Finally, an Unbiased and Objective Climate Science Report

[Foxfyre]

It can slow the increase in climate change

I have seen zero evidence for that. I'm pretty sure you can produce zero evidence from any credible, verifiable source that such is the case.

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

A highly prejudicial or politically motivated source is far less likely to provide competent information than is one that is actually seeking the facts and truth of something and that allows all points of view to be considered.

The source does matter. I agree

 

[Oddball]

Peer review is the process where experts from a specific field or discipline evaluate the quality of a peer's research to assess the validity, quality and often the originality of articles for publication. It is the foundation for safeguarding the quality and integrity of scholarly research

It's also the process by which the "peers" work to discredit, omit, and blackball any contravening evidence.

It's the foundation for safeguarding the jillions of "research" loot these charlatans rake in, for producing absolutely nothing anyone wants to buy.

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

Have you read about the state of peer review lately?

I think the von storch survey is the most recent

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

It's also the process by which the "peers" work to discredit, omit, and blackball any contravening evidence.

It's the foundation for safeguarding the jillions of "research" loot these charlatans rake in for producing absolutely nothing anyone wants to buy.

Magas hate science

 

[Oddball]

I have seen zero evidence for that. I'm pretty sure you can produce zero evidence from any credible, verifiable source that such is the case.

Already asked him by how much and over what period of time...He gives that question a good leaving alone, because he has NFI what he's blabbering about.

 

[Oddball]

Magas hate science

Not a scientific argument, birdbrain.

 

[Foxfyre]

Peer review is the process where experts from a specific field or discipline evaluate the quality of a peer's research to assess the validity, quality and often the originality of articles for publication. It is the foundation for safeguarding the quality and integrity of scholarly research

When the 'peers' are carefully selected to agree with or support one point of view only, peer review is worthless in arriving at truth of pretty much anything.

 

[Sunsettommy]

It can slow the increase in climate change

What climate change is that?

Keep in mind there are only 5 climate zones on the planet as shown here,

LINK

Has polar climate changed to Temperate, or has dry climate changed to Tropical and so on.

My climate I live in has been the same the entire interglacial period which is over 10,000 years.

BSk = Dry climate + Semi-arid Steppe + Cold

 

[Sunsettommy]

The fossil fuel industry, political lobbyists, media moguls and individuals have spent the past 30 years sowing doubt about the reality of climate change - where none exists. The latest estimate is that the world’s five largest publicly-owned oil and gas companies spend about US$200 million a year on lobbying to control, delay or block binding climate policy.

Their hold on the public seems to be waning. Two recent polls suggested over 75% of Americans think humans are causing climate change. School climate strikes, Extinction Rebellion protests, national governments declaring a climate emergency, improved media coverage of climate change and an increasing number of extreme weather events have all contributed to this shift. There also seems to be a renewed optimism that we can deal with the crisis

Bla bla bla bla bla bla bla, where is your long awaited REBUTTAL to post one article, many here wonder if you have anything beyond smears and consensus babblings to offer.

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

I have seen zero evidence for that. I'm pretty sure you can produce zero evidence from any credible, verifiable source that such is the case.

Renewable energy has two advantages over the fossil fuels that provide most of our energy today. First, there is a limited amount of fossil fuel resources (like coal, oil and natural gas) in the world, and if we use them all we cannot get any more in our lifetimes. Second, renewable energy produces far less carbon dioxide (CO2) and other harmful greenhouse gases and pollutants. Most types of renewable energy produce no CO2 at all once they are running. For this reason, renewable energy is widely viewed as playing a central role in climate change mitigation and a clean energy transition

 

[Foxfyre]

Magas hate science

Ah, and there we have it. An admission that your scientific opinions/observations whatever are purely TDS driven. You people always give yourselves away sooner or later. When you can't rebut an argument, it's attack Trump/MAGA/GOP etc. I'm surprised you didn't include the leftist assigned talking points of rapist, felon, racist, Nazis, fascist, jackboot thugs etc. etc. that you are ordered to use.

FYI, MAGAs absolutely DO HATE manipulated, manufactured, dishonest, politically motivated propaganda that is labeled science.

So should you.

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

What climate change is that?

Keep in mind there are only 5 climate zones on the planet as shown here,

View attachment 1150664

LINK

Has polar climate changed to Temperate, or has dry climate changed to Tropical and so on.

My climate I live in has been the same the entire interglacial period which is over 10,000 years.

BSk = Dry climate + Semi-arid Steppe + Cold

Renewable energy has two advantages over the fossil fuels that provide most of our energy today. First, there is a limited amount of fossil fuel resources (like coal, oil and natural gas) in the world, and if we use them all we cannot get any more in our lifetimes. Second, renewable energy produces far less carbon dioxide (CO2) and other harmful greenhouse gases and pollutants. Most types of renewable energy produce no CO2 at all once they are running. For this reason, renewable energy is widely viewed as playing a central role in climate change mitigation and a clean energy transition

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

Bla bla bla bla bla bla bla, where is your long awaited REBUTTAL to post one article, many here wonder if you have anything beyond smears and consensus babblings to offer.

The guy who wrote it is a climatologist?

 

[Foxfyre]

Renewable energy has two advantages over the fossil fuels that provide most of our energy today. First, there is a limited amount of fossil fuel resources (like coal, oil and natural gas) in the world, and if we use them all we cannot get any more in our lifetimes. Second, renewable energy produces far less carbon dioxide (CO2) and other harmful greenhouse gases and pollutants. Most types of renewable energy produce no CO2 at all once they are running. For this reason, renewable energy is widely viewed as playing a central role in climate change mitigation and a clean energy transition

There is also a limited amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, magnesium etc. in the world and the mining of these elements is in no way 'green' or utilizes or is even possible with renewable energy.

Most renewable energy requires massive amounts of non renewable energy to build and maintain leaving behind problemic useless infrastruction when it wears out. And it requires such restrictions on the choices, options, opportunities, liberties of the people the value of it remains questionable.

 

[80zephyr]

Peer review is the process where experts from a specific field or discipline evaluate the quality of a peer's research to assess the validity, quality and often the originality of articles for publication. It is the foundation for safeguarding the quality and integrity of scholarly research

I am certain it started out that way. Then it became a group of "good ole boys".

 

[Sunsettommy]

The guy who wrote it is a climatologist?

It appears you can't provide an actual Rebuttal to post one article after all after many opportunities given to you likely because you don't know how to do it because you don't know anything.

I am does exposing your failures.

Cheers.

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

Ah, and there we have it. An admission that your scientific opinions/observations whatever are purely TDS driven. You people always give yourselves away sooner or later. When you can't rebut an argument, it's attack Trump/MAGA/GOP etc. I'm surprised you didn't include the leftist assigned talking points of rapist, felon, racist, Nazis, fascist, jackboot thugs etc. etc. that you are ordered to use.

FYI, MAGAs absolutely DO HATE manipulated, manufactured, dishonest, politically motivated propaganda that is labeled science.

So should you.

Renewable vs. carbon-free

Most kinds of renewable energy are also “carbon-free”: they do not emit CO2 or other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. Because of this, and because renewables like wind and solar power are so popular in climate activism, the terms “renewable energy” and “carbon-free energy” are sometimes confused. But not all renewable energy is carbon-free, and not all carbon-free energy is renewable.

Biofuels and bioenergy are renewable: we can regrow plants that we burn for fuel. But they are not necessarily carbon-free. Growing plants absorbs CO2; burning plants releases CO2. The total impact on CO2 in the atmosphere depends on how sustainably the bioenergy is produced.

Nuclear energy is carbon-free: a nuclear power plant does not emit any CO2, or any other greenhouse gases. But it is not renewable. Nuclear reactors use uranium, and if we run out of uranium, we can never get it back

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

It appears you can't provide an actual Rebuttal to post one article after all after many opportunities given to you likely because you don't know how to do it because you don't know anything.

I am does exposing your failures.

Cheers.

No answer provided

 

[Sunsettommy]

Renewable energy has two advantages over the fossil fuels that provide most of our energy today. First, there is a limited amount of fossil fuel resources (like coal, oil and natural gas) in the world, and if we use them all we cannot get any more in our lifetimes. Second, renewable energy produces far less carbon dioxide (CO2) and other harmful greenhouse gases and pollutants. Most types of renewable energy produce no CO2 at all once they are running. For this reason, renewable energy is widely viewed as playing a central role in climate change mitigation and a clean energy transition

That was your reply to the question which shows you are going to ignore it because you are mentally unable to make an independent reply to an honest question.

What climate change is that?

You couldn't answer a simple question because you so full of programmed ideology that your replies indicate that you are replying by rote your climate change catechism.

That is why you are a failure in debate.