Five pali's Killed, Another Critically injured, No Israeli's Casualties

[Phoenall]

Sad but true Israel.

Its a start. Israel as a country needs to stop playing nice guy and put an end to nonsense.

28 shot just today. How much longer is Israel going to let this go on.

israel shoots 28 people and you feel bad for israel?

Yes because they should not have been placed in a situation where they have to kill 28 people in the first place. Maybe they should just get it out of their system once and for all and flatten gaza leaving nothing but piles of rubble

 

[ogibillm]

Sad but true Israel.

Its a start. Israel as a country needs to stop playing nice guy and put an end to nonsense.

28 shot just today. How much longer is Israel going to let this go on.

israel shoots 28 people and you feel bad for israel?

Yes because they should not have been placed in a situation where they have to kill 28 people in the first place

They put themselves in that situation

 

[rhodescholar]

you find it morally acceptable to kick people off their land? morally acceptable to enter that camp for an unknown reason, disrupt the lives of people there, and fire live ammunition at people because rocks are thrown?

So you're changing the topic since your earlier claim about the number of casualties was a total lie, quite typical of the low IQ far left.

Go ask any cop/soldier on earth how they'd respond when rocks are thrown against them. I'd really like to throw them at people like you and see if you tolerate it as you claim - but we all know you're lying filth and would shoot back using the same force as Israel and everyone else.

Your arab muslim masters thank you for your useful idiot postings.

 

[rhodescholar]

They put themselves in that situation

The arab muslims certainly have, as they've utterly failed at building functioning societies for 14 centuries.

 

[Phoenall]

israel shoots 28 people and you feel bad for israel?

Oh i get it, the scumbag thinks that the number of injured/killed/casualties is an indicator of which side is in the right/wrong, got it...

So according to this moron, in WW2 Germany lost millions while the US only 400,000, so Germany was the real victim there as compared to the US.

I am sure your deep intelligence brought you many accolades during your formative years; it is reflected here with your fantastic posts which add so much depth to the conversation.

you find it morally acceptable to kick people off their land? morally acceptable to enter that camp for an unknown reason, disrupt the lives of people there, and fire live ammunition at people because rocks are thrown?

It was never their land to begin with, they arrived in an army truck in 1947/1948 and proceeded to try and steal Jewish land. If you receive intelligence that a wanted criminal is hiding in a house you raid that house. It the wanted criminal decides to fight it out then you respond to minimise the casualties. So what would you rather see 5 people killed or 1000 people killed ?

 

[Phoenall]

israel shoots 28 people and you feel bad for israel?

Oh i get it, the scumbag thinks that the number of injured/killed/casualties is an indicator of which side is in the right/wrong, got it...

So according to this moron, in WW2 Germany lost millions while the US only 400,000, so Germany was the real victim there as compared to the US.

I am sure your deep intelligence brought you many accolades during your formative years; it is reflected here with your fantastic posts which add so much depth to the conversation.

you find it morally acceptable to kick people off their land? morally acceptable to enter that camp for an unknown reason, disrupt the lives of people there, and fire live ammunition at people because rocks are thrown?

It looks like you've bought into the pali diatribe hook line and sinker.

The only people kicked off their land was the Jews, both in Europe and in the Arab world. Millions were forced to leave their homes.

The Arabs within the mandate area however, if they left their homes at all, did so because of a war the Arab League started and as a response to Arab League warnings to do so. Possibly as many as 100,000 were forced to leave and another 400,000 Arabs within the mandate area voluntarily did so.

See
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwiIlIOuw_zKAhXGmoMKHYFHAZ8QFggfMAA&url=http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/foreignpolicy/mfadocuments/yearbook1/pages/5%20arab%20league%20declaration%20on%20the%20invasion%20of%20pales.aspx&usg=AFQjCNE8oVQuUM5yT0bso85hTHl69FtvQQ&sig2=wlpL6VnryAv0uBlJInGxDQ&bvm=bv.114195076,d.amc

The Israeli's are well within their rights to enter any pali enclave and conduct security sweeps. They are actually slacking on their obligation to segregate combatants from protected persons. Something the UNWRA should have done in accordance with UN protocols of neutrality but has refused to do.

See
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=7&ved=0ahUKEwi348mMxfzKAhVKk4MKHSdOAJcQFghTMAY&url=http://journals.cambridge.org/article_S0020860400084394&usg=AFQjCNGBOdQS_50o7eyS83hxRL7eCXR50A&sig2=EFKEECUUy58dlzMD2NIDdA&bvm=bv.114195076,d.amc

Something else that seems to be a point of confusion is that the host nation is not required to cede land to those its offering aid to. Israel is under no restraints from entering its own land.

According to the mandate, everything west of the Jordan is available for the creation of a national Jewish homeland.

See
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwi_6ZavxvzKAhUKvoMKHc6MDjkQFggcMAA&url=http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/palmanda.asp&usg=AFQjCNEtqWnoOcMsGUcgKmkZOjrTAGt8uQ&sig2=Ssw_5qR9ZEXeDtV2PxGWsw&bvm=bv.114195076,d.amc

Also see
Palestine Mandate - Wikisource, the free online library

So while the emotional response does tend to lend itself to the immediate situation a more rational understanding of events leads to an entirely different conclusion.

The Arab Muslims are simply continuing a war THEY STARTED in 1948 and as such MUST be treated as a hostile force until such time as all if any civilian elements can be segregated from combatants in accordance with the Geneva conventions.

See
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwidi5nHx_zKAhUitYMKHXxpD4YQFggcMAA&url=http://www.ppu.org.uk/learn/texts/doc_geneva_con.html&usg=AFQjCNHbYrQgN9rs_72KKPTrfHJik1VFEQ&sig2=9jv7GgJDoUO3zQh7DZ4rTQ&bvm=bv.114195076,d.amc

It is easier to point out that according to team Palestine only 350,000 Palestinians lived in the whole of what became Israel, gaza and the west bank. So how could they double in just 24 hours to give 700,000 refugees and still have 350,000 living in Palestine ? The numbers just don't stack up do they, and shows that someone somewhere is LYING

 

[Boston1]

israel shoots 28 people and you feel bad for israel?

Oh i get it, the scumbag thinks that the number of injured/killed/casualties is an indicator of which side is in the right/wrong, got it...

So according to this moron, in WW2 Germany lost millions while the US only 400,000, so Germany was the real victim there as compared to the US.

I am sure your deep intelligence brought you many accolades during your formative years; it is reflected here with your fantastic posts which add so much depth to the conversation.

you find it morally acceptable to kick people off their land? morally acceptable to enter that camp for an unknown reason, disrupt the lives of people there, and fire live ammunition at people because rocks are thrown?

It looks like you've bought into the pali diatribe hook line and sinker.

The only people kicked off their land was the Jews, both in Europe and in the Arab world. Millions were forced to leave their homes.

The Arabs within the mandate area however, if they left their homes at all, did so because of a war the Arab League started and as a response to Arab League warnings to do so. Possibly as many as 100,000 were forced to leave and another 400,000 Arabs within the mandate area voluntarily did so.

See
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwiIlIOuw_zKAhXGmoMKHYFHAZ8QFggfMAA&url=http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/foreignpolicy/mfadocuments/yearbook1/pages/5%20arab%20league%20declaration%20on%20the%20invasion%20of%20pales.aspx&usg=AFQjCNE8oVQuUM5yT0bso85hTHl69FtvQQ&sig2=wlpL6VnryAv0uBlJInGxDQ&bvm=bv.114195076,d.amc

The Israeli's are well within their rights to enter any pali enclave and conduct security sweeps. They are actually slacking on their obligation to segregate combatants from protected persons. Something the UNWRA should have done in accordance with UN protocols of neutrality but has refused to do.

See
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=7&ved=0ahUKEwi348mMxfzKAhVKk4MKHSdOAJcQFghTMAY&url=http://journals.cambridge.org/article_S0020860400084394&usg=AFQjCNGBOdQS_50o7eyS83hxRL7eCXR50A&sig2=EFKEECUUy58dlzMD2NIDdA&bvm=bv.114195076,d.amc

Something else that seems to be a point of confusion is that the host nation is not required to cede land to those its offering aid to. Israel is under no restraints from entering its own land.

According to the mandate, everything west of the Jordan is available for the creation of a national Jewish homeland.

See
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwi_6ZavxvzKAhUKvoMKHc6MDjkQFggcMAA&url=http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/palmanda.asp&usg=AFQjCNEtqWnoOcMsGUcgKmkZOjrTAGt8uQ&sig2=Ssw_5qR9ZEXeDtV2PxGWsw&bvm=bv.114195076,d.amc

Also see
Palestine Mandate - Wikisource, the free online library

So while the emotional response does tend to lend itself to the immediate situation a more rational understanding of events leads to an entirely different conclusion.

The Arab Muslims are simply continuing a war THEY STARTED in 1948 and as such MUST be treated as a hostile force until such time as all if any civilian elements can be segregated from combatants in accordance with the Geneva conventions.

See
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwidi5nHx_zKAhUitYMKHXxpD4YQFggcMAA&url=http://www.ppu.org.uk/learn/texts/doc_geneva_con.html&usg=AFQjCNHbYrQgN9rs_72KKPTrfHJik1VFEQ&sig2=9jv7GgJDoUO3zQh7DZ4rTQ&bvm=bv.114195076,d.amc

It is easier to point out that according to team Palestine only 350,000 Palestinians lived in the whole of what became Israel, gaza and the west bank. So how could they double in just 24 hours to give 700,000 refugees and still have 350,000 living in Palestine ? The numbers just don't stack up do they, and shows that someone somewhere is LYING

The game was rigged such that only so many Israeli's could return to what would become Israel. The Arabs ignored the game and flooded the area in an effort to maintain the status quo

This same principal was used to hyper inflate the refugee numbers. From what I can see just about every move in the Arab game is staged.

For instance the UNWRA is virtually entirely run by Arab Muslims, no conflict of interest there ;--)

Until Israel stops playing nice guy, those five killed the other day, or the 28 shot just yesterday, will only be the tip of the iceberg

 

[fanger]

israel shoots 28 people and you feel bad for israel?

Oh i get it, the scumbag thinks that the number of injured/killed/casualties is an indicator of which side is in the right/wrong, got it...

So according to this moron, in WW2 Germany lost millions while the US only 400,000, so Germany was the real victim there as compared to the US.

I am sure your deep intelligence brought you many accolades during your formative years; it is reflected here with your fantastic posts which add so much depth to the conversation.

you find it morally acceptable to kick people off their land? morally acceptable to enter that camp for an unknown reason, disrupt the lives of people there, and fire live ammunition at people because rocks are thrown?

It looks like you've bought into the pali diatribe hook line and sinker.

The only people kicked off their land was the Jews, both in Europe and in the Arab world. Millions were forced to leave their homes.

The Arabs within the mandate area however, if they left their homes at all, did so because of a war the Arab League started and as a response to Arab League warnings to do so. Possibly as many as 100,000 were forced to leave and another 400,000 Arabs within the mandate area voluntarily did so.

See
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwiIlIOuw_zKAhXGmoMKHYFHAZ8QFggfMAA&url=http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/foreignpolicy/mfadocuments/yearbook1/pages/5%20arab%20league%20declaration%20on%20the%20invasion%20of%20pales.aspx&usg=AFQjCNE8oVQuUM5yT0bso85hTHl69FtvQQ&sig2=wlpL6VnryAv0uBlJInGxDQ&bvm=bv.114195076,d.amc

The Israeli's are well within their rights to enter any pali enclave and conduct security sweeps. They are actually slacking on their obligation to segregate combatants from protected persons. Something the UNWRA should have done in accordance with UN protocols of neutrality but has refused to do.

See
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=7&ved=0ahUKEwi348mMxfzKAhVKk4MKHSdOAJcQFghTMAY&url=http://journals.cambridge.org/article_S0020860400084394&usg=AFQjCNGBOdQS_50o7eyS83hxRL7eCXR50A&sig2=EFKEECUUy58dlzMD2NIDdA&bvm=bv.114195076,d.amc

Something else that seems to be a point of confusion is that the host nation is not required to cede land to those its offering aid to. Israel is under no restraints from entering its own land.

According to the mandate, everything west of the Jordan is available for the creation of a national Jewish homeland.

See
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwi_6ZavxvzKAhUKvoMKHc6MDjkQFggcMAA&url=http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/palmanda.asp&usg=AFQjCNEtqWnoOcMsGUcgKmkZOjrTAGt8uQ&sig2=Ssw_5qR9ZEXeDtV2PxGWsw&bvm=bv.114195076,d.amc

Also see
Palestine Mandate - Wikisource, the free online library

So while the emotional response does tend to lend itself to the immediate situation a more rational understanding of events leads to an entirely different conclusion.

The Arab Muslims are simply continuing a war THEY STARTED in 1948 and as such MUST be treated as a hostile force until such time as all if any civilian elements can be segregated from combatants in accordance with the Geneva conventions.

See
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwidi5nHx_zKAhUitYMKHXxpD4YQFggcMAA&url=http://www.ppu.org.uk/learn/texts/doc_geneva_con.html&usg=AFQjCNHbYrQgN9rs_72KKPTrfHJik1VFEQ&sig2=9jv7GgJDoUO3zQh7DZ4rTQ&bvm=bv.114195076,d.amc

His Majesty's government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

 

[fanger]

it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine,

 

[Shusha]

His Majesty's government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

Text of the Balfour Declaration. Anyone who is participating on this board should be familiar with it. What's your point?

That the civil rights or religious rights of one group is being denied? Which rights? Which people?

(I can tell you with certainty that the religious rights of the Jewish people are being denied at the Temple.)

 

[rhodescholar]

it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine,

So what gave the arab muslims the right to attack and murder jews in 1920? In 1929? In 1936? In 1948? To ethnically cleanse jews out of almost every arab muslim country?

 

[Indeependent]

it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine,

So what gave the arab muslims the right to attack and murder jews in 1920? In 1929? In 1936? In 1948? To ethnically cleanse jews out of almost every arab muslim country?

Didn't you read the Islamic site ScrewTheJews.org - None of this happened.
It's just your imagination running wild.