Fire Protection Engineer: 9/11 BOMBSHELL INTERVIEW

[creativedreams]

More opinion without any evidence. SSDD.

Well educated and very experienced "opinions" from experts in the field......oh but that would hurt your feelings so don't believe them.....

Well educated and experience means nothing without actual physical evidence. You don't even have the explosions that some witnesses reported on tape... Zero audio of the demolitions. With how many cameras trained on them? You got nothing but opinion.

Take your muffler off your car and listen to how loud it is.

The vertical support columns were all in the center core of the buildings with a muffler around them....

 

[Gamolon]

That's not all of the buiilding............But it appears you're all right. I'm going to take my masters from cornell in structural/mechanical engineering back. I apparently cheated to get it.

I'm thankful that I have been educated on these events. I'll rest easy from now on. Signing off on this.

regards,
Dipshit

Yeah, it takes a masters degree from Cornell in structural/engineering to see you were wrong about the 6.5 seconds claim.

Good luck to you.

 

[Mr. Jones]

You answer my question first.

Let's take two of the same columns and secure them vertically in the ground. One will have a 10,000 lb weight on it while the other one won't. We'll subject both columns to the same fire.

Will the columns behave the same exact way?

Yes or no?

Will the vertical columns somehow remove itself ALL the way down well below the heated section...fast enough for the top floor to hit the ground almost as fast as a ball would if dropped right beside it?

Ask a structural engineer if a FAILED column provides any support.

So you refuse to answer the questions I asked you FIRST, I'm not surprised you can't. The steel in the other burning buildings, did not experience sufficient thermal expansion, nor loose its strength enough to cause a global collapse...in ANY instance ..in any of the examples sited previously.
My question to you was, why didn't the N tower experience even a partial collapse in the 1975 fire?
It is noted that you refused to answer.
Another question I asked you was, why did that steel in the other burning buildings NOT behave like the steel in the WTC fires?

You refused to answer this also..duly noted.
To anyone following along, it should be clear that you have no answer to these questions, and aren't even mature enough to admit it. You lose, troll.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Yes, most of the content of the building....MOST, was literally pulverized into dust.

The lines show the amount of rubble remaining after the buildings collapsed. Maybe it all burned up the molten metal pools in the sub floors though...

At any rate, I'll leave you all to it. Peace.

 

[Gamolon]

Well educated and very experienced "opinions" from experts in the field......oh but that would hurt your feelings so don't believe them.....

Well educated and experience means nothing without actual physical evidence. You don't even have the explosions that some witnesses reported on tape... Zero audio of the demolitions. With how many cameras trained on them? You got nothing but opinion.

Take your muffler off your car and listen to how loud it is.

The vertical support columns were all in the center core of the buildings with a muffler around them....

Now THAT was funny!

 

[creativedreams]

Well educated and very experienced "opinions" from experts in the field......oh but that would hurt your feelings so don't believe them.....

I have read and heard from quite a few well educated experts in a variety of fields who insist that the fires caused by airliners striking World Trade Center Towers One and Two could not have caused the kind of collapse of those two buildings, plus Building Seven, which we all saw happen on television. While most of these experts go into extensive technical detail to explain why such an effect is scientifically infeasible, which unavoidably implies that some sort of deliberate effort was made to facilitate the collapses, not one of them has volunteered so much as an educated guess on specifically what was done to facilitate those perfectly vertical collapses.

?

A pre-planned setting of controlled demolition is far simpler than you think.

The World Trade Centers underwent many months of construction renovations on the elevators and in and around the elevator shafts up to the day of 9/11

All the core vertical support columns are in and around the elevator shafts

The World Trade Centers even underwent many months of construction renovations on the vertical support columns up to the day of 9/11

The company that did the construction renovations on the World Trade Centers has worked hand and hand with Controlled Demolitions Inc

It even states on the Controlled Demolitions Inc website they do classified controlled demolitions for the U.S. government Defense Dept on sensitive projects both internationally and domestically

Controlled Demolitions Inc helped with the cleanup at ground zero as did the company that did the many months of construction renovations

The company who did the many months of construction renovations on the World Trade Centers up to the day of 9/11 had its CEO appointed by then Pres Bush to the Presidents Commission on White House Fellows

The weekend before the trade centers were destroyed there were complete power downs in the buildings and security was completely off.

There were Israeli Mossad proven to be working in and around the World Trade Centers also

There were Israeli Mossad arrested and on the News during the 9/11 time frame near the World Trade Centers with evidence of explosives and held in jail for months until word came from the top of the pyramid scheme to deport them

Some of the Israeli Mossad arrested near the World Trade Centers with evidence of explosives were proven to be active in the Israeli Military and explosive experts

Again...the company that did many months of construction renovations on the World Trade Centers up to the day of 9/11...not to mention the complete power downs and security loss the weekend before 9/11....Israeli Mossad Military explosive experts in and around the World Trade Centers....The CEO of the construction company doing renovations on the support columns getting appointed by Pres Bush to the Presidents Commission on White House Fellows.......starts to paint a picture how easy it would be to pull it off.

Not to mention...

it was proven the Israeli Mossad were in the U.S and among the terrorists that got on the planes....did they lure the willing terrorists on the planes to frame them?

It was slipped into the news only a couple months before 9/11 that a Boeing plane was remote operated successfully flying it and landing it without a pilot....did they remote fly the planes into the World Trade Centers to get world support to obtain one of the most strategic squares on the worlds chessboard?

There was a command bunker built on the 23rd floor of World Trade Center 7 to "fight terrorism".

This floor had millions spent on it reinforcing the floors walls, windows etc basically making it a treefort within sight of the Twin Towers.

Was this floor the cockpit for remote operating the planes on 9/11?
Was this floor used to visually see the exact impact points on the Twin Towers to set the sequence for the wireless explosives?

Note: The Pentagon too was undergoing construction renovations in the area that was affected on 9/11. The Pentagon just happened to get hit in the only area of the building that was undergoing a construction renovation to reinforce it's walls for a possible attack.

For those who make the arguement of hearing explosives....

Take your muffler off your car and listen to how loud it is.

The vertical support columns were all in the center core of the buildings with a muffler around them....

 

[Gamolon]

Will the vertical columns somehow remove itself ALL the way down well below the heated section...fast enough for the top floor to hit the ground almost as fast as a ball would if dropped right beside it?

Ask a structural engineer if a FAILED column provides any support.

So you refuse to answer the questions I asked you FIRST, I'm not surprised you can't. The steel in the other burning buildings, did not experience sufficient thermal expansion, nor loose its strength enough to cause a global collapse...in ANY instance ..in any of the examples sited previously.
My question to you was, why didn't the N tower experience even a partial collapse in the 1975 fire?
It is noted that you refused to answer.
Another question I asked you was, why did that steel in the other burning buildings NOT behave like the steel in the WTC fires?

You refused to answer this also..duly noted.
To anyone following along, it should be clear that you have no answer to these questions, and aren't even mature enough to admit it. You lose, troll.

I answered your questions, you just don't understand the answer. The steel didn't BEHAVE the same way because the design and handling of loads is different in every building. I even gave you an example of how the SAME FRIGGIN COLUMN would react differently with weight applied to one and not to the other.

Sorry, but you lose.

 

[Gamolon]

Yes, most of the content of the building....MOST, was literally pulverized into dust.

The lines show the amount of rubble remaining after the buildings collapsed. Maybe it all burned up the molten metal pools in the sub floors though...

At any rate, I'll leave you all to it. Peace.

WRONG!!!!

Here is the debris field.

The "rubble pile", as you call it, was not contained to the footprint as shown in your edited photo.

 

[Gamolon]

Yes, most of the content of the building....MOST, was literally pulverized into dust.

The lines show the amount of rubble remaining after the buildings collapsed. Maybe it all burned up the molten metal pools in the sub floors though...

At any rate, I'll leave you all to it. Peace.

Another thing.

Does that little "yellow outline" you drew match this top down photo of the debris? Is all the debris contained in the one WTC footprint like you show?

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Well educated and very experienced "opinions" from experts in the field......oh but that would hurt your feelings so don't believe them.....

I have read and heard from quite a few well educated experts in a variety of fields who insist that the fires caused by airliners striking World Trade Center Towers One and Two could not have caused the kind of collapse of those two buildings, plus Building Seven, which we all saw happen on television. While most of these experts go into extensive technical detail to explain why such an effect is scientifically infeasible, which unavoidably implies that some sort of deliberate effort was made to facilitate the collapses, not one of them has volunteered so much as an educated guess on specifically what was done to facilitate those perfectly vertical collapses.

?

A pre-planned setting of controlled demolition is far simpler than you think.

The World Trade Centers underwent many months of construction renovations on the elevators and in and around the elevator shafts up to the day of 9/11

All the core vertical support columns are in and around the elevator shafts

The World Trade Centers even underwent many months of construction renovations on the vertical support columns up to the day of 9/11

The company that did the construction renovations on the World Trade Centers has worked hand and hand with Controlled Demolitions Inc

It even states on the Controlled Demolitions Inc website they do classified controlled demolitions for the U.S. government Defense Dept on sensitive projects both internationally and domestically

Controlled Demolitions Inc helped with the cleanup at ground zero as did the company that did the many months of construction renovations

The company who did the many months of construction renovations on the World Trade Centers up to the day of 9/11 had its CEO appointed by then Pres Bush to the Presidents Commission on White House Fellows

The weekend before the trade centers were destroyed there were complete power downs in the buildings and security was completely off.

There were Israeli Mossad proven to be working in and around the World Trade Centers also

There were Israeli Mossad arrested and on the News during the 9/11 time frame near the World Trade Centers with evidence of explosives and held in jail for months until word came from the top of the pyramid scheme to deport them

Some of the Israeli Mossad arrested near the World Trade Centers with evidence of explosives were proven to be active in the Israeli Military and explosive experts

Again...the company that did many months of construction renovations on the World Trade Centers up to the day of 9/11...not to mention the complete power downs and security loss the weekend before 9/11....Israeli Mossad Military explosive experts in and around the World Trade Centers....The CEO of the construction company doing renovations on the support columns getting appointed by Pres Bush to the Presidents Commission on White House Fellows.......starts to paint a picture how easy it would be to pull it off.

Not to mention...

it was proven the Israeli Mossad were in the U.S and among the terrorists that got on the planes....did they lure the willing terrorists on the planes to frame them?

It was slipped into the news only a couple months before 9/11 that a Boeing plane was remote operated successfully flying it and landing it without a pilot....did they remote fly the planes into the World Trade Centers to get world support to obtain one of the most strategic squares on the worlds chessboard?

There was a command bunker built on the 23rd floor of World Trade Center 7 to "fight terrorism".

This floor had millions spent on it reinforcing the floors walls, windows etc basically making it a treefort within sight of the Twin Towers.

Was this floor the cockpit for remote operating the planes on 9/11?
Was this floor used to visually see the exact impact points on the Twin Towers to set the sequence for the wireless explosives?

Note: The Pentagon too was undergoing construction renovations in the area that was affected on 9/11. The Pentagon just happened to get hit in the only area of the building that was undergoing a construction renovation to reinforce it's walls for a possible attack.

For those who make the arguement of hearing explosives....

Take your muffler off your car and listen to how loud it is.

The vertical support columns were all in the center core of the buildings with a muffler around them....

there is no argument that explosives were planted in the towers.they were,case closed.the thing that shills cant get around is not only over a thousand architects and engineers say so but so do some demolition experts when they first saw bld 7 shown to them,the crux of the coverup.many say when they saw bld 7 that it was a controlled demolition,plus firefighters experienced in explosives who heard the explosions in the twin towers called the 9/11 commission a half baked farce and Barry jennings testimony of bld 7 is the smoking gun of bld 7.The shills here cant get around ANY of these facts and can only fling shit in defeat like the dumbfuck monkey trolls they are.

 

[Patriot911]

there is no argument that explosives were planted in the towers.they were,case closed.the thing that shills cant get around is not only over a thousand architects and engineers say so but so do some demolition experts when they first saw bld 7 shown to them,the crux of the coverup.many say when they saw bld 7 that it was a controlled demolition,plus firefighters experienced in explosives who heard the explosions in the twin towers called the 9/11 commission a half baked farce and Barry jennings testimony of bld 7 is the smoking gun of bld 7.The shills here cant get around ANY of these facts and can only fling shit in defeat like the dumbfuck monkey trolls they are.

You want to talk about dumbfuck monkey trolls? Look in a mirror, jackass! There are HUGE holes in the case for explosives in the towers and WTC 7 that you silly fucks just can't explain; like the complete and total lack of evidence. So go ahead and believe opinion from the people who milk sheeple like you out of their money over the facts and hard evidence, but don't try and claim you're right until you have some actual evidence (not opinion) that you are actually right.

 

[PhysicsExist]

there is no argument that explosives were planted in the towers.they were,case closed.the thing that shills cant get around is not only over a thousand architects and engineers say so but so do some demolition experts when they first saw bld 7 shown to them,the crux of the coverup.many say when they saw bld 7 that it was a controlled demolition,plus firefighters experienced in explosives who heard the explosions in the twin towers called the 9/11 commission a half baked farce and Barry jennings testimony of bld 7 is the smoking gun of bld 7.The shills here cant get around ANY of these facts and can only fling shit in defeat like the dumbfuck monkey trolls they are.

You want to talk about dumbfuck monkey trolls? Look in a mirror, jackass! There are HUGE holes in the case for explosives in the towers and WTC 7 that you silly fucks just can't explain; like the complete and total lack of evidence. So go ahead and believe opinion from the people who milk sheeple like you out of their money over the facts and hard evidence, but don't try and claim you're right until you have some actual evidence (not opinion) that you are actually right.

Explosive Residues
Independent researchers have discovered a highly engineered explosive-incendiary material in several dust samples collected near the WTC site. In their paper, entitled Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, nine researchers, led by chemist Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen, conclude:

“[T]he red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.”

REFERENCES

Harrit, Farrer, Jones, Ryan, Legge, Farnsworth, Roberts, Gourley, Larsen, “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe,” Bentham Open Access, 2009. http://rememberbuilding7.org/downloads/Full_Thermite_paper.pdf

 

[Patriot911]

there is no argument that explosives were planted in the towers.they were,case closed.the thing that shills cant get around is not only over a thousand architects and engineers say so but so do some demolition experts when they first saw bld 7 shown to them,the crux of the coverup.many say when they saw bld 7 that it was a controlled demolition,plus firefighters experienced in explosives who heard the explosions in the twin towers called the 9/11 commission a half baked farce and Barry jennings testimony of bld 7 is the smoking gun of bld 7.The shills here cant get around ANY of these facts and can only fling shit in defeat like the dumbfuck monkey trolls they are.

You want to talk about dumbfuck monkey trolls? Look in a mirror, jackass! There are HUGE holes in the case for explosives in the towers and WTC 7 that you silly fucks just can't explain; like the complete and total lack of evidence. So go ahead and believe opinion from the people who milk sheeple like you out of their money over the facts and hard evidence, but don't try and claim you're right until you have some actual evidence (not opinion) that you are actually right.

Explosive Residues
Independent researchers have discovered a highly engineered explosive-incendiary material in several dust samples collected near the WTC site. In their paper, entitled Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, nine researchers, led by chemist Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen, conclude:

“[T]he red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.”

REFERENCES

Harrit, Farrer, Jones, Ryan, Legge, Farnsworth, Roberts, Gourley, Larsen, “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe,” Bentham Open Access, 2009. http://rememberbuilding7.org/downloads/Full_Thermite_paper.pdf

And right on time is the other dumbfuck monkey troll who can't debate; just cut and paste! Go try and make baby truthtards with 9/11 inside job. That way we don't have to worry about you dumbfuck monkey trolls reproducing and further contaminating the gene pool with shit.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

I love how your only rebuttal is to attack your opponent by name calling. Which usually indicates that you have no valid rebuttal. Now I'm sure you will call me names.....so tell us, how long have you worked for the agency?

 

[Mr. Jones]

How long did it take then? Educate me folks. Educate me.....also a link that shows the building fall in its entirety would be cool too.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loYmBaqgyDQ]YouTube - 9/11 WTC 7 Demolition - Penthouse Collapse With Explosion Audio (Extended)[/ame]

0:02 is the start of the penthouse collapse. The roof line disappears behind the biuildings in the foreground at 0:14. And that's not even the end of the collapse. That gives us 12 seconds right there. Almost double your 6.5 second "total collapse" claim.

Or are you going to tell me that the penthouse is not part of the total collapse sequence?

Does anyone else hear that audible noise preceding the total straight down collapse, that produced 2.25 secs. of free fall, in this video??
So why didn't the rigid part of this building resist falling down?
There weren't fires on all the floors...
How could the collapse produce 2.25 secs. of free fall speed?
Why did NIST not calculate this after so many years of time and money at their disposal?
Why did it take a high school physics teacher to FORCE NIST to abruptly change their theory?
Why did the 9-11 commission report writers change their stance on the investigation?
Why are you so hell bent on being an anti American troll?
Why has there been NO global collapse of ANY steel hi rise building that produced free fall speeds, despite more intense fires...IN HISTORY??

 

[TakeAStepBack]

I don't hear the audible noise. But I really dont need to. NIST already admitted that the building fell free. As it is clear from the video. You're right, too. No steel structure high-rise have ever collapsed at free fall, or from fire before that day. Not one, not two, but 3 anomalies all within one day.

Magnificant. You would think scientists the globe over would have ran to the site to conduct field research....oh, wait.....

I'm still caught by the first 2 towers pulverizing. Kinetic energy expelled twice at once should have anyone who knows physics scratching the remaining patch of hair from their head......

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Which image doesn't belong?

 

[Gamolon]

How long did it take then? Educate me folks. Educate me.....also a link that shows the building fall in its entirety would be cool too.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loYmBaqgyDQ]YouTube - 9/11 WTC 7 Demolition - Penthouse Collapse With Explosion Audio (Extended)[/ame]

0:02 is the start of the penthouse collapse. The roof line disappears behind the biuildings in the foreground at 0:14. And that's not even the end of the collapse. That gives us 12 seconds right there. Almost double your 6.5 second "total collapse" claim.

Or are you going to tell me that the penthouse is not part of the total collapse sequence?

Does anyone else hear that audible noise preceding the total straight down collapse, that produced 2.25 secs. of free fall, in this video??
So why didn't the rigid part of this building resist falling down?
There weren't fires on all the floors...
How could the collapse produce 2.25 secs. of free fall speed?
Why did NIST not calculate this after so many years of time and money at their disposal?
Why did it take a high school physics teacher to FORCE NIST to abruptly change their theory?
Why did the 9-11 commission report writers change their stance on the investigation?
Why are you so hell bent on being an anti American troll?
Why has there been NO global collapse of ANY steel hi rise building that produced free fall speeds, despite more intense fires...IN HISTORY??

Where was the noise when the penthouse collapsed?

 

[Mr. Jones]

YouTube - 9/11 WTC 7 Demolition - Penthouse Collapse With Explosion Audio (Extended)

0:02 is the start of the penthouse collapse. The roof line disappears behind the biuildings in the foreground at 0:14. And that's not even the end of the collapse. That gives us 12 seconds right there. Almost double your 6.5 second "total collapse" claim.

Or are you going to tell me that the penthouse is not part of the total collapse sequence?

Does anyone else hear that audible noise preceding the total straight down collapse, that produced 2.25 secs. of free fall, in this video??
So why didn't the rigid part of this building resist falling down?
There weren't fires on all the floors...
How could the collapse produce 2.25 secs. of free fall speed?
Why did NIST not calculate this after so many years of time and money at their disposal?
Why did it take a high school physics teacher to FORCE NIST to abruptly change their theory?
Why did the 9-11 commission report writers change their stance on the investigation?
Why are you so hell bent on being an anti American troll?
Why has there been NO global collapse of ANY steel hi rise building that produced free fall speeds, despite more intense fires...IN HISTORY??

Where was the noise when the penthouse collapsed?

Look at the video again and
Turn you speakers up, there is a clear audible BOOM preceding the
entire collapse! You dont find this in any way suspicious? What are you pretending to be deaf as well as stupid?
What was different in the steel of this building that made it collapse with free fall speed, and the other infernos did not??
You still can not answer this nor probably ever will, you aren't even concerned about it! As if the straight down collapse...first in history caused solely by fire(NIST said this) is perfectly normal....why do you adhere to this fantasy?

 

[Patriot911]

Does anyone else hear that audible noise preceding the total straight down collapse, that produced 2.25 secs. of free fall, in this video??
So why didn't the rigid part of this building resist falling down?
There weren't fires on all the floors...
How could the collapse produce 2.25 secs. of free fall speed?
Why did NIST not calculate this after so many years of time and money at their disposal?
Why did it take a high school physics teacher to FORCE NIST to abruptly change their theory?
Why did the 9-11 commission report writers change their stance on the investigation?
Why are you so hell bent on being an anti American troll?
Why has there been NO global collapse of ANY steel hi rise building that produced free fall speeds, despite more intense fires...IN HISTORY??

Where was the noise when the penthouse collapsed?

Look at the video again and
Turn you speakers up, there is a clear audible BOOM preceding the
entire collapse! You dont find this in any way suspicious? What are you pretending to be deaf as well as stupid?
What was different in the steel of this building that made it collapse with free fall speed, and the other infernos did not??
You still can not answer this nor probably ever will, you aren't even concerned about it! As if the straight down collapse...first in history caused solely by fire(NIST said this) is perfectly normal....why do you adhere to this fantasy?

I love it when a dumbfuck is too stupid to realize he is playing right into the hands of his intellectual superiors. Yes. You hear a distinct rumble from the time the Penthouse collapses until the rest of the structure collapses. Now, the NIST theory is that during this time, the internal structures of the building were collapsing. Wouldn't that make.... you know.... a noise? Probably a rumbling noise? Exactly like what you hear in the video?

And you are aware of what noise explosives make, right? Don't go on about thermite. Thermite can't give you the results you pretend are required for freefall. You need high explosives for that kind of timing. Yet not a single bang can be heard, just a rumble.