A Broader Look At Climate Change

[odanny]

It's still impossible to view climate change in its totality, the scale is too vast, the millions of small changes taking place too numerous to fully grasp. This graphic only scratches the surface.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

You didn't add the massive cloud of methane gas just released in the Baltic Sea by someone, not Russia and most likely a climate change enthusiast, placing explosive charges and damaging the Nord Stream pipeline.

*****SMILE*****

 

[Oddball]

It's still impossible to view climate change in its totality, the scale is too vast, the millions of small changes taking place too numerous to fully grasp. This graphic only scratches the surface.

Yet you moonbat doomsday cultists proclaim THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED!

 

[Crick]

View attachment 703520

It's still impossible to view climate change in its totality, the scale is too vast, the millions of small changes taking place too numerous to fully grasp. This graphic only scratches the surface.

Every subject in natural science is too vast to fully grasp if you think that every bit of information must be known. So, what's your point?

 

[odanny]

Every subject in natural science is too vast to fully grasp if you think that every bit of information must be known. So, what's your point?

It's self explanatory. Figure it out.

 

[Crick]

It's self explanatory. Figure it out.

It is not self-explanatory and if you don't feel like actually discussing the topic of your OP, I would suggest this thread be deleted.

 

[odanny]

It is not self-explanatory and if you don't feel like actually discussing the topic of your OP, I would suggest this thread be deleted.

Oh would you? And who made you the arbiter of what is acceptable on this forum?

Oh, and who are you again?

 

[Crick]

Oh would you? And who made you the arbiter of what is acceptable on this forum?

Oh, and who are you again?

We are all free to make suggestions. I suggest you make yourself available to discuss threads YOU have started. What is the point of your OP?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Oh would you? And who made you the arbiter of what is acceptable on this forum?

Oh, and who are you again?

Crick? He is an EXHAULTED priest of the Church of Gaia and the Immaculate Glowbull Warming.

He either owns or has significant stock in a green energy scam.

 

[odanny]

We are all free to make suggestions. I suggest you make yourself available to discuss threads YOU have started. What is the point of your OP?

Do you really think someone is going to answer a smarmy, condescending prick who demands an answer?

 

[ding]

As no one answers him.

 

[ding]

View attachment 703520

It's still impossible to view climate change in its totality, the scale is too vast, the millions of small changes taking place too numerous to fully grasp. This graphic only scratches the surface.

What does that graphic say is the reason the planet transitioned from a greenhouse planet to an icehouse planet?

 

[expat_panama]

As no one answers him.

This is a serious subject and his choice is to quarrel. For me ignoring seems to work best.

 

[Uncensored2008]

This is a serious subject and his choice is to quarrel. For me ignoring seems to work best.

This is a political question that seeks to pervert the scientific process to promote a political agenda.

 

[Crick]

This is a political question that seeks to pervert the scientific process to promote a political agenda.

Correct. AGW deniers are readily supplied with scientifically invalid and dishonest points of argument to slow or stop AGW mitigation measures by the fossil fuel industry and their puppets since those measures represent an existential threat to the fossil fuel industry which has always provided large donations to republican candidates who historically couldn't care less about the environment and are consistently pro-big business.

 

[odanny]

Correct. AGW deniers are readily supplied with scientifically invalid and dishonest points of argument to slow or stop AGW mitigation measures by the fossil fuel industry and their puppets since those measures represent an existential threat to the fossil fuel industry which has always provided large donations to republican candidates who historically couldn't care less about the environment and are consistently pro-big business.

You're in complete agreement with a climate change denier.

Well done.

 

[Crick]

You're in complete agreement with a climate change denier.

Well done.

I stand by my statement. The problem is that the previous fellow didn't identify who he was talking about when he projected the sins of his own milieu. There was an attempt here at some irony.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Correct. AGW deniers are readily supplied with scientifically invalid and dishonest points of argument to slow or stop AGW mitigation measures by the fossil fuel industry and their puppets since those measures represent an existential threat to the fossil fuel industry which has always provided large donations to republican candidates who historically couldn't care less about the environment and are consistently pro-big business.

Ah little cultist, you morons no longer use "AGW" - your priests and shamans have adopted "climate change" to cover up the fact that warming just didn't happen. It's okay, your cult has put out over 4,000 prophecies and not even one has turned out that way your soothsayers predicted.

Think of the odds of that? Even a two-year-old babbling would get at least a few right - but not the Gaia cult. You science denying motherfuckers are truly the dumbest people on earth.

It's laughable just how incredibly stupid you anti=science morons are with your primitive religion. What your priests want is power, raw political power. The lust to rule is impetus of the Gaia cult. Oh sure, the "green scams" will pilfer billions along the way. But the ultimate goal of you cult is the same as the goal of the fascist left in general, the destruction of the American middle class.

Private transportation provides far too much liberty for the plebs, so you attack it. It has nothing to do with fossil fuels. notice how Kim Jong Newsom ordered the plebs to not charge their electric cars. Nope, this is about control of the populace.

It always was, which is why your absurd lies never had any semblance of scientific fact behind them.

 

[Crick]

Ah little cultist, you morons no longer use "AGW" - your priests and shamans have adopted "climate change" to cover up the fact that warming just didn't happen. It's okay, your cult has put out over 4,000 prophecies and not even one has turned out that way your soothsayers predicted.

I'm afraid that we do. And speaking of abandoned strategies, no one attempts to use "global warming" -> "climate change" as any sort of argument any more. It's not as if it refutes the science now is it.

Think of the odds of that? Even a two-year-old babbling would get at least a few right - but not the Gaia cult. You science denying motherfuckers are truly the dumbest people on earth.

Considering that it is the world's scientists who came up with AGW and it is an overwhelming numbers of those scientists who have accepted AGW and urged the public to act in response, a charge of AGW being "anti-science" is simply laughable.

It's laughable just how incredibly stupid you anti=science morons are with your primitive religion. What your priests want is power, raw political power. The lust to rule is impetus of the Gaia cult. Oh sure, the "green scams" will pilfer billions along the way. But the ultimate goal of you cult is the same as the goal of the fascist left in general, the destruction of the American middle class.

What religion?
What priests and how are they obtaining power?
How is the Gaia cult coming to rule?
What billions are being pilfered?
When did accepting mainstream science become a cult?
Fascism is a right-wing political philosophy.
Why would anyone want to destroy the American middle class? What goal would be served?

Private transportation provides far too much liberty for the plebs, so you attack it. It has nothing to do with fossil fuels. notice how Kim Jong Newsom ordered the plebs to not charge their electric cars. Nope, this is about control of the populace.

It always was, which is why your absurd lies never had any semblance of scientific fact behind them.

Do EVs not provide private transportation?
Why would almost all the scientists on the planet accept a theory that had no semblance of "scientific facts" behind it?

 

[expat_panama]

This is a political question that seeks to pervert the scientific process to promote a political agenda.

"Seeks to" and for the most part succeeds.

Aside from the prostitution of a once orderly scientific community, the reaction is interesting. The right mistrusts the so-called 'scientists' and the left worships them. Subsequently the right sees the left as gullible and the left calls the right "deniers".