It would be easier to have a conversation if Democrats could grasp the idea of different opinions, but they can't. Every disagreement is considered a lie by Democrats. If I say I think lower taxes can stimulate the economy, the Democrat won't say I don't think so. He'll say that's a lie. And then the conversation ends.
It would be easier if you were to not demand that we all agree 100% with your views. Oh, I agree, lowering taxes can stimulate the economy. But lowering taxes on those that have already had their taxes lowered to near zero that find every loophole to NOT pay any taxes
I suggest we look hard at the Corporations for tax cuts and increases. And we need to take a good hard look at ALL forms of taxes. Many taxes, the lower incomes carry the brunt. Things like taxes on fuels. Meanwhile, the rich get to use the roads that are paid for primarily by the lower incomes.
I am not an economist so I don't have good of a handle on this. But so far, the taxation has been controlled by the Corporations so it's no surprise that it's lopsided. I don't really know the fix but I do see the results.
Then there is the court system. I retired from the US Military. In the US Military, ALL people got the same competent treatment and representation. The Military didn't have the equiv of Public Defenders. JAG represented both sides and spent as much time and money on both sides. But in the civilian world, the Rich get Super Lawyers and the poor normally get inexperienced lawyers from the Public Defenders office with zero funds for defense. The Rich either go free or cut lucrative deals while the poor get long jail sentences. Got any ideas how to deal with that?
Those two things would be a start in discussion. But beware, I won't necessarily agree or disagree with you on them.