Firing squad executes Brad Keith Sigmon in South Carolina in 'bloody spectacle'

I always thought that only one gun had a live round .. the rest have blanks so the riflemen wouldn't know if they were the ones that made the kill shot .. I heard that somewhere yrs ago [don't remember the source .. I remember hearing from that they've been doing it that way since the early 20th century in the US .. though I could be wrong ..
It's real easy to tell the difference between a blank, and a live round.

That's a myth.
 
The guy's attorney allows his client to chose a bizarre method of execution and then calls it a bloody spectacle. What was he expecting?
 
Lethal in
I would go for firing squad vs hanging, electric chair or gas. They take too long. Might be bloody, but let the shooters clean up the mess after you are gone

Still not sure about lethal injection. I have put several dogs down and they seem to just fade away.
Lethal injection would be what I would do. The first injection puts you to sleep, the second is a paralysis drug that stops breathing, the third causes immediate cardiac arrest.
The first is for humane reasons
The 2nd is to stop gross physical reactions to the 3rd "kill shot".
 
He is serving the world better now as fertilizer than he ever did in life! I have no remorse for this piece of shit being put down.
 
The guy's attorney allows his client to chose a bizarre method of execution and then calls it a bloody spectacle. What was he expecting?

It's not the attorenys call as to what method his client requested. If the attorney can't fulfill the clients requested filing, the attorny can apply to the court to be removed as the attorney of record or file what the client wants.

WW
 
Last edited:
if you’re going to execute someone by shooting them, what is even the point of a firing squad?

Why not just shoot them in the back of the head with a single shooter? More efficient and more accurate
 
if you’re going to execute someone by shooting them, what is even the point of a firing squad?

Why not just shoot them in the back of the head with a single shooter? More efficient and more accurate
Agreed, but can you see that mess every time somebody’s executed like that they figure out the person’s name that pulled the trigger and they’d be calling him the Grim Reaper. The left would be vicious and destroying his life and any others that do the same. The fact is without a doubt is better without this piece of shit! He needed to be put down. He serves the world better as fertilizer now than he ever did in life just like a many in this world do!
 
He could have thought that bullets hurt while he beat them to death for 10 minutes.
Ooops, that would be a responsibility No No
 
It depends on body weight and composition. Some hangings result in decapitation. The heavy body falls and the head just pops off.

Until they struck the death penalty in WA, they used hanging as an option. I know of one case where the condemned ate until obese and used that fact to defeat the penalty as hanging would have severed his head from his body.
 
Death by hypoxia is painless and clean.
They just pass-out and fall asleep.
They could just pump the air out of the chamber.

They train pilots on how to see the warning signs of hypoxia.
 
I still think Klingon disruptor, fuck this painless shit for lowlifes that deserve to be fertilizer by their own chosen actions! 😉

IMG_4131.webp
 
I’m a bigger fan of drawing & quartering or blood eagle-ing. Far more painful and dramatic.
 
Hanging--you have to stand :(

electric chair--you get to sit down 😐

lethal injection--you can lounge like you on the couch!:)
 
---but that she didn't agree with his execution, saying death should be in God's hands.

I've no problem here except the victim's family did not want the execution. I feel the victim should always have a say in the penalty for true justice to be served. If the victims are dissatisfied in the result, how can anyone say justice was served?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom