they are skeptical about,

Only up until the point of being deemed special needs.

If a teacher cannot demonstrate scientifically that a science fact is a fact, why is it being taught as a fact?

If a teacher cannot demonstrate scientifically that a science fact is a fact, why is it being taught as a fact?

They do it every day.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

water boils at 100c. Period.

Depends on your altitude.

Water boiling point is a couple of degrees lower in Denver, Colorado. ...

The boiling point also Depends on the impurities in the water.

Then it isn't water. It's water with shit added.

Right on. But I think the idea being related is that saying "water" without qualification is technically incorrect. To boil at 100 dg C or freeze at 0 dg C it should be said "pure" water at sea level.

That's a given by stating 100c, dope.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Facts cannot be challenged.

The sky is blue and water boils at 100c. Period.

Not to be a smart ass but water boils at 100c only at sea level. I can make water boil at temps as low as 26c. This is provable because we can repeat it and get consistent results.

Mans effect on the enviroment is a completely different can of worms. In order to accept their conclussions one must do it based on faith. It should not be taught as facts.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

It's obvious what standard I used when I said 100c , dope.

I just challenged your fact, asshole

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

And you look foolish for doing so.

... says the person who had their ass handed to them by the dumbass conservatives!

 

[hadit]

Students should question things they are skeptical about,

Only up until the point of being deemed special needs.

If a teacher cannot demonstrate scientifically that a science fact is a fact, why is it being taught as a fact?

If a teacher cannot demonstrate scientifically that a science fact is a fact, why is it being taught as a fact?

They do it every day.

And they need to. That's how you change society, not by jetting around the globe in a massive jet, riding around in a massive limo, yelling that everyone is burning too much fuel, then going home to a massive mansion that consumes more power than that used by 99% of the people on earth, ala Algore.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Facts cannot be challenged.

The sky is blue and water boils at 100c. Period.

Not to be a smart ass but water boils at 100c only at sea level. I can make water boil at temps as low as 26c. This is provable because we can repeat it and get consistent results.

Mans effect on the enviroment is a completely different can of worms. In order to accept their conclussions one must do it based on faith. It should not be taught as facts.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

It's obvious what standard I used when I said 100c , dope.

I just challenged your fact, asshole

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

And you look foolish for doing so.

... says the person who had their ass handed to them by the dumbass conservatives!

By whom?

You idiots just talk in circles and get nowhere.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Not to be a smart ass but water boils at 100c only at sea level. I can make water boil at temps as low as 26c. This is provable because we can repeat it and get consistent results.

Mans effect on the enviroment is a completely different can of worms. In order to accept their conclussions one must do it based on faith. It should not be taught as facts.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

It's obvious what standard I used when I said 100c , dope.

I just challenged your fact, asshole

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

And you look foolish for doing so.

... says the person who had their ass handed to them by the dumbass conservatives!

By whom?

You idiots just talk in circles and get nowhere.

You, are an idiot without comparison. You forget so easily!

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Students should question things they are skeptical about,

Only up until the point of being deemed special needs.

If a teacher cannot demonstrate scientifically that a science fact is a fact, why is it being taught as a fact?

If a teacher cannot demonstrate scientifically that a science fact is a fact, why is it being taught as a fact?

They do it every day.

And they need to. That's how you change society, not by jetting around the globe in a massive jet, riding around in a massive limo, yelling that everyone is burning too much fuel, then going home to a massive mansion that consumes more power than that used by 99% of the people on earth, ala Algore.

So schools aren't teaching ' junk science ' then?

The real problem is Al Gore?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

It's obvious what standard I used when I said 100c , dope.

I just challenged your fact, asshole

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

And you look foolish for doing so.

... says the person who had their ass handed to them by the dumbass conservatives!

By whom?

You idiots just talk in circles and get nowhere.

You, are an idiot without comparison. You forget so easily!

Give examples and we'll discuss.

 

[whitehall]

"Man made climate change" is a theory. It's not even marketed by liberals as scientific fact. It's so freaking incredible that liberals who used to be for open debate and the sharing of ideas and opinions in collage now promote assault rather than argument. Now the libs are whining because a kid in Fla. can't be expelled or locked up if he asks a freaking question. If liberals had their way they would be burning global warming heretics at the stake.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I just challenged your fact, asshole

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

And you look foolish for doing so.

... says the person who had their ass handed to them by the dumbass conservatives!

By whom?

You idiots just talk in circles and get nowhere.

You, are an idiot without comparison. You forget so easily!

Give examples and we'll discuss.

Why? You'll ignore facts and keep on blabbering about things you know nothing of

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I just challenged your fact, asshole

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

And you look foolish for doing so.

... says the person who had their ass handed to them by the dumbass conservatives!

By whom?

You idiots just talk in circles and get nowhere.

You, are an idiot without comparison. You forget so easily!

Give examples and we'll discuss.

No. I am done with your stupid games. there are plenty of examples in this thread. Go find a child to read it for you!

 

[healthmyths]

.
Conservatives in Florida got their wish last Monday when their governor, Rick Scott signed a bill into law guaranteeing scientific facts taught in public schools can be challenged if they offend an individual’s personal beliefs.

Climate change tops the list of such facts denied by conservatives. But will they be as happy about this law when they find their homes waste-deep in seawater? Or, when they are finally forced to tread water 24/7 if they wish to remain in Florida?

The oceans ARE rising, and Florida’s conservatives will eventually discover how burying their head’s in the sand will have them drowning much sooner. This is going to make being a devoted Republican much, much more difficult.

Two Sad Ironies In Florida Passing Its 'Anti-Science' Law

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

View attachment 136518

Debating a conservative is like playing chess with a pigeon, they wander around the board aimlessly, sh!t on everything, and still believe they won. And they prove this over and over and over.





.

It's the liberal solution they are fighting. Liberals want to redistribute billions of tax payer money when it will have no effect on anything. Pumping money into socialist and communist countries who have run out of money has nothing to do with climate change.

And it has not been proven. Many scientists have come forth to say that the science is flawed, skewed and some it just plain made up bullshit.

The purpose is to have an excuse to take control over all energy sources and be able to attack capitalism and take more money from people.

Either come up with a real solution, after proving we can change anything, or shut the **** up.

Industries hurt by reducing emissions pay for their own "science" & then dupe the feeble minded to believe their "science" is right.

How many is "many" ? 2? 5? 10? The vast majority say global warming is real & man made emissions are a factor.

Solar & wind & geothermal are capitalistic. Companies make panels & companies install panels. Companies manufsacture geothermal HVAC units & drilling companies drill hoes & companies install these systems.

That asswipe is capitalism.

The fact is that the higher the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere the high the greenhouse effect & that makes it warmer.

If we can lower the CO2 concentration, the greenhouse effect will be less.

Why can't you morons get that?

The solution is lower emissions.

What CO2 in the atmosphere? 3 trillion trees absorbing 48 lbs CO2 each year equals 72 Billion tons ... what's the problem if the total combined CO2 is 38.2 billion?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

"Man made climate change" is a theory. It's not even marketed by liberals as scientific fact. It's so freaking incredible that liberals who used to be for open debate and the sharing of ideas and opinions in collage now promote assault rather than argument. Now the libs are whining because a kid in Fla. can't be expelled or locked up if he asks a freaking question. If liberals had their way they would be burning global warming heretics at the stake.

No one teaches it as fact. It's taught the same as relativity or evolution. It's you dopes who can't handle that and feel compelled to rewrite laws to satisfy your own ignorance.