More opinion without any evidence. SSDD.
Well educated and very experienced "opinions" from experts in the field......oh but that would hurt your feelings so don't believe them.....
I have read and heard from quite a few well educated experts in a variety of fields who insist that the fires caused by airliners striking World Trade Center Towers One and Two could not have caused the kind of collapse of those two buildings, plus Building Seven, which we all saw happen on television. While most of these experts go into extensive technical detail to explain why such an effect is scientifically infeasible, which unavoidably implies that some sort of deliberate effort was made to facilitate the collapses, not one of them has volunteered so much as an educated guess on
specifically what was done to facilitate those perfectly vertical collapses.
The term,
controlled demolition, is frequently tossed out by conspiracy theorists, including some
experts, most if not all of whom have seen tv documentary clips of buildings which have been collapsed by the strategic placement of explosive charges, thus their firmly imbedded belief that this is what was done to the World Trade Center. But I wonder if any of these conspiracy theorists, in both the "expert" and the lay categories, have given any thought to just what so massive and intricate a project would entail.
To begin, just one of the Twin Towers is roughly eight times bigger than the biggest building ever brought down by controlled demolition anywhere in the world. And the biggest buildings brought down by explosives are rigged while the buildings are completely emptied and their interiors are stripped to their structural skeletons.
Next, even if the Towers were emptied and stripped there are only two explosive demolition contractors in the U.S. with the experience and expertise to even attempt such a project. And even if one of these contractors were willing to undertake such an incredibly heinous mission, which certainly is unimaginable, the task itself, which would take weeks with at least six or eight sappers working ten hour days, would be impossible to carry out without detection -- as anyone who ever has actually been inside one or both of the Towers would assume.
Last,
who would be willing to involve himself in such a damnable project? Even the most reprehensible sociopath would know that the odds of such a conspiracy either coming to light or being detected after the fact are significant.
And presuming that all of the impossible factors could somehow be carried out, how do the hijacked airliners fit into the plot? Was this whole thing the result of a magnificently timed and choreographed scheme that turned out just a bit too perfect? If the explosive charges were in place, the planes were not needed. And the effect of those planes striking the Towers eliminated any need for the redundant collapses. A nice touch, but really not necessary to make a point.
So, are there any "experts" out there who would like to explain how (with some detail, please) and why the World Trade Center buildings were brought down by controlled demolition -- in addition to the airliners striking them?
So then kinetic energy ISN'T being constantly generated through gravity converting the potential energy of every single ounce of the tower that is coming down? Wow. Better take a step back and realize you're the one who doesn't know what the hell he is talking about! 
