jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 151,444
- 35,062
- 2,180
No you don’t. I proved your list as bullshit. Try again.
"Fingerprint" of Greenland ice melt seen in satellite sea level data
- Thread starter Crick
- Start date
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 151,444
- 35,062
- 2,180
List the journal that says what the temperature of 120 PPM of CO2 is
- Thread starter
- #143
What list would that be?
ReinyDays
Gold Member
Would you please post this "known formula"? ... and show how these values were "simply calculated" ...
- Thread starter
- #145
The large caption on the AR6 forcing factor graphic I posted includes "The ERFs of well-mixed greenhouse gases (WMGHGs) are from the analytical formulae". ERF is Effective Radiative Forcing. It appears the subject is discussed in Chapter 6 of the Technical Summary. I'd look there.
- Thread starter
- #147
I made no claim that needs backing up. You demanded experimental results for a phenomenon that was demonstrated, in the lab, almost 100 years ago. The more significant point was that it has been empirically observed and measured in situ.
80 years since the first calculations showed that the Earth was warming due to rising greenhouse gas emissions
Some people argue that concern for global warming is a modern phenomenon. And that scientists and environmental activists invented these worries to raise awareness of rising greenhouse gases from burning fossil fuels.
And certainly YOUR Chapter 6 says nothing of the sort. You didn't open up the AR6 Technical Summary did you? Or you did and realized you couldn't understand a word of it. Yes?
Last edited:
ReinyDays
Gold Member
I made no claim that needs backing up. You demanded experimental results for a phenomenon that was demonstrated, in the lab, almost 100 years ago. The more significant point was that it has been empirically observed and measured in situ.
80 years since the first calculations showed that the Earth was warming due to rising greenhouse gas emissions
Some people argue that concern for global warming is a modern phenomenon. And that scientists and environmental activists invented these worries to raise awareness of rising greenhouse gases from burning fossil fuels.phys.org
And certainly YOUR Chapter 6 says nothing of the sort. You didn't open up the AR6 Technical Summary did you? Or you did and realized you couldn't understand a word of it. Yes?
You claimed these are calculated values ... I want to see the calculations ... the link you provided isn't from AR6, and doesn't include any formula or equations ...
I think you're lying again ... or just repeating someone else's lies ... AR6 is ten times longer than the Holy Bible ... I want book, chapter and verse ... To refresh your memory: "The forcing factors shown in that graphic for emitted gases were simply calculated by known formula" --- You, post #139 --- Oct 12th, 2022 ...
The Greenhouse Effect is expressed, mathematically, as the emissivity factor in SB ... what values should we use? ...
- Thread starter
- #149
I do not seem to have provided a link in this thread but yours goes to a technical writing guide. Here is a link to the Technical Summary of IPCC's Working Group I's report, "The Physical Science Basis". It is a large PDF you can either download or read online.
https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_TS.pdf. Commit to memory the beginning of that URL: ipcc.ch. It will take you far. Once you have the PDF open, you can easily get to Chapter 6.
My comment about the calculation of forcing factors was simply telling you what was clearly stated in the caption of the forcing factor graphic I posted which you seemed unable to read by yourself. I pointed it out to inform you that the data from the graphic did NOT come from a laboratory experiment so that you would understand that - with that graphic - I was NOT attempting to answer your demand to be shown 80 year old science.
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 151,444
- 35,062
- 2,180
Your bogus list of climate scientists. It’s called credentials
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 151,444
- 35,062
- 2,180
It seems you’re cornered
- Thread starter
- #152
Do you mean the list of the authors who produced "The Physical Science Basis"? If so, their full CVs are available on the website. Who do you think they are? Homeless people they skimmed up off the street?
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 151,444
- 35,062
- 2,180
Indeed, I couldn’t find one with credentials as a climate scientist
- Thread starter
- #154
That, quite obviously, is your problem. I've yet to see your credentials as an actual human being.
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 151,444
- 35,062
- 2,180
I rest my case! You don’t know any. You use the adjective for emphasis, but they are no more climate geniuses than anybody. A meteorology expert at least knows meteorology! Weather! Pressure, Wind!
Last edited:
No change in incremental waste heat from using electricity generated from fossil fuels compared to using electricity generated from solar.
Maybe you should study the climate history of the planet for the past 3 million years.
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Changing your silly claim?
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Maybe you should study the First Law?
Nope. You are changing yours by arguing I have changed mine.
Similar threads
