Fisa documents released. Nunes memo thoroughly discredited.

[Faun]

..“Now, we actually know that’s exactly what Hillary Clinton did. Hillary Clinton paid people … they got dirt from Russians to use it against Donald Trump,”

The dirt didn't even come from the Russians, it came from Mi6

But colluding with the Brits isn't a problem

It is illegal to pay for / use info from a foreign source in a US election.

Hillary broke the law ... Again.

Great, then show the forum when Hillary obtained the dossier

 

[Faun]

It is illegal to pay for / use info from a foreign source in a US election.

Hillary broke the law ... Again.

She didn't hire Russian bots to work her campaign. And she wouldn't have kissed Putin's ass like the current President did.

She hired Russian spies to smear Trump. Your belief in Hillary's integrity is hilarious and pathetic.

Oh? What smears were used against Trump during his campaign?

 

[blastoff]

It is illegal to pay for / use info from a foreign source in a US election.

Hillary broke the law ... Again.

She didn't hire Russian bots to work her campaign. And she wouldn't have kissed Putin's ass like the current President did.

R-E-S-E-T button. Oops...I mean O-V-E-R-L-O-A-D button.

 

[easyt65]

She didn't hire Russian bots to work her campaign. And she wouldn't have kissed Putin's ass like the current President did.

REALLY?! LOL....

Nice OPINION, but:

Hillary colluded with / hired foreign spies and Russians who provided an unverified document based on the 2nd and 3rd hand accounts of RUSSIANS, a document Steele said he never tried to verify and figured was about 50-50% chance it was true.

Hillary violated election law by using this paid-for piece of foreign/Russian propaganda in a US election.

McCabe and the FBI passed this document off to the FISA Court judges as 100% accurate, despite the fact that this was a lie.

None of this is debatable.
It is documented.
It has been reported.
It has been cited by the US IG....who recommended McCabe for Indictment for his crimes (but who is being protected by his co-conspirators).


Wouldn't kiss Putin's ass?

She took over $100 Million from Vlad, helped hand over 20% of the US supply of uranium over to him, . giggled like a schoolgirl as she ignorantly handed a plastic 'reset' plague that read 'OVERCHARGE' instead of 'RESET' to a laughing Russian Ambassador, and handed over TOP SECRET+ data to the Russians and 5 other foreign entities the US IG stated gained access to her illegal unauthorized unencrypted unsecured (all crimes) server.

You snowflakes just never give up....

Bwuhahahahaha..............

 

[Jantje_Smit]

Why are you lying?

One of the first items listed...

The FBI reaches out to the DNC again, warning them that one of their computers is transmitting information back to Russia.​

... how sad for you that you have to lie to maintain your ignorance?

.....A technician scans the system and does not find anything suspicious.

Eh, so what's the evidence exactly?

There's plenty of evidence that Seth Rich was murdered though... a robbery apparently...allthough nothing was robbed... and the police refused to search his laptop...

 

[easyt65]

Why are you lying?

One of the first items listed...

The FBI reaches out to the DNC again, warning them that one of their computers is transmitting information back to Russia.​

... how sad for you that you have to lie to maintain your ignorance?

.....A technician scans the system and does not find anything suspicious.

Eh, so what's the evidence exactly?

There's plenty of evidence that Seth Rich was murdered though... a robbery apparently...allthough nothing was robbed... and the police refused to search his laptop...

The US IG found what the FBI missed - the fact that there was a set-up in Hillary's server that was sending EVERYTHING to 6 un-official foreign entity addresses.

The whole 'Russia, Russia, Russia' BS narrative pushed by the media, Democrats, Hillary, and snowflakes was based on Trump jokingly saying in a debate he wished the Russians would hack and the release the files Hillary was hiding and completely ignores the fact / evidence showing that 6 Foreign entities - not just Russia - took full advantage of her crime of illegally using an unauthorized, unencrypted, unsecured server.

'Espionage'....'Gross Negligence'!

Hillary compromised national security.

On that note, so did Huma Abedin, Hillary's aide, who stole, copied, and moved copies of every one of Hillary's files / documents / e-mails to her personal illegal unauthorized unencrypted unsecured laptop which she shared with her convicted sexual deviant pedophile husband.

 

[Jantje_Smit]

Hillary compromised national security.

Even worse, the psycho princess compromised the deep state

On that note, so did Huma Abedin, Hillary's aide, who stole, copied, and moved copies of every one of Hillary's files / documents / e-mails to her personal illegal unauthorized unencrypted unsecured laptop which she shared with her convicted sexual deviant pedophile husband.

That too, funny how you never hear anything about her anymore

 

[Faun]

Why are you lying?

One of the first items listed...

The FBI reaches out to the DNC again, warning them that one of their computers is transmitting information back to Russia.​

... how sad for you that you have to lie to maintain your ignorance?

.....A technician scans the system and does not find anything suspicious.

Eh, so what's the evidence exactly?

There's plenty of evidence that Seth Rich was murdered though... a robbery apparently...allthough nothing was robbed... and the police refused to search his laptop...

Now you’re lying by conflating the timeline. What I just posted actually goes on to say…

November 2015 - The FBI reaches out to the DNC again, warning them that one of their computers is transmitting information back to Russia. DNC management later says that IT technicians failed to pass along the message that the system had been breached.​

What you posted occurred months earlier.

How sad you have to lie to maintain your ignorance.

 

[Jantje_Smit]

Now you’re lying by conflating the timeline. What I just posted actually goes on to say…

November 2015 - The FBI reaches out to the DNC again, warning them that one of their computers is transmitting information back to Russia. DNC management later says that IT technicians failed to pass along the message that the system had been breached.​

What you posted occurred months earlier.

How sad you have to lie to maintain your ignorance.

Oh, sorry, my bad, the first warning was fake but the second one was real

....DNC management later says that IT technicians failed to pass along the message that the system had been breached.

Interesting, would those be the same IT technicians that proved it was hacked by the Russians?

You realize "DNC management says..." isn't evidence of anything, right?

 

[easyt65]

 

[WTP]

You keep repeating "Republican appointed judges" like that changes the outcome.

FISA judges issue warrants based on information provided to them in FISA application. Whoever sign the application is sworn and testifies that information is verified and correct, and judge issue the warrant based on that testimony. Every single of four applications based primarily on fabricated dossier paid for by Hillary was presented as truth and based on that, the judge issues the warrant. That is not so hard to understand, is it?

That is a totally fabricated statement. There is zero evidence that those four judges issued those warrants because of the dossier. Why do you lie? There exists not one link out there remotely proving that statement of yours. And that is how the Right keeps finding themselves in these pickles.

Lying to the (any) judge under oath is criminal act of perjury, punishable by federal law with up to five years in prison. Each and every one of four that signed those fraudulent applicants should charged with perjury and end up in jail However, that is not the only crime they committed and the rest is coming out little by little and when it all come out, they're not gonna be looking at 5 years, by 50, or more.

Once again, you are lying. If you were telling the truth, you would have provided the link proving these judges did what you say they did. But you didn't.

Enjoy your derangement, it's fun to watch.

I'm enjoying watching you play games by inventing scenarios that never existed.

Funny, I explain to you how FISA court works, wich is in fact how every court works at their own level, I provided to you link to the FISA court rules and procedures, and with all that in the front of you, I am one that is lying. On the contrary, you who provided nothing of the value, and your opinion pulled out of your ass has no value, according to you is an absolute truth.

No proof? Andrew McCabe testified on the front of Congress that there would not be FISA warrant without the dossier. Also...

FISA Applications Confirm: The FBI Relied on the Unverified Steele Dossier

No, no, no, liar, you're going to explain why you lied first about these four judges. I don't need lessons on how FISA's work.

You said that each judge signed off on a fraudulent FISA. That is a lie, and has jack squat to do with this side diversion of yours. This is your quote: Each and every one of four that signed those fraudulent applicants should charged with perjury and end up in jail. Prove they are fraudulent or you continue to be a liar.

You really don't know how courts function, eh shitstain?

And second, yes each of those four applications were fraudulent. If you don't believe me, read the FISA rules and procedure in the link i provided, it may give you a hint.

When Comey said that "the dossier" was salacious and unverified, what does is mean? Even Steele confirmed that more than half is not verified. Are you saying "the dossier" is not fraudulent?

Since "the dossier" not confirmed and verified, it could not be presented to the court and under oat presented as truth. Therefore if ANY part of the application is fraudulent, the whole application is fraudulent and those who signed it committed the perjury.

If that's not clear, I'll get my kid's crayons.

Comey never said the dossier was salacious and unverified — he said parts of it were. And if the FISA application were truly illegal as you ignorantly claim, people involved would have been indicted.

Which is just another example of how far out to lunch the Right is on this argument. They throw way too much out there that are just made up accusations, only to come back and prove them wrong. This is just the normal desperation from this thug party and their complicit minions, pedaling one lie on top of the next. And that's all this is.

 

[WTP]

View attachment 206849

Love the desperation spin....

They tried to get out ahead of those of us who really know how to read and follow the dots.. Nunes memo was confirmed and all doubts were laid waste. It even reinforced the fact the Dossier was the only thing used to lie to the FISA court in an effort to get a warrant..

Hilarious spin by you left wing retards... The only people your fooling are those who cant read or refuse to read and use their brains..

You don’t know the dossier was the only thing used. The warrant application was so heavily redacted, you don’t know what’s in there. You’re only being shown what Trump wants you to see.

"Zero evidence?" How ******* stupid can a person get? They just published 415 pages of evidence.

Much of it reacted, meaning there’s a shit load of evidence contained in that FISA application you haven’t seen.

Now if you were right, and you never are, folks would have been brought up on charges by now.

Hmmm, no they wouldn't. We have all seen how the deep state is fighting tooth and nail to keep their operatives out of the pokey. They have plenty of allies in the fake news media and with lobbyists and big donors in Washington.

Holyfuckingshit!

It never ceases to amaze me just how moronic you rightards are.

******* moron... Trump is the top dog when it comes to law enforcement. He’s the one Constitutionally tasked with enforcing the law. The Department of Justice reports to him. According to lunatics like you, Trump must be deep state.

If Trump fired Rosenstein or declassified the documents the House oversight committee is requesting, turds like you would be screaming bloody murder. The Democrats in Congress, the #neverTrump Republicans and the fake news media would all be screaming for his impeachment.

Who the **** do you believe you're fooling, shit for brains?

Trump should declassified the documents.
Soon as the next SCCU judge makes it through the Senate he needs to bring in a new IG.

You do know, that all this unsealing of documents gives the criminal the access to the evidence against him or her right? You do know that?

Is that what Republicans want now? To give a potential criminal the evidence the prosecution has, giving the criminal the opportunity to manipulate that evidence?

 

[jc456]

View attachment 206849

Love the desperation spin....

They tried to get out ahead of those of us who really know how to read and follow the dots.. Nunes memo was confirmed and all doubts were laid waste. It even reinforced the fact the Dossier was the only thing used to lie to the FISA court in an effort to get a warrant..

Hilarious spin by you left wing retards... The only people your fooling are those who cant read or refuse to read and use their brains..

You don’t know the dossier was the only thing used. The warrant application was so heavily redacted, you don’t know what’s in there. You’re only being shown what Trump wants you to see.

Much of it reacted, meaning there’s a shit load of evidence contained in that FISA application you haven’t seen.

Now if you were right, and you never are, folks would have been brought up on charges by now.

Hmmm, no they wouldn't. We have all seen how the deep state is fighting tooth and nail to keep their operatives out of the pokey. They have plenty of allies in the fake news media and with lobbyists and big donors in Washington.

Holyfuckingshit!

It never ceases to amaze me just how moronic you rightards are.

******* moron... Trump is the top dog when it comes to law enforcement. He’s the one Constitutionally tasked with enforcing the law. The Department of Justice reports to him. According to lunatics like you, Trump must be deep state.

If Trump fired Rosenstein or declassified the documents the House oversight committee is requesting, turds like you would be screaming bloody murder. The Democrats in Congress, the #neverTrump Republicans and the fake news media would all be screaming for his impeachment.

Who the **** do you believe you're fooling, shit for brains?

Trump should declassified the documents.
Soon as the next SCCU judge makes it through the Senate he needs to bring in a new IG.

You do know, that all this unsealing of documents gives the criminal the access to the evidence against him or her right? You do know that?

Is that what Republicans want now? To give a potential criminal the evidence the prosecution has, giving the criminal the opportunity to manipulate that evidence?

so if you were arrested, you wouldn't want to see the evidence that put you there? ok. wow. let me take a moment and laugh.

 

[easyt65]

You do know, that all this unsealing of documents gives the criminal the access to the evidence against him or her right? You do know that?

Is that what Republicans want now? To give a potential criminal the evidence the prosecution has, giving the criminal the opportunity to manipulate that evidence?

Bwuhahahaha.....

YOU do know that the House has legal Congressional Oversight of the DOJ, the Deputy Director of the DOJ, and Mueller's circle jerk, right?

After 3 years without any evidence tp support the reason for forming a special counsel - Illegal Russian Interference involving the President - the House wants to know WTF is going on and demands - as is their right - to see the Documents.

Snowflakes went ape-shit demanding to see something they had no legal right to see - Trump's taxes. Right now the Deputy Director of the DOJ, the FBI, and Mueller are currently CRIMINALS, in violation of a Congressional Subpoena.
-- The PROVEN criminal witch hunters are in FURTHER violation of the law by refusing to comply with a Congressional Subpoena. Not only would it be appropriate to IMPEACH Rosenstein and FIRE Mueller and Wray, Congress has the legal justification for INDICTING them and charging them with the crimes of OBSTRUCTION!

So don't try to defend their crimes by claiming Congress is somehow IGNORING the law and attempting to help the President. Congress is exercising its authority and responsibility as Congressional oversight...except they are NOT carrying out that responsibility in an attempt to be 'politically sensitive' to what is going on.

F* 'Political Sensitivity'!

'Political Sensitivity' & criminal partisanship is why Hillary Clinton is not in jail today
'Political Sensitivity' & criminal partisanship is why Holder is not in jail today.
'Political Sensitivity' & criminal partisanship is why Lynch is not in jail today.
'Political Sensitivity' & criminal partisanship is why Brennan is not in jail today.
'Political Sensitivity' & criminal partisanship is why Clapper is not in jail today.
'Political Sensitivity' & criminal partisanship is why Comey is not in jail today.
'Political Sensitivity' & criminal partisanship is why McCabe is not in jail today.
'Political Sensitivity' & criminal partisanship is why Strzok is not in jail today.

 

[Ame®icano]

You keep repeating "Republican appointed judges" like that changes the outcome.

FISA judges issue warrants based on information provided to them in FISA application. Whoever sign the application is sworn and testifies that information is verified and correct, and judge issue the warrant based on that testimony. Every single of four applications based primarily on fabricated dossier paid for by Hillary was presented as truth and based on that, the judge issues the warrant. That is not so hard to understand, is it?

That is a totally fabricated statement. There is zero evidence that those four judges issued those warrants because of the dossier. Why do you lie? There exists not one link out there remotely proving that statement of yours. And that is how the Right keeps finding themselves in these pickles.

Lying to the (any) judge under oath is criminal act of perjury, punishable by federal law with up to five years in prison. Each and every one of four that signed those fraudulent applicants should charged with perjury and end up in jail However, that is not the only crime they committed and the rest is coming out little by little and when it all come out, they're not gonna be looking at 5 years, by 50, or more.

Once again, you are lying. If you were telling the truth, you would have provided the link proving these judges did what you say they did. But you didn't.

Enjoy your derangement, it's fun to watch.

I'm enjoying watching you play games by inventing scenarios that never existed.

Funny, I explain to you how FISA court works, wich is in fact how every court works at their own level, I provided to you link to the FISA court rules and procedures, and with all that in the front of you, I am one that is lying. On the contrary, you who provided nothing of the value, and your opinion pulled out of your ass has no value, according to you is an absolute truth.

No proof? Andrew McCabe testified on the front of Congress that there would not be FISA warrant without the dossier. Also...

FISA Applications Confirm: The FBI Relied on the Unverified Steele Dossier

No, no, no, liar, you're going to explain why you lied first about these four judges. I don't need lessons on how FISA's work.

You said that each judge signed off on a fraudulent FISA. That is a lie, and has jack squat to do with this side diversion of yours. This is your quote: Each and every one of four that signed those fraudulent applicants should charged with perjury and end up in jail. Prove they are fraudulent or you continue to be a liar.

You really don't know how courts function, eh shitstain?

And second, yes each of those four applications were fraudulent. If you don't believe me, read the FISA rules and procedure in the link i provided, it may give you a hint.

When Comey said that "the dossier" was salacious and unverified, what does is mean? Even Steele confirmed that more than half is not verified. Are you saying "the dossier" is not fraudulent?

Since "the dossier" not confirmed and verified, it could not be presented to the court and under oat presented as truth. Therefore if ANY part of the application is fraudulent, the whole application is fraudulent and those who signed it committed the perjury.

If that's not clear, I'll get my kid's crayons.

Comey never said the dossier was salacious and unverified — he said parts of it were. And if the FISA application were truly illegal as you ignorantly claim, people involved would have been indicted.

If any part of the FISA application is salacious and unverified, government MUST inform the court about it.

FISA rules and procedures. Read rule 13 on page 5.

Has any of the four that signed FISA application (government) done that?

No. In fact, not that they hadn't informed the court of any salacious and unverified information, after the initial warrant they swore three more times that information they're submitting is correct even they knew it's not. In other words, they lied to court under oath in order to get the warrant, and that is perjury.

Why they have not been indicted? Because all that have been discovered just recently and I expect indictment will come when investigation is finished and all evidence is 100% verified. You don't make processing mistakes in things serious as such.

 

[Ame®icano]

You keep repeating "Republican appointed judges" like that changes the outcome.

FISA judges issue warrants based on information provided to them in FISA application. Whoever sign the application is sworn and testifies that information is verified and correct, and judge issue the warrant based on that testimony. Every single of four applications based primarily on fabricated dossier paid for by Hillary was presented as truth and based on that, the judge issues the warrant. That is not so hard to understand, is it?

That is a totally fabricated statement. There is zero evidence that those four judges issued those warrants because of the dossier. Why do you lie? There exists not one link out there remotely proving that statement of yours. And that is how the Right keeps finding themselves in these pickles.

Lying to the (any) judge under oath is criminal act of perjury, punishable by federal law with up to five years in prison. Each and every one of four that signed those fraudulent applicants should charged with perjury and end up in jail However, that is not the only crime they committed and the rest is coming out little by little and when it all come out, they're not gonna be looking at 5 years, by 50, or more.

Once again, you are lying. If you were telling the truth, you would have provided the link proving these judges did what you say they did. But you didn't.

Enjoy your derangement, it's fun to watch.

I'm enjoying watching you play games by inventing scenarios that never existed.

"Zero evidence?" How ******* stupid can a person get? They just published 415 pages of evidence.

Much of it reacted, meaning there’s a shit load of evidence contained in that FISA application you haven’t seen.

Now if you were right, and you never are, folks would have been brought up on charges by now.

Hmmm, no they wouldn't. We have all seen how the deep state is fighting tooth and nail to keep their operatives out of the pokey. They have plenty of allies in the fake news media and with lobbyists and big donors in Washington.

Holyfuckingshit!

It never ceases to amaze me just how moronic you rightards are.

******* moron... Trump is the top dog when it comes to law enforcement. He’s the one Constitutionally tasked with enforcing the law. The Department of Justice reports to him. According to lunatics like you, Trump must be deep state.

Have DOJ reported to him?

If they have, who, when and what have they reported? Give us an example.

If not, why they have not?

Since Sessions recused himself, how many times Rosenstein reported to Trump about ongoing things, since DOJ as you say "reports to him"?

 

[WTP]

You do know, that all this unsealing of documents gives the criminal the access to the evidence against him or her right? You do know that?

Is that what Republicans want now? To give a potential criminal the evidence the prosecution has, giving the criminal the opportunity to manipulate that evidence?

Bwuhahahaha.....

YOU do know that the House has legal Congressional Oversight of the DOJ, the Deputy Director of the DOJ, and Mueller's circle jerk, right?

After 3 years without any evidence tp support the reason for forming a special counsel - Illegal Russian Interference involving the President - the House wants to know WTF is going on and demands - as is their right - to see the Documents.

Snowflakes went ape-shit demanding to see something they had no legal right to see - Trump's taxes. Right now the Deputy Director of the DOJ, the FBI, and Mueller are currently CRIMINALS, in violation of a Congressional Subpoena.
-- The PROVEN criminal witch hunters are in FURTHER violation of the law by refusing to comply with a Congressional Subpoena. Not only would it be appropriate to IMPEACH Rosenstein and FIRE Mueller and Wray, Congress has the legal justification for INDICTING them and charging them with the crimes of OBSTRUCTION!

So don't try to defend their crimes by claiming Congress is somehow IGNORING the law and attempting to help the President. Congress is exercising its authority and responsibility as Congressional oversight...except they are NOT carrying out that responsibility in an attempt to be 'politically sensitive' to what is going on.

F* 'Political Sensitivity'!

'Political Sensitivity' & criminal partisanship is why Hillary Clinton is not in jail today
'Political Sensitivity' & criminal partisanship is why Holder is not in jail today.
'Political Sensitivity' & criminal partisanship is why Lynch is not in jail today.
'Political Sensitivity' & criminal partisanship is why Brennan is not in jail today.
'Political Sensitivity' & criminal partisanship is why Clapper is not in jail today.
'Political Sensitivity' & criminal partisanship is why Comey is not in jail today.
'Political Sensitivity' & criminal partisanship is why McCabe is not in jail today.
'Political Sensitivity' & criminal partisanship is why Strzok is not in jail today.

One can only guess how many "window dressed alternative facts" are in this post?

 

[WTP]

That is a totally fabricated statement. There is zero evidence that those four judges issued those warrants because of the dossier. Why do you lie? There exists not one link out there remotely proving that statement of yours. And that is how the Right keeps finding themselves in these pickles.

Once again, you are lying. If you were telling the truth, you would have provided the link proving these judges did what you say they did. But you didn't.

I'm enjoying watching you play games by inventing scenarios that never existed.

Funny, I explain to you how FISA court works, wich is in fact how every court works at their own level, I provided to you link to the FISA court rules and procedures, and with all that in the front of you, I am one that is lying. On the contrary, you who provided nothing of the value, and your opinion pulled out of your ass has no value, according to you is an absolute truth.

No proof? Andrew McCabe testified on the front of Congress that there would not be FISA warrant without the dossier. Also...

FISA Applications Confirm: The FBI Relied on the Unverified Steele Dossier

No, no, no, liar, you're going to explain why you lied first about these four judges. I don't need lessons on how FISA's work.

You said that each judge signed off on a fraudulent FISA. That is a lie, and has jack squat to do with this side diversion of yours. This is your quote: Each and every one of four that signed those fraudulent applicants should charged with perjury and end up in jail. Prove they are fraudulent or you continue to be a liar.

You really don't know how courts function, eh shitstain?

And second, yes each of those four applications were fraudulent. If you don't believe me, read the FISA rules and procedure in the link i provided, it may give you a hint.

When Comey said that "the dossier" was salacious and unverified, what does is mean? Even Steele confirmed that more than half is not verified. Are you saying "the dossier" is not fraudulent?

Since "the dossier" not confirmed and verified, it could not be presented to the court and under oat presented as truth. Therefore if ANY part of the application is fraudulent, the whole application is fraudulent and those who signed it committed the perjury.

If that's not clear, I'll get my kid's crayons.

Comey never said the dossier was salacious and unverified — he said parts of it were. And if the FISA application were truly illegal as you ignorantly claim, people involved would have been indicted.

If any part of the FISA application is salacious and unverified, government MUST inform the court about it.

FISA rules and procedures. Read rule 13 on page 5.

Has any of the four that signed FISA application (government) done that?

No. In fact, not that they hadn't informed the court of any salacious and unverified information, after the initial warrant they swore three more times that information they're submitting is correct even they knew it's not. In other words, they lied to court under oath in order to get the warrant, and that is perjury.

Why they have not been indicted? Because all that have been discovered just recently and I expect indictment will come when investigation is finished and all evidence is 100% verified. You don't make processing mistakes in things serious as such.

While you are busy self erecting yourself as somehow this producer and author of FISA rules and procedures, it might be best to remind you that no one has heard your call. Even your own corrupt Republican chair Nunes and his flunkies have produced nada on anything salacious towards these Republican judges with respect to their job of following protocol. You can swat the air all you want, and you'll keep on swatting at it, and your results will always be the same.

 

[WTP]

As we all knew, when the truth came out, the Nunes memo was total bullshit.




FBI releases Carter Page surveillance warrant documents - CNNPolitics

Creepytush is a moron.

Because he reveals the truth, and you won't, and that's how folks become morons. Got it.

 

[bripat9643]

View attachment 206849

Love the desperation spin....

They tried to get out ahead of those of us who really know how to read and follow the dots.. Nunes memo was confirmed and all doubts were laid waste. It even reinforced the fact the Dossier was the only thing used to lie to the FISA court in an effort to get a warrant..

Hilarious spin by you left wing retards... The only people your fooling are those who cant read or refuse to read and use their brains..

You don’t know the dossier was the only thing used. The warrant application was so heavily redacted, you don’t know what’s in there. You’re only being shown what Trump wants you to see.

Much of it reacted, meaning there’s a shit load of evidence contained in that FISA application you haven’t seen.

Now if you were right, and you never are, folks would have been brought up on charges by now.

Hmmm, no they wouldn't. We have all seen how the deep state is fighting tooth and nail to keep their operatives out of the pokey. They have plenty of allies in the fake news media and with lobbyists and big donors in Washington.

Holyfuckingshit!

It never ceases to amaze me just how moronic you rightards are.

******* moron... Trump is the top dog when it comes to law enforcement. He’s the one Constitutionally tasked with enforcing the law. The Department of Justice reports to him. According to lunatics like you, Trump must be deep state.

If Trump fired Rosenstein or declassified the documents the House oversight committee is requesting, turds like you would be screaming bloody murder. The Democrats in Congress, the #neverTrump Republicans and the fake news media would all be screaming for his impeachment.

Who the **** do you believe you're fooling, shit for brains?

Trump should declassified the documents.
Soon as the next SCCU judge makes it through the Senate he needs to bring in a new IG.

You do know, that all this unsealing of documents gives the criminal the access to the evidence against him or her right? You do know that?

Is that what Republicans want now? To give a potential criminal the evidence the prosecution has, giving the criminal the opportunity to manipulate that evidence?

What "criminal" is that? I'm only aware of victims of Mueller's witch hunt.